User talk:Steve Crossin/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Hello Samekh, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia!

You may begin by reading these:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

You can edit any pages you want! Anything you write can be changed later. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on Talk pages, please sign your name by typing "~~~~" (four tildes)

Good luck and happy editing! Synergy 01:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ohai, thanks. ס Talk 01:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome! :) Master of Puppets (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great Job!! I can live with that though I will make one minor change to fix the wikilink.--   ChristianMan16  19:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that works better. Thanks for fixing my typo. I failz. ס Talk 19:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're learning not a failure.--   ChristianMan16  20:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Samekh, Welcome to Wikiproject Anti-Vandlism! Thank you for Joining to help make a differnce. If you need help, check out the Talk page of our Wikiproject, or leave a message on my talk page. Anyway, Welcome! -- RNBSIG 00:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ombox

Be careful to check each page with a template you've changed present on it. If you'll look at Wikipedia:Username, the updated template is broken. --Gwib -(talk)- 06:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also centre the template rather than left-align it? --Gwib -(talk)- 06:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, by default, it's aligned left. I'll see if I can alter it to centre align it, hang on. ס Talk 06:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
kthnxbai. --Gwib -(talk)- 06:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it can be aligned centre. I'll ask around, but personally, I don't know how to align the text centre. ס Talk 06:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should stop updating templates for now. You barely waited on ST for users to voice opinions. Try waiting about a day (most editors edit in the evening) until you start editing. --Gwib -(talk)- 06:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. ס Talk 06:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The second bookmark you have up there, YouTube Download, I have that also as a bookmark. I even called it that and use the same icon! I thought it was funny. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 20:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Omai! But does {{ombox}} work the same for you? ^_^ That's the important thing. ס Talk 20:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New message

I have left a message for you on my talk page--Sunnah and Hadith ***THE MUZI*** (talk)

Good work

Hey Samekh. Good work lately, particularly with your work with articles and templates. :) I hope you'll continue to contribute to Simple English Wikipedia! – RyanCross (talk) 05:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two points

One point bot, one point user:

1. Your signature, while it works fine on Mozilla and Safari based browsers, causes big problems with IE browsers. The text of the person that edits directly under you is half covered up by your message due to an issue with line spacing in IE.

2. I would strongly suggest being careful on what templates get subst'ed - mainly on which pages you do it. Some people do not like others editting their user space and the subst of BS can bring up issues. For example, all your edits to my archives were reverted; I am fine with the templates as is and prefer my archives (and user-space in general) to remain in its original form. Other are totaly fine with people editing their user space, but some people are not. Content editing is one thing, but style editing can bring up issues. -- Creol(talk) 06:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

Hello, there seems to be an issue with your signature. It is bunching all the lines together and making your (and other) comments hard to read. A good example is here. Kennedy (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have an issue with your bot running to fix your signature - too many diffs on my watchlist - but its done now I guess. I am not convinced that your signature is still resolved since I cannot actually read your name from looking at your signature - a little less style would be appreciated. Have you read WP:SIG? For example when referrring to other scripts - As a courtesy to the rest of the contributors, users with such usernames should sign their posts (at least in part) with Latin characters. Your name has Latin characters but you choose not to use them. This user finds it a bit annoying. --Matilda (talk) 19:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I disagree. I think at the moment his signature is fine. Its a little long perhaps (in the edit window), but not as bad as some. He does have "Talk" in latin characters, and if you roll over it, you see his username. I assume the "ס" means Samekh in Hebrew? Kennedy (talk) 09:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I've considered whether or not to respond to your comment, Matilda, but think it's wise if I do. I don't think my signature is inappropriate, or unacceptable. I know some people like very simple signatures, I decided to go for something slightly more complex. In my signature, the ס, is a Samekh, hence where I got my username from., which I chose so I could sign my name with a single letter. As Kennedy points out, ס is hebrew for Samekh. As for my bot updating my signature, I see no other way this could've been done better. The signature needed to be fixed. It would've taken longer for me to do it manually, which would also flood recent changes. This was the best way I thought the task could be done. ס Talk 10:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • It is your choice not to comply with the guideline at WP:SIG but please don't say nobody told you what the guideline was - I again draw your attention to it: As a courtesy to the rest of the contributors, users with such usernames should sign their posts (at least in part) with Latin characters. I had gathered it was the Hebrew character and I have since noted you said as much on your talk page. In my view your disregard of the guideline is not in keeping with the purpose of simple English wikipedia as it is not reader friendly - mouseover is no substitute. I won't say anything more on the subject. --Matilda (talk) 04:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your comments on my RFa

