User talk:Neotarf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Simple English Wikipedia[change source]

Hi, Neotarf, welcome to Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. If you need help, check out the Help section of Wikipedia, or leave a message on my talk page. Whenever leaving messages on talk pages, please remember to sign your name by typing four 'tildes' (like this: ~~~~); doing this makes your name and the date show up. Also, it helps if you write something in the box that says 'change summary' whenever you change an article. Below are some useful links to make your time here simpler. Happy changing! Peterdownunder (talk) 06:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Other

Peterdownunder (talk) 06:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. —Neotarf (talk) 05:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Beatrice Mtetwa[change source]

Thanks for creating the article about Beatrice Mtetwa. I enjoyed learning about her. I noticed that you removed some red links from the article. On this wiki, we usually keep red links because they help us see what articles we are missing. Please don't remove red links just because they are red. Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions about this. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Sure, are there any guidelines for that? I notice you are putting back some names of major institutions. I took out some redlinks of, for instance, things like "2008 Zimbabwe Presidential Election" because it did not seem general enough for an article on this type of wiki. The definitions of ordinary words I have either been removing or rewording. She is interesting, isn't she. I was going to shorten the article as it says to do in the instructions, but I got caught up in her story. —Neotarf (talk) 23:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Red link talks a little about it. Where it says that good articles and very good articles should have few or no red links, that doesn't mean that red links should be removed, it means that the articles should be created.
I'm not sure what instructions you saw that said articles should be shortened. It's OK for articles to be long, as long as the language is simple. It's just harder to simplify longer articles, so many editors don't try. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I was looking at #4 in Wikipedia:How to copy from another Wikipedia that says "you don't have to copy the whole page if it's very complex, just copy what is important". —Neotarf (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I see. That's saying that it's OK to shorten articles, not that you should. Personally, I wish people wouldn't shorten them quite so much. It doesn't have to be short to be simple. Of course, it does take more work to simplify a longer article, but our readers might very well like the additional info. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, looks like a judgement call. Some articles would definitely be improved by shortening. It also might encourage the creation of complex articles that might seem too intimating to begin, particularly for someone who doesn't have a formal background in the subject. But I agree that "simple" is not the same as "dumbed down", and that the advantage of this type of wiki is lost if it does not contain actual useful information. —Neotarf (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Categories[change source]

Thanks for the articles on all the award-winning women. Could you include additional categories on them? For each one, there should be a category for the year she was born, her nationality, and possibly for her profession or what she is known for. In most cases, there should also be a DEFAULTSORT. Thanks, and feel free to let me know if you have any questions. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

I suppose I could set aside a block of time to work on it. Someone on another site once showed me how to make a new category, so I figured out how to do one for the Women of Courage Award, but in general, I have tried to stay away from categories, outside of making sure each new article has at least one, as I have heard it can be a contentious area, and it is being taken over by microdata anyhow. I suppose it would be useful for anyone who was making a list of people born in a particular year to be able to find them all in one category. The individuals in the Women of Courage Award category should all be *notable* for having received the award. —Neotarf (talk) 22:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories#Categorizing people has more information on this. We want articles to be fully categorized. Receiving that award is certainly notable, but the recipients were notable for something before they got the award, and there could be categories for whatever that was. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
I can see I'll have to spend some time with it. "Notability" has a different meaning here. The DEFAULTSORT must be easier, just a matter of applying the right formula? —Neotarf (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Hi, have you had a chance to look into how to categorize yet? We really need to have all the appropriate categories on articles. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 05:42, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Auntof6, thanks for checking back, and thanks for all your help. Yes, the categories seem pretty straightforward, they're on my user page now to make it faster to copy/paste, which I recommend. The newly created articles should be all right now, with the possible exception of whatever I have been working on last, as it is possible to lose connectivity before finishing an article, but feel free to check and see if I have missed something. The DEFAULTSORT is a little more difficult, but I have managed to find info for most, if not all of the articles. Neotarf (talk) 21:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Good, it sounds like you have it down. There is some helpful information on DEFAULTSORT for people's names at en:WP:NAMESORT. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Very useful, thanks. Neotarf (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Kuwaiti people[change source]

