Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Pages to delete)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Adolf H. Uunona[change source]

Adolf H. Uunona (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NPOLITICIAN. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Uunona --Ferien (talk) 17:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep - If anyone were to ask if he is mentioned twice on English wiki, and if there is article about him on German wiki [1], Danish wiki and others - the answer is "yes". (I am okay with keeping the article for now. There might be other options in the future, maybe even similar mention as on English wiki.)

This request is due to close on 17:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Controversy over the establishment of video surveillance cameras in Zizur Mayor[change source]

Controversy over the establishment of video surveillance cameras in Zizur Mayor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Initially tagged QDA4 but declined. Non-notable event. Gotanda (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Not encyclopedic, therefore delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol speedy delete vote.svg Quick Delete This is not simple. Not even the title is simple. Nobody is ever going to search for this. Non-notable event. Fails GNG by a long, long way. 58.179.159.63 (talk) 17:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Question: QDA4 was declined as not applicable, so which QD tag should I have used? Thanks. --Gotanda (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, sorry, maybe. I would accept the decision you take from this. I created this because I thought it may be interesting, but, if you don't see it, you can delete it. My apology. Grilando (talk) 11:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chalet Lizette Brannan[change source]

Chalet Lizette Brannan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Recreation of article previously QD'd Unsimplified copy-paste from draft declined at EnWP Gotanda (talk) 23:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep The article. It has been simplified and rewritten, not copy and paste as insulated and meets all its notability criterion, why then the deletion request? Not also existing on the English Wikipedia, no violation to the Wiki policyMirandatalks (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes the draft has been deleted, I was the one that absolutely created the article and makes a request for deletion in other to avoid conflict of interest of the articles, that gives the validity for the simple Wikipedia (Mirandatalks (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2021 (UTC)).[reply]
  • Symbol speedy delete vote.svg Quick Delete As recreation of speedily deleted content. Fails GNG. Not simplified. Just a way to get around it not being on EN-Wiki. This user also emailed me to try to get me to vote keep (like that matters). Probably undisclosed paid advertising. Blissyu2 (talk) 17:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I also received a mail from User:Mirandatalks. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 17:56, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't know the policy on that, but it certainly looks bad. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. This is a clear delete as it fails to establish notability and primarily serves as an advertisement. Also, it would require substantial revisions to be encyclopedic. Padres89 (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A request was made for the improvement contribution for this article, it’s meets all Wikipedia guideline, this is Wikipedia, it is meant to develop and give a quota of knowledge by volunteering to do your own extra research on any subject matters, i rather find way of balancing and making articles better than the sense of nominating them for deletion on guidelines of such ground this article is been portray as much it meets the notability guidelines in the case of the article. You said it is not simple, why don’t you check the different before the previous articles and make a case?. When a request is made for assistance, it is always subjected to paid advertisements and promotion without an envidence!. Can we make Wiki projects better than this?. Mirandatalks (talk) 06:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The subjects meets the notability of been an actress that has acted prominent roles in franchise and acclaimed movies. A cancer survivor child sensation that has been advocating internationally and recognised with Honoree Humanitarian Academy Award one of the biggest award category in America. Not to mention others awards and nomination based on impacts in the movie industry. She became the youngest nominees of Oscar Award at 9 years. I think we should be dealing with facts and not errors. What difference will it make instead of improving the article than taking it down? A little research will have help to understand some facts. Mirandatalks (talk) 06:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blissyu2 In a case of Davey2010 https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/4671027 in 2013, he made mentioned of an article as copy and paste from the English page and rather first, he made research and update it for improvement before later nominating it again for deletion on a ground that doesn’t meets the ethics standard of voluntarism action he made at initial.4 years later an admin have to justified taking the tag out, and the article have gotten other recents updates, why will you have seen an error in something and you corrected it and felt others are doing less about it instead of condemnation. Wikipedia is not about democracy of counting numbers, is about fact and fixing problems. Thanks Mirandatalks (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 23:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Village Haji Muhammad Malook Shar[change source]

Village Haji Muhammad Malook Shar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a bit of a mess. Listing students seems wrong and might be an invasion of privacy. It doesn't seem to be notable and might be borderline QD Blissyu2 (talk) 05:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Delete. Just a list which is very confusing and difficult to understand. No evidence on how this could be suitable enough for inclusion. Padres89 (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: It looks like it has been deleted ??? Blissyu2 (talk) 17:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Robin Vauvelle[change source]

