User talk:Wielbiciel Papieża

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RfD nomination of Template:QD warning[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Template:QD warning, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Template:QD warning and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. DaneGeld (talk) 13:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017[change source]

Please do not change or exclude RFD tags from pages which are marked as such. We do not wrap RFD templates in a noinclude tag. This is merely a courtesy note to advise you not to do this again. DaneGeld (talk) 13:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

I note that you have undone my edit to your template. I will ask you again, please do NOT revert this change. Regardless of what you do elsewhere or how you do things in other places, on THIS wiki, we do not wrap RFD templates within a NOINCLUDE. Please DO NOT do this again, or you may be reported for vandalism. DaneGeld (talk) 13:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
@DaneGeld: we do in the case of an RFD on a template. Only (talk) 13:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
@Only: Fair enough. That's Twinkle's fault then, not mine. I've never been shown otherwise. Regardless, the changes being made by this editor are not useful. DaneGeld (talk) 13:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
In the end YOU are responsible for all your edits, not Twinkle. It's not "Twinkle's fault." Only (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
So even though Twinkle doesn't add a noinclude when you nom a template, it's my fault for not knowing that, not Twinkle's for not putting it there? Whatever. DaneGeld (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

One strike warning[change source]

Because of your blocks on two different Wikimedia projects, you are subject to our one strike reciprocal block policy. That means you can be blocked indefinitely at any time if your edits appear to be disruptive or vandalistic. Continuing trying to force in your "quick deletion" restructure without first receiving consensus can be considered disruptive, so I suggest that you open discussion rather than creating new templates or restoring your edits at Wikipedia:Quick deletion. Only (talk) 14:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)