Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Category:Very active wikipedian

Category:Very active wikipedian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not sure we want a category like this. Who's active and who's not changes all the time, and trying to keep a category up to date would be a pain. If kept, the category should be named "Very active Wikipedians" (plural instead of singular). Also, users shouldn't be added here without their consent. Auntof6 (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Note: I deleted all the user talk pages from the category because this type of category should contain user pages, not user talk pages. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete unless there is some kind of user box it could be used for. Even then, the "very active" is subjective, so otherwise its use is unclear. --IWI (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
• Yeah, if we needed this then WP:Active users could be used but I don't see the need. Also it should be added to user pages by the user themselves not someone else. --Ferien (talk) 09:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

but if kept, it should probably be renamed to Very active Wikipedians. --Ferien (talk) 09:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marie LaVeau

Marie Laveau (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:444:201:9E70:E5F4:2348:62FF:7B15 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Deciding if this page is true 2601:444:201:9E70:E5F4:2348:62FF:7B15 (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep appears to be a real and notable historical figure.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 00:32, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Keep Yes, it is true. I've heard of her before. What made you think she wasn't real? --Auntof6 (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

History of the Jews in Canada

History of the Jews in Canada (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Completely free of content, contains no history Lights and freedom (talk) 02:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep it is a stub, not free of content. If it was free of content, that would be a QD reason anyway. Stubs encourage people to add to them in the future. No reason to delete. --IWI (talk) 09:09, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Peter Abbay

Peter Abbay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable actor. Only rumoured to have had his largest part. Other roles appear to be very minor. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 22:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Franz Kober

Franz Kober (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable. No significant contributions to the field. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 22:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Arshdeep Bhardwaj

Arshdeep Bhardwaj (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tanbirzx has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is about a man whose has no strong data in a website. Tanbirzx (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Added more relevant information. This shouldn't be deleted, because he's a big public figure in India. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dogeout (talk • contribs) 11:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete no independent coverage. --IWI (talk) 11:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Symmetrical Car-body Control System (SCCS)

Symmetrical Car-body Control System (SCCS) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability. A cursory search produced no sources for this SCCS (though it did produce other things that use the same acronym). I'm not sure this system is notable yet. But engineering is not my area of expertise and it's possible that sources exist in more specialized places. Someone who knows trains and train control systems should comment. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I believe the correct interpretation of this one is "Not simple" or "not simplified". Readers here should not have to cope with unexplained technical terms. I can't comment on the accuracy of the information. Delete or rewrite. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• Delete unless somebody wants to rewrite it. This is too complex, and does not seem to be an essential topic. In its current state, it is not a net positive for this website. Lights and freedom (talk) 00:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Radhesh aria

Radhesh aria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable --IWI (talk) 01:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Cannot find a single reliable source on this person, fails WP:GNG.--Ferien (talk) 10:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
• Comment: Popping in from en.wiki and this article has been recreated there many times by sock-puppets. See here. Spencer (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

  Thanks, but sock puppetry isn't considered when discussing the notability of a person. We don't delete articles based on creators here. --IWI (talk) 11:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dragan Klaric

Dragan Klaric (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article was nominated for deletion by an IP in August of 2019, however they apparently didn't know how to create a discussion, so none was ever held. Looking at it now, I don't think this subject meets our notability guidelines, so I'll go ahead and make the nomination. Maybe it is the language barrier, however I'm not seeing anything that would lead me to believe the subject is notable. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 22:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Clario Tech

Clario Tech (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SpaceGuy32 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail notability guidelines + sources don't appear to meet appropriate criteria + refbombing Milo, Talk, Contribs 22:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• IMO, being a "security software development company" does not automatically make you notable. However, I have found two pretty reliable sources, https://www.standard.co.uk/tech/security-apps-clario-launch-how-it-works-a4443061.html and https://uk.pcmag.com/news/129572/facebook-uber-and-dating-sites-top-list-of-companies-collecting-your-personal-data --Ferien (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Martin Boys

The Martin Boys (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SpaceGuy32 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails notability guidelines Milo, Talk, Contribs 22:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete this article per nom, but an article could be created for the the related YouTube channel, en:Family Of Five, which has been covered by reliable sources. Lights and freedom (talk) 01:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

This article is true. I created this so that way you can add it to the knowledge panel on google, Its been days. 4:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC), so that's why it shows a deletion request.

Akash Jagga

Akash Jagga (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable --IWI (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete Hasn't appeared in multiple significant works or done anything else of note. Milo, Talk, Contribs 17:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable, and previously deleted.. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:24, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

GITSN

GITSN (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional. Notability issues. This article is a double of Gitsn, which is also up for deletion. Darkfrog24 (talk) 13:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete Duplicate article. Darubrub (Let me know) 15:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
• I don't think the article should be quick deleted as it doesn't meet any Quick Deletion criteria. I think it should be deleted when the other RfD closes as it is the exact same. --Ferien (talk) 06:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

The argument in favour of a quick delete is based on its having a function of an advertisement. It can also be quick deleted as a version of an already deleted article. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:06, 25 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Neomee Shah

Neomee Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SpaceGuy32 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines and seems somewhat like self-promotion. Milo, Talk, Contribs 16:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete no evidence of any independent assessments of her work. --IWI (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete Lacks notability Fixing26 (talk) 08:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete Per above.Yaakov Wa. (talk) 16:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
• Comment: also delete this: Template:Neomee Shah - 2601:640:4000:3170:9425:8A2B:3497:A983 (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Mahmood Alam

Mahmood Alam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail GNG and NPOL --IWI (talk) 16:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Fails the general notability guideline, cannot find any independent reliable sources. --Ferien (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete He has never held elective office, and was only a candidate and a local political leader, so he fails WP:NPOL. Apparently neither of these roles received coverage from the news, so the subject is not notable. Lights and freedom (talk) 01:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Gitsn

Gitsn (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks promotional and I don't see the notability, but this isn't my area of expertise and I might have missed it. The lack of sources is telling. Bloomberg shows that the company exists. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete. Advertising by an interested party. And the bottom section is a copy-paste from an unacknowledged source. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete Per nom and Macdonald. Darubrub (Let me know) 14:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Delete Not notable. I can find only one independent reliable source that talks about them, regarding an award they won, and only briefly.[1] Lights and freedom (talk) 01:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

LZ77 and LZ78

LZ77 and LZ78 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Yaakov Wa. has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I believe this article topic is extremely complex and does not belong on simple wiki. Yaakov Wa. (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I believe this article topic is extremely complex and does not belong on simple wiki.Yaakov Wa. (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
• That alone is not necessarily a reason to delete. I think simplewiki can be most useful when complex ideas are explained simply. Complex articles can be marked with {{complex}}. --Ferien (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Dear Ferien,

According to you, simple wiki should have complex articles, provided that they are marked as complex (By complex, I mean of course, complex in ideas, not necessarily language). Am I understanding you correctly?Yaakov Wa. (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@Yaakov Wa.: No, simplewiki should not have complex articles, but articles that are complex should be marked with {{complex}} and simplified, not sent to RfD. Regards, --Ferien (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

And I mean that articles that have complex language should be marked with {{complex}} Not necessarily complex ideas unless they contain complex language --Ferien (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Dear @Ferien:,

Ah, I see. There are two types of complexity which does not belong in simple wiki. The first type is complexity of ideas, which should be sent to an RfD. The second type is complexity of language, which should be tagged with {{complex}} and simplified as much as possible. Am I understanding you correctly?

Blessings,

Yaakov W.Yaakov Wa. (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@Yaakov Wa.: No, if an article just covers a complex idea then it should not be sent to RfD at all. It is fine to keep articles with complex ideas. Regards, --Ferien (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Dear @Ferien:,

Thanks for explaining that to me! In that case, lets get this closed ASAP.

Blessings,

Yaakov W.Yaakov Wa. (talk) 18:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I'll do a non-administrator closure --Ferien (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Chris Lester

Chris Lester (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't see how this subject passes GNG. Looks like a local businessman with no wider reach. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 22:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Bikram malati

Bikram malati (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Indian actor, aged 17. Contested quick deletion, so going through RfD. There are 20-odd references, but given the claimed aged of the person, I doubt he is notable. I do not know the Indian/Hindi movie industry though, so going thorugh a regulat RfD to clarify is probably not a bad idea. In my book, this is a delete. Other thoughts? Eptalon (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Cross-wiki spam, as shown by the deletion log on enwiki --Belwine (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
• Dont delete this is a notable person on simple Wikipedia Bikram malati Don't Delete this Article He is working on Indian Nepalese cinema Supporting Actor

14 April 2021 (UTC)

• Not delete He is notable Person Not delete this article on simple wikipedia

15 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete The articles references don't seem to be reliable sources to back it's claims about notability. I am also unsure of why there is a large amount of cite tags next to a single sentence in the article, Furthermore, a lookup on Google (note that I use the Japan Google, but this shouldn't affect the results, if the actor was notable) did not return what I would call reliable soruces, leading me to believe that the article should be deleted at this time. I would also like to state that the claims for 'keep' here make no argument on why the article should be kept, saying 'don't delete' is not a valid argument of why the article should be kept. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

 Delete. Cross-wiki spam and advertisement of non-notable person. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Does not meet notablity guidelines.. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Dur Khan

Dur Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't believe this subject to be notable. Can't find much to source the article, and the award he won doesn't appear to be notable either. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 22:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The status of the Public Peace Prize is unclear. It seems to be not stated in all the example pages I dredged up. (List of Peace Prizes on En wiki). That may mean it is a private venture, a web creation with no public standing. Because it has no public face, we do not know how its winners are chosen. As for Dur Khan, no doubt a good person, but the value of prizes is not just money (lots of it in the case of Nobel Prizes), it is more importantly about reputation. The reputation of this prize is unknown. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Does not meet notability guidelines. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Asif Jeriya

Asif Jeriya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SpaceGuy32 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail guidelines for music notability. Milo, Talk, Contribs 13:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• A significant percentage of the sources from the article are from self-published media. Darubrub (talk) 13:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

  I now go back to  Delete per Belwine. Darubrub (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Delete Lots of refbombing and social media. No Google News results come up. As I actually find any reliable sources for this person, they seem to fail the general notability guideline.--Belwine (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests