Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2015/October/Notdone

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:ChecKemzV[change source]

I now reapply for rollback with more experience reverting vandalism than before. The Checker of Kemz Five (Talk to me!) 15:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Still not yet. When Chenzw said he'd want to see you get more experience, he meant more than just five more days. In looking at your changes, I see several reverts that didn't need to be done or weren't explained, such as your edits to Purple and Thermophile. Your edit to Drake Bell removed an unsourced addition to the article, but also removed the infobox. Some of your quick deletion requests, such as the one for Toni Brunner, have shown that you don't yet have a good understanding of when an article should be deleted. Your edits to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Andriod65 were also not appropriate. Those last two weren't reverts, but they reflect your judgment. Those were all just in the last couple of days. Take more time to learn how this Wikipedia operates before asking for any rights. During that time, feel free to ask for other people's opinions about reverts you're thinking of doing or articles you think could be deleted. I would recommend waiting at least a month, preferably more. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChecKemzV[change source]

I seem to have fallen in love with vandalism-fighting. Almost every single time I patrol Special:NewPages and Special:RecentChanges, I find myself reverting vandalism and nominating pure vandalism for deletion per QD G3. I would like to step it up a notch with rollback to help me with this. The Checker of Kemz Five (Talk to me!) 00:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet for now. I would prefer that you gain more experience with patrolling changes and reverting vandalism before gaining the rollback tool. You have not been on this wiki for long, either. Chenzw  Talk  00:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]