Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Mahalakshmi Pavani

Mahalakshmi Pavani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person. Borderline A4. SHB2000 (talk) 12:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Paonam

Paonam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We don't usually have articles for individual surnames such as Lee, Wang, William nor Smith. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this should be transwikied to Wiktionary. SHB2000 (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep There are many articles about surnames (family names) in English Wikipedia, like Kapoor, Bachchan, etc. Regards! If the article has reliable sources, then we have no problem with its existence. Haoreima (talk) 12:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Laininghan Naoriya Phulo

Laininghan Naoriya Phulo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Founders of schools aren't notable. Poorly sourced (all from Google Books), and does not seem notable. SHB2000 (talk) 08:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep The article has been provided with reliable sources. Please check it once more. If the sources are reliable, then the topic is automatically notable. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kings of Kings (Album)

Kings of Kings (Album) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Borderline A4 SHB2000 (talk) 07:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as not notable. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep I will try to add some secondary sources like the album in news but pls Do not delete it BrightjY (talk) 8:36, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chayom Thupki

Chayom Thupki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Borderline A4. SHB2000 (talk) 06:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep Notability is already provided by the reliability in the article. Please see the Other websites section, there is a lot of good references. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ethoi Oinam

Ethoi Oinam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable actor and fails the GNG criteria and probably a borderline A4. There is no article about them except on mni.wikipedia which seems like it was also started by Haoreima [1]. SHB2000 (talk) 06:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep as has an article in another language [2] and has ample Google credibility and establishment of notoriety. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
• On second thought, I note that this article was created by Haoreima, who states on his user page that he is Goutamkumar Oinam, with the same surname as Ethoi Oinam. I suspect a conflict of interest with this article and encourage for this user to stop editing articles about himself and his family. Blissyu2 (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  @Blissyu2 The mni.wikipedia article was created by the same user who started this article. SHB2000 (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  No one in the another wikipedia has any issue with the article. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  No one had a problem in mni.wikipedia because there's not much active users there to begin with, let alone oppose. SHB2000 (talk) 11:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

• Fair enough. I didn't notice that bit. Nonetheless, seems to establish notoriety. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

@Blissyu2: Thanks for your interest in participating here. But let me clarify you one fact, that if a person who has William surname creates an article about an actor with William surname, whom he had no relationship, there's no problem. It's like mine. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 12:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Keep I put a better sourcing there in the article. And a person can't easily judge the actor to be notable or not, without concerning the references provided. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 11:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  "And a person can't easily judge the actor to be notable or not, without concerning the references provided.". Yeah, because there's no references to begin with SHB2000 (talk) 11:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello dear! And as I have said here, I have put one more reference there. Haoreima (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

SML

SML (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A borderline A4. SHB2000 (talk) 02:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as non notable. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Wikivoyage

Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Wikivoyage (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Elytrian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Empty apart from SHB200, the other two are templates. 💠Ely - Talk💠 13:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep that rationale doesn't apply to user categories. Also see Special:Diff/7703405. SHB2000 (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ḥumāt ad-Diyār

Ḥumāt ad-Diyār (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Style not consistent with expected standard, added anthem to Syria Hockeycatcat (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep as a national anthem should be kept. Needs a translation and simplification though. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment - I went ahead and updated the article at least partially based on the English Wikipedia. Blissyu2 (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. SHB2000 (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Grant Road (Santa Clara County, California)

Grant Road (Santa Clara County, California) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SkeletalDome$ has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn’t appear to be notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 00:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as doesn't establish notoriety. 58.179.159.63 (talk) 07:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete borderline A4 SHB2000 (talk) 07:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fremont Avenue (Santa Clara County, California)

Fremont Avenue (Santa Clara County, California) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SkeletalDome$ has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Little evidence of notability. A Google search returns mostly addresses of places on this road and nothing else. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete per A4. SHB2000 (talk) 05:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete. Not notable. Does not make or substantiate the claim. Just a prose-type list of connections. Meaningless. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bangladesh Black Hat Hackers

Bangladesh Black Hat Hackers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Yahya has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails general notability guideline. Sources are not reliable. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 20:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 22:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Assim al-Hakeem

Assim al-Hakeem (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Sources are of poor quality and don't seem to meet the requirements of GNG. Djsasso (talk) 18:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

'* Comment' I do not find any Single link to any reliable source, the creator mainly focused on social media references, a few mentions, own website and similar wiki Copies, May be the Individual has not reached required notability Wikipedia inclusion. I believe this article can be improved by removing social media links and adding independent reliable sources. Americanoa (talk 18:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC).