Hi, Neotarf. I noticed that you created this category with only one entry. You might not have known, but we want at least three entries in every category. Are you planning to add more entries to this category? If so, please do so as soon as possible. If not, we can recategorize the one entry until we have at least three entries. Let me know. Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I just noticed that you created some other single-entry categories. I'm going to recategorize the entries for now and delete the categories. You are welcome to recreate them when there are three entries. If you'd like more information on this requirement, you can read Wikipedia:Categories#Is there a need for the new category?. Feel free to ask if you have any questions about this. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
@Auntof6, I'm confused. Doesn't every BLP need a nationality? She's from Kuwait. It's a very small place, a city really, so I doubt I'll run into many more Kuwaiti BLPs soon. —Neotarf (talk) 04:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes, normally any biography, BLP or not, needs a nationality. However, if there aren't enough people of the nationality to have a category, we put them in the main category for the country. I see one other Kuwaiti person in the Kuwait category, but that only makes two. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
On second thought, for now I'll just put a {{popcat}} tag on the categories that have two entries. They can sit in the "underpopulated category" category for a bit and see if anyone creates more articles. Eventually, though, if they don't get more they can be deleted. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
That would be Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah. —Neotarf (talk) 04:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Cool! The Kuwaiti people category is safe! --Auntof6 (talk) 04:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks to Faisal Al-Dakhil, a football player, which probably means soccer. I was hoping to find something on the emir's wife, the late sheikha [Fatuwah bint Salman Al-Sabah]], but she doesn't seem to have led a very public life. Any other categories need populating? —Neotarf (talk) 04:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes, he is a footballer, which means soccer. When we mean what Americans call football, they're called "American football players" (a little confusing, but American players of soccer are "American footballers"). I did remove and delete some of the categories you had on Fahmy Foundation. You could create articles for those if you want, but there's no rush. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Which ones, there are probably already articles...surprised no one has created a proper category for Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, etc., all these organizations that track jailed reporters. —Neotarf (talk) 05:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
It was Category:Organizations based in Canada, Category:Freedom of expression organizations, and Category:Human rights organizations. Actually, now that I look at Category:Human rights, I see more organizations there. I'll recreate the human rights organizations category and populate it -- I should have done that before I deleted it in the first place. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Ok, getting kicked out now, I see the deletions are also coming up in my watch list, I'll try to put those categories in order later. —Neotarf (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

The Scream[change source]

Hi, Neotarf. We already had an article on this painting. However, since yours was better, I moved it over the existing one. Let me know if you have any questions. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Auntof6Actually there is more than one painting, and some lithographs, but it seems they are all referred to colloquially with the same name. The specific 1893 painting is associated with wikidata item (Q18891156) https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18891156 (part of Wikidata:Europeana Art History Challenge) [1] When I tried to add The Scream article to the wikidata item, it gave me an error as there is already a wikidata item for the series of compositions at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q471379 Neotarf (talk) 19:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Oops, my mistake: thanks for the education! That's like van Gogh's "Bedroom in Arles" paintings, my favorites of his. I see that you've already restored the article. Is there anything I need to do to put things right? --Auntof6 (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Well, there was an edit conflict and I didn't want to lose the edit, so I just went ahead. I have already stated on something else, but I can look at it later, is it important to preserve the history in this case? I don't know how to do that, but as I recall the first article was very short. I wonder if a separate category for the project would be helpful in preventing misunderstandings, I think there is one for one of the other wikis. Neotarf (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quick deletion of The Last Judgment (Toma din Suceava)[change source]

Ambox deletion.png

The page you wrote, The Last Judgment (Toma din Suceava), has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Lolcats20 (talk) 20:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

RfD nomination of List of nuns[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of List of nuns, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/List of nuns and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 07:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[change source]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Bare source citations[change source]

