User talk:Proflowa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2023[change source]

Please stop adding inappropriate links to other websites to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not the place for advertising or promotion. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 01:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Show me the Spam? Its topic relevant Backlinks? Read the Rules of Wikipedia!!! 2003:D6:3F05:4B00:9D59:3B1E:3F9F:6212 (talk) 01:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Blog sources are not good sources. In addition, some of the sources added were not relevant or did not support the statements in the article directly. Do not use them. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 01:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
90% of all References in Wikipedia is Backlinks from News/ Blogs or like this. What is wrong with you? I adding nicherelevant Articles about the Topic and you call it Spam? Tell me 1 Rule what i break? I think you probably have no hobbies and nothing better to do than annoying people here. I will report you for misuse of your user rights. 2003:D6:3F05:4B00:9D59:3B1E:3F9F:6212 (talk) 01:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from changing pages without any more notices. Illusion Flame (talk) 01:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What i do wrong? Gife me a Information / URL to the Rule what i break? 2003:D6:3F05:4B00:9D59:3B1E:3F9F:6212 (talk) 01:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SPAM, specifically link spam. Illusion Flame (talk) 01:37, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"There are two basic types of spam: advertisements hidden as articles and link spamming created by robots. Articles that are advertisements include articles that sell things for a business, product, or service, or public relations articles pointing to it aim to make a company or individual look better. Wiki spam articles are usually marked for deletion. However, one should differentiate between spam articles and good, informative articles about commercial businesses, websites, or similar."
1. No bots were used, I'm not a bot.
2. The articles provide information and are relevant to the topic
3. The links have no advertising
Can you tell me exact what u mean? Proflowa (talk) 01:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
References need to be reliable, and blog posts are usually not. I suggest seeing referencing for beginners: [1]. Have a good day! Dylan | ✉   01:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then Blog-Posts is not allowed? Now you are without Arguments.
1. Show me the Rule, Blogs posts is not allowed? I dont found this Information ? Where is it?
2. So you make the Rules / change the Rules of Wikipedia?
3. i see much Reference from Blogs-Posts in Wikipedia, how is it possible? Proflowa (talk) 01:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple people have given you 4 links to Wikipedia policies that prohibit spam links. What do you mean? Dylan | ✉   01:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This might also help in the future: [2] <— Reliable sources.
Dylan | ✉   01:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also see WP:EL, specifically the advertising/COI section Illusion Flame (talk) 01:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
" Links to potentially revenue-generating web pages are not prohibited, even though the website owner might earn money through advertisements, sales, or (in the case of non-profit organizations) donations. " Proflowa (talk) 01:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please you should understand the Rules. Proflowa (talk) 01:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You understand english? Proflowa (talk) 01:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
" not prohibited!!!" Proflowa (talk) 01:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would read WP:Competence is required too. Illusion Flame (talk) 01:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wtf I've been a web designer for 15 years, have an honorable Dr. Titles and degrees in Germany and the USA. My website is over 10 years old and I've had over 1000 clients in web design, programming. And I'm not a reliable source? No competency. Who are you that you can decide that or even just judge=? Proflowa (talk) 01:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are not a reliable source. Reliable sources are outlined here. Illusion Flame (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As a guide, the more people who help with checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and examining the writing, the more reliable the publication.
You dont know how much people working in my company and you dont know how much people was checking the articles / informations. And there is Rule/ Number what it should be. Proflowa (talk) 02:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the section he told you to see about advertising: WP:EL#ADV
Thanks and have a good day.
Dylan | ✉   01:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any breaches of the rules, and you couldn't give me a single statement naming any breaches of the rules. We should let a Wikipedia employee / admin decide. Proflowa (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
I did. You've been blocked from editing this project and I'm adding the domains you tried to add for SEO to our global spam blacklist. Cool fact: Anything in <ref> tags doesn't work for SEO. So the only point you're succeeding in is having your customer's domains added to a blacklist. :) Enjoy! Operator873 connect 02:03, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok tell me the Rule what i break? Proflowa (talk) 02:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And cool fact: Sure its working, maybee its a nofollow tag. But the Authorty flow working and the traffic too. And next cool fact: Nobody need a Account to edit article. So what u want to ban? Proflowa (talk) 02:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This account is now globally locked. The answer you were looking for is in WP:SPAM but it really doesn't matter now. Byyeeeeeeeee! Operator873 connect 02:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]