You said you have a feeling that I would use the tool to enforce censorship. While yes I think some of the extreme things should not be on the front page I do not think Wikipedia should be censored except for a few images when their are medical diagrams that can serve the same purpose just as well and it's not the real thing.....my point is I would do no such thing cause that would be an abusing of adminship, and me as a Christian just wouldn't do that. I would properly take it up with the community, for a consensus. Thank you.--   ChristianMan16  19:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's just my point of view. ס Talk 19:04, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to assure you I would not do such a thing.--   ChristianMan16  19:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Cheers, ס Talk 19:05, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How many hits per article

Hi I would like to find out if there is any way possible of finding out how many hits an article receives. I know you can do this on en wiki but what about the simple en wiki. Also I started this account on simple and when I went to the en wiki I automatically had an account over there as well. How can this be.--Sunnah and Hadith ***THE MUZI*** (talk)

Okay, to answer your questions.

  1. - I'm not too sure if this can be done on simple wikipedia. Let me have a look around and I'll get back to you.
  2. - Wikimedia now has a unified login system. This means if you go to another wiki, an account will automatically be created for you.

Best, ס Talk 08:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the article with the most clicks, but there is Special:MostRevisions or Special:MostLinked which might give you some idea... Kennedy (talk) 10:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] has a Simple English option in the drop-down box. Tombomp (talk) 20:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sig Vio

You sig appears to violate WP:SIG#NL could you fix that please?--   ChristianMan16  04:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thought about it, I think I can come up with a compromise. Sig change implemented. ס (Samekh) Talk 07:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you - looks good - no need to change it everywhere by bot! future use only is fine. --Matilda (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, my bot is busy, anyway ^_^ ס (Samekh) Talk 19:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News Issue One

Issue 1 - 15th November 2008

31,511 editors, 39,781 articles, 106,605 pages.


Announcements Administrators


User Articles

In his first article Kennedy welcomes you to the first Simple News newsletter, and explains how you can get involved!
Bluegoblin7 writes in his debut article about the DYK procedures. Watch out next month too!

[Subscribe]
[Dates]
[Discussion]
[The Team]

QandA

  • The QandA. Every month, Kennedy will interview one of Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username. First up is Microchip08! Click for his interview:
Microchip08 Interview


--GoblinBot (talk) 13:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interwikis

Please don't make useless edits like this one. Thanks. Giggy (talk) 00:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IRC logs

Can I publish the IRC logs from the conversation that we just had about Benniguy/Iamandrewrice on Wikipedia? Jonas D. Rand T 05:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

The Yotcmdr Barnstar
Thank you for supporting me in my RFA which passed with 15 supports and no opposes. The barnstar may not mean much to you, but your support did to me, thanks. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 09:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: New Page

Hello Samekh, Thanks for your offer. I have replied on my talk page. Thanks again! :D Kennedy (talk) 13:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News Issue Two

Issue 2 - 13th December 2008

37,332 editors, 41,432 articles, 109,917 pages.


Announcements Administrators


User Articles
It's a bumper edition from Kennedy this month, with a round-up of recent and future developments, and also news of a spin-off from Simple News.
In his second article, Bluegoblin7 writes of the new wikicup that has come to the wiki.
Yotcmdr writes about the Good Article and Very Good Article processes and how we need your help in his debut article.

[Subscribe]
[Dates]
[Discussion]
[The Team]
  • Christianman16 has applied to be an Administrator.
  • Yotcmdr applied to be an Administrator, and was promoted.
  • Matilda had applied to be an Administrator, but was not promoted.
  • Chocolates had applied to be an Administrator, but was not promoted.
  • Gwib had applied to be a Bureaucrat, but was not promoted.

QandA
  • The QandA. Every month, Kennedy will interview one of Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username. Las month we debuted with Microchip08. Due up next was Shapiros10 but due to uncontrollable circumstances we have had to postpone this to next month. Instead, Bluegoblin7 takes the reigns and interviews Gwib, who kindly volunteered to keep the section in this issue. Click for his interview:
Gwib's Interview

Everyone at Simple News would like to wish all users at the Simple English Wikipedia a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.


--GoblinBot1 (talk) 17:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nations Cup

Name change

I have rotated the names Steve Crossin and Samekh. The bot was also renamed and the link from the bot page corrected to the new name. The next step is all on you though. With the move of Samekh, about 4 gazillion redirects got created. The User and User talk should probable at least get a soft redirect to reflect the move, but the rest should have all the links fixed and then tagged for quick delete. While I do tend to do this many times, given the number of subpages involved, I will leave it to you to clean that part up. -- Creol(talk) 07:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My bot can fix double redirects, I'll get on that right away. I'll see what I can do to clean stuff up. Thanks for the rename :) SteveTalk 07:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update

You must updated your userpage because it still says Samekh. Tharnton345 10:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks. Don't forget {{sofixit}} :) SteveTalk 09:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve?

You're late for dinner!!!! Just kidding, seriously though, I have a question. Can your bot do a task for me? VandalFighterFR bad warning? 22:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should ask what you want it to do, so then he can confirm whether it can or can't. :-) Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 22:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I can't believe I forgot. Anyway, the task is moving pages that don't seem encyclopedia to the right namespace that the article seems like. VandalFighterFR bad warning? 22:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Without any knowledge of bots, I can say that the task requires human judgement. Only humans an judge whether a page is encyclopedic, with the exception of pages created for vandalism (containing expletives, etc). A bot can't decide whether an article doesn't seem to fit into the encyclopedia. Secondly, only humans can know which namespace such an article should go into, if it was created in error. Thirdly, such pages are created very rarely, and won't require a bot to take care of the workload. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 23:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*points to Peter's TL;DR post above* What he said :) Bots have no AI, or at least, nowhere near enough to perform a task such as this one, and it's not something that happens in such high volume that would need a bot to do it. SteveTalk 08:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya!

Hi there Steve! I remember you from over on the English Wikipedia, and I am glad to see that you are editing on this site now! This is the Wikipedia that I edit on the most and even though I was not very active in between June of 2008 and now, I can say with certainty that I am back to being a very active editor here on this site. We will probably cross paths here on the Simple English Wikipedia, and I also look forward to working with you here on this site :). See ya around the SEW! Cheers, Razorflame 23:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

*Push* *Prod* *Nudge* ;) Any progress on my new userpage? Don't like to hassle, but I would like to see how its going. Have you started? Any ideas on how it will look? Kind regards, Kennedy (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Argh, I've not started it yet. I completely forgot about it! I'll start on it in the New Year, I'll have more free time then. Sorry! SteveTalk 23:23, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tut tut. ;) No worries really, its not important. Have a nice new year, and don't get too drunk Kennedy (talk) 08:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News

Special New Year Edition

39,214 elves, 42,705 reindeer, 112,260 presents.


Annoucements Plans for 2009

  • You can find the wikicup pools here, tomorow! They were chosen randomly by our judge, Bluegoblin7.
  • Happy New Year everyone!


[Subscribe]
[Archive]
[Discussion]
[The Team]


Wikicup has started

Yotbot (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikicup Notice

Yotbot (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

rename of Steve Crossin

I see your request here. Wich username do you prefer for Steve Crossin? --vector ^_^ (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments needed

Your comments are needed.
Your comments are needed.
I have written an apology for enWP here that I intend to present to the enWP community somehow and I would like some constructive criticism please. Please read the "letter" and comment on the "letter" here. Thank you.-- CM16 MLB  07:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup Points

Simple News Issue Three

Simple News
Simple News
Issue 3 - 19th January 2009

42,058 editors, 53,245 articles, 124,392 pages.


Announcements Administrators


User Articles
Another bumper article from Kennedy this month, with not one, not two, but three pages including Simple News, DYK and RfA
This month Bluegoblin7 writes about the GA and VGA processes
In his second article for Simple News Yotcmdr writes about his new WikiProject, WikiProject France
In a third short article Yotty talks about his opinions of the RFA system

[Subscribe]
[Dates]
[Discussion]
[The Team]

QandA
  • The QandA. Every month, Kennedy interviews one of the Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username. This month is a bumper edition for QandA, as Kennedy was an idiot and forgot to load the interview last edition! This month will be Shapiros10 and Yotcmdr! Click for their interviews:
Shapiros10 Interview
Yotcmdr Interview

The Commander's Choice

The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list:


--GoblinBot3 (talk) 20:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankspam

Thank you for voting in my recent RfA. Unfortunately, I have decided to withdraw from the RfA due to concerns brought up in the oppose votes. The final tally was 4 supports and 6 opposes. I would like to thank American Eagle for the nomination. Razorflame 22:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my recent request for adminship, which passed with a total of 21/5. I will try to the best of my abilities to maintain the trust of the community, and I will carefully consider the opposes to learn how to further improve. Cheers, Juliancolton (talk) 14:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retirement:

Strong oppose - Sorry, Steve, you can't retire. I won't let you. :( Why not become more active here instead? Ach well, good luck for the future, IRL too. Don't be a stranger. Kennedy (talk) 09:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kennedy. This isn't an RFA :) You can strong oppose me if I ever have one >_>...but really, I retired because the only things I really like doing are editing articles related to 24 (TV series), which I can't do here, and dispute resolution, which I'm not trusted to do, regardless of my experience. If you have any ideas, let me know, but I'm stumped as to what, if anything, I could do to benefit Simple. I'm still a banned user at en, so I'm kinda just bringing extra drama to Simple. SteveTalk 02:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per Kennedy. –Juliancolton (talk) 02:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not RFA 9_9 SteveTalk 02:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per Kennedy. ;) Razorflame 02:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(un)I'm glad you have reconsidered. :) The strong oppose was opposing your retirement btw... But I'm sure you knew that already. Good luck! Kennedy (talk) 09:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff to do

Hi, I read in your ER that you didn't know what to do at the moment. You could seriously help me! I am trying to create articles in two areas; Nazi Germany (en:Category:Nazi leaders) and police articles. I'm trying to get a new article I wrote from scratch to GA status, it is Color of the day (police) and could use help with the red-links in it, and in reading and correcting it. Up to you (you can, of course, do anything you want) :-) Regards, fr33kman t - c 01:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good

Hi, Wikipedia:Solving disputes noticeboard is looking good! :) fr33kman t - c 23:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

reverting vandalism is not edit-warring FYI. SimonKSK 00:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Steve: This vandal is well known to us here on simple, if you check the block log you'll see they are easily spotted, Simon did the right thing: I left him to it and went to enWP to find Majorly. :) fr33kman t - c 00:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yes. Never spotted them before, sorry :) SteveTalk 00:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, since I reverted that one 2 times, I am certain I didn't break anything.;) It was more of a joke vandalism, that one. SimonKSK 00:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No sorry needed, you acted in good faith! :) fr33kman t - c 00:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
^What he said. Besides, it got my edit count up a bit. :P SimonKSK 00:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

My RfA

Simple News Issue Three

Simple News
Simple News
Issue 4 - 2th March 2009

50,066 editors, 55,989 articles, 130,887 pages.


Announcements Administrators

  • Happy Birthday to Shapiros10 who celebrates his birthday today! Party at his place later!
  • The Simple English Wikipedia now has:
  • 1,421,733 changes have been made since the Simple English Wikipedia started. This comes to 11.15 'changes per page' in the project.

User Articles
Another article from Kennedy including writing about Simple News, P(V)GA's and some blatant spam!
This month Bluegoblin7 revisits the current situation at the DYK process.
A piece this month from Yotcmdr about a simplification project.
In his debut article for Simple News, Razorflame writes about the recent increase in Vandalism
Shapiros10 writes about Simple's recent turmoil for his debut article.

[Subscribe]
[Dates]
[Discussion]
[The Team]

January

February


QandA
  • The QandA. Every month, Kennedy interviews one of the Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username.

This weeks interviews are with Bluegoblin7 and Kennedy! Yotcmdr and BG7 took the interviews.
Click for Bluegoblin7's interview!
Click for Kennedy's interview!


The Commander's Choice

The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list:


--GoblinBot3 (talk) 22:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News Issue Five

Simple News
Simple News
Issue 5 - 16th March 2009

52,806 editors, 56,607 articles, 133,001 pages.


Announcements Administrators


User Articles
In his debut article, DefenseSupportParty talks about the spoken articles project and what it means to them
In his second article, Razorflame explores the big world of article writing.
For his fifth article, Yotcmdr also speaks about the Spoken articles project... and you can even listen to this one!

[Subscribe]
[Archives]
[Discussion]
[The Team]

QandA
  • The QandA. Every month, Kennedy interviews one of the Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username.

This weeks interview is with Eptalon
Click for Eptalon's interview!


The Commander's Choice

The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list:



--GoblinBot3 (talk) 12:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]