I would like rollback permission here. I currently have rollback permission on en.wiki, where I often patrol recent changes. If you have any questions, please ask me. Mako001 (C) (T) 06:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, and welcome to this Wikipedia. At the time I write this, you have made less than 100 edits, and you have been here for about a month. I think it would be best if you contributed a little more in this project. Eptalon (talk) 08:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I have lots of experience using vandalism tools. I believe a need for this tool is to revert changes without the need of extensions, userscripts, etc. I believe I could use this tool well. SoyokoAnis - talk15:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to leave this one for Ferien. However, since your last request about 5 months ago, I only count about 30 reverts/undos, of which not all were vandalism. I'm not saying they were wrong (they were correct undos), but to me, it shows that there isn't a lot of need for the tool. I encourage you to keep working on New Changes Patrol and the other great work you are doing on Wikipedia. It is really appreciated. Feel free to reach out to me personally in a few months if you feel that you have built more experience. Best, Griff (talk) 01:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Unfortunately, I haven't seen much more experience since the last request, so I'll have to mark this as not done for now. There's not enough anti-vandalism experience for vandalism right now but thank you for all the work you have been doing here. :) --Ferien (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am Mr. Me. I think that I have lots of experience using twinkle. Rollback would be helpful for me to revert vandalism more easily and effectively and I believe I have gained enough knowledge. I try to lurk in new changes and revert vandalism whenever I spot it. I hope to help Simplewiki in the future and revert as much vandalism as I can. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk05:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MrMeAndMrMe:Not done for now. Thank you for all the work you have done so far, but I worry you've not been, or recently not been, aware of the edit warring policy. The reverting at Keibul Lamjao National Park was an editing dispute and broke 3RR. For a few of those reverts, you used "reverted as vandalism", whilst it was an edit dispute, which shows a misunderstanding of 3RR and what vandalism is, and that "rollback [vandalism]" button could have been the "rollback" button if you had rollback now. I appreciate that you understood that the situation could have been handled better, but I think the situation is too recent (only two days ago) for rollback to be given right now. That being said, if you continue how you've been going and keep on reverting vandalism like you have been otherwise, requesting rollback in the future probably won't be a problem. Please keep up the good work. Thanks :) --Ferien (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Unfortunately, I haven't seen much more experience since the last request, so I'll have to mark this as not done for now. There's not enough anti-vandalism experience for vandalism right now but thank you for all the work you have been doing here. :) --Ferien (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)