User talk:LukeSkywalker26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is LukeSkywalker26's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to LukeSkywalker26.
Article policies
Archives: 1


Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.


welcoming users[change source]

Hello. Instead of welcoming users on account creation, we usually do it once they have made a constructive edit or two. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 19:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I'll wait until they make an edit or two. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[change source]

Hello, LukeSkywalker26 and thank you for your anti-vandalism efforts!
I'm inviting you to WikiProject Anti-Vandalism, which, as the name suggests, is a WikiProject for anti-vandalism.
Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 17:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring Talk Pages[change source]

Hello. If a user blanks their talk page, do not revert it. They are allowed to remove RfD and QD notices from their talk page. ShadowBallX (talk) 19:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I did not know that. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I did the exact same as you when I first joined Simple English. ShadowBallX (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please note that your planning to block my user page! This is a page that everyone can edit on (your own user page)!

Please stop this... This is a chat also...

BCNY2011bup (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't block your page even if I wanted to because I'm not an administrator. The reason why I reverted your edits is because I thought they were vandalism and I have a low tolerance when it comes to that. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that anyone can remove QD notices from their talk page. Also, I've requested for a user page to be deleted before as it was just two characters long, but G1 doesn't really apply in user page space. I guess you can see User:Some Gadget Geek for an example of that lol... Belwine💬📜 20:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And also, you shouldn't really be reverting other people's edits on their own talk page, saying it's vandalism. Anyone can remove warnings from their own pages and editing on your own talk page is not vandalism. Thanks, --Belwine💬📜 20:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I can remove them? BCNY2011bup 21:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BCNY2011bup: Yes, you can remove warnings from your own talk page. Whilst I'm nearly 100% sure an admin will decline the QD request for your user page, just wait for it to be removed. Best, --Belwine💬📜 21:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Also I changed my names on the members cuz my "~" did not go though. BCNY2011bup 21:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[change source]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LukeSkywalker26 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Hello. I just noticed that I was blocked because Checkuser confirmed it. I just want to tell you that I do have another account, but I only used that account once and only made one edit with it. What I was doing was not sockpuppetry and I have been only using my normal account. I've been doing constructive stuff like reverting vandalism. Thanks

Decline reason:

Globally locked. -- Djsasso (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your other account had been blocked after you made the one you have now, then that is why technical evidence shows Operator873 that you may or may not have evaded a block. I am not trying to be rude but he has seen the evidence, meaning you might have evaded your block if your other account had been blocked. Along with this, your username (LukeSkywalker26) shows you are impersonating a fictional person. This is not allowed on any Wikimedia projects, but if you think you have not done anything wrong, an administrator or checkuser (for example: Operator873) will inform you about why you were blocked. Thank you. George (Kirkburn) (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KirkburnFandom: just leave it to admins to deal with unblock requests. They keep track of them and respond when necessary. --Belwine💬📜 16:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@KirkburnFandom: It isn't really possible to "impersonate" a fictional person. There wouldn't be any misunderstanding because a fictional person can't post. Also, if you don't have direct knowledge of the checkuser information, it isn't helpful for you to respond to unblock requests. That's why I'm not going to respond to it even though I'm an admin here. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KirkburnFandom: When I created the other account, I had no active blocks. Also I honestly think I wasn't doing anything wrong (I've been reverting vandalism). Lastly, I didn't know you weren't supposed to use names of fictional people. I chose the name because I thought it was a cool name. Thanks. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That’s alright then. Sorry I spoke of your other account being blocked. I had been concerned your other account had been blocked, but it’s good to know that it didn’t. An admin will help you with your appeal for unblock. Thank you. If you require more help, you can’t visit my talk page as your block has stopped you, but you can contact me here. George (Kirkburn) (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KirkburnFandom, I have already explained to you why non-admins commenting under unblock requests should be avoided unless absolutely necessary, as your comment could be interpreted as coming from an administrator. I am sure the sysop and checkuser teams are capable of responding to this unblock request without our assistance. Best, --IWI (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ImprovedWikiImprovement: Sorry about that. I’m sorry. I promise not to do it again unless absolutely necessary. Thank you. George (Kirkburn) (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, is it ok if someone reviews my Unblock request? Thanks. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: Sorry about that though. My mistake. George (Kirkburn) (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: It was actually me who was blocked, not KirkburnFandom. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 20:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LukeSkywalker26: I know that. I was responding to KF's comment. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6:Ok. LukeSkywalker26 (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]