User talk:Stang

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on a site that is not Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. The page may be old and the owner of this page may not have a relationship with sites that are not Wikipedia. The original page is located at http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stang.

Wikimedia Foundation

This is the User talk page for Stang, where you can send messages and comments to Stang.

Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.

Welcome[change source]

Hello, Stang, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will show your username and the date.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! Stang 05:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[change source]

Hi Stang, thank you for your anti-vandalism efforts, they are really appreciated. Please remember to warn users gradually. Please don't give one final warning template like you did here. Instead, try to start on level 1-2, then move up to 2, 3 and then 4. If you've given a level 4 warning, please then report to admins on VIP if they continue to vandalise. You can also do all the warning in SWViewer if you want, by pressing the "Rollback with summary" button, enabling "Warn user" and then pick the problem with the edit. Thanks again! --Ferien (talk) 19:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I forgot to say, for LTAs, you still shouldn't warn; WP:DENY applies. --Ferien (talk) 19:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[change source]

Hi. I have turned on rollback for your account. Please make sure to re-read Wikipedia:Rollback feature and make sure to understand all of the guidelines. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Feel free to test out the feature at our testing ground. Thanks. --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 16:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Horror film on English Wikipedia[change source]

Dear Stang can you remove postmodern from the 1990s section of the article horror film on English Wikipedia it's making that section unsourced. Anucksonamun (talk) 14:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Supplementary angles[change source]

Hey Stang! I've declined your QD at Supplementary angles as a user asked it to be kept. Feel free to send it to RFD and I'll comment on the request there. Best, Griff (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting MrOllie[change source]

Dear Stang I want to report a user named MrOllie he's been vandalizing articles and harassing different users on English Wikipedia can you block him? MiLanGaoPing (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry[change source]

sorry for the attack. 88.110.38.249 (talk) 15:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[change source]

I need of source of reference or parameter that force you delete a content immediately. I do not have any source to provide you if you find an idealistic or philosofic or diplomatic lines of informations. I want you know the effort and value of a creation so that you focus on identifying the contents and act on your deletion process. A Writer is not a computer always with back in built. I need it for protecting my writing anyway. I am not forcing you to do what goes against the policy but giving a useful advice of think before delete. I again declare capable enough to understand the information and it's forms for creation and purpose of creater and interests of the readers. Get it and apply in your acts. There is no sense at all if contents are shortages is statement in one hand and contents will be never added in another hand. 360 words writing is enough to show you 360 degree mirror and your [ zero point zero zero 360 seconds ] deletion speed is a slave to one 360 words writer's creation speed. Your boldness lies in challenging before deleting. If you do not read before deleting then learn to read first before thinking readers benefit and welfare. Use translator before you say I should have wrote it in Simple English. Being Simple and Being bold do not co exist as per law , as per common sense.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandeep Manikpuri (talk • contribs)

Message moved to bottom and added section heading. MathXplore (talk) 06:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am replying again if you do not get annoyed as I believe in expressing and one of few is a "Clear contradiction of wanting a simple explanation for readers in mass and denying a simple explanation of information when written or added in article" I have many examples to show but let me give few. 1. A prescription is for medicine not for drug. A patient is needy and a drug abused is not a needy. 2. Abusive verses addicted, I can write even wrote many things which got deleted immediately. A cannabis highes dosage or alcohol causes abuse whereas an anty anxity avoids abuse. Both are subject of addiction in any case. A reader will not be available to understand what is needed to choose in a highly crucial decision making as we have given infirmation in straight and "source guranteed" manner. I had written many good things, all went in vain and I can not explain in a single message. 3. An information on JAA and FAA where I aded Pilot license in the place of certificate and their FAA activity on missing "convert" facility which can be made confirmed by asking the Authority by Telephone if needed. This too got deleted immediately. I am not satisfied with this "just delete" protocol of power holders. I need a customized guideline right on my page if you think worth providing. Roaming here and there is a night mare for me. Straight and simple guideline to write for bold and positive changes. I have no source to strengthen if I give an diplomatic explanation of a traditionallly taught definition of any thing which can benefit reader for their well being.

Thank you. Sandeep Manikpuri (talk) 07:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]