User talk:TrueCRaysball/Archive/6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk Page Archives


Feb. 2009 - Feb. 2009

† UserspaceNavigation

Sig

← Archive 5 |
Archive 6
| Archive 7 →


Time feature disabled

I have disabled your time feature. It continues to exist interfering with the DIFF page when I use the history page on your talk. I use FF. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 22:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should talk to me first cause I like it as it is, You should please try to explain it's problem on your screen to me then I will decide what to do.-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r

Time feature

I posted a note to the wrong talk page. The note said

Time feature disabled

I have disabled your time feature. It continues to exist interfering with the DIFF page when I use the history page on your talk. I use FF. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Don't you think your revert here was a bit disruptive. It is really not recommended to break the interface. Sorry for not sending the note first. NonvocalScream (talk) 23:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is my talk page, I'd rather discuss it with me first so I can find out the exact problem, and no it's not disruptive.-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 23:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Please fix it at your pleasure. Kind regards, NonvocalScream (talk) 23:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked it out and it wasn't interfering for me, if you could get me a screen shot, it would be helpful.-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 23:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Screenshotcm16.png. Best NonvocalScream (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What look like what happening is that you have JavaScript disabled, if you enable that on your end it should solve the problem, your gonna have to discuss FireFox on how to do that. The box is designed to collapse, which doesn't work without JavaScript.-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 23:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
JS is enabled on my end, but I'll look into other things. Perhaps it is me. NonvocalScream (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eastvillagegroupie (talk) 16:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Spanish Article

Hello again, I hope I am not bothering you, but could you take a look at this article: Jordan Galland (the spanish version) my Spanish is pretty terrible..and you seem to be good at this, thanks! this is my favorite singer! besides Sean Lennon!173.33.21.101 (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

user Precious Roy

Do you have any recommendations for this guy? he keeps sending me rude and abusive messages..I don't know what I have done to him?

http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:173.33.21.101&diff=cur

thanks!

Eastvillagegroupie (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

There is a problem. There is no "2008 in professional wrestling" article in the enwiki. There is a category named "2008 in professional wrestling". Unfortunately, When I type Category:2008 in professional wrestling|2008, the link and 2008 do not show. I try to see what I can do. SimonKSK 22:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I can do is unlink "2008" SimonKSK 22:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done with Armageddon (2008). SimonKSK 22:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I'll propose it now. SimonKSK 00:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful...

You do realise edits such as this bored on meatpuppetry? This edit here suggests you know you getting the other user to proxy for you. Such actions, if continued, will only ensure you are never allowed to return to EN, and will outweigh any attempts you have made to reform your behaviour Soup Dish (talk) 22:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other end of this discussion is here.-- † CM16 t c r

your sig

is 370 characters. That is ridiculous. Please change it, or if you want, I can make you one. §imon 22:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to make a whole new sig? §imon 22:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done The first one has the original colors that you have in your current sig, and the second one has the colors you requested.

1. -- † CM16 t c r
2. -- † CM16 t c r
Both barely go under the 255 mark. They are both 252. If you are asking what I shortened, I removed useless font tags, and I redirect User:CM16 to your page. SimonKSK 23:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect use of rollback

CM16, you can't use rollback to revert users removing content from their own talk pages. See en:Wikipedia:TALK#User talk pages for the reasoning as to why you can't. Cheers, Razorflame 03:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your use of rollback Cman. You have been warned several times before and had it removed before. Kennedy (talk) 08:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe we're talking about this? If so, I have to agree. IPs are allowed to remove content off their talk pages, even if they are warnings. It's not vandalism at all, it is perfectly fine. You can gain rollback again when you have shown you have learned from this. — RyanCross (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I didn't know IPs got that right, also.-- † CM16 t c r 09:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I read you request now, yes. --vector ^_^ (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My RfB

Dear ChristianMan16, thank you for participating in my RfB, which ended with a tally of 21/5. I understand your concerns but please be assured that I will do my best in this new role. Thanks. Chenzw  Talk  08:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Be sure to watchlist Jake Hager and Against All Odds (2009) when you have the time. Just letting you know, in case of vandals. SimonKSK 21:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, I'm done with the The Invasion (professional wrestling). Finally! SimonKSK 02:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signature - Wikicup?

Thanks for the signature recommendation. Could you add your two cents about the Wikicup at the talk page? Thanks, obentomusubi 04:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I responded to your response at the Wikicup talk page. obentomusubi 08:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PW

Is there Wikiproject pro wrestling here on simple? Thanks.  ←Kalajan→  17:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck. Seems to be a lot less drama than the enWP project. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An immensley lovely thought. Actually, I also have non WP:PW articles in my sandbox on En that I might simple-up and bring over. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not too familiar with project pages so I can't help there. I'll be bringing over my sign and whatnot later tonight. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Yeah, sure, I can do it. SimonKSK 21:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, while we can write in universe, we should write OOU, as simple does not shorter. If we want people to understand wrestling more, we should help them understand by writing OOU. Example: They might not understand what a heel is. SimonKSK 23:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
When reading, people like to keep reading, rather than drift away into another topic. That's what Special:Random is for. SimonKSK 19:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Or [[heel (wrestling)|villian]]?SimonKSK 19:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They might think that it has something to do with a foot....>.> SimonKSK 19:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
bad guy sounds too simple...

RE:

Yah great I'll join.  ←Kalajan→  14:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kalajan

To be honest, I really wanted to help this person and gave them loads of advice and pointed out errors; always kindly. I can point you in the direction of DOZENS of problem posts, insults, policy violations and general naughtiness. I do believe in second chances, but you have to take them; not spit them back in the face of the community that is offering them. fr33kman t - c 21:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a new mesg at my place fr33kman t - c 21:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Oh, well. BTW, I disagree with a year block, because he did the same thing on en. We tolerated him too much. Maybe, I'll ask someone at en to join simple, and we can reopen it. Also, me and you a tag team. What's our finisher ChristianSplash? SimonKSK 21:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe...ROFL.-- † CM16 t c r 21:13, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sure. A tag team. I'll just make stable over there. By myself. :-9 Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hazardous ChristianSplash? o.O SimonKSK 21:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So you'll join?-- † CM16 t c r 21:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I enjoyed editing the articles but enWP:PW had so much drama that I had to step back. It'd be nice for it to be fun again. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yay! The stable has formed! SimonKSK 21:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll go de-closify the project.-- † CM16 t c r 21:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I change here and there. And, yeah, I'll go invite some users. SimonKSK 15:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, I'd like to contribute to the project but I usually check from work, so I'll work on articles in my sandbox when I can. Anyone got one I should start off with? Hazardous Matt (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I'll pick one and and start it some time this weekend. Hazardous Matt (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hey, you got rollback. Congratulations! Fancy watching the project for a little bit (lots of vanadlism at the moment) as I'm trying to heavily edit two articles and it's distracting me ;) fr33kman t - c 20:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow....

13-time champ. Damn. I was rooting for the Undertaker. SimonKSK 01:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like it. They are pushing him too hard. It better Taker vs. HHH at WM25. SimonKSK 02:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Too soon? SimonKSK 02:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
HBK vs JBL?-- † CM16 t c r 02:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HBK. duh. SimonKSK 02:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was asking if the match was next-- † CM16 t c r 02:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, Jack and Finlay is next. SimonKSK 02:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Way Out (2009)‎‎

Enjoyed it? :-) fr33kman t - c 04:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was so-so....we'll see after Raw tomorrow night.-- † CM16 t c r 06:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Poke*

Hi. How are you? Cheers, Razorflame 06:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imperative Hornetman-related matter