Robin Vauvelle (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: based on current sources can't see why the subject should have stand-alone article, what others think about it? 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Spam. Along with Online Shop (Brand) and Beyonk by the same editor which I tagged for QD (advert / non-notable). Thanks. --Gotanda (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No genuine claims of notability. Not even close. Blatant advertising. 05:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
  • None are spam and are notable and factual information. You are just discriminatory. Jose82923 (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Obvious spam, and not notable. Padres89 (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Gianfranco De Rosa[change source]

Gianfranco De Rosa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: too soon to have stand-alone article on wikipedia, did quick search on google couldn't find any reliable sources for the subject. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete While he does have some presence on IMDB and has some claims of notability, I don't think it's quite enough. Blissyu2 (talk) 05:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep he is notable as you can see there are a lot of independent reliable source of italian newspapers that feature him. He has participated in numerous famous italian films. This page need to be keep.

Altojahjk (talk) 09:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i don't say the subject is not notable, @Altojahjk don't you think it's soon to have stand-alone article, i mean the subject can't satisfy WP:GNG. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Rafaat Khan[change source]

Rafaat Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable. Fails GNG. --Hulged (talk) 10:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete No claims of notability. No references. Reads like an ad. Probably paid entry. Blissyu2 (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Donovan J Greening[change source]

Donovan J Greening (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads like an ad. Nothing on Google. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Delete. The grounds the nominator listed seem fair to me. Padres89 (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close on 21:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

[reply]


Debashish Talukdar[change source]

Debashish Talukdar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads like an ad. Nothing on Google. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 21:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete. The grounds the nominator listed seem fair to me. Padres89 (talk) 18:58, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nomination. –—Yahya (talkcontribs.) 19:07, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Nishant Shah[change source]

Nishant Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads like an ad. Nothing on Google. Fails GNG. Blissyu2 (talk) 21:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Delete. The grounds the nominator listed seem fair to me. Padres89 (talk) 18:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Foolad Veis[change source]

Foolad Veis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. Not notable. MER-C (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete While there are cross-wiki links, it doesn't seem that notability is established. No major claims to support having an article. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sirmaan Ramachandra Raja[change source]

Sirmaan Ramachandra Raja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. Not notable. MER-C (talk) 17:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Reads like an ad. No claims of notability. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Puissance spirituelle du verbe[change source]

Puissance spirituelle du verbe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Even if this page exists in many other Wikipedias, I am not sure the organisation meets our notability guidelines. Searching for the name of the organisation, I find wikipedia quite high up in the list, yet Wikipedia is bad, when it comes to serving as a primary source. I also find a few social media sites, but I find little to no info on the organisation, let alone its website. Yes, we are probably looking at a new religious movement, some of which have very few followers. Not being from Africa, it is very difficult to judge how reliable the sources given are. I am not against ncluding new religious movemets, but in the case of this one, I find it really difficult to see its notability. So what do other people think? Eptalon (talk) 17:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Usually I avoid certain debates or entering into conflicts that are of little importance. I don't see how the article is irrelevant, since the sources are there, we talk about it well, as well as its author. I have not found anywhere among these sources where we have spoken of the author without mentioning this organization. There is also a work written in the Kongó language in which this organization is criticized. I'm really sorry that you can say otherwise, if not re-read the contents of these existing sources to really verify this info. I know it's all there! And, the organization exists in the Central African Republic, Angola, Congo-Brazzaville and Congo-Kinshasa. Lephare and ADIAC are national presses and what more can we say ... --CapitainAfrika (talk) 18:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
the tone is neutral and there is no promotion or unpublished work CapitainAfrika (talk) 19:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I am happy to keep this. It is in multiple languages and makes multiple claims of notability that are proven. It is also quite a short article, but may need to have some more simplification done. If this is kept, I am happy to embark on some of the simplification process. I just don't want to do it now in case it is deleted. Blissyu2 (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Notability not proven. The page is a type of advertisement for a not-notable religion. It has to follow the same rules as any other topic. It is not special. It has been put up in EN wiki yesterday: same author. Let's see how that goes! Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    therefore, this is not a reason. if an article is translated it remains a promotion even if the sources demonstrating its notoriety exist? I'm surprised ! CapitainAfrika (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The article is notable and encyclopedic, instead of deletion more informations should be research and add to it, it gives more insights on spiritualism which is an incessant history many doesn’t understand otherwise.

