User talk:Nataly8/Archive 2

This page is an archive. Do not change this page. Make new comments on the current talk page.

Autoblock

Auto block automatically blocks the IP used by that user, and it blocks any IP the user tyies to log in on. If that happens and I log in as the bot for a reason, my IP could be blocked, and if I try to log in as me, I would be blocked. Hazard-SJ^Talk 14:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I appreciate them; but I hope you aren't giving away too many. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Want to try creating a chemistry article? --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I create articles in a brainstorming fashion. For example: I created articles about chromium oxides. Chromium(II) oxide is made by reduction by hypophosphites. I create articles for reduction and hypophosphite. Then hypophosphite disproportionates... oops another article to phosphine (another article) and phosphite (another article). That's how I create so many articles. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 14:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're a hard worker too, but sometimes you might want to press the Save Page button more to make a higher percentage of your edits to the article space. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I recently saw someone complaining that you made more edits to user's talk pages than to articles. That would increase your article edit count. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing the phosphorus area now; I should get to it soon. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 19:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Finished phosphorus section now. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My largest article so far is... is... SODIUM PHOSPHATE!!! --Chemicalinterest (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did some copyediting on your article. Normally languages are capitalized. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I try to go to bed around 21:30 or 21:00; and wake up at 6:00 or 6:30. See you too. Now don't keep editing because you saw the message bar. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 20:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals

I am about to start. I was offline on both places, but I am on now. I'll set here to around, as I will be here, but focusing on En. I'll start reviewing some of what are on en:Special:OldReviewedPages (I'm a reviewer) and patrolling on RC (hide logged in users) (I mainly patroll IP edits). Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What user rights do they have there? Do you have any? Are they doing a pending changes trial? Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? Go to Special:ListGroupRights there and check. Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The url: Δικαιώματα ομάδων χρηστών(Whatever it says) Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No rollbackers, Checkusers, Stewards, Account creators, Oversighters, IP block exemptions etc.? Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well... Did you know that on En, you have the "Founder" rights (which only Jimbo has currently)? Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
He co-founded Wikipedia... Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The founder can:

Edit all user rights (userrights)
Make users into Administrators or Bureaucrats (makesysop)

The list (one person) is here (on en). Hazard-SJ^Talk 15:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

en:User:Jimbo Wales See that. Hazard-SJ^Talk 16:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo Wales is the founder (ON En). Your rights are up on your talk page; read. Hazard-SJ^Talk 16:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply] ┌─────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────┘

What exactly do you want? Hazard-SJ^Talk 16:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On which wiki? En? Hazard-SJ^Talk 16:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

founder is a global group. πr² (talk • changes) 16:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your user group rights on en... Hazard-SJ^Talk 16:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because you don't have rights there. Hazard-SJ^Talk 16:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only Jimbo Wales is founder. Hazard-SJ^Talk 16:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WE were TALKING aBOUT User RiGhTs... Hazard-SJ^Talk 17:00, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop saying

“

Well... Did you know that on En, you have the "Founder" rights (which only Jimbo has currently)?

”

Hazard-SJ^Talk 17:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say you were... I said

“

Well... Did you know that on En, you have the "Founder" rights (which only Jimbo has currently)?

”

Hazard-SJ^Talk 17:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because I wanted you to know that

“

...on En, you have the "Founder" rights (which only Jimbo has currently)?

”

Hazard-SJ^Talk 17:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who said you were a founder?:

“

...the "Founder" rights (which only Jimbo has currently)?

”

Hazard-SJ^Talk 17:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I said over and over, only Jimbo Wales has the founder rights. Not you...

I won't answer that (again), because you'll start this over again. Hazard-SJ^Talk 17:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its OK. I was using Huggle, but I am now making a personal sandbox. Hazard-SJ^Talk 19:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Hazard-SJ^Talk 20:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I saw you copied my roses and gave it to Princess of Llyr! No fair!...:P Just kidding. I'm glad you liked them enough to use them. :) And just for a present, have an extra boquet for yourself!

Belinda has given you some beautiful, lovely roses! Enjoy the scent!

There you go! I hope you enjoy your time here, and in the meantime, why don't you try to do some other kinds of article work instead of just concentrating on Avatar? There's a lot of community work to be done, and, if you click show any page, you can edit other articles too. :) It is also pretty interesting if you participate in discussions such as DYK, and Requests For Deletion. Wish you blessings, Belle ^{tête-à-tête} 00:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flood flag

Read this page. Hazard-SJ^Talk 04:58, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read it?

