User talk:PseudoOne

Welcome to Simple English Wikipedia

Hi PseudoOne, welcome to Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

If you need help, check out the Help section of Wikipedia, or leave a message on my talk page.

Whenever leaving messages on talk pages, please remember to sign your name by typing four 'tildes' (like this: ~~~~); doing this makes your name and the date show up. Also, it helps if you write something in the box that says 'edit summary' whenever you change an article.

Below are some useful links to make your time here simpler.

If you make a short article please mark it with {{stub}}, our guideline is here: Stubs

Happy editing! Bärl iner 22:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
How to: change a page • write Simple English articles
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Administrators • Leaving a message for administrators
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Can this be checked? Saying where the idea came from • What Wikipedia is not Copyrights • Using images and Pictures Spam • Vandalism • Deletion policy

The Community
Assume good faith • Be kind Community Portal • Simple talk • TASERING Announcements • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Peer review • Cleanup
Other
Useful templates • Stubs

-- Bärl iner 22:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're bored :)

Our New Changes always has a backlog of articles to simplify etc --Bärl iner 22:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi. How exactly are my edits deemed to be vandalism. In my honest opinion I am being quite constructive to the site, by replacing archaic material with that which is more suitably structured for a "simple" audience. Regards, Kev iz bak (talk) 23:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. How are my edits not constructive? Kev iz bak (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see your point, the edit of mine you have quoted seems reasonable to me, just like the rest. And so what if I am a sockpuppet? Kev iz bak (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonable in the sense that there is nothing wrong with it. The tone of the language is appropriate, the content that it is replacing is obsolete, and the articles in their final state offer useful insights into the topics they describe. Now please desist with your reverts. Kev iz bak (talk) 23:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block error

Sorry about the block, I was aiming at Kev iz back and clicked the line above it and got your account by mistake. -- Creol(talk) 23:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]