•  Delete on the reasoning of Americanoa. SHB2000 (talk) 22:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Numantia

Numantia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Dingothegorg has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copy and pasted from another en-wiki article, little simplification. Dingo^Talk 15:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

As I have already indicated with the template, I am still working on it. I believe you should give people some time before nominating an article right away for deletion, right? --Caro de Segeda (talk) 15:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Yes, but I think it's best to simplify the page with the template in one edit. I didn't know that you we're simplifying at first, so I apologize. Dingo^Talk 15:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. However, I am not just taking information from the English article, but also from the Spanish one. Thus, the reason for deleting would not be valid as it is not a copy-paste from the English version. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

The reason indicated for deleting the article is not true, as it takes information from the Spanish article and the English one, so I believe that, unless there is another reason for asking for its deletion, the template should be taken out. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 15:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

1) Deletion is not cleanup 2) Scipio Africanus got the (cognomen?/title) Numantinus after completely destroying the city in 134 BC. This can be found in at least 3 notable latin authors (Ovid -Fasti, Cicero-De re publica, Livius-Ab urbe condita, Florus, Epitomae). So definite keep...--Eptalon (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Reminder: Dear @Caro de Segeda you can use {{Under construction}} it will help others to understand that you're still working on your article Thank you 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 16:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I have already taken it out as I have finished it. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

• Keep: Just needs a bit of cleanup, is decently simplified. 💠Ely - Talk💠 07:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep per Elytrian. SHB2000 (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
• Comment Whether adapted from English Wikipedia, Spanish, or both, the source(s) should be credited in the edit history, or even better on the article talk page. See, How to copy from another Wikipedia. --̴̴

This request is due to close on 15:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Firestar's Quest (Warriors)

Firestar's Quest (Warriors) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, probably belongs on a fansite Derpdart56 (talk) 13:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep The article has its en wiki equivalent, where no one thinks there's any problem. Using the references cited there, we can develop this article a lot. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Keep as per Haoreima Ppacot (talk) 08:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Angom Gopi

Angom Gopi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested Quick deletion, enwp has/had a very similar article. Google finds some poems, and translation work. On the one hand, we get dates of 1710-1780, on the other google finds some color photographs. So, dear community, please elucidate this, or should we delete (no context)? Eptalon (talk) 11:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep The article is about a very important historical figure. The article has numerous reliable sources, 1, 2, 3, 4. He is the pioneer of Hindu literature in Manipur kingdom. India is one of the most populated country in the world. So, there are thousands of people with similar names. So, color photos might be of other people with similar name, of recent times. Haoreima (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete given the unreliability, but I'm just, confused. SHB2000 (talk) 12:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

There's no case of unreliability in the article as well as it's sources. If anyone uploaded a color image of ancient or medieval historical figures outside wikipedia in Google, it can't affect the existence of the article, unless we don't find the sources unreliable. The color photo might be of another person of different era or that website is just a spam. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 12:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

I still highly doubt about those actual colour images or vice versa. Wikipedia is not a data collection. SHB2000 (talk) 22:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rebecca Sealfon

Rebecca Sealfon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No explanation to how the subject is notable. I guess this doesn't meet A4 since they did win a Spelling Bee competition but that doesn't make them notable. SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Has an article in another language [3] and ample Google credibility and notoriety established. Just needs a bit of a cleanup. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:34, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  mni:ꯔꯦꯕꯕꯤꯀꯥ ꯁꯤꯜꯐꯣꯟ was started by the same person SHB2000 (talk) 11:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Keep Notability is provided by reliable sources. There's a rich citations of reliable sources in the article. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 11:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Maxina Paonam

Maxina Paonam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be a notable actor and fails the GNG criteria. SHB2000 (talk) 07:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comletely fails the Criteria.  Delete 💠Ely - Talk💠 07:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

  *completely 💠Ely - Talk💠 07:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

You are right! But let's think of merging somewhere! Haoreima (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Where would we merge it? Only if the person is related to something notable can we do that. 💠Ely - Talk💠 08:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

I can't think of a good place to merge it, given that BLPs rarely get merged. SHB2000 (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete. Zero notability. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I want it to be merged into the page Paonam, which is about a family. Haoreima (talk) 11:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  Paonam has nothing to do with Requests for deletion except they share the same surname and a merge there would be inappropriate. SHB2000 (talk) 11:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello dear! Paonam is an article about the surname, not particular person. We can put a list of people making notable persons list there, like many article does in the en wiki. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 12:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Th. Tarunkumar

Th. Tarunkumar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lecturers and journalists don't get their own articles and fail the GNG criteria. No sign of notability, and poorly referenced. SHB2000 (talk) 06:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rozina Negusei

Rozina Negusei (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A quick google search gives mostly social media (and her investing a sum of money in Uganda), so I think this person may not yet have reached the general level of notability, we want for inclusion in Wikipedia. What do other people think? Eptalon (talk) 21:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Personally created for someone non-encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not Facebook. --158.181.69.98 (talk) 05:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry! Suggestions from IP address aren't counted. Haoreima (talk) 12:27, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

There's no policy saying IPs can't comment. We've had IPs vote for global sysops as well, and there's nothing saying that IPs can't vote here. SHB2000 (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your statement shows how you read the wikipedia guideline pages very well! :):-) Regards! Haoreima (talk) 12:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Dear @Haoreima thank you for the interest, IP users have just as much "editing rights" as Registered Users Have and should be treated the same as registered users; Remember that IP editors are human too, Thank you 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

I never said "they can't comment", I said "their comments aren't counted". There's a great difference between these 2 sentences. It's explicitly written in the 6th rule of discussion rules of Wikipedia:Requests for deletion#Discussions (RFD page) of Simple English Wikipedia. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 13:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

The key word here is "may" (it says "may not be considered"), although it's the argument that counts. SHB2000 (talk) 13:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Who says "may"? The rule page says "will not"! Regards! Haoreima (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

If I highlight the quote

New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.

That does not necessarily mean that it will. I don't know where you're getting the "will not" from. SHB2000 (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please let's Remain calm while talking, dear @Haoreima as i stated above IP Users are Human too and should not to be treated less than Registered ones, the rule you're referring to is for Sockpuppetry and does not apply to normal IP Addresses

Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.

Thank you 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Let's be civil and humble while talking. Talk can be proceeded with calmness too. Well, let's analyse the sentence Sakura quoted. It says "suggestions by "users using sock puppets" and "IP addresses" will not be counted." Here, the 2 bold groups are 2 separate entities. Hope everyone understand the sentence properly. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

And for User:SHB2000, what you are quoting is from the 5th rule, and I already said that it's from the 6th rule. Without looking properly, please don't get angry! Talk can also be proceeded with calmness! Regards! Haoreima (talk) 14:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

that says for those using IP adresses for socking. SHB2000 (talk) 14:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

let's ask an administrator @Ferien

Hello dear @Ferien i think IP addresses are Human too and they're no different from others; unless they're sock puppets and meat, they are no different from registered ones, in simple wikipedia we're not going to count their votes? if yes why? Thank you 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 14:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok, agreed. Haoreima (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Eptalon has already confirmed that IPs can vote below SHB2000 (talk) 22:51, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete SHB2000 (talk) 07:12, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

  This is not a vote, so a comment as to why to delete the page would definitely be useful--Eptalon (talk) 08:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

  Sorry about that. Well, the reasoning to that is that they're non notable and fail the GNG criteria. SHB2000 (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

• Keep Has WP:BEFORE been abandoned? This Individual apparently has significant press coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources despite mostly talking about her investing a sum of money in Uganda, In the google reports, She has made business with Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni,who even Nicknamed her.

Note It's not that anybody can just meet and dialogue with a President. It should be noted that she is a well known wife to an International Music Star Akon with whom they have jointly managed and Produced music for prominent artists like Demarco, T-Pain, P.Diddy,and others, besides she also co-produced and Prominent 2015 Movie; Chocolate City with Jean-Claude La Marre. I find This Individual notable enough as per the WP:RS. Deletion is not cleanup. Ppacot (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

• Keep per the WP:RS available and per WP:1E 196.0.50.50 (talk) 12:37, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Just to clarify: this is not a vote, it is about gathering valid arguments in favor (or against) deleting a page. Anyone is welcome to give his/her opinion, including IP users, problem users, etc.--Eptalon (talk) 13:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

• Keep, the Article passes WP:1E, She is very significant for his or her role in investing million dollars in Uganda, However, I find every single Link allover describing her as CEO Of Entertainment business, so for that case i will rephrase as entertainment entrepreneur may be.