This request is due to close on 17:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ashish Mehta(Astrologer)[change source]

Ashish Mehta(Astrologer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. Not notable. MER-C (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 17:52, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


David Kilgore[change source]

David Kilgore (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a Bodiadub topic (m:Wikiproject:Antispam/Archives/2021/Wikibusiness#D). As such, although written by some IP, this iteration is very likely to be both undisclosed paid-for spam and not notable. MER-C (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete This is pretty borderline to me and certainly doesn't read like advertising, and this is about a runner not a business or businessman, so is a very different category. He has some significant claims of notability but I just don't think it's quite enough to warrant keeping an article. It's not far off it though. 58.179.159.63 (talk) 12:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep definitely not a spam with a good record of media and sport achievements. As for sportsman, he passes WP:GNG, he was inducted into the SpaceCoast Hall of Fame and passes WP:Athlets (won a national event of competition). --24.249.213.2 (talk) 09:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Kilgore became the USATF Male Athlete of the Year in 2016 (USATF is national governing body for the sports), often entered the top five runners in different competitions, broke the record on the route Manhattan Loop. --79.140.150.63 (talk) 10:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:49, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


SriLankaNZ[change source]

SriLankaNZ (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO spam sources (see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Egodarchar) for a non-notable website. MER-C (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep Only New Zealand newspaper for Sri Lankans seems like a claim of notability to me, and it's clearly proven. Blissyu2 (talk) 13:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mehdi Ayoubi (composer)[change source]

Mehdi Ayoubi (composer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Relying on translation software a bit here, but nothing I am seeing leads me to believe this subject is a notable composer. Gordonrox24 | Talk 17:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete There is a swimmer by this name who seems to be notable but nothing by the composer. I'm just not finding anything worth worrying about. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sarthak Chaturvedi(Advocate)[change source]

Sarthak Chaturvedi(Advocate) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads like an ad. Nothing on Google. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 13:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 13:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Syed Falak (2nd nomination)[change source]

Syed Falak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. Nothing on Google. Reads like an ad. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 13:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete undisclosed paid-for spam supported by black hat SEO sources. MER-C (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The person is really notable he has alot of articles about him and he has above 100k followers on his social media. He has won 3 awards:
  • Business Excellence Awards & Expo organized by REDAP
  • Pakistan Business Council Award (PBC)
  • Multi-talented business proprietor by Management Association of Pakistan

Do you really think he is not a notable person? Regarding Google, here is his Google Knowledge Panel (https://g.co/kgs/jHxe6U) you can see alot of data about him on Google. Thanks 39.41.144.183 (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


David Kimba[change source]

David Kimba (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable football player. Possible hoax. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 10:37, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Juned king[change source]

Juned king (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable musician. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 10:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Badsha Al Kawser[change source]

Badsha Al Kawser (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, self-promotion. There are claims but nothing significant enough to meet GNG or any other notability criteria. BRP ever 06:33, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete – non notable. --Hulged (talk) 10:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 06:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Gaurishankar Chaubey[change source]

Gaurishankar Chaubey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails our notability criteria for people. --Hulged (talk) 08:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 08:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Lucky Gupta[change source]

Lucky Gupta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 08:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 08:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Jesca Wilfredy[change source]

Jesca Wilfredy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable. Fails our notability criteria for people --Hulged (talk) 04:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 04:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Influencer Born[change source]

Influencer Born (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable. Fails WP:GNG --Hulged (talk) 04:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Promotional article. Not notable. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 18:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, promotional article, already deleted from Bengali Wikipedia. Al Riaz Uddin (talk) 09:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Leonardo Glauso (photographer)[change source]

Leonardo Glauso (photographer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. QD was declined, so I am starting an RfD. --Hulged (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 04:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Arnob Khan Akib[change source]

Arnob Khan Akib (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads like an advertisement. Nothing on Google. Fails GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 21:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 21:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Vaibhav Chhaya[change source]

Vaibhav Chhaya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QueerEcofeminist has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: All the sources mentioned in the article are not independent of the subject but by themselves. No WP:AUTHOR, No WP:Notability and importantly no significant coverage to state this person is notable. Only one book with 1000 copies is a really poor argument. thanks QueerEcofeminist (talk) 05:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the sources assessment table and deletion discussion on enwiki w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaibhav Chhaya . QueerEcofeminist (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete – per nom. Fails WP:AUTHOR. --Hulged (talk) 05:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The article is notable to be kept on wikipedia. -- Sandesh9822 (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    how? can you elaborate? are there any reliable sources? what is there contribution as a poet? or otherwise? QueerEcofeminist (talk) 17:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Delete per nom. 89.8.102.194 (talk) 10:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While there are some interwiki links, there is no reliable coverage and no significant claims of notability. Seems to be spam. May be advantageous to also look at the interwiki pages. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Øystein Aarseth[change source]

Øystein Aarseth (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Blissyu2 (talk) 06:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • See Euronymous - we already have an article about the subject. (That article has language lnks.) 89.8.77.222 (talk) 07:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Then a redirect is appropriate. Blissyu2 (talk) 10:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep and redirect to Euronymous – The article is notable to be kept on wikipedia. --Hulged (talk) 10:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Equally for this one, I am happy to go with a redirect. It looks like I was too hasty in nominating this one. 10:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Manuel Menezes[change source]

Manuel Menezes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to pass GNG Blissyu2 (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • This article is approved on english wikipedia, here is the link: [[3]]Bondzoegirl (talk) 13:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think you linked that badly. This is the link [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Menezes]. Of note, being on English Wikipedia doesn't automatically make it notable here. Blissyu2 (talk) 06:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Of note, the EN-wiki article mentioned by the creator of this article appears to be identical to this one, which would make this a copyvio. I'm also not convinced that the EN-wiki article meets GNG. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: As nominator, I know I am not allowed to vote, but I think that I may have nominated this one in error and I am happy for it to be kept. Blissyu2 (talk) 10:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 06:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Markéta Procházková-Lutková[change source]

Markéta Procházková-Lutková (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Suggestion to delete from IP editor, who said this: I am not sure that the subject is notable for Simple-wiki. If anyone wonders about the deletion at English-wiki? See "16:43, 11 November 2021 Materialscientist talk contribs deleted page Markéta Procházková-Lutková (G5)". 89.8.77.222 (talk) 19:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Blissyu2 (talk) 06:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Delete per nom. The article does not say anything notable about the subject. 89.8.131.154 (talk) 23:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 06:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Amalia Megapanou[change source]

Amalia Megapanou (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Brought to RFD after request from IP editor, who said the following on the article's talk page: (No explanation of how the subject possibly can be notable.) The subject of the article does not look notable. Anyone has my support, in starting the process to have the article deleted.

Please, anyone, go to WP:AfD (if the subject of the article does not look notable to you). If anyone wonders about the deletion at English-wiki: "14:38, 11 November 2021 Materialscientist talk contribs deleted page Amalia Megapanou (G5)". Thank you! 89.8.77.222 (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Blissyu2 (talk) 06:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 06:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Inga Edwards[change source]

Inga Edwards (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: IP editor suggested on the talk page for this to be deleted so I am bringing it to RFD. This was their comments: (No explanation of how the subject possibly can be notable.) The subject of the article does not look notable. Anyone has my support, in starting the process to have the article deleted.

Please, anyone, go to WP:AfD (if the subject of the article does not look notable to you). (About the deleted English-wiki article: "14:38, 11 November 2021 Materialscientist talk contribs deleted page Inga Edwards (G5)") Thank you! 89.8.77.222 (talk) 19:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Blissyu2 (talk) 06:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Not notable.--If anyone wonders: In one article [4] on English wiki she is listed as a member of a former traveling theatre group. That article lists the notable members in the lede - and she is not mentioned in the lede.

    About simple-wiki: If an article here has language links to - or maybe has been spammed onto - wikis: Swedish, Norwegian, العربية,فارسی,مصرى - that does not give an automatic keep at simple-wiki. 89.8.66.165 (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 06:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dee Dee and the Man the movie[change source]

Dee Dee and the Man the movie (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Blissyu2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible hoax, though this is a character out of Dexter's Laboratory. Doesn't seem to be notable, and is written in a very unencyclopaedic way. The closest thing I can find to this is this episode: [5] which is episode 27 of season 2 of Dexter's Laboratory. There is no evidence that I could find that a movie of this name exists, let alone that it is notable. Blissyu2 (talk) 06:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 06:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:19th-century male artists[change source]

Category:19th-century male artists (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Propose either deleting or renaming to Category:19th-century artists. We don't usually separate genders unless there is a specific reason, which I don't see here. When we do separate them, we have categories for both males and females, and there is currently no category for female. I also don't know why this category would need to be non-diffusing; we don't have a general category for 19th-century artists, and very few categories should be non-diffusing. Perhaps a list article would serve this purpose better. Auntof6 (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • REDIRECT to Category:19th-century artists and MERGE anything useful from this list into that one. Blissyu2 (talk) 05:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 01:29, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Italian male painters[change source]

Category:Italian male painters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Propose deleting. First, we don't usually separate genders unless there is a specific reason, which I don't see here; we certainly don't have so many articles about Italian painters that they need to be subcategorized. When we do separate genders, we have categories for both males and females, and there is currently no category for female (not that I'm suggesting we create one). Second, almost all the painters in Category:Italian painters are male, so there's little benefit in having a separate category, even if it's non-diffusing. I also don't know why this category would need to be non-diffusing anyway; very few categories should be non-diffusing. It's also not clear why the creator of this category has put only 4 entries in it at this time when there are so many more that would fit. Perhaps a list article would serve this purpose better. Auntof6 (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • REDIRECT to Category:Italian painters and MERGE anything that needs to be moved (if there is anything) Blissyu2 (talk) 05:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 01:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Priyakanta Laishram[change source]

Priyakanta Laishram (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced BLP. Non notable. Couldn't find any sources that support the claims in the article. --Hulged (talk) 17:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Delete per nom. 89.8.77.222 (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I have made the changes. Added citations and sources. It is a genuine article. Jacob Louis Mathew (talk) 17:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I have made the changes and added the reliable sources. This article is a genuine article.
    Jacob Louis Mathew (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This is written in a very unencyclopaedic fashion and makes no real claims of notability. Blissyu2 (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Murat Ekşioğlu[change source]

Murat Ekşioğlu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: after some research, i think it is soon to have stand-alone article. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Looks like paid advertising to me. No claims of notability. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Advertising, not notable at all. Padres89 (talk) 00:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Docker[change source]

Docker (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional, no good sources. If someone wants to save this by finding good sources, fine with me, but in its current state, it's no good. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep yeah it needs some improvements, and the article deserves to stay.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sakura emad: Can you specify why it deserves to stay? -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    according to my search on Google and especially YouTube The subject passes WP:GNG because it's widely recognizable Software 😊 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep if not lots of interwikis it could be speedy deleted. however should stay but be improved. --77.1.35.78 (talk) 14:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Having a lot of interwikis doesn't mean the article here is in good enough condition. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:51, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Obviously notable. I'd hate to see 3 obviously notable pages deleted against WP:GNG rules in 3 days, all with many other Wikipedia articles. 58.179.159.63 (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Saying "obviously notable" doesn't give the closing admin anything to consider. What makes the subject notable? -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The article should be expanded, not deleted. --93.93.171.2 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe it should be expanded, but the decision here has to be made based on the current condition of the article. If you think it needs to be expanded, then expand it. If no one has the time or desire to improve the article right now, then maybe it should be deleted until someone does. -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep save and expand this stub. --Lecz Ka (talk) 07:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The title should be moved to something like "Docker (company)" or "Docker Inc." and the backlink cancelled. The term is far more used to describe the people who work on docks. Historically, this was a very large number of people round the world. "Docker" is the standard English word used to refer to those workers. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It's Docker (software) on EN-wiki, which would seem like a fair name change. 58.179.159.63 (talk) 17:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Cprime, Inc[change source]

