User talk:The Three Headed Knight/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi

Your work on templates is very good. Keep up the good work! PiRSquared1 7 19:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great Work

Just wanted to say its great to see someone else here working on hockey. I know I changed some of your stuff but none of that was personal, its just what happens on a wiki. Seeing someone else interested in hockey on here has gotten me working on it more again. I used to be the only one on here doing much to do with hockey so its nice to see. Is your team still in the playoffs? -DJSasso (talk) 15:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Three Headed Knight. For all your work on the NHL templates, I give you this message. PiRSquared1 7 15:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing![reply]
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

DJSasso, No problem. I worked too late into the night last night, and did not realize you has split some of the seasons into their own article. I am in the process of undoing my damage :-\ --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I mostly only split them because in some cases they overwhelm the page. And since there are so few people that edit hockey here they can get out of date fast, by making them their own pages they can't really be out of date (once the season is done anyways). -DJSasso (talk) 16:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Formula One season

Thanks for a message. In Polish Wikipedia Team Lotus and Lotus Racing are in one article. Director "new" Lotus - Tony Fernandes, said that Lotus Racing continuing the tradition "old" Team Lotus, but you are right, both teams had common name only... --Flyz1 (talk) 18:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheKnight is User:The Three Headed Knight

IRC cloak

Hi. I see that you applied for a wikipedia/ cloak. However, we cannot give you a cloak without a registered nickname. So, you'd have to register your nick, TheKnight, and send a memo to wmfgc, confirming that you indeed want a cloak. Also, since your account is turning 3 months of age in 4 days, we won't be able to set a cloak before then. Thanks --Dungodung (talk) 21:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to send the meno to wmfgc, but received an error stating I was not logged on. I was going to wait a week, and try again. I am new to IRC. Is there someplace I need to register my nick first? Thanks.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 21:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have to register on IRC itself. Type /msg nickserv help register on IRC to get help regarding registering. After you have successfully registered your nick, you can send memos. --Dungodung (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you. I have now registered my nick. I will request the cloak in a couple of days.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Both of the active GCs are traveling after Wikimania (which includes me), so we are prevented from doing our regular GC duties. It will be done at some point. I believe Casey will be back home before me. Sorry for that... --Dungodung (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I just wanted to make sure I didn't make a mistake.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It can take awhile. Took me a couple months to get mine. -DJSasso (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For tirelessly doing the little things that keep the site running. Kansan (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template Holic

Hello. Hello. Hello. (One for each of your heads.) I see you enjoy working with templates. Keep up the good work.

Hello The Three Headed Knight, Polymathsj has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

 Polymathsj^Talk 04:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you, thank you. One of us is always smiling!--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 05:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for all your hard work with those boring templates! :) You're already such a great benefit to this project! By the way, do you think you'll need the flood flag right now? —Clementina talk 12:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome. I love boring templates

. I just finished the bulk of my changes. I woke up early, and realized I had failed to build the flag template for our friends in the great white north and could not get back to sleep!

I have not received any comments about my proposed change to the {{tl:flagicon}} template. Does that mean that everyone is in agreement, or did I overwhelm them with too much information?--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 12:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, but some (like me) simply might not be as clever as you in templates, and so don't really understand what you are talking about, and therefore forbear from commenting. ;) Anyway, thanks again for your great work, and please tell me if you ever need the flood flag or anything else I can help with! :) And by the way, you don't have to go to the trouble of putting a talkback on my page next time, as I've had your talk page watchlisted (I am a bit of a talk page stalker). Cordially, —Clementina talk 01:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Griffinofwales commented on my post, so now I know that as least two people have read it! :-) The flag templates are quite convoluted, and it cost this olde knight many hours and more than a few pages to understand how they work. Me thinks Rube Goldberg designed them. (oh no - another red-link

)--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 13:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many read it, as Clementina said, most of us a not template editors, too complex. If you think it will work and make things better and easier, then do it. We can always change it back. --Peterdownunder (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have tested it against dozens of pages. I exported every page linked to the templates, search the output for the calls, and checked everyone of them. My only concern is templates that pass parameters to {{flagicon}} in non-standard format. I have checked out a bunch of them, and they all look good. Griffinofwales suggested waiting five days before implementing. I will make an announcement on Wikipedia:Simple talk the day before the change over. BTW, I hope you are not still being held in the Eureka Stockade

--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its always good to leave a discussion open 5-7 days since people edit at different times. But it looks pretty good to me. I usually get frustrated with flagicons and end up just creating redirects at commons to fix them. ;) -DJSasso (talk) 16:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I accidentally rolled back your edit (I was trying to click on the diff below). πr² (talk • changes) 20:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have pleaded you case before the king himself, and all is forgiven. Try clicking those little diffs with a giant sword sometime

--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 20:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Ok. Please continue your work. Hazard-SJ^Talk 01:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found it

I found it, but it is actually "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks anyway for the idea. Hazard-SJ^Talk 20:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome. I am running beta, so I believe they renamed and rearrange a few things. Keep up the good work!--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 20:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Three Headed Knight/sandbox

Sorry for butting in again, but I happened to see this in NC (new changes)? Do you wish to contribute to the discussion at ST or simply test in your sandbox? With good intentions, :| TelCo NaSpVe :| 21:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote it, intending to post it in ST. Then I chickened out. I am not sure if it would be helpful, or make the situation worse. I kept it because I may still post it.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution and conversion

Please do not forget to attribute the source article when moving from another Wikipedia, and please don't forget to convert. If you have to, please convert only a section at a time, because as it is largely unconverted, and un attributed, it may be deleted soon. Thank you for your hard work. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 23:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are talking about 2007 Formula One espionage controversy. A bad store was coming in fast, so I had to shut-down fast. I am planning on finishing it up.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

Yes it should be merged. I am in high school and very interested in chemistry. But I am not autoconfirmed so I cannot move, although I am a more veteran editor on english wikipedia. Again, you can move it. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait. Chemical compounds have a definite structure. Chemicals do not. Chemical compounds are all chemicals, but all chemicals are not chemical compounds. Household ammonia is a chemical, but not a chemical compound. Sorry for wrong info. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 15:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flood

You are flooding. πr² (talk • changes) 15:25, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought AWB did not show up in RC.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 15:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your question at WP:AN. Are you done using AWB, or would you like to bot/flood flag? EhJJ^TALK 16:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would the flood flag. I am going to use undo, because these were bad change made in the first place. I would have sworn the last time I used AWB, it did not show up in new changes. I must be getting rusty.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article size

Hi, when I wrote my first article I see the show preview and I see the phrase:

This page is 32 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections

Why 32 KB? Nataly8 (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nataly8, that message is generated on large article to warn the editor. That is kind of an old limit. In the bad old days, some browsers could not handle large web pages. As I understand it, 32K was picked as a threshold for a large article. As long as you are not much over 32K, it should not be a problem.

I assume you are talking about List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes. If the article expands, say more books are added, they you may want to consider breaking the article into two or more articles. I see a problem with the the article. You use Avatar Wiki as a source a number of times. That may not be a valid source.

One more thing. When you leave a message for someone on their talk page, you should start a new section if the message is a new topic. If you click the + sign tab it will automatically create a new section.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about the sources: I saw this show, and I find this Avatar Wikia. I found articles for all the episodes, so I make them references. Nataly8 (talk) 16:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As for watching the show, that certainly helps you in terms of knowing about the subject, but you cannot write you own review. That would be a violation of No original research (NOR). As for the Avatar Wikia, I only took a quick look, but I don't know where they got their information because they have not credit anyone or listed any references (that I could find). It may be original research, they may have copied it from another, possibly copyright website. Verifiability states that "sources should be unimpeachable". I am just pointing out that Avatar Wikia may not meet that standard. --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 17:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how they work. Thanks for the help. Nataly8 (talk) 17:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Animated films

Hi. Did you have a category for animation films? Nataly8 (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Try Category:Animation, which has a bunch of different subcategories which may fit your need. :| TelCo NaSpVe :| 18:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes. I wish I solve the problem with the sources. Nataly8 (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sites such as tvguide, amazon should generally be considered reliable. imdb can provide a lot of information and a good starting point, but it is not always considered reliable, because it contains user contributed data, and does not have the editorial review that a source like tv guide would have.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for advices. I will try. I put all the articles about the episodes in the peer review. Nataly8 (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aang

		Congratulations
		With the best wishes for the future! Nataly8 (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We thank you most kindly, kind sir!--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sir? If you know my age... What about the article? It need some simplification, but I didn't find anything. Nataly8 (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used sir as a sign of respect, not referring to a persons age. I did assume you are a male, which I should not have. As to Aang, I have not seen the show. I looked over the article. Simplification will take a bit of work. I always struggle to find the balance of simple and complete.

Something you could work on is simplifying the sentence structure. For example, the article has

"The plot they described relates with the first and second episodes of the series, where the "water people" (Katara and Sokka) find the "air guy" (Aang) while "trapped in a snowy wasteland" (the Southern Water Tribe) with "some fire people [that] are pressing down on them" (Fire Navy and Zuko)."

This sentence is very complicated. Maybe this could become something like

The plot they talk about is the first two episodes of the series. There are Katara and Sokka, who are the "water people". They find Aang, who is the "air guy". Aang is "trapped in a snowy wasteland", the Southern Water Tribe. There are "some fire people [that] are pressing down on them". These people are Fire Navy and Zuko.

But the above leaves me with some questions. Is the Southern Water Tribe the snowy wasteland, or do they live there? I am not sure how the fire people are pressing down. That could be explained a little after the quote.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 15:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aang and Appa, his flying bison, were frozen in an iceberg for 100 years (too many :)) and Sokka and Katara free them. They live in a near village of South Pole, a little village withe 10-20 people. Nataly8 (talk) 15:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flood (2)

Would you like the flood flag? sonia ♫ 04:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you want to flood. If so, why don't you request the flood flag? Hazard-SJ^Talk 04:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia, yes. I didn't I had this many changed to make. I will post a note when I am finished.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 04:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Sonia.

Could I get the flag too? Hazard-SJ^Talk 04:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: You must log out and back on when using AWB, as you must have the flag before logged in. Hazard-SJ^Talk 05:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am finished my mass changes. Thanks for the flag.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 05:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Sonia.

great imprisonment

I don't think that was a test page; whilst it was deletable as a hoax (QD A6), it was not a blatant test. Just a note for future QD tagging. Cheers, sonia ♫ 06:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Sometimes it is hard to pick a category. Can we add a "I just don't want this page"

category? --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 06:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No one expects...

No one expects the Wikipedia Picture Book, but here is your copy to enjoy.

This editor is an **Apprentice Editor** and has the right to show this **Wikipedia Picture Book**.

--Peterdownunder (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All three heads feel very honored --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 14:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		Congratulations
		For your good and hard work in articles about cars! Nataly8 (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All three heads nod in thanks!--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Verify an update

It was true, but sort of trivial, so I removed it. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 15:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar!

For all of your work on Formula 1 related articles, I award you this barnstar! πr² (talk • changes) 23:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

πr² (talk • changes) 23:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We three thank you kindly.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, thanks for all the hard work you've been doing but just a little pointer, you don't need to add an internal link if the same link is found within the same paragraph or table, linking to it once in such an instance is generally sufficient. Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? 05:29, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I try not to in paragraphs. For the race results table, such as Formula One, I usually do. It seems to me to look better. Plus, with the larger tables, a desired link could be scrolled off the screen by the time someone wants to click on it. I am open to suggestions.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Thanks for the barnstar, it is nice to know that someone notices...which brings me to something I would have noticed had I not been busy with a shubbery (a nice little one with a sort of two tiered effect)...a new book for you, the Little Red Book. Congratulations Peterdownunder (talk) 10:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This editor is a **Journeyman Editor** and has the right to show this **Wikipedia Little Red Book**.

Hey there

Just saw your message on User talk:Clementina. After you move Template:Infobox football club to Template:Infobox Football club/doc, what happens afterwards? Thanks. RomeEonBmbo (talk) 23:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only difference will be that the documentation will be displayed when you go to the Template:Infobox Football club page. You can call the template as is, just be sure to use an upper case F. Cheers--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 23:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Please request the flood flag if you are to be flooding RC. — μ 00:22, Tuesday February 15 2011 (UTC)

Per User:Djsasso, flood flag is only for more than 100 changes. I will be doing a couple of dozen. --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 00:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response to "20th race in F1"

That's a very good point you made there. However, I can't help but see an empty row, but you do make a great point about next year. Did you already revert the edits removing the 20th race tablet? Thanks.

And yes, please call me Rome. Rome Eon Bmbo 18:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. And you can call me The Knight or just Knight if you like.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 02:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External link templates

Not trying to be a bother, but please don't subst external link templates. They are not subst'd on purpose so that if the webpage changes how they formulate their URL all that needs to be changed is the template and not every page that the link is on to fix the broken links. -DJSasso (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was just going by the instructions on Template:Imdb name under the Example section.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 19:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't notice it said that. Shouldn't be there. We aren't supposed to worry about server load. Anyways it wasn't that big a deal, just wanted to let you know in case you intended to do it to any others. -DJSasso (talk) 22:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patroller.

Hey there. I've just given you the patroller flag. This automatically marks your new pages as patrolled, and lets you patrol the pages in Special:NewPages, if that interests you. If that doesn't interest you, that's ok, the flag removes some workload from the admins and other patroller. Thanks for all of your good articles!--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 02:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you for the flag. I will do some patrolling. Happy to work on the articles too. --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 03:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Importer

You have to create an RfI page to get the "importer" flag. --SEPTActaMTA8235 (talk) 17:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 02:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Importer

I have assigned the transwiki importer permission. Please take a moment to review WP:IMPORT. Thank you. Jon@talk:~$ 18:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GAK! Wikipedia:Importers. Jon@talk:~$ 22:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, The Three Headed Knight. You have new messages at Hazard-SJ's talk page.
Message added 22:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whoops!

Thanks for letting me know. So do you usually do the updates for the F1 standings on the current season page? Rome Eon Bmbo 21:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Template:F1 season

The page you wrote, Template:F1 season, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Template:F1 season/doc

The page you wrote, Template:F1 season/doc, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Template:Lang fo

The page you wrote, Template:Lang fo, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Template:Lang is

The page you wrote, Template:Lang is, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. The Three Headed Knight (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Articles and Essays

Hi, thanks for telling me about citing the English Wikipedia. I'll keep that in mind it makes sense, since Wikipedia now works under the Creative Commons, and we don't have the revision history here. I've only got a couple more articles I want to add now. I'm trying get my to-do list done section-by-section, and since the first SEW article I used was developing countries, economic development is first on my to-do list. Out of curiosity, if I request importer privileges in two months, (or whenever I get to the next part of my to-do list), will it cite the English Wikipedia automatically?

Also, I will consider making an essay. I'd assumed there was one already actually, I just didn't bother to look for it. But I noticed that BE_1500 includes a lot of words my students certainly don't know, and excluding ones they do. I've also noticed that it entirely excludes phrasal verbs, despite the fact that my students know quite a lot of them. Is there by any chance a list of simple phrasal verbs already?
Thanks and regards, --Quintucket (talk) 06:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find a list of phrasal verbs. There was a list of verbs, but it was deleted. I found several discussions, such asWriting Simple English: Monosyllablism? and Phrasal verbs. The consensus seems to be to avoid them. And yes, Import will cite enwp (English Wikipedia). Cheers--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting discussions, I definitely disagree that phrasal verbs (or even idioms) should always be avoided, but there's a number of factors to consider. So yes, I'll definitely try to write something on that, though right now I'm trying to get a couple of groups of articles sorted out. But yeah, any rate, thanks again. --Quintucket (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the infobox on religious leader

I think that the 'infobox religious leader' needs the 'website' and the 'known' (known for) parameters. Sorry I'm unable to provide more suggestions. Thank you.--Soumit ban (talk) 15:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestions. I have included them, plus some others. A new and improved version is at User:The Three Headed Knight/TemplateTest. It is almost ready to go live. Need more documentation still. --The Three Headed Knight (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your changes to the article on Swami Vivekananda. Thanks.--Soumit ban (talk) 10:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Active users page

Dear 3HKt, I think you should consider being on the list of WP:Active users. Regards, Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the heads up.

--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 04:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Speed

Hey. Do you have any idea what Scott Speed is doing now? His article needs updating, but I'm not sure where he is racing. I don't think he is racing in the Nascar Nationwide Series anymore, and I've not seen him in F1. Any idea? Thanks!--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 04:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think he has done any racing since the the Red Bull Cup team released/fired him in 2010. I looks like he is suing the team, and has just won a lien on their property in North Carolina. I'll take a look at his article.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome thanks! I had completely forgotten that had happened. Article looks good! --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 17:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning users

Don't forget to leave a message on the talk page of user's who have made a change that is not constructive. Since Twinkle seems to be broken, I like to use Vandal Warner. It's quite helpful. :) MJ94 (talk) 20:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Radiator

Hi there! I just wondered if you are going to improve and wikify radiator? I was almost clicking the delete button while you patrolled it. :-) -Barras (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I will. I was just called away from my computer for a while.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. I just saw it. Good work! -Barras (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Template:Infobox settlement/mi2km2

The page you wrote, Template:Infobox settlement/mi2km2, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Osiris (talk) 07:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Template:Infobox settlement/mi2km2/doc

The page you wrote, Template:Infobox settlement/mi2km2/doc, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Osiris (talk) 07:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Template:Infobox settlement/permi2km2

The page you wrote, Template:Infobox settlement/permi2km2, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Osiris (talk) 07:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]