I can't suggest that we should rephrase the article to cover only the Huge millions investment in Uganda, besides she is also reliably reported as Akon's wife according to every single link about her, which fact in my view should not be notably disputed; and She also took Akon to Uganda and the government offered him big land for AKON CITY Building, meaning without her, Akon could not have gone to Uganda for business so, basing on WP:1E, both: her own Uganda Investment and Akon's City building grow with her as a masterminding induvial, So there is no justification to put emphasis on those events and ignore the events Creator. We should instead talk about the Individual making those events to happen, then state the events under the individual hence in my conclusion, the article should stay. Americanoa (talk 18:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Los Rios Community College District

Los Rios Community College District (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested deletion, looks like a number of colleges/universities working together, not like a single university. Nominated for QD, for failing notability guidelines. So what does the community think? Eptalon (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Well, the college district is not a university, and is not automatically notable. The case for notability should be argued, with evidence, like any other page. Some city colleges are indeed notable (like San Francisco City College). Ignoring the need to argue notability degrades WP if it is treated too lightly. That applies to almost all the cases we get here. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: Considering 70 thousand Students and the surrounding areas meets the General Notability if it was not notable enough we could say it's simply too soon. --🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

  The district was founded in 1965 according to the article, meaning it’s over 50 years old, so that’s not the reason why it’s not notable. The reason it’s not notable is because it hasn’t received enough coverage from independent, reliable sources. The creator of this page keeps insisting that the district is notable just because there is an article about it on the English Wikipedia, but the creator needs to show that by adding more reliable sources. The references in the article all come from the district’s website, so they aren’t enough to establish notability. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Susovan Sonu Roy

Susovan Sonu Roy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable and mostly unreliable sources Hockeycatcat (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 12:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete not notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep notable, Don't delete. 11:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep notable, keep it. Antezblik (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

  socking SHB2000 (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Keep notable. Gringotee (talk) 1:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  Socking. 💠Ely - Talk💠 04:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

• Note: Please Remember that wikipedia is not democracy, simply to put it's not a number of votes that decide what will goes to happen, but with Consensus, we should explain why it's notable and why it's not, For More see WP:AAFFD Thank you --🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete: Self-promotion, see c:Category:Sockpuppets of Ssr0197 and en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blogs19 --Achim55 (talk) 20:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

  I should mention that an image here was uploaded by a sock of this user on Commons. Now I highly suspect Antezblik, Sikpink, 2409:4060:16:613::f5b:38a1 and Gringotee are the same person SHB2000 (talk) 04:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  They are... why do you think they undid my striking without explanation? 💠Ely - Talk💠 04:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  not sure. Likely the effect of x-wiki socking or meatpuppetry. SHB2000 (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Keep notable, good article and it's not Self promotion, Keep it. Sikpink (talk) 9:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

  Socking. 💠Ely - Talk💠 04:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  @Elytrian: see WP:RFCU. I've submitted a report for these accounts and IPs. SHB2000 (talk) 05:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

• User SHB2000 and Elytrian these two guys are deleting the "keep" votes, admin please look at it.

  Yeah, because you were socking to keep this article. And one of your socks are globally locked, which means you shouldn't be editing any Wikimedia project. SHB2000 (talk) 08:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ananta Kumar Seram

Ananta Kumar Seram (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails the GNG criteria. Just because the subject is the founder of an organisation, that does not make him notable and have an article on Wikipedia. No Wikidata nor English Wikipedia article, and even the organisation the subject was apparently the founder of doesn't have an article. Finally, poorly sourced, as all of the sources mentioned except the last one is the same source. SHB2000 (talk) 07:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep It doesn't fail GNG criteria. It has a lots of contributions to the society, and he is the winner of one of the most prestigious literary awards. The article has no lack of reliable sources, no matter it's only two or three. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 07:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm confused when you say "The article has no lack of reliable sources". What do you mean there? SHB2000 (talk) 11:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

"The article has no lack of reliable sources" means "The article has reliable sources, whatever present can't be called unreliable". Please see one by one! Haoreima (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

The effects of using double negatives... SHB2000 (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

These two are too much reliable sources, 1 and 2. Haoreima (talk) 06:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete It looks like advertising to me and doesn't establish notoriety. 58.179.159.63 (talk) 07:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry dear, there's no advertising while writing article. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 12:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marvelous MMW