Cprime, Inc (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional page about a not-notable company. BRP ever 09:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • If someone wants to rewrite, they are welcome to do so, but this discussion needs to address the current state of the article. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep makes claims of notability and proves them. May need to be rewritten and simplified though. Blissyu2 (talk) 04:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Proves them how? Most of the sources are not independent, and none of the claims are significant enough to make it automatically notable. BRP ever 05:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The company is notable, but the article contains a lot of unnecessary information - it needs to be reduced. --79.106.129.90 (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You don't say why you consider the company to be notable. We need that info to consider your input. I also note for the attention of the closing admin (which will not be me) that as of this writing, this input is this IP's only contribution here. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep old, and notable with huge number of awards. The topic of the page is maybe too specific for such a small wikipedia as simple wiki. Per users above, I suppose too that the page should be put into simple wikipedia frames. --Lecz Ka (talk) 07:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • But how significant/notable are the awards? Also, I'm not sure what the user means by "Wikipedia frames". However, I know they can't address this because they have been indeffed for socking and also globally locked. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I read that to mean Simple Wikipedia terms, in that it wasn't written in Simple English. Of note, I checked and the other 2 IPs who voted here don't seem to be related to Lecz Ka, so whatever sockpuppetry they were doing didn't seem to be related to this vote. 58.179.159.63 (talk) 12:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Doesn't explain what it means by "agile", so is not simple; Tainted by its origin. We must get rid of it. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 09:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Hancock[change source]

Kate Hancock (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I've declined a qd for a4 as the article makes multiple claims of notability. That said, I feel those claims are not strong enough or sufficiently supported to meet our notabiility guidelines. Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete as no claims of notability. Blissyu2 (talk) 03:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    To be fair, the article has an entire "accolades" section that are all claims to notability. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 12:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Nothing notable there. Blissyu2 (talk) 14:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd agree that the claims don't demonstrate notability, however we need to be careful. A claim doesn't have to be proven notable, it is just a claim. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 16:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The claims generally have to be proven notable, per our policies. But there are some that are obvious enough that they don’t need much saying. Padres89 (talk) 00:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Red flag: " She ... where she created over 92K entrepreneurs and growing 500+ daily. She also assists entrepreneurs in the WMB mastermind and provides them with once in a lifetime experiences". This is not encyclopedic; It is a "whopper"; It is a tall tale, in an encyclopedia. 89.8.77.222 (talk) 04:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Spammy, to the point where it should not be in an encyclopedia. Arguably not notable~. 89.8.68.231 (talk) 23:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete

Soham Rockstar Entertainment[change source]

Soham Rockstar Entertainment (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cannot find reliable sources about this company. MathXplore (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete non-notable. Although there are some sources present about the Taish film, the company remains unsourced and hence non-notable. --Hulged (talk) 16:56, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zawad khalid[change source]

Zawad khalid (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cannot find reliable sources about this person. MathXplore (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 16:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tahsin arafat[change source]

Tahsin arafat (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hulged has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable. Fails WP:GNG Hulged (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete not notable actor --Lecz Ka (talk) 08:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete no claims of notability. Reads like a resume. Blissyu2 (talk) 22:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:47, 28 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Juhi Smita (2nd nomination)[change source]

Juhi Smita (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable journalist. The page fails wp:GNG. BRP ever 09:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: In the previously deleted article, there was no mention of awards.-BRP ever 09:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Not notable. About the award: I have taken a brief look at English wiki to see if I could find information about the award - I saw no indication of notability. 89.8.95.1 (talk) 18:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • As of today, the wiki-article does not link to this discussion - it links to an older discussion. 89.8.95.1 (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete not enough independent sources to claim notability. --77.1.35.78 (talk) 14:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No independent sources = not notable. Padres89 (talk) 00:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gabe Jaramillo[change source]

Gabe Jaramillo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage about himself and as far as I know, the notability is not inherited. Fails WP:GNG. BRP ever 08:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete. Not notable. Delete per nom. If anyone wants to see the Deletion decision at English-wiki: see [6]. 89.8.95.1 (talk) 18:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete not visible notability. delete per nom --77.1.35.78 (talk) 14:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I found more information about his mother and brothet in the article, but about the Gabe. not sources and not enough notability --Lecz Ka (talk) 08:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. By strict vote count, this looks like the article should be kept. However, I note that several of the inputs saying to keep 1) said only that notability guidelines were met but didn't say how, and/or 2) were made by users whose only edit here has been on this RFD or the related article, and some of those users have been indeffed for socking. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Javaheri[change source]

Benjamin Javaheri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. No other claims of notability. BRP ever 08:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

You cannot place 2 DELETE votes. But you can post it as COMMENT.--2A01:5EC0:B006:E1E0:4103:FDF3:5EF6:B7A5 (talk) 05:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

London Junior Cup[change source]

London Junior Cup (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. There is some coverage but it's not enough to meet our guidelines. BRP ever 14:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete. Most of the article is just a list of winners of the cup and there is little information about the cup itself. So unless more reliable sources and information are added, deletion is likely. Padres89 (talk) 19:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete it's the list not the article. It probably has copyright violations. --Lecz Ka (talk) 08:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:35, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liza Egbogah[change source]

Liza Egbogah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. The page was created by a single-purpose account. BRP ever 13:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Not notable. Apart from that, delete per nom. 89.8.116.236 (talk) 19:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per nom, as this person doesn’t appear to be notable. Padres89 (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No significant claims of notability. Blissyu2 (talk) 21:38, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nanalan' episodes[change source]

List of Nanalan' episodes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page is supposed to be about the list of episodes but there are no episodes listed. No content on the topic. BRP ever 13:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete it's not a list. The information in the article was copied from this one Nanalan' --Lecz Ka (talk) 08:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While the main article Nanalan' does have its own article, having a list of episodes is something we didn't do in the English version and I don't think it is warranted here either. It's debatable that we hypothetically could do it, but there is presumably some criteria for a list. Even if we were to have a list, that is not what this article is. Blissyu2 (talk) 14:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Forky: The Series episodes[change source]

List of Forky: The Series episodes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not sure what this page is about as it offers no content on it. Not encyclopedic and likely a hoax. BRP ever 13:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Of note, there is a character called Forky from Toy Story who had his own series [7] that has a list of episodes on EN [8] however that doesn't seem to have anything to do with this article. The title of this article is wrong and the content has nothing to do with the notable series. This looks like a hoax to me. Blissyu2 (talk) 06:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:31, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Albums by Rise[change source]

List of Albums by Rise (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Didn't come across anything about this online. BRP ever 12:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Discographies need to be of notable artists. This isn't a notable artist so this is a no-brainer. Blissyu2 (talk) 21:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lillian Cox[change source]

Lillian Cox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: All sources point towards one event. She was the oldest driver in the USA in 2008 and got some municipal recognition. There is no lasting coverage on the matter that goes beyond that. Clearly not enough to make a Wikipedia page on the subject. Page on enwiki was deleted after an AFD. BRP ever 12:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Delete per nom. 89.8.114.112 (talk) 22:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete the page was deleted afte AfD in En Wiki. The coverage per nom is really scarce. delete --77.1.35.78 (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep She is really a unique person, about supercentenarians are articles in Wikipedia. But the article needs to rewrite. Perhaps there are mention of her and her life in local literature and media? Worth looking. --Printila Wail (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The fact that there is a Lillian Cox Day (per article) is enough to push this borderline one over the line. While it was deleted after an AFD on EN-wiki, that may have been in error. Blissyu2 (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Leaning towards Delete. -- User:Blissyu2 is talking something about a day. But there is no state-wide day or no country-wide day in her honor. (Anything less than that - I don't think that it will be necessary to send User:Blissyu2 on a fact-finding mission about non-notable days-of-honor.) 89.8.131.154 (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a municipal recognition, which in itself isn't enough to prove notability. She still needs to meet GNG.-BRP ever 22:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Municipal recognition is nice, but definitely not a main reason for us to have an article about her. 89.8.68.231 (talk) 23:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:25, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liming Family[change source]

Liming Family (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Barely any sources showing the notability of this organization. Also, the article is not encyclopedic. BRP ever 10:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Comment: not sure should be it deleted right now. Google Books to know about this NGO. It definitely shows notability. The style is awful. [9] --Lecz Ka (talk) 08:04, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's out of date in a fast-changing country. What is it going to look like in a few years? Notability is also an issue. It does not show notability as we use the term. Delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:37, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Not written in Simple English. Impossible to follow. Doesn't seem to be notable. Blissyu2 (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In Europe it is/was common that (usually Catholic) congregations/monasteries also run schools, and care for orphans. So this is only special in that it is in China (where the religion of the majority of the people is not Christianity). So, if there's nothing else that makes this entry notable, we should probably delete it.--Eptalon (talk) 20:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tbhawt Manufacturing[change source]

Tbhawt Manufacturing (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional page about a not-notable company. Likely undisclosed paid editing. BRP ever 09:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep the biggest wind power turbines developer in North Europe and CIS region. The company is quite notable with big highligts in media, both Estonian, partly Russian and English languages. The facts in the article are supported by the independent sources. It was also included into best renewable energy companies in Europe (however not sure about the quality of the ranking). --185.81.67.8 (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I believe the best way to prove something is notable is by showing significant coverage. A business popular in the town won't be notable just because the people in the town known about it, but will be notable when there are significant and independent sources publishing about the business.-BRP ever 06:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This is a large Estonian renewable energy company, a leader in the wind energy industry in Estonia. Tbhawt Manufacturing cooperates with the government of the country. --Urals Sport (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Not notable. If someone is wondering about what English wiki thinks: the draft was Deleted 5 month ago - not notable, see [10]. 89.8.174.96 (talk) 15:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep sources prove the company's notability. It's a stub so definitely not so well written as it could be. In terms of heavy industry such enterprises are not quite remarkable. --Lecz Ka (talk) 08:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While I could see the merit in this one being kept, per WP:FOLLOW we should go with what EN-Wiki says, and per the IP comments above the draft has been rejected on EN-wiki, so until that draft is allowed on EN-wiki, we shouldn't allow it to come in on Simple Wikipedia either. Of note, there is an article kept (and not nominated for deletion) on Estonia's Wikipedia page, but I don't think that's enough to warrant this one staying... yet. Blissyu2 (talk) 21:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gismart[change source]

Gismart (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional page about a not-notable video game company. BRP ever 09:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete yet more cross-wiki spam by WMF banned spammer Bodiadub, see m:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Wikibusiness. MER-C (talk) 11:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This is definitely part of a promotional scam, and fails because it is advertising. See link above. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep article is well sourced, the game developer company is notable enough for being included into simple wikipedia. It's being traded on stock exchange and can boast with numerous deep enough covered in media achievements. The language isn't simple, however the article easily meets basic notability criteria. It's definitely not a spam. --Closter Frau (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    None of the sources are reliable enough to prove your claims.-BRP ever 19:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep too long for simple, however definitely not spam and lots of good sources about the company at one of the most reliable gaming industry media https://www.pocketgamer.biz/. --77.1.35.78 (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Delete per nom. 89.8.130.142 (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep happy to support this one as there are many claims of notability and references to support it. Might need to be simplified though. Blissyu2 (talk) 04:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Blissyu2 Please be more specific. There is no significant coverage to meet GNG. A lone pocketgamer website as source isn't enough to prove significant coverage. BRP ever 05:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am leaning towards Delete. Spam that is non-notable - case in point: "The company has sealed deals with large music publishers, such as Universal Music Publishing Group and Sony/ATV Music". Further comment: another company had a deal with those large music publisher: supplying toilet paper at their head offices; That company is also not notable to have an article. 89.8.153.72 (talk) 05:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep besides of enough media both deep and routine coverage in Pocketgamer, Billboard, Venturebeat, The Hollywood Reporter, IGN Asia, Techradar India, Game world observer and numerous others, the company got significant gains, e.g. in 2019, its game Cool Goal was ranked number one by downloads in 62 countries. It also is the sixth fastest growing companies in Europe (by Financial Times). It can be easily saved as it's not a spam. --37.214.12.164 (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The Billboard source doesn't show significant coverage and Venturebeat is mostly talking about possibilities for the future and I am concerned about the reliability of this one. The claims you made are based on later source, and in light to these claims it's hard to believe that the games that is growing this fast has little to no coverage in mainstream media. I believe we are missing something major here.-BRP ever 05:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: isn't the article really to long for simple wikipedia? --37.214.12.164 (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am leaning towards Delete. Regarding Size: It arguably does not matter, if the article is in Simple English, and if the article is okay. 89.8.153.72 (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages[change source]