Hi Neotarf. Instead of using bare urls for source citations, consider using easy to fill out templates. For example, Wikipedia:Citing sources offers several and I can find more for you if you're interested. Alternatively, you can use reFill, a tool for filling out source citations. Enter the urls as you have been doing, then go to reFill. Add the page name to the first box and in the drop-down box to the right, select "Simple". Then click on "Fix page" and wait until it fixes the page—10 to 30 seconds on average. It will check and create templates for all valid in-line sources and eliminate any dead-links. If you haven't noticed I've been using reFill for many of the pages you started that I've patrolled. It's easy and would be a big help. Thanks Rus793 (talk) 00:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Rus793, thank you for the information. If you check my edit history I think you will find I use refill routinely. For instance in the last few days, I have used it here [2] and here[3]. You will also note that I keep a link to the Refill utility on my user page for convenience. However, I prefer to use it when I am finished with an article rather than every time I add a ref. Please also note that refill does not accommodate bare URLs; it requires ref tags. Regards, —Neotarf (talk) 00:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Luke M. Griswold[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Luke M. Griswold, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Luke M. Griswold and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[change source]

(Sorry to write in English)

Sources on Photojournalism[change source]

Could you check the sources on this article? The first one could use formatting, and the second one appears to be from The New York Times, not the International Herald Tribune. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes I noticed that and wondered why it was being credited to the Herald Tribune, and went back to correct it, but it looks like that's where it's from. A reprint maybe? The International Herald Tribune owns the NYT, as noted in the piece, so maybe that's it. The piece is also reprinted here in the Deccan Herald and credited to "David Jolly: International Herald Tribune". This bio also makes it look like "International Herald Tribune" is correct. I don't have a really good rationale for departing from the REFILL program established to do this function. The other source I have tried to format with REFILL, REFLINKS, and WEBREFLINKS, and none of these programs can find any code to fix. I rather like the piece, as it is comprehensive, but perhaps too advanced for this venue. I have replaced the refs as this seems the easiest, but if you want to try to do something with it, feel free.—Neotarf (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I think the point of this project is more that just the prose is simpler, rather than the refs and sources.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017[change source]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. You might not have done it on purpose, but your recent change removed helpful information from Wikipedia. We ask that you do not remove things from pages, as you did to "Photojournalism", without giving a good reason in the change summary. If it was a mistake, do not worry. The part of the article you removed has been put back. If you want to try things out, please use the sandbox. If you would like to learn how to help Wikipedia, please see the welcome page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jeff G. Thank you for telling me how to learn to help Wikipedia. Please see the discussion in the section above. Regards, —Neotarf (talk) 23:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Sorry about the template.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
LOL. I see you have started a lot of pages, but they were talk pages. Might you be interested in starting articles? There is a list of red links here, I think this would be a very easy place to start. —Neotarf (talk) 23:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Content creation out of whole cloth has never been my forte, I'm more of an editor than a writer. However, I will try, probably via a sandbox due to my tools' unreliability.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I have never used a sandbox. Tools?? Can't you just, like, edit? Do you want to start one now and see how it goes? What about the next one on the list, John Hack. Do you want me to start it (in article space) or do you want to start it somewhere.—Neotarf (talk) 00:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Jeff Here is his bio on Military Times: http://valor.militarytimes.com/recipient.php?recipientid=1738 and here is his bio on the army site: http://www.history.army.mil/html/moh/civilwar_gl.html#HACKJ The second one is a little harder to search because you have to know he was "Civil War (G-L)", but that info is on my list. Two refs is probably enough to make the first few edits.—Neotarf (talk) 00:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff, I have just started Sidney Haight, so you can see an article from the beginning. The first edit was a straight copy/paste from Luke M. Griswold, changing the name, the date of birth, date of death, and changing "sailor" to "soldier", but keeping the format. I also added two refs, with simple ref tags (they can be tweaked later), and one category, to keep it from being an orphan. The second edit was a simple copy paste of an info box, with the name, a couple of dates, and some other minimal information. diff This should now be a solid enough article/stub to keep it from being deleted until I (or you) have time to work on it again. I hope this makes it easy for you, and that you can adapt this to your own way of working, and that you enjoy trying this. Cheers,—Neotarf (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. You can watch as User:Jeff G./John Hack develops. When ready, it can be moved to mainspace and get cats. My tools of the moment (Puffin, iPad, WiFi, router, cable modem, cable, etc.) are never 100.00% reliable, so I save early & often. :)   — Jeff G. ツ 01:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey that's great. It looks like you have a good start.—Neotarf (talk) 02:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. It's now live at John Hack.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey nice, I'm losing my connection now....—Neotarf (talk) 03:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Jeff, that is very nice. It now shows up in the "articles created" tool. I have just figured out how to do barnstars, so you have one of those now. Now that you have found out you are good at creating articles, you can do one whenever you need a change of pace. :P