Marvelous MMW (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Claims to have won a singing award. This award doesn't appear to be a notable award, and I cannot find anything else to indicate the notability of this artist. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 01:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom as non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep If possible, we can still develop the article in better way. And I think one good source is still there. Haoreima (talk) 06:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

  That still doesn't counteract to the original reason given, and what was "non notable". SHB2000 (talk) 06:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete No reliable sources in the article. I can't find any reliable sources in search either. --Ferien (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
• Quick Delete you Not notable, QD A4 Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

  Claims to have won an award so not applicable for A4 deletion. --Ferien (talk) 10:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete Not notable, no reliable sources. Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete. Notability is based on significant coverage in reliable sources, not on the awards that the person received. I think we have discussed this issue before in past RfDs. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep Yes it can still be developed, and I think it has a reliable source. BrightjY 03:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment The Facebook profile sourced is very weird as it has no bio but a phone number, It seems like it's his personal account? Dingo^Talk 14:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
• Delete not just notableGimmelover (talk) 16:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
• Ain't notable at all, why do we even need an RFD. 💠Ely - Talk💠 05:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

  Because apparently they won an award so not eligible for A4 SHB2000 (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete Doesn't establish notoriety 58.179.159.63 (talk) 07:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

 Comment He doesn't seem very notorious! Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

@Hockeycatcat: I think he meat notability. (r is next to t on the keyboard so probably autocorrect typo) 💠Ely - Talk💠 11:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Ah yes... I meant "meant" not meat 💠Ely - Talk💠 11:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

• Requesting immediate deletion, has been deleted multiple times. Also was protected for a while. 💠Ely - Talk💠 09:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

 Comment I think article is good and on way notable BrightjY talk 5:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Joilson Melo

Joilson Melo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Feel like this page should be looked at. From what I am understanding, the claim to notability is a lawsuit allowing people to file a case electronically. Some of the references, such as the piece in Maxim magazine, appear to be written directly by a PR firm. Leads me to believe this is just a promotional piece, and the subject isn't notable. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 01:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Extracted from Maxim magazine, replaced by an article in Fobes. 22:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. SHB2000 (talk) 07:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep Has a French Wikipedia article [4] and significant news articles written about him. Easily establishes notoriety. Just needs a cleanup and simplification. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Anna Mello

Anna Mello (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Probably a borderline A4 candidate, but I'd be more comfortable with an RfD. The references provided don't have any real content about the subject. Cannot find anything online that would make me believe the subject to be notable. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 01:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Obvious case for deletion. SHB2000 (talk) 07:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Don't delete it, I've added more relevant info. You can google search on "Anna Mello", "Anna Grace Mello" or "Anna That Star Wars Girl." This one is particularly notable because she's affiliated with Comicsgate, which itself part of the alt-right movement the Wikimedia movement has right now. The alt-right has the capability to masquerade as progressives such as the one on Kiwi Farms, which has since been implicated in at least three suicides, including the emulator developer Near last June. You are being protected by people from this site. You share responsibility of what happened here, including the aforementioned death of Near, as well as pain and harassment of many more, and the January 6th Capitol insurrection. Is this the image you want to maintain? Is this deletion worth the weight on your conscience? --2001:D08:D8:5EB3:7CE9:87F7:2699:45DF (talk) 11:15, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

    This is 100% not the venue for the kind of comments you're making in your last couple sentences. I totally understand how discussions around these topics can get heated, but please limit comments to those that help us judge if the subject should have a Wikipedia article. Aranya (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - I'm not seeing any reputable publications talking about her in-depth - mainly niche, comic book news sites that include some of her criticisms. The cited Flickering Myth source pretty briefly covers her creative work and the articles related to Comicsgate briefly mention her alongside a number of other figures. This Distractify article on her sister might be added to help, but unfortunately, I don't think it's even a borderline case given the sources we have. Aranya (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I've added some, but I don't know it will. Still, if you find something noteworthy, add it here. -- 2001:D08:D8:5EB3:7920:5B5D:F46C:4F7F (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete. Not notable, not a shred of evidence. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I knew it. It was made without any shred of evidence that makes it notable. But deleting it would be a victory for Joshua Conner Moon's Kiwi Farms, Comicsgate and the alt-right, as well as Nazbols (National bolsheviks) and marginal idiots who can be alt-right and progressive, including the case for the Wikipedia community which is being surrounded by those. I know this is 100% not the venue for the kind of comments. --2001:D08:D8:5EB3:8888:54BE:37EA:5314 (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

