User talk:Sir James Paul
User:Sir James Paul/Archive 1 User:Sir James Paul/Archive 2
December 11, 2006-???
Re:admin?[change source]
I'm pretty sure that you could make as an admin, but unfortunately, only time will tell. --§ Alastor Moody (T + C) 15:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not censored[change source]
Please see WP:NOT because you had removed the list of swear words and WP is not censored. The edit has been reverted. --Shaericell 01:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Baseball[change source]
The problem is that the version of the article you started working from was the very oldest version when it was first created two years ago. A lot of improvements have been made on the article since then, and you undid a lot of editors' work - two years' worth. If you want to simplify an article, please start with the most recent available version. Thanks. Blockinblox - talk 01:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Maybe I was a bit harsh, but a majority of the user's edits were vandalism. If you want to, you can contest his block by asking User:PullToOpen (the blocking administrator). --Az1568 03:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- I am going to answer your question here that was on Eptalon's talk page, because it should have been directed to me. Mooceleimh was a vandal, pure and simple. There is no reason why a vandal should be allowed to edit. He/she blanked Az1568's user page five times, and it is clear that this user wanted to do harm. PullToOpen Talk 03:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, he/she only had two warnings, that is true. However, it was PullToOpen who locked him. So if you want that time revised, please talk to PullToOpen (or BlockInblox, who blocked someone else, for very similar offences). My personal opinion is, that he/she would have continued. -- Eptalon 11:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
You warned IP User:75.58.52.61 about "only putting in encyclopedic content. But if you look at that IP's contributions, you'll see its only edit was a correct grammatical change [1]. If you were trying to respond to J Di's edit [2], that material was placed in the article by the original creator in October [3]. You really need to be more careful about issuing warnings. --ZimZalaBim 23:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear Sir James Paul[change source]
I would like to bring this message forward to you. You see, I know you are eager to learn and eager to be an admin. But the point is: Wikipedia is not about adminship. Adminship is NOT everything. Look at us admins: We patient waited until the time was right before becoming admins. You have grasped the basics of editing, but you will need to learn more about policies. You are friendly, this I know. But still, do remember that when you become an admin, don't let it get over your head, okay? (I know you won't, but just telling you.) Merry Christmas, Sir James Paul. Bear in mind what I said.-- Tdxiang 04:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Anti-vandalism bot[change source]
Hello SirJamesPaul. Perhaps it is really the case that reverts to vandalism do not happen fast enough. However, I do not see an automatic method (ie. a machine) which is able to decide what is vandalism, and what is not. A way to really speed up the process would be to get more users to SimpleWP. These would then be faster to decide if something is vandalism. --Eptalon 19:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please don't try and make an anti-vandal bot). The only anti-vandal bot currently in operation is User:AntiVandalBot on the English Wikipedia, and that took months to perfect, and was made and tested by really experienced developers. As it runs from the Wikimedia Toolserver, technically we could get it over here, but if it's not necessary we don't run it, and it really is not necessary. AntiVandalBot exists because there are 20 edits every second on the English Wikipedia, and humans can't check them all. AntiVandalBot also only reverts really obvious vandalism. Simple Wikipedia does however have one form of bot fighting vandalism: Tangobot4. This bot sits in the #vandalism-simple channel and checks every edit going in. If it spots something suspicious, it alerts a human in the channel to check it. There's quite a few people that use the channel now, so vandalism reversion is actually quite quick. We will not approve an AntiVandalBot, and it's developers won't either. Tangobot4 is an amazing bot, and that's one we already have. Archer7 - talk 20:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Did you read my message? We won't allow an AntiVandalBot. Tangobot4 is brilliant, and it's all we need. Come check it out in #vandalism-simple if you like. Archer7 - talk 20:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your welcome[change source]
Thank you for your welcome ! Ixnay 23:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Esperanza![change source]
Welcome, Sir James Paul, to Esperanza! As you may know, all the members have one important goal, which is the success of this encyclopedia. To do this we want to make the community better, and be the nice side of Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, comments, or general ideas, use the Esperanza talk page! We thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!
Dear Sir James Paul[change source]
Dear Sir James Paul, I am Juan Manuel Arcia Salazar. I have read your message. I appreciate your information about the policies of Simple English Wikipedia and your words of welcome. I hope to write many articles in Simple English; in particular articles about my country, Venezuela. Sincerely, Juanmanuelarcia 00:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome![change source]
Hi, thanks for the welcoming message, and the Simple English editing guidelines!
Thanks for the welcome[change source]
Hi, Thanks for the welcoming message and the editing guidelines! Andrew1990 22:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
English Wikipedia page[change source]
See your English Wikipedia page. Tasman 00:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:Warn Vandals :)[change source]
Um, I know that and I have, if you look at my contributions, I have only reverted vandalism once, and warned user.. I am a member of Wikipedia English, and I do know that one is supposed to warn vandals, and I have.. Illyria05 (Talk • Changes) 23:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- What edit is this? Looking at my changes, I only see one revert and I did warn that user.. Illyria05 (Talk • Changes) 23:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Barnstar[change source]
Hey Sir James Paul. Many thanks for the Barnstar! :D
Bye. FrancoGG ( talk ) 00:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the barnstar! · Tygartl1·talk· 17:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I like it here a lot. I try to be as helpful as I can. Thanks for asking. I hope you have a nice week as well. · Tygartl1·talk· 19:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey Sir James Paul, thanks for the Barnstar, it really made my day =)
WikiReligion[change source]
Do you still WikiReligion? It's me, Luiza. See ya :), --'Choos'nink TALK 03:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC) (and CandyCorn is ForestH2...)
My RfA[change source]
 Thank you for voting in my RfA. I would like to thank those 3 people who supported me on my first RfA, which unsuccessfully came out with 3 supports, 5 opposes, and 1 neutral vote(s). In addition, I would also like to thank the 6 people who didn't support me, but gave me better advice as being a wikipedian. I am not let down because of my unsuccessful RfA and plan to continue to work with you in the coming days. Later I hope to have a second RfA and hope you'll vote for me again. Anyhow thanks a lot. I put in the peace sign since I think it helps to lift sad feelings and to promote happines. --§ Alastor Moody (T + C) Adminship 23:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
Question[change source]
Are we allowed to copy parts of articals from wikipedia to make an artical here, I'm knew here so I don't know. Thank you OysterGuitarist 03:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm not actually use to making or editing articals so i decided to copy one and make it simple. OysterGuitarist 15:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Re:Esperanza[change source]
yes. OysterGuitarist 16:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Simple Wiktionary[change source]
I've set a goal of 2,000 entries on the SE Wikt by the end of the month. I hope you'll be inspired to come and help us achieve it.--Brett 17:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
RfD nomination of Quality[change source]
An editor has requested deletion of Quality, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Quality and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Hydriz (talk) 02:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)