Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2016/May/Done

User:Oluwa2Chainz[change source]

Oluwa2Chainz (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I have been actively reverting vandal edits on this wiki and I believe having this right would help me in combating vandalism and disruptive edits effectively Oluwa2Chainz (talk) 17:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chenzw Talk 15:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Patient Zero[change source]

Patient Zero (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I have this user right on en.wiki, and I am interested in AV work on this Wikipedia also. Ches (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done We generally do not give automatic approval even if the rights are being held on another wiki. Please re-apply in a month or so when you have more edits and/or reverts. Chenzw Talk 02:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to this page "Once autoconfirmed, admins/rollbackers from other projects can be granted rollback without these requirements." I also don't understand why this policy was disregarded on my request for rollback rights. Music1201 (talk) 02:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Granted - I will honor the text of the policy, then. Chenzw Talk 02:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted it. Policy is that they can be, not that they will be. -DJSasso (talk) 17:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Music1201[change source]

Music1201 (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Currently an English Wikipedia rollbacker (verify) Would love to start helping out here! Thanks! Music1201 (talk) 01:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, for the same reasons as I gave for your request for patroller rights, plus I don't see any anti-vandalism work here that would let us evaluate how you would use the rollback right.. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to this page "Once autoconfirmed, admins/rollbackers from other projects can be granted rollback without these requirements." Music1201 (talk) 02:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Granted - I will honor the text of the policy, then. Chenzw Talk 02:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted it. Policy is that they can be, not that they will be. -DJSasso (talk) 17:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Omni Flames[change source]

Omni Flames (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I'm a rollbacker on the English Wikipedia [1] and I'm very active in counter-vandalism work there. I'd like to be able to use the rollback right here as well, and have already began reverting some vandalism. However, I've been having to use Twinkle for reverts, which is a little slow, hence why I could use the rollback right. I'm familiar with when and when not rollback should be used. Thanks for considering! — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 08:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chenzw Talk 02:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lolcats20[change source]

Lolcats20 (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I revert lots of vandalism on Simple Wikipedia, and am fairly active in the anti-vandalism community. I believe this will help my ability to prevent vandalism in this community. Lolcats20 (talk) 23:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chenzw Talk 02:41, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]