MADELA

MADELA (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested deletion, page originally deletion as A4 - notability. Now restored to do a proper RfD. So: this is a first-person game, and from the article, I see a number of game reviews attached, I don't really see what makes this game notable. Does anyone? Eptalon (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Comment: Sometimes it's simply just too soon for some topics to have an article..--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete as non notable SHB2000 (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete as not enough notoriety yet. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete. Article is short and doesn’t even explain in detail what the game is about. No claim to notability at all. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Cash High

Cash High (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ZEP55 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I guess can't pass the GNG, please review. ZEP55 (talk) 21:50, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Delete. Basically an ad for a young person which claims nothing notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete per MR SHB2000 (talk) 11:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete simply to put Too Soon to have an article (subject can always return to wikipedia once they passed General Notability thanks.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete looks like a user page to me. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete. Article primarily serves as an advertisement and does not claim notability. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kaptain Kush

Kaptain Kush (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable, no reliable sources found online or in the article. Claims to have won an award in 2017. Ferien (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep as seems to do enough to establish notoriety. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Enioluwa Adeoluwa

Enioluwa Adeoluwa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have restored the article after a quick deletion. The sources seem to be interviews, and I can't find many other sources online. Thoughts on this? Ferien (talk) 15:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete those aren't reliable sources. SHB2000 (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I do not understand this comment. Dazed has been a popular print fashion magazine since 1991 and is published in London, this should be good as a reliable source for impact in the fashion world. TechCabal is a respected source for technology in Africa and has an established editorial board and the interview there supports public impact. The Nigerian Tribune was established in 1949 and is the oldest national newspaper. These are independent reasonable sources given that there is no open LGBTQ press in Nigeria, there are almost no open LGBTQ celebrities in Nigeria who have not been forced into asylum in other countries, and this makes sourcing and writing about these related topics and people in the Nigeria Write for the Rights, challenging. --Anstil (talk) 09:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sam and Friends

Sam and Friends (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable and may be a hoax. Hockeycatcat (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep there are articles about this topic on other WMF projects but this is poorly formatted. All this needs is some fixing SHB2000 (talk) 11:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep We can develop this article by formatting in a better way. Besides, we have information about it in en wiki too. We can collect many from there. Haoreima (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep seems to be notable. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:16, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Thokchom Jitendra Kumar Singha

Thokchom Jitendra Kumar Singha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject mentioned in this article is not notable for Wikipedia. Analysing the article:

• a Bangladeshi Manipuri social worker

Social workers don't get their own article.

• He contributed to the inter-ethnic relationship between Manipuri speaking ethnicity and the Muslim Bengali people of Bangladesh.

That does not explain how this person is notable.

Furthermore, it is poorly sourced, as all of the five sources mentioned here are the same source, which is a Google Book. SHB2000 (talk) 08:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:N says the person is notable if he has good contributions. This is satisfied. Besides, WP:N (notability) can be supported with the provision of WP:RELIABLE (reliable source). WP:RELIABLE highly recommends Google Books, JSTOR, BBC, etc. among which the cited sources are one of the recommendations. This too is satisfied. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 10:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@Haoreima: You misunderstand some of the guidelines you quote here. The notability guideline doesn't say anything about "good contributions". The reliable sources guideline doesn't recommend any particular source. It says that the sources you mention are useful, but that doesn't mean that everything there is a reliable source. It says "Google Books and Google Scholar often have many useful books and papers", but often is not always. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Yes, ma'am! But the very sourcings provided are good. And what I say is "Recommendations in the guidelines". If one says that something is useful, then he/she is recommending it. Cheers! Haoreima (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@Haoreima: They might mention, for example, Google Books as a place to look for good references, but that doesn't mean that everything there is recommended. So they might "recommend" Google Books but not the individual books and other things in it. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

You are right, ma'am! Haoreima (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

• MERGE - It seems to have already been merged and I'm fine with this. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Romani food

Romani food (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Bad redirect. A page about food shouldn't redirect to a page about people. SHB2000 (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• As is (redirect to article, not even section of article), this is a clear delete. I am no good with food articles, the respective enwp article (which doesn't say much either, redirects to Gypsy food). That article might need cleaning up, but may be a valid redirect target. On a more meta level, we could of course discuss if there's such a concept at all, given that Gipsies are usually not sessile; they probably slighlty adapt the food from the place where they live. If worked out, this could also be a valid fate for this article (to be merged with Gypsy food in some way).--Eptalon (talk) 15:17, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete Pointless redirect that isn't needed. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Stanley and Martin