One thing I did notice is that you have referred to him as "private". If you look at en:MOS:SURNAME, it says "After the initial mention of any name, the person should generally be referred to by surname only, without an honorific prefix.." so Donald Trump is "Trump", not "President Trump", Jesse Jackson is "Jackson", not "Reverend Jackson", Kirama Wimalajothi is "Wimalajothi", not "Venerable Kirama Wimalajothi Thera", and John Hack would be just "Hack".

Also if you are not familiar with Wikidata you might want to take a look at that. I see a bot came by and made the interwiki link with the enwiki article, but IMO it is too easy for a bot to make a mistake on that, and I always do it myself as soon as I start the article. Interwiki links are much easier than they used to be. All you do is go to the bottom of the left column under "In other languages" and click on the pencil icon where it says "change links". For enwiki you just type "en" and it will give you a box where you can paste the article title from the other wiki. You will be amazed at how easy this is.

Also, I was wondering what a "battery" was, so I found a couple of drawings of the batteries at Vicksburg in the spring of 1863, that John Hack would have had to pass under at night in order to get supplies to the troops. 1 23Neotarf (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Hey, Jeff G., I don't know if you are still around, but do you think you could show me how to do patrolling? —Neotarf (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Patrollers.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:45, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
That looks interesting, Jeff G., I see also something called "rollback". Why do people do patrolling? Do you think I should ask for both? —Neotarf (talk) 00:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar[change source]

ODM article award.png This Orders, Decorations, and Medals Contributor Barnstar is presented to Neotarf for their contributions on Medal of Honor related articles, namely User:Neotarf/Medal of Honor red links, Luke M. Griswold, and Sidney Haight. Presented by Jeff G. ツ 21:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! —Neotarf (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Ananta Bijoy Das[change source]

RfD nomination of Ananta Bijoy Das[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Ananta Bijoy Das, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Ananta Bijoy Das and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Tbennert (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Hossein Khan Movaghar[change source]

  • This person was covered by a recent RfD discussion and has now been twice deleted. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Yes, Macdonald-ross, I saw the discussion. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2018/Mohsen_Movaghar There was not any objection to the content of the article, only to the person who wrote it, as there seems to be some kind of COI, and undoubtedly a language barrier as well. Since the article was deleted, I was not able to examine it. I based the one I did on the sources in the Farsi article.

Note that I was not able to access these directly from my location but had to use the internet archive to read them, maybe this is part of why they were questioned? They do seem to be official government sites, so I see no reason to doubt their reliability, even if the material is about the previous government before the 1979 revolution. I did notice a discrepancy in the number of terms served, which looks like it was copied incorrectly, or perhaps it is listed on the site incorrectly, in any case I do not think Wikipedia can claim more than is contained in the sources. Also I forgot to add the defaultsort, if you decide to restore the article you may want to look up how they do these names in Persian/Farsi language. Neotarf (talk) 22:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Not quite. There was, on En wiki and here, an underlying concern for the subject's notability. Several comments here made the point, and the summary of the En wiki discussion was even clearer: "Little content; accuracy unclear and sources inadequate, no supporting material on talk page". Of course, I can't read the links in Farsi, but I can say that the remarks on notability may have been developed further even if the original editor had been in good standing. In your brief version, the issue of notability was not addressed, just assumed, and the sources were not in English. There were inadequate biographic details. On the whole, I don't think this one flies, but if you put it up again it will probably go to RfD again. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘

@Macdonald-ross, The notability criteria is taken from WP:POL which states "The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature." You can see Iranian national politicians, like politicians in other places, are routinely considered to be notable on enwiki, for instance en:List of MPs elected in the Iranian legislative election, 2016 So the question is whether the sources show that he was elected to a national office.

Reading the links in Farsi is not a problem, you can do it very easily with Google Translate, especially with forms or lists that do not use complex grammar. Of course it took me literally hours to verify all of this, but it is all just routine gnoming.

  • For establishing notability, the second link is the most informative [4] We get the following information

میرزا حسین خان موقر

حوزه انتخابیه : خوزستان (خرمشهر) توضیحات : فوت شد.

هم هشتم ششم

..that is: "The honorable Hussein Khan, constituency or district: Khouzestan (Khorramshahr) Description: died. Sixth eighth ninth (sessions of the assembly)."

There is a further note in the margin

نمایندگان ح. ا. "خوزستان" کاربر گرامی، در این بخش فهرست نمایندگان "دوره نهم (قبل از انقلاب)، حوزه انتخابیه خوزستان" نمایش داده شده است.

that is: "Representatives of H U Khuzestan ...Dear user, in this section is the list of representatives of the "Ninth period (before the revolution), the Khuzestan constituency", verifying again the district and legislative session number. The path is further specified as "مسیر شما : مجلس شورای اسلامی › نمایندگان › میرزا حسین خان موقر" or "Parliament> Representatives> the Honorable Hussein Khan", and the website is "Islamic Parliament Research Center Of The Islamic Republic Of IRAN". If you are in a place where you can read the original website (I am not, but have wormed through this with internet archive), you can see there is an English language section, but at present it only lists the post-revolution legislature.

  • The first link adds further to establish notability: [5],

شماره مدرك : ۴۹۶۲ عنوان : میرزا حسین خان موقر مشخصات ظاهري : فردی، سیاه و سفید۶*۸ اطلاعات توصیفی : مشاغل: نماینده مجلس شورای ملی زبان : فارسی کلیدواژه : میرزا حسین خان موقر مجموعه : ۱۳۰۶/۰۶/۲۷۱روزنامه اطلاعات

which works out to

Issue number: 4962

Title: the honorable Hussein Khan Exterior Features: Individual, Black & White 6 * 8 Descriptive information: Occupations: MP Farsi language Keyword: Dear Mirza Hussein Khan Collection: 1306/06/271 Newspaper

I have bolded the part that establishes notability, that is WP:POL that the individual was a member of the national legislature: مشاغل: نماینده مجلس شورای ملی. If you take the title نماینده مجلس شورای ملی and work it through google translate, it will tell you this is a "National Assembly MP" or "member of the national majlis". You can look at the article I created on Islamic Consultative Assembly; I have not been able to determine the years of the 6th, 8th, and 9th sessions, but the 13th Majlis was in 1941.

I am not likely to spend hours trying to recreate this lost work if it is only to be judged on the basis of a deleted article somewhere else that I cannot even see, or judge what sources were used, or whether the participants even understood the notability criteria for WP:POL. This is very similar to Jalal Movaghar and even uses one of the same sources. I think you should restore the article, but of course it is up to you. If there are any other questions let me know. —Neotarf (talk) 01:38, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Niloy Neel[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Niloy Neel, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Niloy Neel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Faisal Abedin Deepan[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Faisal Abedin Deepan, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Faisal Abedin Deepan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)