Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).

• It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.

1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.

• You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.

• It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.

1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.

• A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
• As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/(name of page to be deleted)}}

1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Benny Banks (rapper)

Benny Banks (rapper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is questionable. Interestingly, this page is salted on enwiki and seems to be created by an LTA of some sort. Zaxxon0 (talk) 09:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bishop's Stortford Hockey Club

Bishop's Stortford Hockey Club (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable local amateur field hockey club. DJSasso (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Delete. Local club, no evidence of wider notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Daniel Antosch

Daniel Antosch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Wyatt2049 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not Notable Wyatt2049 (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Possible research needed. I believe he may meet en:WP:NFOOTBALL. That guideline says "Players who have played, and managers who have managed in a competitive game between two teams from fully-professional leagues, will generally be regarded as notable." Antosch plays for FC Liefering. Our article for that club has conflicting info about which league it's in, but the enwiki article shows it in en:Austrian Football Second League. That league is listed at en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues (a good reference for this) as a fully-professional league. The fact that he is on the team doesn't prove that he has actually played in any games, or that such games were against other qualifying teams, but I don't think we've usually done the extra step of verifying that. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

 Comment@Wyatt2049: I don't see how it fails WP:NOTABILITY. --Znotch190711 ^{(Talk - Contributions - CentralAuth)} 04:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

• Anotsh plays as a goalkeeper at FC Liefering, in Salzburg; Liefering is a club in the second-highest Austrian football league; this means that the person is probably noatble. Of cpurse this does not mean that the article does not need work. PLease also note: The person was born in the year 2000, so there's probably not a lot to say... --Eptalon (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Playing for a 2nd division league is not by itself grounds for notability. This particular league is one of the weaker leagues in Europe. A player in a second league might become notable, for example there are cases where England teams have had a player from the English second level (now called the "The English Football League Championship"). So it comes down to whether he has done anything special, and the answer in no, he has not. We're not a fanzine, we're an encyclopedia! Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:16, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

• Playing in the second league actually is grounds for notability per NFOOTY, notability isn't about how good they are athletically, its about how much news coverage a particular league is likely to give to its players. -DJSasso (talk) 11:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

• Keep Meets WP:NFOOTBALL by playing in the Austrian Second League which is listed as one of the leagues which meets the requirements for notability. -DJSasso (talk) 11:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Yea, like the Scottish Championship is listed, where the standard is laughably bad and many players are only semi-professional and some are amateurs. These lists were obviously done by pro-forma, whereas I actually do know what I'm talking about when it comes to soccer! Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:18, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

The list is made up of only leagues which are fully professional and don't include semi-pro or amateur. They are not added to the list until there are sources that indicate they are fully pro. -DJSasso (talk) 10:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per DJsasso and he also played for the Austrian U17 team. He plays as a position of a goalkeeper who will rarely have a chance to score. So, not having any goals should not be taken into consideration about notability. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Her death certainly received significant news coverage. --Peterdownunder (talk) 22:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Joana Sainz

Joana Sainz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Has no other references other than her death, basically has no significant coverage. Zaxxon0 (talk) 22:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The issue here seems to be notability. She may be notable for the means of her death, but that would need multiple references. We don't have those at present. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Just to be clear, if no further evidence, the page should be deleted. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

1.  Keep - Is somewhat notable. Could be article. --Wyatt2049 | ^{(Talk) or (Stalk)} 12:46, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Notabilty shown. --Peterdownunder (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Glory to Hong Kong

Glory to Hong Kong (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Wyatt2049 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It is a youtube song with no sources. I feel that it really does not need to be here as it seems unnotable. Wyatt2049 | ^{(Talk) or (Stalk)} 13:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comment Did you do a search for sources? There are plenty on the en.wiki page for it. Also the page was only created 3 minutes before you nominated it...maybe give editors time to fill out the article without being WP:BITEy. Please read WP:BEFORE before you nominate any more articles. -DJSasso (talk) 13:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

 Keep I'm in the midst of expanding. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Keep clearly. Desertborn (talk) 14:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Notability not shown. --Peterdownunder (talk) 21:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC).

Kazuya Yamashita

Kazuya Yamashita (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As far as I can find there is nothing anywhere showing he meets GNG or NFOOTY. Even the stats on the page don't say he actually played a game. Non-notable. DJSasso (talk) 16:10, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Delete --大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not needed.--Peterdownunder (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2019 (UTC).

Template:Vipreported

Template:Vipreported (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Computer Fizz has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: isn't level 4 already the final warning? why do we need this? Computer Fizz (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep I made it as a notice that they have been reported, and that they should stop. This is simalar to final warning, but this could be the absolute final warning, and if they continue, they Will be blocked. --Wyatt2049 | ^{(Talk) or (Stalk)} 16:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

What's an "absolute" final warning? A final warning is a final warning. There is already level 3 as aggressive "we're serious" warning, then level 4 is the final warning or else they'll be blocked. Why do they need to be warned a fifth time? Computer Fizz (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

 Delete per Computer Fizz. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

• Delete just doesn't seem to make sense or be necessary. We already have more than enough warning templates. -DJSasso (talk) 16:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

@Djsasso: Can I use the template for personal purposes. --Wyatt2049 | ^{(Talk) or (Stalk)} 17:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

