Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:CFD)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Adodo Eddy Osaman[change source]

Adodo Eddy Osaman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Chenzw has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Majority of cited sources do not appear to provide independent coverage. Also does not seem to meet ANYBIO - no evidence that the awards are significant. Chenzw  Talk  06:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 06:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mônica Gwëlle[change source]

Mônica Gwëlle (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Dibbydib has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No references, un-notable Dibbydib (talk) 23:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Other articles linked of movies she was in. Very weak keep. IWI (chat) 02:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Frank Simms[change source]

Frank Simms (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG and en:WP:ENT. Subject has had mostly minor roles as a voice actor. Hiàn (talk) 22:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 22:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bincho[change source]

Bincho (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Japanese restaurant in London, with proper external sources (reviews). I am not a gourmet, and I know that restaurants can be notable, for example because they are run by great chefs. Since this article gives reviews in three different newspapers, I guess there is at least some reputation. Big question: Will this constitute notability in the sense we are looking for? Eptalon (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - many restaurants get newspaper reviews, but there is no claim of encyclopedic notability. IWI (chat) 07:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
also the reviews they've used are dug out from 2007, 13 years ago. This doesn't go against notability, but is worth noting. IWI (chat) 07:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:06, 7 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sportsprediction.asia[change source]

Sportsprediction.asia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about a startup company, who seems to trade predictions about sports events. Contested quick deletion (original grounds: A4/notability). I therefore propose we do a reglar RfD (Which will also give time to improve the article to a keepable standard). Eptalon (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - I don't think it is notable enough for Wikipedia. IWI (chat) 20:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Hiranya S[change source]

Hiranya S (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about a Singaporean student of medicine of Indian origin, who seems to have had some coverage in the press, and on radio and TV. The person also seems to have won prizes. I see several problems though: First of all, the article was created in one edit, by a user with the same name; we probably have a conflict of intterest here. Secondly, it reads like a CV. Third: there are absolutely no references for the claims made. So: while this may be a bright student, I do not see any form of encyclopedic notability. As the awards, and appearances in media give at least a claim to notability (if properly referenced, and substantiated), I am going through a regular RfD, rather than doing a quick deletion. Eptalon (talk) 08:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete - CV, and a huge majority of the awards listed are not important/significant enough to satisfy GNG. Chenzw  Talk  08:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete, terribly written CV Dibbydib (talk) 23:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Katie Coble[change source]

Katie Coble (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Dibbydib has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, only cites a Wikipedia article (wikis should never be referenced) on the subject's field of work. Dibbydib (talk) 01:16, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Little notability shown, search turns up unrelated results, only citation is Wikipedia, multiple violations of Manual of Style (while deletion is not cleanup, it still is problematic). Naleksuh (talk) 01:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete Unless secondary reliable sources are found. IWI (chat) 01:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete If we indeed suppose that winning a beauty pageant confers notability (which it probably doesn't), this is currently a two-sentence stub for a person whose notability is limited to one event. The article referenced in EnWP is a list-type article, and does not confer encyclopedic notability. --Eptalon (talk) 09:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Rafika Boujday[change source]

Rafika Boujday (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to pass notability with the current sources IWI (chat) 23:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep She is screenwriter of several Tunisian series and she has French and Arabic Wikipedia --Doctor tn (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete - fails CREATIVE. Chenzw  Talk  16:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Theme Music International[change source]

Theme Music International (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Record label existing for 7-8 years, based in Mumbai. Looking at Professor google:SEWP is on the first page, at position 6 or so. So: I doubt that this label meets the general noatability criteria. As it also is a contested quick deletion, let's do a regular RfD. Eptalon (talk) 16:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]


This request is due to close on 16:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Divyansh Mishra DM[change source]

Divyansh Mishra DM (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Chenzw has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: QD A4 declined, subject appears to have written the books mentioned in the article, but they are independently published and sold via Amazon, and there is no evidence indicating that the author (or books) have been particularly well-received. Chenzw  Talk  08:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Comment The QD template (and now RfD template) is continously being removed by a single IP. Naleksuh (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete - no sources and the page was quickly deleted from enwiki. Not notable enough for Wikipedia. IWI (chat) 13:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • BUT HE HAS 16K FOLLOWERS ON INSTAGRAM, THIS TELLS HIS AUTHENTICITY。HIS BOOKS WERE SOLD IN REATILER SHOPS IN LONDON,HIS STORIES ARE COMPRESSED BY PEOPLE AND BEING SOLD ON AMAZON。 YOU CAN SEE THAT HE AHS ALSO GOT EDUCATION IN HARVARD。 HENCE, IT SHOULD NOT BE DELETED— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:a198:ddf6:ece3:6e82:ee78:bd55 (talkcontribs) 04:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Lacks evidence of notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete Aside from self-published books and user-generated content, there have been no reputable media publications covering the subject. Infogapp1 (talk) 17:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete doesn't appear to be notable --DannyS712 (talk) 03:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


MadeinAmerica[change source]

MadeinAmerica (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail notability and is written a lot like an advert. IWI (chat) 00:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Besides the association/trade fair the article describes, there's also a music festival, and a movie about the festival. Given this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, I'd prefer an article about the music festival, or the movie about it. But I doubt any of them is notable in the sense that we are looking for....So delete --Eptalon (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete. It's a recent event with little evidence of notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dinesh Gupta[change source]

Dinesh Gupta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Only claim to notability is for breaking a world record. Very few substantive independent sources are available based on a quick search. Hiàn (talk) 18:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete self-promotional spam. IWI (chat) 18:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Arjun sapkota[change source]

Arjun sapkota (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Dibbydib has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Badly made, not notable Dibbydib (talk) 08:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - self-promotional spam. IWI (chat) 00:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Honey (movie about domestic violence)[change source]

Honey (movie about domestic violence) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable, nor does it make much sense. IWI (chat) 18:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete I have not been able to find anything about this movie's existance, much less notability and such. Completely unsourced stub about something that seems to make no sense. Naleksuh (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete It appears that there was an attempt to recruit cast for the movie, but there is no evidence that production was eventually successful. Chenzw  Talk  02:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  DeleteChenzw  Talk  03:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC).

Ralph Smart (psychologist)[change source]

Ralph Smart (psychologist) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Vermont has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Noted lack of independent, reliable, secondary sources. Nearly everything cited is connected to Smart personally and/or very obviously paid for, and most are unreliable. Not notable. Vermont (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 02:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Closed before end date (June 6), as there was no activity, and the votes that were there were to delete.--Eptalon (talk) 07:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Danny Tran[change source]

Danny Tran (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Quakewoody has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails notability Quakewoody (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Delete - not notable at all. Self-promotional spam. IWI (chat) 18:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 Delete Bordering on spam Dibbydib (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

New end date: June 6--Eptalon (talk) 18:15, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  DeleteHiàn (talk) 16:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC).

Rajat Singla[change source]

Rajat Singla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Naddruf has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails notability and self promotion He have a long history of using IP's as puppets to recreate his WD item so don't be surprised if they start voting (Nominating on behalf of User:Trade) Naddruf (talk) 14:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Delete - Should have been QDd. No notability; blatant self promotion. IWI (chat) 18:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Aminreza Alimohammadi[change source]

Aminreza Alimohammadi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think notability has been established here. IWI (chat) 20:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Comment: Hello and don't be tired, I consider it necessary to give you an explanation as the author of this article .

Thank you all dear ones.Viliamhogos (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

None are reliable sources, they are music streaming sites. IWI (chat) 20:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Chenzw  Talk  03:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Lina Rohe[change source]

Lina Rohe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtful notability; yes, she was part of that team, and the two references given basically list her as part of that team. The essential question however: is being part of a professional sports team enough for notabiliity? - Just for completeness: There's currently no aricle at German Wikipedia, the article on English Wikipedia was deleted (created by a banned/blocked user). The first page of google hits is essentially social media sites (and the now-deleted EnWP article). When we discuss this: who created, or edited the article is irrelevant; what can we use to derive her notability? - Note: Water polo is a team sport. Eptalon (talk) 08:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • They meet the specific notability guideline for athletes, so keep. The deletion on enwiki is because Slowking4 has about 200 sockpuppets (maybe more they haven't found yet) there and, in the pursuit of WP:DENY, they delete the page creations of all of them regardless of the merit of the actual articles. Vermont (talk) 15:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep - Another of case of the "not on enwiki so not notable" way of thinking. This easily fits the notability guidelines. IWI (chat) 15:50, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  DeleteChenzw  Talk  03:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC).

Don Buckner (entrepreneur)[change source]

Don Buckner (entrepreneur) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: To me, this looks like the usual, not notable entrepreneur. E&Y seems to have given an award, and the person seems so have appeared in newspapers. Personally, I think the person is not notable, and the item can be deleted; what do others think? Eptalon (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Keep, Forbes mention and awards. --Jacksorworse (talk) 00:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete, obviously non-notable. JavaHurricane (talk) 09:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete - not notable enough for Wikipedia. IWI (chat) 18:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pages[change source]