User talk:TrueCRaysball/Archive/3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk Page Archives

Jun. 2008 - Jul. 2008

† UserspaceNavigation


Archive 2 |
Archive 3
| Archive 4


So you're the editor formerly known as Hornetman. LOL, sorry. You have become something of a "legend" In the normal Wikipedia where I am an active editor. You've changed alot. Maybe this wikipedia is more easy, no? Anyways leave me a message. I would love to help you expand articles.SimonKSK 19:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Okay...That's gonna be tough. You mean Simple like "said" instead of "stated"?SimonKSK 20:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay I'll try, I mean "attempt" ;)SimonKSK 20:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Who do you think is gonna win the TLC match? And shouldn't we add more PPVs?SimonKSK 02:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]


A StatusBot has now been implimented on this Wikipedia. Feel free to follow the instructions at User:SoxBot to set up your Status. Cheers, Razorflame 03:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because you're Nice!

Untitledangel.jpg The IuseRosary Barnstar - For all things Nice
Because you are all things nice : ) A Nice editor and a Nice person. It hasn't gone unoticed. IuseRosary? (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:ChristianMan16/sandbox/WrestleMania 21 has to many red links. Once it is posted it's needs to have on there {{redlinks}} you may add it now your later

Cheers, Running  talk  23:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Userpage Barnstar!

Userpage barnstar.svg The Excellent Userpage Award
This is for the great looking userpage you created --  AmericanEagle  19:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Night of Champions ready....

There was almost nothing to change, but change it if I missed anything....


SimonKSK 22:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Thanks! So which PPV should I do next?SimonKSK 23:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WM21 ready for checking.... User:ChristianMan16/sandbox/WrestleMania 21 SimonKSK 00:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

OK....SimonKSK 00:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Done! Can you tell me how to do a green check? User:SimonKSK/Sandbox/WWE Brand Extension. SimonKSK 01:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

User:SimonKSK/Sandbox/WWE Royal RumbleSimonKSK 01:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I'm working on it... --  AmericanEagle  19:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done - I started it. But I have to go. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  19:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I guess I didn't, those socks were on Ben and LuR's feet a few days ago. lol. Sorry about opposing you in the RfA, I had it neutral at first, but then Razor told me that wasn't allowed. But you're doing way much better now. Also, are you still HornetMan? Or did they change it yet. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  20:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, is that so. I could give you an endorsement or ask them myself to change you. Could that work? --  AmericanEagle  20:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Who should I ask? I'm now checking... --  AmericanEagle  21:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Started, now I have to go. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  21:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That is so awesome! Special thanks should go to Alison. Congrats! --  AmericanEagle  19:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm going to miss him... just kidding, I never met him. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  20:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reverting my move of 12 rounds.

Are you saying that this isn't notable? Clearly, that article is notable. Cheers, Razorflame 03:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RE: Your RfA

This is hard to explain. Listen ... (I'm rewriting this over and over) ... I think that you are on the right path, and you're not a sock-puppeteer anymore. At first, I did vote neutral, but I found out that that wasn't allowed. But being an admin (or so I hear) is much more complicated that it looks. I mean, having that kind of tools cannot be just handed out. It has to completely untrusted. Also, you've been mostly editing wrestling-related articles only (at least for the most part, but I am partly guilty of that with Christian-related articles). I think that it takes much more experience (that's why I haven't run). As for not liking your reasons, anyone would like to have them to delete and for moving there articles, but it is more special then that. And you shouldn't say you expect to fail, only run to win. I hope you understand what I'm saying. No hard feelings? Cheers --  AmericanEagle  03:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See, if I ran, I would be opposed by some. That doesn't mean I'm a bad editor, just that I'm not quite ready (which, I doubt that I am right now). I get what you mean by "That's what you know about," I've tried to explain that to people with my Christian articles. I like working on those. Just if you see formatting mistakes in articles, or typos, or such, just make sure you work on those and keep you eyes open to errors. You'll find them, even if you aren't looking for them and focusing on Wrestling as long as you try. You don't have to create or expand articles you have no clue about, just every once in a white click "Show any page" and check an article. But that is not wholly why I was neutral/weak oppose. Also, next time I notice the Rays playing, I'll root for them! lol. I like the Tigers, mostly all Detroit sports. But I am starting to fully trust you (along with most of the other editors here), so keep at it, you'll get. Before doing, (just a piece of advice), ask an admin if you're ready. That's the road I've chosen. Thanks for eading my long messages. Cheers --  AmericanEagle  04:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Gold barnstar 2.png American Eagle's Barnstar of Excellence
For your killing Hornetman16, I award you my Barnstar! --  AmericanEagle  18:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Working Wikimedian's Barnstar.png The Working Man's Barnstar
For you creating very long and very informative articles on wrestling people and stuff, I hear by award you this Barnstars! --  AmericanEagle  18:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I nominated the redirect for quick deletion because nobody, absolutely nobody, will type that in as a search for the WWE Diva's Championship. Note that the R3 criteria also accommodates "uncommon redirect" per the template instructions. I'll renominate for {{qd}} again if that's okay. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, please note that en-wiki redirects WWE Diva's Championship to WWE Women's Championship - do you know something (which you can verify) that the rest of us don't? I would recommend adding some references. Plus, deleting that redirect should have no effect on the template you've referred me to as the article on reigns should most definitely not exist yet since the tournament has not even been hosted once! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, you don't need to "create" a redirect for an article which doesn't exist (and won't until there's been at least one instance of this championship). I'm confused why you think this list is needed right now? Besides the template (which can be adjusted when required) there's no requirement for this page at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Given that the SmackDown! title is as much a seperate entity as the WWE Championship, ECW championship (WWE) and the World Heavyweight Championship are from from each other, combining the SmackDown! and RAW womens titles as one single title is just as wrong combining those three. The entire aim of the brand separation (excluding the ECW/Smackdown! and soon to be ECW/RAW colaberation) is to give seperate identities to each product's performers. With rare exceptions, WWE has kept each brand entirely seperate. (Cross over's do exist mainly as a special appearence or brand vs brand confrontation and certain performers - Hornswoggle/Finlay - have cross over status due to storylines but overall, they are two seperate groups) -- Creol(talk) 08:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Rest assured should I wish to know more about the wrestling articles here I'll ask those whom I think would be most useful. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Sorry to quit our "SIG Group," but I created (myself) a new sig. How's it look? I won't be on much or any on Sunday, I'm sure you understand. Good night Aaron. Cheers -- ApEtSIG 04:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maybe, it's a work in progress, I think. Good-night -- ApEtSIG 06:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I didn't finish the WWE US championship, I only put it there for futher use. It's not simple yet.SimonKSK 17:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

RE: My thoughts...

I just now was able to get on my computer. I think that it looks unique (and cool). Cheers -- ApEtSIG 04:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maybe, should it test run? I would test it out for awhile. Got to go in a minute. Cheers -- ApEtSIG 04:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good-night -- ApEtSIG 04:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good morning :) -- ApEtSIG 20:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Will attempt, it's very long. -- ApEtSIG 22:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not fully done, but I think that I may have to go in a moment. Cheers -- ApEtSIG 22:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


You are User:Hornetman16 on ENWP using your global account. (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, he's actually User:ChristianMan16 over there, and we ENWP folks are already aware of the situation - Alison 16:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And on that note ...

... you really need to see this. If you wish to make a statement here, I'll gladly post it over yonder. But just one statement and no long conversations, okay? Glad to have helped on this one! - Alison 16:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ping! Check my talk page - Alison 20:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My sig...

But you have to admit, it looks pretty cool. At least, that's what I thought. Cheers -- America alk 03:37, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Turning a comment into a vote

Hey CM16, can you explain why you turned a comment into an oppose vote per this please? Vector has already added a comment in the support section and I don't think it's appropriate for you to modify the position or content of his comment. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Time out

Not that you're doing it, but can we drop the arguing for awhile. Thanks -- America alk 22:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Not sure, cool clock by the way. -- America alk 22:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That should work. -- America alk 23:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Guess that it doesn't. It still looks great anyway. Cheers -- America alk 23:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


For me this is a vandalism, can you explain what you done? --vector ^_^ (talk) 06:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Do you badly need the image I restored? Other admins don't exactly agree with me, and want me to redelete it. Maxim (talk | editor review) 22:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Could you review me? Thanks -- America alk 04:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Aren't you interested in something other than wrestling, kid? John Stalvern (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


How was church? -- America alk 03:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really, that wouldn't be fun. -- America alk 03:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]
Now I feel bad. I had a good day - though I'm all burnt up. -- America alk 03:16, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, I give you a brake you backsliding. lol. Thank God (really) you had those 40 miles left. -- America alk 03:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]
You must've liked those Star Wars episodes. (hint, hint) -- America alk 03:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It was pretty good (at least, good effects and an "epic" feeling you got in it). Plus we watched it in theaters, so that makes almost any movie better. If we were on en:WP, we would both be blocked for turning this into a chat room for friends (I mean, I would lol). -- America alk 03:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]
Yes, but I've gotten that warning message there. Even though a Muslim just asked what I thought about his religion, so I answered him. They're annoying there. Still working on those Star Wars articles, hey! You do know about something besides wrestling! I'm working on my final draft of Charles Spurgeon, that's taking work. -- America alk 03:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editor review

Hello Christianman. I just wanted to tell you I joined the Christian WikiProject. And I was hoping if you could review me. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My revert

I reverted the changes to RF's RfA as the problem with figuring out the count was not in the use of the templates. Vector and my votes were easy enough to understand and there was no need to make an emphasis that we were opposing since we listed it under the oppose section supplying the main reason as being per M/ so the change was both unneeded and a change to what the editors actually said (not in what they meant as the changes you made did not change that, but their word choice and it is thier right to make their point as they feel is right). It was clear that we were in opposition. Half the other opposes are not so clear given points I brought up in the comments about people thinking through there position before saying something about the matter and having to actually search through the history to ensure the original commenter was the one who struck their votes.. or such as maxim, voted oppose, struck that and voted strongly oppose.. oi.. couldn't he just reply to his own vote and emphasis the point rather than causing more headaches??... -- Creol(talk) 06:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]



Hello, I am in the process of "re-vamping" Evolution so that it can still be a very good article. I invite yxou to contribute what oyu think can be done. In the revampled article I created a section called Responses to the idea of evolution. It links to Social responses to the idea of evolution as a main article. When the first ideas of evolution began to be discussed (afaik Lamarckism) there were of course people who did not like it; ever since, people have talked about it.

I would be glad if you could do a proofreading/copyediting

All the best --Eptalon (talk) 15:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Why thank you, I appreciate it. But remember, "None is good but God." :) Cheers -- America alk 04:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I knew what you meant. So, how was Star Wars this week? -- America alk 05:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, so you went to church? That's good. Cheers -- America alk 16:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Better? On my sig, I only changed the color :) Cheers -- America †alk 20:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This was my week not to go to church. Had to stay home :) -- America †alk 01:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


SimonKSK here. Can you help me on The Invasion? Thanks. (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, forgot to login.SimonKSK 20:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi I am Woohoo855 on youtube. you should know me because you subscribed to me see you around. Baseball16 Talk to me My Edits 00:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey can you help me out. I am making an article about Chris Parks in my sandbox and I need help "simplifing it".Baseball16 23:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes please.Baseball16 23:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
On my userpage it should say FIRST SIMPLE ARTICLE (yet to be finished). That is where the article is.Baseball16 23:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
as you are really busy I did the whole TNA part but I don't think I simplified it enough.Baseball16 02:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK good night also we can be compared about our WP Past. If you don't want to talk about it it is fine.this is me on WikiPedia

In other words when will you be on tommorow?Baseball16 02:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know this is a little early but here you go.
Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar.png The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For helping me simplify articles I, ThePageChanger (formally Baseball16) give you this barnstar. Cheers, The Page Changer 16:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]
Aaron you there?The Page Changer 17:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK until then I will try to work on the Chris Parks article.The Page Changer 18:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey are you really Bo Bice's Third Cousin? Also are you online so we can work on that article? Tell me if you are.The Page Changer 14:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
WOW so lets finish the Chris Parks article today.The Page Changer 19:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK I will.The Page Changer 20:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Even though the template doesn't look important, it is used like {{!}}. Because of some bugs in the software, this is need to combine templates and tables, because they both use the | character. I've closed your RfD as keep, since this is a very widely used template.--Werdan7T @ 06:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agree. I was going to add my "speedy keep" !vote by I edit conflicted with Werdan7. It is a widely used template if you look what links to it and it will just "mess up" all those pages if deleted. The rest I was going to say at WP:RfD was basically mentioned above by Werdan7. -- RyanCross (talk) 06:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Tossing in my own "Dear God, No!" on this one. The two "table" templates ({{!}} and |-) are workarounds for dealing with the limitations of the Parser functions (mainly the #if: statement although also greatly affects #ifequal: and #switch:) used in many templates. Using |- and | in many of these templates causes them to get confused as to if that is a wiki-table function (most often is) or a deliminator of the parser function (which is usual thinks it is but rarely is correct). These bypass the need to have to totally abandon wiki-markup when dealing with conditional table entries and having to use HTML markup (tr and td tags - both opening and closing) to deal with table cells and rows. The mediawiki update back in Feb 2008 caused issues with how this templates are read and treated ({{!}} is no longer needed inside piped links in parser statement) but for overall table design, they is usualy essential. -- Creol(talk) 08:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Title changes

