Wikipedia:Editor review/StaticFalcon

StaticFalcon

StaticFalcon (talk · contribs) I feel that I need a little update on my progress. Static ^{-=Electrify My Thoughts=-} 19:55, Saturday August 30 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

With 75% of your edits in the user/user talk namespaces, there is little to critique aside from saying the Wikipedia is not MySpace and should not be used as such. Your current contributions show 85 edits to articles compared to 82 edits to your user page. Looking at all your userspace subpages edits, only a handfull show activity that can benifit the wiki. (mainly the redirects from article which were created in your user space) Of the actual edits to articles, much of the work is .. sloppy. This edit was completely has no links, was completely against the Manual of Style, no categories, no interwiki links and factually questionable. (it is not a device in game - the device is in the system, not the game. The function is a part of the game.) Then there is Colin Delaney. Properly wikified, but a glaring red error in the fuction box where a template did not work. Real Madrid Baloncesto had two non-working templates still on it and no categories. WWE Backlash you mislinked SmackDown! - your main area of interest and you couldn't find the article for SmackDown!? In Scarborough, North Yorkshire, you removed the links from every term in the article. In your changes to Wii, you added content in the second person (this should never be done) and a sentence fragment. You have added spelling errors to The Fratellis and Webkinz. Your QD tagging of Banglore was reasonable, but simply redirecting it to the correct article (as it is on en:wp) would have been a better choice. -- Creol(talk) 20:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Well SORRY for failing the community but I am trying my best. Static  Blah!  20:47, Saturday August 30 2008 (UTC)

You have some good contributions, and you are a good editor at heart, but the self-loathing has got to stop. Admins here need to be mature. Sebb ^Talk 16:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Like you can do any better? Static  Blah!  16:54, Sunday August 31 2008 (UTC)

When he can't edit, he just can't edit. He doesn't retire, say that he is leaving. if you're feeling stressed, take a wikibreak instead of retiring. Cassandra ^talk 17:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments

• Uh, didn't you recently have one? You archived your old one earlier today I believe... Its at Wikipedia:Editor review/ThePageChanger. -- RyanCross (talk) 19:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

No that was a while ago and that was under my old username. Falcon ^{-=Electrify My Thoughts=-} 20:01, Saturday August 30 2008 (UTC)

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
• I've seen you around and you appear to be a good user. I would ask you to tone down the vibrance of your user and talk pages! They hurt my poor eyes! :) Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I feel that the article I have created have helped wikipedia and my edits to the mainspace.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I have retired twice because I felt like a nuicence but I have returned both times.