User talk:Luminous Person

Please post new message subject in this box, and click New section button

Etiquette of my Chat page[change source]

Hello, if you wish to contact me, here's the place! Not many rules, just be nice. New talks shoud go below this section! All comments MUST be signed or they'll be deleted. Lucie Person (talk) 23:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks[change source]

Hello Lucie I can see you make edits to the page I greated a short while ago David Plouffe. Thanks for the Additions.

Also review the other ones I created a while ago Sasha Obama and Malia Ann Obama and if possible make similar edits.

I was also wondering on the following scenario

Could it of importance if I create a page of the High School i attended, because it only has one available verifiable sources?

Antony2365 (talk) 01:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Antony2365: No problem, glad I could help. As for the other two articles, they have since been deleted, so I cannot review them.

For your question regarding the high school, I would think not. See WP:GNG. It does not meet the requirement: If a topic has received important coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable. if it only has one source. Feel free to ask me any other questions. ⇒ Lucie Person (talk) 23:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt response. I thought so on the High School as it has only one source and did not want to risk setting it up beforehand.

Also check these Francine Muyumba , University of Namibia and Joseph Kalimbwe for review.

Francine Muyumba and University of Namibia have not been reviewed. Joseph Kalimbwe was set up for discussion due to, as the editor who nominated it said 'notability'. The Admin has since gone on leave from Wikipedia until August. However, having checked and read it's sources, it must be on Wikipedia as the sources are reliable and independent of the subject. I made edits to the article Joseph Kalimbwe earlier today, added quotes and put some extra sources which deem its reliability. Kindly make reviews.

Best regards

I have done so. I've made some changes and added a tag to one. I do agree that it doesn't meet WP:GNG, so I would let that be deleted. ⇒ Lucie Person (talk) 00:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Antony2365: Ping ⇒ Lucie Person (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, very much appreciated. What could be done to get Joseph Kalimbwe up, regardless of its nomination outcomes. Make more edits perhaps? I did check Wikipedia's definition of notability and maybe, I did not understand my reading in it but it does look to be reliable for Wikipedia inclusion. Perhaps you could help me edit more as someone with more knowledge from searching goggle on the subject Antony2365 (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably nothing (in my opinion). Your sources do not seem to meet WP:RELIABLE, so unless you can find more reliable sources, I’d suggest just letting it be deleted. Making more edits will not change anything. ⇒ Lucie Person (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Antony2365: Ping ⇒ Lucie Person (talk)19:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming:[change source]

Hi Lucie, I'm sure you're aware of this after what happened with your talk page being vandalised, but we prefer not to welcome editors until they have at least a couple of edits (especially if they are IPs), since as you saw they can often be vandals. Anyway, keep up the good work otherwise: Milo, Talk, Contribs 18:06, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MiloDenn: I am unsure of what exactly you mean? You don't welcome vandals? Thanks in advance. ⇒ Lucie Person (talk) 23:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You welcomed 75.253.231.23, who is an IP and whose only change was vandalising your talk page: while I can see that you used a {{subst:Welcomevandal} template, it is better to just use a level 1 warning in this case (Welcome vandal is intended for use on actual accounts as opposed to IPs). Hope that clears up any confusion, Milo, Talk, Contribs 05:20, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]