Stanley and Martin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not Notable or Hoax A6 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 10:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Delete Possible hoax, no sources either way, and couldn't find any info online after a quick search. Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete per nom and HCC. SHB2000 (talk) 14:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete. Hoax. Nothing about this show on Google. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete Delete. Doesn't establish notoriety. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mayengbam Mohendra Kumar Singha

Mayengbam Mohendra Kumar Singha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person. Google search of this guy only gives me simple.wikipedia and a couple of Linkedin pages. Poorly sourced, and no Wikidata or English Wikipedia article. SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep There's no poor sourcing. WP:N (notability) can be supported by WP:RELIABLE (reliable sources). WP:RELIABLE recommends sources from Google Books, which is satisfied by the article's sourcings, which explicitly describes the facts and figures of the information provided in the article. Having no wikidata item and en wiki article is completely irrelevant to this RFD. Besides, I have upgraded the article. Haoreima (talk) 08:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete. Weakly sourced, achievements show no evidence for notability. Proposer doesn't understand the concept of notability, I think. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

  Don't worry, I have upgraded the article in a better way. Haoreima (talk) 14:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete i can't say the subject is not notable nor Notable Enough, but to put it in simple terms: Too Soon to have an article on wikipedia, the subject can always return to wikipedia once they passed General Notability thank you.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

  Sakura emad Don't worry, I have upgraded the article in a better way. Haoreima (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

• MERGE - This seems to have already been done. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mutua Bahadur

Mutua Bahadur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person does not appear to be notable (founders of museums don't make people notable). Almost all the sources are unreliable with almost all of them being a book found on Google Books. There is no English Wikipedia article, nor is there a Wikidata item. SHB2000 (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep WP:N (Notability) depends on the person's contributions as well as WP:RELIABLE (reliable sources), which are satisfied by the article's sourcings! Please read the article first. Wikipedia guidelines recommend links from Google Books, JSTOR, BBC, etc. I put almost most of them from Google Books. Having no wikidata item or en wiki equivalent article isn't a problem. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 08:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Admins! Please read the article first before any decision (to keep or to delete). Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 12:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete. No it does not! -- because those sources do not establish it as notable. WP:GNG says "If a topic has received important coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable". Each word in this para is defined on the page below this quote. Another page which helps is WP:Reliable sources. Anyone who takes the time to read all this carefully will become a better editor. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

The sources satisfied "If a topic has received important coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable". Because the sources are from the third party community. Haoreima (talk) 08:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete as it doesn't seem to have enough notoriety. While it's nice to have a museum named after him and to have a few published books, these need to be famous books and they don't seem to be. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

J.W. Dant

J.W. Dant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: i recently put QD (G1) on the page however after searching on the google found out it is not complete nonsense so i am not sure whether it should be quickly deleted or not. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete not notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep as it has a strong Google presence and an article on Whiskeypedia [5] that establishes notoriety. I think that we should clean it up a bit but keep it. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sungai Petani

Sungai Petani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SoyokoAnis has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apologies, but I believe this article has WAY too many errors. It's even listed in hoax articles category. Please disable this RFD if you believe this discussion is irrelevant. SoyokoAnis - talk 16:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Notable, It just needs grammatical correction. Dingothegorg 19:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep it's notable the problem is fixing some grammatical errors which is waste to delete it like that.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep per above. SHB2000 (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep We can repair every problems. Haoreima (talk) 08:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep. Notable, just needs a cleanup. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
• Copyvio. Place is notable, but text looks extensively copied from an unacknowledged source. Too much like a copy from a web or ad source. We can keep but cut it down to a sentence or two. That would protect us from copyvio, which is my main concern. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep but it needs to be changed dramatically. That is way too complicated for a Simple English article. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No consensus to delete. --Ferien (talk) 16:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

LIV Swiss Watches

LIV Swiss Watches (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Watch-making company, making "Swiss-made" watches, but with company headquaters i the US. Article reads like an extended press-release/product catalog, and is not encyclopedic, in my view. Note that companies that make "Swiss watches" are usually located in Switzerland. Much like "French cheese", which is not from France. In short: I don't think this company has reached encyclopedic notability yet. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Speedy keep It meets encyclopedic notability, but the tone of the article can be corrected. I just worked from the French version and some other stuff found online, which mostly seem to draw too heavily from press releases, and I didn't really like the way it was written either. The main thing is that it's clearly notable regardless of whether they're really American or Swiss, and the watches are on the list of highest-funded crowdfunding projects. Basically it's definitely noteworthy enough in the world of Swiss watches, and not some garage shop. Now I think we can get back to removing whatever press release content might be in there. Cheers! Jlockerocks2 (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep i think it is Notable as @Jlockerocks2: said it can be corrected if the article has some errors.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Please note that what we have is pretty close to being a translation of the French wikipedia article. Note: Anyone can set up crowdfunding, and being successful at raising money is the prerequisite for starting a company. In the Fintech sector, people talk about Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have both been used as cryptocurrencies. Possibly, in the watchmaking industry, crowdfunding wasn't used beforehand. It may be a lot like the case of being notable, because of a large following in social media channels. Or a person being notable, because he or she was nominated for an award (but later, someone else got the award)...--Eptalon (talk) 12:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
• Template:Vwk I suppose that this could be translated from the French Wikipedia but I'm okay with this being deleted. SHB2000 (talk) 07:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
• KEEP - While the lack of an English article does push me towards delete, it looks notable enough to me. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  Ferien (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Maura Schindler

Maura Schindler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TDKR Chicago 101 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hard time seeing notability (unsourced and a quick google search results in nothing) TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 03:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Unrelated to Emilie and Oskar Schindler, the people the movie Schindler's List is based on. As she's born after the war (1949), she might have been a child of Oskar & Emilile; but their children are named Schlegel. So: likely not notable, delete--Eptalon (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
• Only source in this article is a website which I can’t access online since it was taken down. After googling him, I couldn’t find any more sources about him. Also, he is not on the English Wikipedia. So, we might as well delete this article. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete as non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
• DELETE - She had an article in another wiki [6] but it has been deleted, so we should do the same. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:10, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. The person is clearly notable, and the article is in a keepable state. Whether it can be simplified further is no question for RfD.--Eptalon (talk) 11:36, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Dalai Lama

Dalai Lama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Elytrian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Is pasted from en-wiki, went unnoticed as it was old. 💠Ely - Talk💠 15:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Just needs simplifying. Dingothegorg 14:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment: i think Reducing the Article to minimum; that meets simple wiki's standards is better than deleting it, the subject is notable anyway it will be wasted|🌸 Sakura emad 💖--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
• I agree with Sakura emad. I'll try simplifying the article. This definitely isn't something for requests for deletion. --Ferien (talk) 15:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep. Subject is notable. Article just needs a cleanup. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep It could use some simplifying, but it's not bad enough to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep all it needs is simplifying. SHB2000 (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep Let's keep it, by simplifying. Ely! Haoreima (talk) 08:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep Needs to be kept. Just needs to be simplified. Blissyu2 (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep. It's a misuse of RfD to use the procedure to request an edit. Furthermore, the page is not a copy of the En wiki page, and it is not so complex as to be considered for deletion. We have many pages which need improvement, and personally, I don't think this is by any means the worst example. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:34, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Deleted by Macdonald-ross. --Ferien (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

User:Krasheduzzamanrafi

User:Krasheduzzamanrafi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Advertising on user page Hockeycatcat (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete Blatant advertising. SHB2000 (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Quickly deleted, as it's been deleted at RfD before: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Deri Lorus --Ferien (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Deri Lorus (musician)

Deri Lorus (musician) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May not be notable for Wikipedia Hockeycatcat (talk) 11:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as non notable. Although there is an article about this person on es.wikipedia, that was also created by a newbie who I suspect that both users are socks of each other. SHB2000 (talk) 11:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep He is notable, because notability can be supported by reliable sources. And the article possesses reliable sources. Thanks! Haoreima (talk) 07:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete No reliable sources. All the sources aren't reliable, they're interviews and/or promotional. --Ferien (talk) 06:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

  Wait, already deleted before, yet created again under a different name. Deleting per G4. --Ferien (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Keep he is notable, because I see the sources in the article relies on Wikipedia Notability criteria. Moreharmonics (talk)
•  Delete - non-notable individual, fails GNG and NMUSIC. Also the product of a cross-wiki sockpupeteer.-KH-1 (talk) 10:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests