Wikipedia:Requests for oversightship/Djsasso 2

Add links
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Successful. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DJSasso[change source]

Djsasso (talk • changes • e-mail • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • right changes) End date: 29 August 2009

Statement[change source]

Candidate Statement: I have a long track record of using tools in an appropriate manner here and on en. I believe I can help support the wiki in this manner as I am used to dealing with sensitive information on a daily basis through my occupation which deals with highly confidential product information at times. I am well over 18, and will identify myself to the WMF should this succeed. I am available a large chunk of the day so am able to respond quickly to requests. -Djsasso (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions[change source]

Q:Okay, I'll ask the first question then will I? What makes you think you are a good candidate for this position? What is your experience on-wiki and why should we vote support for you? Kennedy (talk • changes). 20:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A: It's hard to have on-wiki experience for this specific position as there isn't really much equivalent to it. The closest would be vandal reverting of which I obviously do when I see it. I have been known to do a "poor mans oversight" from time to time where I hide the offending edit using the delete and restore method. I have been an admin here for a number of months and a little over a year and a half on en. So it I think that shows I don't abuse tools because I have a wide open track record that anyone can see. I have never been in any drama concerning my use or non-use of tools. As for why you can support me? Because I have common sense. I know what is oversightable and I know how to not disclose confidential information. And that is really the most important part of this particular flag. -Djsasso (talk) 22:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Q. When is it appropriate to use the oversight tool? When is it inappropriate? --Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A. Without getting too specific with examples its boils down to the following times basically. Any non-public personal information such as home addresses or anything that "outs" a user. Any potential libelous information when there is no clear reason to keep the edit. And copy vios on the advice of the WMF legal eagles. As for inappropriate really anything that doesn't fall into those categories such as minor vandalism. Those are the only 3 things that should ever be oversighted. -Djsasso (talk) 21:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support[change source]

  1. We've clashed, but I trust Djsasso to use this tool properly. Majorly talk 15:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Changed my mind. We do need many OSes. Pmlineditor  Talk 15:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Of course. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support – We need 25 !votes, and Djsasso is trustworthy. American Eagle (talk) 17:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes, I think you are a good choice for this tools. Good luck. Barras || talk 18:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. –Juliancolton | Talk 19:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Definitely. Shappy talk 19:54, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. hmwithτ 20:15, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. fr33kman talk 21:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Malinaccier (talk) 22:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support No problems here. Razorflame 00:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. David0811 (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. The more the better. --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 03:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. support --vector ^_^ (talk) 07:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support No reason not to Soup Dish (talk) 10:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. →javért stargaze 08:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. I trust DJSasso to use these tools in the correct way. --Eptalon (talk) 13:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. We need some actual oversighters, not more stupid drama. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:23, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sounds good to me. Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Griffinofwales (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Airplaneman talk 05:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Maxim(talk) 23:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support  Mm40 (talk | contribs)  13:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support - We need a few OS's to spread the load and to allow them to watch over each other. You've done fine as an admin and I see no reason not to support. EhJJTALK 23:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. NonvocalScream (talk) 23:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[change source]

  1. There are other candidates I trust more. Three OS are enough. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 08:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ditto. We are a small community, remember? —MC8 (b · t) 09:09, Monday August 10 2009 (UTC)
  3. I would support you, but there are other people I think are better, sorry. This community isn't really that big. иιƒкч? 11:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but compelled to agree. We don't need so many OSes. Pmlineditor  Talk 15:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[change source]

  • I'm not going to support or oppose, not that it will make any difference, due to my views that these elections are being improperly conducted. We should not be extending any time periods to get a required amount of votes - that's why we weren't going to start until September. I think we have some power hungry people wanting to get these started early... Goblin 13:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Fr33kman![reply]
  • I will not !vote either. I don't want to support, but I don't think it would be right for me to oppose either. Cheers.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 18:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_oversightship/Djsasso_2&oldid=8898818"