• Sidenote Wyatt has been adding his template to other places like here. i don't know whether those should be reverted instantly or not, but if the delete passes best someone remember to clean them up. Computer Fizz (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

  Probably wouldn't be added to that page even if the template existed so I reverted it. I will look at the other locations. -DJSasso (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Unnecessary. Wyatt, please stop creating templates and trying to enact large changes. We have a good system and it works, and if you want to continue contributing here you're going to need to contribute within it. Best, Vermont (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Delete as our existing templates are sufficient, and per Computer Fizz. Desertborn (talk) 14:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

The creator of this template has now been blocked indefinitely. Will that affect this rfd, or should we just proceed as usual? Computer Fizz (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

It will proceed until an administrator closes it; his block does not have a direct effect on the outcome. Best regards, Vermont (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:30, 18 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Close early as keep, clearly notable.--Peterdownunder (talk) 22:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Antonio Ascari

Antonio Ascari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Wyatt2049 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person is not notable. There is no references, and he did not win any races at all. Wyatt2049 | ^{(Talk) or (Stalk)} 12:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Was a champion racer. Did win races. I was going to just delete this nom as being disruptive but I decided to just leave it here and ended up blocking the nominator for the number of clearly disruptive things they have done since coming over here. -DJSasso (talk) 13:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Keep as clearly notable. This driver won several races, including the first ever Belgian Gran Prix. Of course the article could be improved, as is the case with any stub. But not a reason for deletion. I'll try to find and add in one source at least, for starters. Desertborn (talk) 12:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Keep Notable. --Znotch190711 ^{(Talk - Contributions - CentralAuth)} 02:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Keep Notable. The reference link explains why. All forms of racing (car, plane, railway, ships...) were big deals between the wars. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Delete as non-notable.--Peterdownunder (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC).

Ava Eagle Brown

Ava Eagle Brown (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

大诺史 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Same content as Ava Eagal Brown which was Qd-ed. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I don't see any notability to have an article. From the website, all I can see is how she well coaches people and a large portion of the website mainly states about courses she conduct. Moreover, I can't seem to find any other reliable 3rd party source. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Delete Promo, non-notable, created in violation of the Wikimedia TOU.  — FR 17:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Two articles in reliable sources do exist, namely the "The Gaurdian" article and the "Belfast Telegraph" article, however, both of them are primarily interviews with a major part of the text quoted from the subject making them primary sources.  — FR 17:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Delete. Clearly not notable, and I think its intent is to advertise the person. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Delete as not notable. Desertborn (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Keep as a redirect. --Peterdownunder (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Bumblebee Man

Bumblebee Man (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

PrimordialTaco has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Minor character from the show, and is arguably already covered by List of The Simpsons characters. All this page seems to actually cover on him is his appearances, which aren't really important. PrimordialTaco :D (say hii) 11:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: Already on the general list and only content of the page is appearances, nothing else. Also doesn't have a page on enwiki, for what I assume is the same reason. Reception123 (talk) 11:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Delete. Minor character, no individual page on En, notability not shown, obvious delete. OK, I go with redirect! Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of The Simpsons characters: there's an incoming link. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect per rationale of Auntof6 -- Deborahjay (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect per rationale of Auntof6 and Deborahjay. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 02:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect there is a lot of info about this character at https://simpsonswiki.com/wiki/Bumblebee_Man Ottawahitech (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2019
  • Besides the above - That "simpsonswiki" appears so informative, though we can't add an external link as inline content, I decided to make it accessible with the following edit: List of The Simpsons characters#Other websites, linking to the Characters directory page there. -- Deborahjay (talk) 14:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
• Keep as redirect per Auntof6. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect and merge per 大诺史. --Znotch190711 ^{(Talk - Contributions - CentralAuth)} 02:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect per Auntof6. Desertborn (talk) 20:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Author requested deletion. -DJSasso (talk) 11:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC).

Template:Placeholder

Template:Placeholder (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

大诺史 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The template was created recently by Mohammedbhaq along with {{Text placeholder}}. The template is only used in the creator's own user space and he/she do not have any edits out of their own userspace. What seems weird to me is that Rohaanhaq123 (created later than Mohammedbhaq) edited in Mohammedbhaq sandbox (User:Mohammedbhaq/sandbox/Rohaanhaq123's Sandbox) 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. QD'd under QD option U1. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Mohammedbhaq/sandbox/Rohaanhaq123's Sandbox

User:Mohammedbhaq/sandbox/Rohaanhaq123's Sandbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mohammedbhaq has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page not required that I created. Mohammed - Simple English Wikipedia Editor 21:40, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Unused categories. --Peterdownunder (talk) 03:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC).

Template:Yugoslav wars

Template:Yugoslav wars (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Also nominating:

• Template:Bosnian War
• Template:Croatian War of Independence
• Template:Post-Cold War European conflicts
• Template:Fall of Communism
• Template:Yugoslavia timeline
• Template:Campaignbox Yugoslav Wars
• Template:Yugoslavia topics

They were all created in June but never put on any pages. Mostly full of red links. If people want to go and find pages for them I am ok with that as well. But at this point I think deletion with no prejudice to future creation is the best route to go. DJSasso (talk) 12:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete They're all copy pastes from enwiki, and per nominator are not currently of use on Simple. Reception123 (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests