Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Blockinblox
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.
User:Blockinblox (for bureaucrat)[change source]
Zephyr2k suggested on my talk page a few days ago that I run for bureaucrat. I have been an admin since last March 7. While I disdain politics, I have become convinced that we do need a couple more bureaucrats, as well as more admins on the project. I keep my eye on the RC fairly often while I do other computer work, usually anywhere between roughly 7 AM and 10 PM. Note, I have never used my admin power in any content dispute, other than with blatant vandals. I feel that if we can harness the category system usefully, we could have a lot of useful potential toward our goal as a useful "everyman's" encyclopedia. Blockinblox 21:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support - Thank you for your acceptance, M7 21:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support - Definitely should be a bureaucrat. Archer7 - talk 21:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Simple support Misza13 21:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Can handle the additional power, though same applies as ofr Archer7 (I do not want to do this again in 6 months). -- Eptalon 21:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Very strong support - GREAT! All of my dealings with Blockinblox have been very good (especially the quick admin vandalism interventions). I am absolutely certain that Blockinblox will use the even bigger set of tools responsibly. PullToOpen Talk 22:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- support --vector ^_^ (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support.-- Tdxiang 03:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support. Will be a great bureaucrat. - Tangotango (talk) 04:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Support. Thanks for accepting additional responsibility. zephyr2k 22:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Creol 00:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. ...Aurora... 13:22, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I hope he does a good job. But overall, he seems okay to be a bureaucrat. --§ Alastor Moody (T + C) 01:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support. Very responsible and civil as an admin, will do a great job being a bureaucrat.--TBCΦtalk? 08:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.