As I was watching the draft last week, I dreaded the expected outcome from NoC on Sunday. Mainly the one that would result in a major rewrite of the belts articles. (Triple H beating Cena and Batista beating Edge and the belts being switched between brands yet again). Tossing in Glenn Jacobs moving to RAW with the belt and a NoC match with no ECW competitor scheduled and this looked like a major fiasco from an editing stand point (Thank you Teddy long and Mark Henry for that little help at least). While not expecting the CM Punk angle instead of the obvious Batista one, I had a feeling we were looking at article rewrites to get them to the newly correct brands. I noticed you fixed the infobox's on each belt, but the overall text of the articles had not been changed. I updated the WWE championship (Raw to Smackdown), World Heavyweight Championship (WWE) (Smackdown to Raw) and WWE draft (effects on championships) to their current status (not exactly new status as we are just back to where we were before the Cena/Batista draft shift corrected the titles to WWE championship being on RAW as the historic WWE/WWF/WWWF belt on the "A" brand). I am not certain if I added a comment to the ECW side of the situation about the belt move and it return and if there are other pages dealing with this history I may have missed them as well. I covered Hardy's US title belt change under the drafts effects on belts, but never got around to checking the main article itself to make certain it was up to date as an ECW belt. Since you pay the most attention to the articles, I thought it best to make certain you were informed of these changes I made to the articles. -- Creol(talk) 08:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I was wondering what it is you wanted done to Chris Benoit? I couldn't expand it much, for I don't know much about him, but I could do copyediting/other work if you wanted some. I thought it looked like a fairly good article, aside from the red links and other minor work. If you want help on something on it, just ask. Cheers -- America †alk 18:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy Independence Day To You As Well!!!!

July 5...

Party's over. Cheers -- America †alk 05:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Very true. Sadly, I didn't do any sparklers and off-the-ground fireworks are illegal in Michigan, but we had fun and celebrated anyway. Plus my brother came home last night - right before going to our city's fireworks show. God bless, and I still am able to say it, America. Cheers ChristianMan16 -- America †alk 05:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh my,

How awesome. I've added it to my page. Cheers -- America †alk 16:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Have you seen my new userpage. Also I am still looking for sources for Chris Parks's Ring Name. The Page Changer 17:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

I made an account at your WIKIA. Look on your talk page there.  ThePageChanger 01:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

I dunno.  ThePageChanger 14:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Oh I didn't know what sig you meant.  ThePageChanger 00:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

User:ThePageChanger/CookieTemplate  ThePageChanger 15:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

My Request for Adminship

A word from Daniel

Hi ChristianMan. I just wanted to drop by to tell you that Daniel of the English Wikipedia told me to tell you he said "hi" to you. He told me to tell you a few hours ago. Thanks, RyanCross (talk) 07:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


I need help on the invasion storyline. Im going on vacation soon.

P.S. Im typing from a Sidekick Slide!—This unsigned comment was added by SimonKSK (talkchanges) 19:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


I laughed so hard: [1]. --Gwib -(talk)- 00:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Haha, they just start throwing chairs into the ring. "Please do not throw chairs into the ring", that was funny also. :D -- RyanCross (talk) 00:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Sig

I just thought you'd like to know your sig is too long per WP:SIG. Could you reduce it?--   ChristianMan16  17:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What part of WP:SIG am I breaking? Your markup takes up a lot more space than what mine does. It goes onto FIVE lines. ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) (wikiproject collaboration) 18:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not the code part it's the physical part....and my code is THREE lines on my screen.--   ChristianMan16  19:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Right, well sorry, no I won't be changing it right now. The wikiproject collaboration is only a temp thing. Anyway, have you seen other peoples sigs? Mine is nothing compared to theirs. Infact, my sig is hardly very big at all. I made it so thats its quite small, compact. Sorry, not changing. ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) (wikiproject collaboration) 19:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry to but in but just so you know I have finished WWE The Great American Bash and moved it into mainspace.  ThePageChanger 21:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. ;) --TBC 14:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why you say that?--   ChristianMan16  16:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Guess. The pot calling the kettle black and so forth... ← κεηηε∂γ (talk) (wikiproject collaboration) 21:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This topic is escalating into an argument. All participants are reminded of policy and that personal attacks may culminate in a block. mc8 15:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


AzaToth doesn't have his/her twinkle script on this Wikipedia, see User:AzaToth/twinkle.js, it's blank. Cassandra 01:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Please Review me. Click on the "Changer" in my sig.ThePageChanger! 19:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC) Reply[reply]

PLEASE REVIEW ME NOW!!!!!!!!!! ThePageChanger! 20:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's StaticFalcon! (talk)

See my userpage. (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I can help is you want. (talk) 19:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'll be working on it in my sandbox. (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sig's done. see the bottom of my sandbox. (talk) 19:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Hi! I'm just here to alert you that your signature violates this. If you could change it, that would be great. Thanks! SwirlBoy39 20:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]


So whats up and do you want the barnstar yet? StaticFalcon08:55, Wednesday June 7 2023 (UTC)