I have proposed here that your community ban on ENWP be officially lifted. I am doing this per WP:BOLD, WP:AGF, and an e-mail I just got from User:Kalajan. --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 00:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not so sure how they (@ ANI) should take your response. I posted a notice about it there, if that's OK. Also, if unblocked, would you agree to Shapiros10 (talk · contribs) being your mentor? --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 11:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
One final question; are you interested in returning to ENWP at this time? --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 12:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I find it astonishing that you haven't even asked that before launching the appeal? Kennedy (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. I feel stupid because of this. CM16, my apologies for this incident. --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 14:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No I woudn't mind about Shapiros. And yes I'm willing to return when ever.-- † CM16 t c r 15:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry CM16, but EN really doesn't like me as a mentor. :( Oh well. Shapiros10 15:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It really is sad, Sam would be a good mentor. I guess Wikipedia is not ready for you, yet CM16 SimonKSKContradict me... 16:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, Sam, EN might not like you as a mentor, but I bet SE does. :-) So, CM16, when would you next be ready for an unblock from EN? Your ban's two-year anniversary? Christmas? No answer required. Also, on an irrelevant side note, while we're all here, who's up for some s'mores? --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 16:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While you guys are eating smores, how about you criticize me? Just saying.... SimonKSKContradict me... 16:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just let me get our materials for the s'mores, and I'll hop over to your review. Hmmm... I know I had some ingredients somewhere... AHA! Here they are! In the kitchen! --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 16:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! The Kitchen's in Giza! Cool! 18:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
I suppose it's not out of the question if we cook our s'mores on the sand.... OOH OOH HOT HOT! :P --Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 18:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, guys, I was originally gonna try after WrestleMania 25 but now I guess I'll wait for the two year anniversary.-- † CM16 t c r 20:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be unblock on the english Wikipedia, you need to prove in your contributions here that you have matured, and can be trusted back on the site. I'm not saying you haven't because I've not looked at your contributions, but that was one of the main reasons it was opposed at AN. iMatthew (talk) 22:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What wrestlamania, r u fan?

Hey how to email you, i have some ideas on how to improve wiki but can only tell one person!

An account

Is User:CM16 your account? I'd also like to find out why Simon redirected the userpage and usertalk a little more than a week before the account was created. Synergy 04:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was reducing a sig, so I redirect that page. I didn't know he was going to make an account. SimonKSKContradict me... 21:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Fairfield#Sig request: "The above examples are a little longer than the 3 line limit, but you can shorten it by creating an account with a name like CM16" might explain it. :) Toliar (talk) 00:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toliar hit it on the head, that's exactly why I did it, oh and to prevent impersonation, I seem to be a target of that.-- † CM16 t c r 04:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CM16

What do you think of the work that I did here and here? SimonKSKContradict me... 21:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Yeah, we need to get rid of the red links. SimonKSKContradict me... 20:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Removing red links by removing the [[]], right. Because, if we have to create them.......... SimonKSKContradict me... 20:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We might have to split this up. I'll take nWo, and you can take Kurt Angle.Anyway, since we're talking WP:PW stuff, shouldn't we tell Matt? SimonKSKContradict me... 15:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. SimonKSKContradict me... 20:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I want to to get Royal Rumble (2009) to GA status. I'm getting rid of red links by creating new articles. I fixed the template. Help would be nice. SimonKSKContradict me... 17:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Remember how that table in Royal Rumble (2009) was full of red links? Not anymore! SimonKSKContradict me... 18:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

It's the official name. It may say Wrestlemania 25 on the WWE.com sidebar, but that's to shorten space. 25th Anniversary of WrestleMania is obviously promotion, so that's not it. The reason that there is no "XXV" is because you can't write XXVth Anniversary of WrestleMania XXV, right? SimonKSKContradict me... 20:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, it's used every time. It's to make a bigger impact. 25th Anniversary sounds more exciting than WrestleMania XXV. Also, if you look at the bar to your left here, you can see that the name is WrestleMania XXV. The search thing is somewhat similiar to w:WP:GOOGLEHITS. SimonKSKContradict me... 21:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
? Did you look at the link I showed you? The left sidebar says, "WrestleMania XXV." Not "WrestleMania 25," or "25th Anniversary of WrestleMania." WrestleMania XXV is the official name. SimonKSKContradict me... 15:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it does mean something. If the sidebar has WrestleMania XXV on the main WrestleMania page, instead of others, then that's the official name. At this point, I would ask for a third opinion an WP:ST. Also, did you check what I wrote the section above? SimonKSKContradict me... 18:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The link's not working for me. What does it say? SimonKSKContradict me... 20:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. I don't watch NASCAR, though. SimonKSKContradict me... 20:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Donaldson

Hi, good ?morning? Regarding this article. An award of the Victoria Cross has always been taken as notable in its own right on enWP and I think that the same would happen for seWP. The logic behind this (as far as I can glean) is that there are so few of them and it takes so much to get one. (I beleive the same goes for the Medal of Honour winners in the US) Cheers :) fr33kman t - c 07:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CM16 your use of the qd tag was not appropriate in this case - if you had an issue with article you should have used the rfd tag--Peterdownunder (talk) 07:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Peter, I replied to you personally, and as for fr33kman, the medal is notable yes, but that doesn't automatically make a recipient notable. Just like it doesn't make a recipient of a Medal of honor notable (the US equivalent).-- † CM16 t c r 08:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: I have replied to you both personally.-- † CM16 t c r 09:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Rumble (2009)

I'm trying to get this to GA status, and I wanted your opinion on something. Near the eliminations table, I put 2pics to make it look better. I put Randy Orton, and Santino. Orton, cause he's the winner, and Santino, cause of his elimination record. Is this a good idea? Also, if you want you can create The Royal Rumble stubs. Just the lead and the infobox. Make it like the lead of Royal Rumble (2009). SimonKSK 20:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just finished Chavo Guerrero, Jr.. Coincidence? BTW, I could have made the "Let it Rock" article and "Kevin Rudolf". Yeah, I'll make Vickie too. SimonKSK 21:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clamb

Hi! "the guy you reverted was on the right track": You are false. I reverted i love you. Regards, Barras (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youre right the "i love you" should be reverted, but I think it should have been edited out with out a undo button, cand the of to and was right.-- † CM16 t c r 21:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now I see what you mean. I saw on only the i love you and reverted. I'm not perfect. To err is human. Sorry. Barras (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE Christianity

The irony of being called biased in the context in which you did so by a persona such as yours, is, well, astoundingly acrid.

RE: Biting; that I am new to simple-pedia by no means indicates I am new to the wikiuniverse. Phentos (talk) 07:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your steadfast hold to your work. I would like to draw to your attention a statement you made, however: ´´(I thought it made the article atheistic)´´. Do you think something with a NPOV is one which is Christian? I cannnot imagine you would. P/t
That is understandable. I think you may be misconceiving the meaning of ´Atheistic´, though. In that context it would mean ´´a lack of belief in a god or gods´´. When one removes belief, one is left with fact -- which is exactly what NPOV is all about. P/t
It is not unintentional. It is intentional. The article is not a brochure, and unless youre trying to say that the article should be written from a Christian perspective the de facto position is an atheistic one.P/t

Thanks

Just a note to say thanks, TrueCRaysball/Archive, for your comments and vote in my RFB which closed as successful with 25 supports and no opposes. It is my second unanimous request, which I find astounding. In my previous thanks (from where I stole the code for this one) I promised you I would do my best as an admin. I promise I will continue to do my best as an editor, admin and 'crat, and I won't let you down! Thanks again, Kennedy (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links....

Don't forget. :) TheAE talk 05:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DID I MISS THAT?! :D-- † CM16 t c r 05:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Shall we write a proposal for the ability to upload images on seWP then? The debate has stalled but I think that we should try and work on a fair-use policy proposal and see if it flies and then see if we can get image upload enabled? What do you say? fr33kman t - c 23:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TrueCRaysball/Archive/6&oldid=8884402"