I have many categories to add to many pages. Hazard-SJ^Talk 05:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems she left. I'll ask Clem. Hazard-SJ^Talk 05:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No you won't. I'm just checking over the recent discussion on AN. sonia ♫ 05:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~German~~

Does this mean "Harassing / aggressive behavior"?: "Παρενοχλητική/επιθετική συμπεριφορά" It seems to be your block reason on el. Hazard-SJ^Talk 05:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine

It doesn't (Patna) but this exists: File:Golghar, Patna, 1888.jpg Why do you archive so fast?? --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I am an journeyman editor at enwiki. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nataly8. You have new messages at PiRSquared17's talk page.
Message added 15:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

πr² (talk • changes) 15:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wait

Don't start again. Stop. πr² (talk • changes) 15:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't start again. Simon^KSK 17:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you click the "This is a small change" button below the change summary box when you revert changes by Hazard sj? Thanks. Battleaxe9872 ^文/ _テ 19:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert the edits of Hazard sj to articles that have hurricane in the title. Thank you. Battleaxe9872 ^文/ _テ 19:12, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricanes

No, those are right. He added the category Hurricanes to those articles, and those are right. Battleaxe9872 ^文/ _テ 19:14, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about vandal day?

Is it a celebration? Or is there just a lot of vandalism? --Chemicalinterest (talk) 19:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your message on En

What problems? I saw your note on En. Could you specify? Hazard-SJ^Talk 23:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See your talk page and SimonKSK's contribs. I assume this is the problem that you are talking about. πr² (talk • changes) 23:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 48 hrs

I have blocked you from editing for 48 hrs. You have been reversing Hazard-SJ's edits time and time again. If you have such a problem with their edits then you need to take it to WP:AN and not stalk them. I see your actions as detrimental to the project and unhelpful. fr33k man 03:38, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing restriction!

You are hereby required to refrain from direct interactions with Hazard-SJ for the next 3 months. If you feel something they have done if wrong you are required to ask an admin via email to do something about it. Failure to comply will result in a longer block. fr33k man 03:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of articles

Hey. When you create an article, please don't categorize it as Category:American people. That's too big a category. Use one if it's subcategories...we have subcategories for all fifty states, and categories relating to ethnicity, religion and vocation of Americans as well. Purple backpack89 05:29, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Scott Aversano

A user has nominated Scott Aversano, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Scott Aversano and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Purple backpack89 06:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

En-based articles

Hello, it is great to see what you have done by making new articles here based on en.wikipedia. However if you could reword the sentences more it would be beneficial because the article will not seem to be one of little modification or simplification. Currently when I google the first paragraph, it shows me almost the same text as the en article albeit a few words. This is just a light note and not to be taken too seriously. :) Nifky^{^} 10:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Nickelodeon Universe

The page you wrote, Nickelodeon Universe, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was copied from another Wikipedia. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. EhJJ^TALK 11:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Cosmos

The page you wrote, Cosmos, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was copied from another Wikipedia. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. EhJJ^TALK 11:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning about making complex pages

I have warned you about this before, and I'm warning you one more time. You must simplify articles that you make. You cannot simply copy the first line or paragraph from the English Wikipedia (without simplification) and post it here as a stub. If that was allowed, I could write a bot that could make thousands of new articles, but they would be useless, since they are written in complex English. Also, many of your articles about people or places do not say how they are notable, which also makes them useless and deletable. I'm going to repeat what I said before: stop making any new articles until you have fixed the many articles that you have already created. If you continue to make bad pages, you may be blocked! EhJJ^TALK 11:55, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

No. Simon^KSK 14:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to warn

After you revert a user's edit, please warn that user. Thank you. πr² (talk • changes) 16:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

You have been blocked from changing Wikipedia for 24 hours for copying pages from the English Wikipedia with little or no simplification.

Once the block has ended you can make helpful changes. Please read Wikipedia's blocking policy and remember that adding spam, making changes that do not have a neutral point of view, making personal attacks on others, not respecting other people's privacy, and vandalizing pages are not allowed. If you do any of these things, you will be blocked again.

If you think this block is unfair, you can ask to be unblocked by adding {{Unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked. EhJJ^TALK 16:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contrib number

Yes, I'm #161. You're at #97. You are a member of this group. Make sure you get some exercise! ;) --Chemicalinterest (talk) 12:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for breaking editing restriction

Six days ago, you were put under an editing restriction at User talk:Nataly8#Editing restriction!. It told you you could not have direct interaction with Hazard-SJ. Just a few minutes ago, you made this edit. This is direct interaction with Hazard-SJ. Because it breaks your restrictions, and because you have two recent blocks, I have blocked you for 72 hours. Please take more caution to follow your restrictions in the future. Thank you, Either way (talk) 11:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't understand that I cannot speak with Hazard. English is not my native language and I didn't completely understand the message. Nataly8 (talk) 11:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also seem to not understand that you should stop making new articles until you fix the ones you have already made! Making one-line stubs here that are exact copies from the English Wikipedia is not useful and not allowed. If you keep doing that, you will be blocked for even longer. Please work on making a few good articles instead of many bad ones! EhJJ^TALK 21:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you're unblocked. Are you on a voluntary abstinence? --Chemicalinterest (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a 72 hour block:

11:54, 27 August 2010 Either way (talk | changes) blocked Nataly8 (talk | changes) with an expiry time of 72 hours (account creation blocked) ‎ (breaking edit restriction: http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hazard-SJ&diff=prev&oldid=2393662)

72 hours are up. πr² (talk • changes) 19:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that you still thought you were blocked. Maybe you can archive this page? --Chemicalinterest (talk) 10:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]