Wikipedia:Requests for oversightership/Fehufanga

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Fehufanga[change source]

Fehufanga (talk · contribs · count)
RfO of Fehufanga
global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted blocks · protects · deletes · moves · rights
Last comment by: EN-Jungwon.

End date: 21:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello everyone,

I'm here today to nominate Fehufanga for oversightership. At the last request for oversightership (linked), there were quite a few comments pointing out that we should still have more oversighters, as Enfcer is the only oversighter we have voted in since 2011, and we have still haven't filled in that gap, and recently, there has been some discussion on IRC about how we should probably get another oversighter.

From a timezone perspective, Fehufanga is online when many other admins are not. He is one of our more active admins and is also very easy to contact in Discord, IRC and through email – which is perfect for the OS role. All of this I believe would make him a great choice for our next oversighter.

Thank you for your time, and best of luck to Fehufanga! --Ferien (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I accept the nomination. Thank you Ferien.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 21:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support[change source]

  1. I seem to be the most active oversighter at the moment. And when requests come in, that are time-critical, having to alert a steward because the oversighter is in Europe, and currently asleep, gives a bad impression. So I would definitely appreciate help.--Eptalon (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Is very responsible and the help from this time zone is needed. Absolutely, support. --IWI (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. I don't see why no one would want to support this nomination. Fehufanga is one of the best admins here, and they totally deserve this feat. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. There are four current oversighters. Of the ones other than Eptalon, one hasn't edited in over a month, and the other two haven't edited in over 2 months. Eptalon should definitely have help, and Fehufanga is trustworthy. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Even without the fact that we plainly need more oversight coverage, Fehufanga is a great admin and more than qualified for the role. Definitely support! --DovahFRD (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. No reason not to support. Has the support of other OS. Can't hurt. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  7. Sure. Has the support of a current OS, why not? Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  8. Yeah! I mean, all I see in recent changes these days is Fehufanga doing cleanup. It only makes sense. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  9. I'm mostly satisfied with the candidate's answer to my question below. Fehufanga has my support --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  10. Support--BRP ever 23:58, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  11. Support Admin does a good job, we need oversighters anyway.--Derpdart56 (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  12. Support An active oversighter agrees to this nomination. How dare we not? Angerxiety+ 15:27, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  13. Support Has shown understanding of the complexities of admin tasks, and would be an active member of the team. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  14. Support per nom and others. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  15. Support: OK with me! Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  16. Support--Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  17. Support -- EN-Jungwon 15:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose[change source]

Comments[change source]

  • Using a hash tag ('#') instead of an asterisk generates a number; this likely makes counting easier.--Eptalon (talk) 22:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yep. That is generally what we do at RfAs, and all other user right requests where people make votes. However, sometimes someone uses a bullet point and everyone else follows on. It doesn't really matter too much in RfAs and RfBs but for RfOs and RfCUs, it is definitely something we should follow. --Ferien (talk) 22:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • This may be a bit of a difficult question to answer, because it may be broad. I will try my best to explain it. Could you, in your own words, explain what the oversight right is? (Not the criterion for it, or the process, but just what [Oversight] is in a nutshell). Thank you! --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @つがる The Oversight userright allows a user to hide a change from regular users and administrators. This is similar to revdel, however, only other oversighters can see an oversighted change. I hope that answers your question. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 20:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thank you, Fehufanga. My vote will be up shortly. Tsugaru let's talk! :) 20:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]