Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2017/October/Done

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:DaneGeld[change source]

As a (relatively) experienced user of this Wiki, I have spent quite a large amount of time working on vandalism and undoing bad changes made across the site. It's not what I originally intended doing, but it's become part of my work. I recently encountered edits which required rollback, and while trying to use Twinkle's RB facility, discovered it doesn't do what I thought it did. Discussion with User:Auntof6 led me to understand that rolling back more than one edit in a row requires the Rollback permission, which is why I am applying for it. I am getting the hang of issuing warnings for different things, and learning to put things in the right place. I hold myself responsible now for any edits I screw up :) DaneGeld (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Don't be afraid to ask questions or seek advice. --Peterdownunder (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tahmid02016[change source]

I am an experienced and regular user of wiki. I have the experience in reverting vandal edits in Wikidata (I am a "Rollbacker" in Wikidata <verify>). I have a huge amount of anti-vandal edits. I am fighting against vandalism here for many days. I undid vandal edit by clicking "undo" but in case of reverting many vandal edits in a page, it become a hard work to undo those edits. So I am requesting "Rollback" permision here, so that I can revert vandal edits more easily. T@hmid02016 (talk) 11:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold I am inclined to grant the right especially since you have it on another wiki, but there is one thing I don't see that I would like to see. We prefer to give user warnings. Please look at Talk Page User Warnings. I will review this in a couple of days after you have a chance to look at the templates, and start using them. -- Enfcer (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your advice. I will start to use those template to warn users. I think you will give me the permission.

T@hmid02016 (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done While you have started to use the warning templates, you are not using them consistently, which is what is expected here. Please use them more consistently and then re-apply. -- Enfcer (talk) 22:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Reopened After further review, you have over the last week consistently reverted and warned users more appropriately.  Done Please continue to warn users appropriately, and only use rollback for true vandalism. Any other reverts please use another method to undo the edits. -- Enfcer (talk) 02:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jon Kolbert[change source]

I patrol changes in the cvn channel when I can, rollback would be useful for this task. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --Auntof6 (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:PlyrStar93[change source]

I have rollback rights at English Wikipedia and actively revert vandalism or otherwise unconstructive edits. Sometimes I come here as well, either for edits in this wiki or dealing with a cross-wiki abuse. Currently I use Twinkle here but occasionally it takes a long time to load, so I think the rollback tool along with Twinkle (for user warnings) or Huggle (rollback + warning altogether) should be more efficient. Thanks in advance. PlyrStar93 (talk) 02:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --Eurodyne (talk) 03:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:72[change source]

I am very active at enwiki, with thousands of anti-vandalism edits and have been checking recent changes here every so often. I usually prefer the combination of navigational popups and rollback instead of Twinkle's interface which I find unintuitive and slow, so I think I would find rollback helpful here. Thanks for your consideration –72 (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Only (talk) 21:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zhangj1079[change source]

This is my first time requesting rollback, so bear with me. I believe that I have sufficient anti-vandalism experience, since a large portion of my changes are reverting vandalism and warning users. I believe I can tell apart vandalism and constructive changes. Twinkle's rollback feature is getting a little tedious and this would definitely help. Thanks, --Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 01:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Thanks for your vandalism fighting efforts. --Eurodyne (talk) 01:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]