Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although it does not have simple english.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Kourage Beatz NSI

Kourage Beatz NSI (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

94rain has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, all UGC sources, A4 contested 94rain ^Talk 00:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Delete per nom. RiggedMint 01:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

 Comment: why are there 2 discussion sections?- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Because they copied my message... RiggedMint 15:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

 Keep per nom. Deede05 07:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of poets from Oceania

List of poets from Oceania (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Links to category, which is how this should be handled. See also ongoing deletion rq at https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2023/List_of_poets_from_the_United_States Gotanda (talk) 12:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The continent, Oceania, has many countries. So, let me see if I have got user:Gotanda's proposal straight: If one wants to explore "Which poets come from countries in Oceania, but not from Australia", then user:Gotanda thinks that it is adequate to sift thru the following "list":
  

Matoug Adam, Dritëro Agolli, Claribel Alegría, Manlio Argueta, Ryhor Baradulin, Kamau Brathwaite, Hienadz Buraukin, Ernesto Cardenal, Teresa Colom i Pich, Luis Cordero Crespo, Viriato Clemente da Cruz, Bernard Binlin Dadié, Adwa Al-Dakheel, Oliver Friggieri, Stephen Gray (writer), Rowley Habib, Hadrawi, Abdullah al-Hamid, Wilson Harris, Emile Hemmen, Monika Herceg, Hồ Xuân Hương, Keri Hulme, Ibn ul-Arabi, Naftali Herz Imber, Ismail Kadare, Kee Thuan Chye, Gulnazar Keldi, Kim Chi-ha, Haji Qadir Koyi, George Lamming, César Lévano, John Lyons (poet), Francisco Massiani, Peya Mushelenga, Álvaro Mutis, Nezahualcoyotl, Sapa'u Ruperake Petaia, Valeri Petrov, Norberto James Rawlings, Rolly Lambert Fogoum, Marcelino dos Santos, Léopold Sédar Senghor, , Enrique Verástegui.

(Thumbs down, to that idea is what I am leaning toward.)
Keep article, is what I am leaning toward. 2001:2020:319:E17D:593E:A0F5:B73C:5148 (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

• List of scientists from Oceania, was not pushed off the cliff, when an opening was made for that (six years ago). Cf. Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Lists of scientists. 2001:2020:319:E17D:3130:87DA:6432:E153 (talk) 02:04, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  Other stuff exists is a weak argument. This is an arbitrary list. A category would work better, being more comprehensive, possibly divided by country and automatically updated. Rathfelder (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  The system you are writing about, as if it were a future idea, is already here: The system has (mainly) only two pages (while we wait for the Delete-discussion to finish):
  

  Poets from North America.
  

  Poets from Oceania.
  

  Each article is broken down into sections about countries (where at least there is one wiki-article about a person from that country).--The two (main) articles, for now, has more than just the names of poets (and related countries).--With "your" system it is also, difficult to go back to - for re-checking dubious articles (such as the one about a world-champion African boxer who is a poet, and has no article at English-wiki.--He is from one of the countries without a category about poets.--Newsflash: that boxer/poet article ain't gonna survive a Delete-discussion, on the merits of his non-notable fights, claimedly in Bangkok and other places.)--
  Your argument about "arbitrary list" is a bogus argument, at least when it relates to New Zealand and Samoa: the list names all the (relevant) articles from those two places.--
  The section about Australia, can be improved. But Delete-discussions are not for the purpose of improving articles: If an article is barely okay, then it should survive. If not, it goes down in flames.--
  The article seems to indicate that Simple-wiki has a problem in regard to having articles created about poets from countries in Oceania; There are poets from three different countries, and that is clear from the article in question.--Now, if one could delete the article in question, then hardly anone will know that Simple-wiki only has articles from 3 different countries in Oceania; Brushing things under the rug - maybe that is a justifiable reason for deleting the article. 2001:2020:319:E17D:19D9:549:252E:22 (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  IP editing is of course OK, but if you wish to discuss, then a pseudonymous account might be helpful. It appears all of the IP comments here are one person, but that is unclear. Also, projecting negative motivations onto other editors is not constructive. Sticking with the article is better. It is quite obvious that Simple is far less extensive than EnWP. The reason is fewer constructive editors. --Gotanda (talk) 00:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of poets from North America

List of poets from North America (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Mostly links to categories, which is how this should be handled. See also ongoing deletion rq at https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2023/List_of_poets_from_the_United_States Gotanda (talk) 12:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The continent, North America, has many countries. So, let me see if I have got user:Gotanda's proposal straight: If one wants to explore "Which poets come from countries in/on North America, but not from Canada, Cuba, Jamaica or the United States", then user:Gotanda thinks that it is adequate to sift thru the following "list":
  

Matoug Adam, Dritëro Agolli, Claribel Alegría, Manlio Argueta, Ryhor Baradulin, Kamau Brathwaite, Hienadz Buraukin, Ernesto Cardenal, Teresa Colom i Pich, Luis Cordero Crespo, Viriato Clemente da Cruz, Bernard Binlin Dadié, Adwa Al-Dakheel, Oliver Friggieri, Stephen Gray (writer), Rowley Habib, Hadrawi, Abdullah al-Hamid, Wilson Harris, Emile Hemmen, Monika Herceg, Hồ Xuân Hương, Keri Hulme, Ibn ul-Arabi, Naftali Herz Imber, Ismail Kadare, Kee Thuan Chye, Gulnazar Keldi, Kim Chi-ha, Haji Qadir Koyi, George Lamming, César Lévano, John Lyons (poet), Francisco Massiani, Peya Mushelenga, Álvaro Mutis, Nezahualcoyotl, Sapa'u Ruperake Petaia, Valeri Petrov, Norberto James Rawlings, Rolly Lambert Fogoum, Marcelino dos Santos, Léopold Sédar Senghor, Enrique Verástegui.

(Thumbs down, to that idea is what I am leaning toward.)
Keep article, is what I am leaning toward. 2001:2020:319:E17D:593E:A0F5:B73C:5148 (talk) 01:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

• List of scientists from North America, was not pushed off the cliff, when an opening was (arguably) made for that (six years ago). Cf. Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Lists of scientists. 2001:2020:319:E17D:79B1:ADF4:4412:FC66 (talk) 02:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC)/ 2001:2020:319:E17D:79B1:ADF4:4412:FC66 (talk) 02:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
• Other stuff still existing, after having been associated with the subject (that was later deleted), in a Delete-discussion - that can be viewed as an okay argument. 2001:2020:319:E17D:19D9:549:252E:22 (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ramesh Krishnan

Ramesh Krishnan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: QD was declined, but this is a word-for-word copy and paste from EnWP without any simplification or attribution. Gotanda (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominator. The lead has directly been copied from Ramesh Krishnan on English Wikipedia with little to no signs of simplification. Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 06:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Gurjar clans

Gurjar clans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cyber.Eyes.2005 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Requesting the deletion of the page Gurjar clans. It has little content, and most of the listed links are to uncreated pages. The content of this page could be incorporated into a section on the "Gurjar" page, suggesting a merger. Additionally, it largely depends on a single source that too needs verification. Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

@Cyber.Eyes.2005 this is not a right excuses I want to extend the article first even the article is new and not meet the criteria for deletion when there are reliable references to meet General notability.TalanChopra (talk) 20:19, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep list is according to the General notability criteria of the Simple Wikipedia and list is long enough to stand even the article is nominated immediately and the list can be expand enough and the intention of nominator is not as per the Wikipedia Neutrality and he is also making disruptive edits at [Kushan]] page and involved to remove large amount of well sourced materials without starting a discussion at talk page for the removal of large amount of content.

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rashid Ali Ghazipuri

Rashid Ali Ghazipuri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Peterdownunder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of notability, a self published author of e-books. I was unable to find any other references apart from promotional press releases. Peterdownunder (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agree with nominators reasons. Writing self-published books does not make one a notable author. Ravensfire (talk) 03:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Steve Haddadin

Steve Haddadin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Written like an advert, fails WP:GNG. Sources look to have self-promotion. RiggedMint 18:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep, widely published. As noted earlier, he sources Readers digest, Fullerton (an education institution), and Ok magazine (staff written) seem to be reliable sources per the GNG guidelines. Bonvoyambassador (talk) 20:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

  Are they independent of the subject? RiggedMint 17:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

  Does independent of the subject require the page is not maintained exclusively by the subject?

  "Wikipedia articles are generally written based on in-depth, independent, reliable sourcing with some subject-specific exceptions." per subject specific notability guidelines

  It is unlikely an article about an un-noteworthy subject's birthday being national waygu day is sufficient to meet the independent reliable sourcing standard. ManThatIsActually511 (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  The contention here is over source selection; you've cherry-picked a single sentence from the article. The subject is a significant real estate figure who founded a holiday, and the sources meet GNG. Your comments and activity suggest a personal bias against this individual, indicated by your admission of knowing them by your comment “I have stood next to him”, hinting at envy. Continued spamming or vandalism will lead to a block. Bonvoyambassador (talk) Bonvoyambassador (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  Notability strongly prefers "recognized peer-reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally."

  Sources provided in this article are OKmagazine, written by OKmagazine staff, lacking a named author. Further it lacks any cites for its for its assertion.

  The same can be said for the Reader's Digest article. Are we to believe that the best and brightest minds at OKmagazine and Reader's Digest worked tirelessly on these articles? Or is it more likely that the subject commissioned these articles?

  Generally speaking, wikipedia articles should be reserved for noteworthy political figures, people that have made historical accomplishments in their field, coaches of athletic programs, etc.

  Note everyone with a college degree deserves a wikipedia page. "No subject is automatically or inherently merely because it exists" per WP:NRVE. Personal accomplishments like that should be limited to a resume or a social media page.

  Wikipedia is supposed to a compendium of human knowledge and history, curated by people that care. Shameless self-promotion should be taken elsewhere. ManThatIsActually511 (talk) 18:22, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  Your emphasis on sourcing and notability within the Wikipedia framework is valid. However, while OKmagazine and Reader's Digest are recognized sources, suspicions of commissioned content need solid backing, such as a promotional tone or explicit disclosures like "sponsored" or "paid for" tags which these platforms do have, but not in this case. None of these tags are on these sources. Regarding OK staff written, articles written by their staff are considered credible contributions from the publication as a whole.

  Regarding Wikipedia's notability criteria you referenced, it indeed focuses on individuals with significant contributions in various realms. Notability guidelines highlight that notability is based on significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. These sources may include peer-reviewed publications, credible books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources. The sources referenced as mentioned above are peer reviewed and reliable and your accusations are without evidence. Notability also extends beyond the article sources. It's worth noting that the subject in question has a broader range of notability, evidenced through TV interviews and other media indexing, which extends beyond personal achievements mentioned in these articles.

  Your reference to personal interaction with the subject ("I have stood next to him") and the recent creation of your user account will be perceived as bias, affecting your objectivity. Wikipedia prioritizes neutral, unbiased editing. Without strong evidence, any claims about the nature of the sources or biases should be approached cautiously. Bonvoyambassador (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  Your account is only one day older than mine.

  Yours only currently exists because your previous accounts were banned. It's obvious that you are Steve Haddadin, editing this page. How can you be objective? ManThatIsActually511 (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

  These are baseless accusations, but you have referenced standing next to subject. Bonvoyambassador (talk) 20:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes, they are produced independently by the source on the subject not by the subject as an ad as per GNG guidelines. Bonvoyambassador (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• Delete, no evidence of notability. Peterdownunder (talk) 20:38, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

  Agreed. ManThatIsActually511 (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

^Spam user

• Agreed.

Bonvoyambassador (talk) 5:08, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

The sources Readers digest, Fullerton (an education institution), and Ok magazine (staff written) seem to be reliable sources per the GNG guidelines.

This request is due to close on 18:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Papal appointment

Papal appointment (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Below the standard of an article. Misleading. Rathfelder (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete The article is written as if it is the way monarchs of the Holy Roman Empire are currently appointed by the pope. There is no longer aHoly Roman Empire and therefore no current appointments. The article is therefore a nonsense and should be deleted. fr33kman 19:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Riley Terry

Riley Terry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced. I cant find any trace of this person, though there is an author [[1]] Terry Riley Rathfelder (talk) 23:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Geopbyte

Geopbyte (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be an actually used term. Kk.urban (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete probably fake. If somehow not, I have never heard the term used anywhere.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Non drug use inhalation of tobacco smoke

Non drug use inhalation of tobacco smoke (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sjö has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Newly created very implausible search term Sjö (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Is intended as the article title for reasons given, not as a search term Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

"Non drug use inhalation of tobacco smoke" is FK 55.9 ‎"Passive smoking" is 35.6 indicates a simpler meaning at 55.6. Readers of simple.wikipedia won't necessarily search for the idiom, more common "passive smoking" as they perhaps won't know the term and would instead locate the article by an internal link at an article. The idiomatic version is a complication of the simpler 55.9 which explains the actual occurence. Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC) https://goodcalculators.com/flesch-kincaid-calculator/ was used by copypaste for scores as shown in the previous "20:01" 20:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - that is what I am leaning toward.--That phrase, used as a title (or redirect) seems to be an explanation, not one of the names, used about the topic.--Would it help keep this discussion short, short, short, if i suggest: Go to talk page, and ask which (possible) Redirects, might be a good idea.--On the other hand, this Delete discussion might become a thousand-words per-person, per day, thingy.--Do i however think that there might be a resonable redirect, that is an explanation? Possibly, but i expect that bad alternatives (and little else), is as far as we will get, until this discussion closes.--(I am willing to be surprised, in a positive way. But i ain't holding my breath.) 46.15.114.252 (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
• Clear Delete. Editor has been blocked for disruptive editing, which this is a prime example of. --Gotanda (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Nobody uses this name. Also, again, the Flesch-Kincaid score is not the only thing to think about. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Abdul Basit Syed

Abdul Basit Syed (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SpeakNeak has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lack of independent coverage. Just interview and profile mentions. Fails notability criteria. GNG. SpeakNeak (talk) 05:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Promotional piece for an otherwise unnotable individual with no significant coverage from reliable sources.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete: Blatently promotional without any justification. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of legal entity types by country

List of legal entity types by country (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesnt match the title. This is just a poor copy of Legal entity Rathfelder (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete The content is not "by country". Kk.urban (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vespa velutina eradication

Vespa velutina eradication (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested quick deletion; let's do an RfD. In short, we are talking about the Asian hornet, which has also appeared in France, Spain, Portugal, South Korea, and Japan. In many of these it is classified as invasive species. As an invasive speciews it has few/new natural ennemies in the area where it is an invasive species. But that's beside the point: keep or delete, this time as an RfD? Eptalon (talk) 19:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge into Asian Hornet, I can create the article for it too. RiggedMint 19:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

  We can only merge to existing articles... Eptalon (talk) 19:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

  Well now it exists... RiggedMint 20:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

• Keep The article has suffered Special:Diff/9210005/9214067 a large amount of content and reference removal followed by a request for Quick Deletion based upon purported lack of documentation. I suggest revert and keep. The citations show Vespa velutina eradication incurs costs and generates coverage to a much greater degree than the mere existence of the species in its native range. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

  We dont need a seperate article about eradication. Rathfelder (talk) 08:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

It's common to talk about eradication campaigns separately from the organism. We often hear about smallpox, rinderpest, malaria and Guinea worm and this species could have a suitable article also. This is even more appropriate now because there are efforts on 2 continents. It only requires me to expand it and I'm working to do so. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Yet this is not enwiki, its simplewiki, we don't want many articles that make it hard for the reader to read about a certain lifeform. (Might I add, smallpox and malaria are way more notable than a hornet.) RiggedMint 20:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

You've got 3 days to impress us with what can be done. fr33kman 21:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

• Merge to Asian hornet works for me too. It's an obvious solution. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Merge to Asian hornet as a section.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Merge into Asian hornet fr33kman 21:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
• Comment if merged, the exaggeration and misleading use of images and refs needs to be removed. --Gotanda (talk) 00:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

  Delete: Now that I have time, here is an example of sloppy referencing and pushing a point.

  From the article:

  Georgia[10] and the US government are also attempting to eradicate Vespa velutina.[11] The eradication effort began on August 15 2023.[12]

  South Carolina began an eradication program November 21 2023. The federal government is helping the state government to do this.[13]

  [10] is just a link to the Georgia Dept of Agriculture, so I guess it shows that Georgia exist. It allows hornet reporting, but no mention of eradication.

  [11] shows that there are not enough to be eradicated, "So far, no full colonies of the hornets have been found—just two individual hornets on the same property."

  [12] is the same as [10] but does not say anything about eradication starting in August 2023. [11] Does mention a state of Washington program in 2023, "Upon luring the hornets, the team used radio transmitters to then locate and trap the pests. So far in 2023, there have been no sightings of the murder hornet in Washington" but not eradication.

  [13] "November 21" is the date of publication of the ref. Ref contains no announcement of a program starting November 21, or any existing program of eradication. The article says the federal government is "committed to working with our state partners on the eradication of this pest", and includes that the state "will work with federal officials to confirm suspected specimens and will respond to active hornet colonies if they are located." There is no eradication because there is nothing to eradicate yet.

  The whole thing is a mess and based upon the sloppiness here, one could reasonably question the citation of paywalled references. This article is just pushing a point. See the article history and talk page for other deletions of OR and poorly referenced or misleading contents. --Gotanda (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• [10] is just a link to the Georgia Dept of Agriculture, so I guess it shows that Georgia exist. and [12] is the same as [10] but does not say anything about eradication starting in August 2023. Misconfigured http server. I have corrected this.

• No, you changed to a completelky different source which also does not support your statement. --Gotanda (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

• I changed 1 character so the server would recognise the url. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• [11] shows that there are not enough to be eradicated, "So far, no full colonies of the hornets have been found—just two individual hornets on the same property." If you search for the word eradicated … Additionally in the 6 weeks since I believe there have been 5 nest eradications. (This is OR. I won't add this until I find a source.)

• You need to go back and delete the other OR you have added, which I deleted, and you replaced. --Gotanda (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

• [11] Does mention a state of Washington program in 2023 Vespa mandarinia in Washington is different from Vespa velutina in Georgia.

• You are missing the point. The ref you used to support 2023 eradication in Georgia does not talk about that, but does talk about Washington. You seem to be confused or confusing these situations. --Gotanda (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

• If you search the ref for the string Georgia … the first summary line … Invasive Spices (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

  Which, again, is about the first ever sighting of the insects--not an eradication program, let alone one that specifically starts in Georgia in 2023. You keep adding misinformation to the article and to this discussion, which is disruptive to this wiki. --Gotanda (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• [13] "November 21" is the date of publication of the ref. Ref contains no announcement of a program starting November 21, or any existing program of eradication. The article says the federal government is "committed to working with our state partners on the eradication of this pest", and includes that the state "will work with federal officials to confirm suspected specimens and will respond to active hornet colonies if they are located." There is no eradication because there is nothing to eradicate yet. I'm uncertain how to respond to this.

• Perhaps you should not be editing these aricles if you are uncertain of the meaning of a plain statement. --Gotanda (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

• Lovely. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• one could reasonably question the citation of paywalled references. No. WP:V.

• Just saying "No" is not constructive editing or collaborating effectively with other editors. Please reconsider your actions here. --Gotanda (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

• Lovely. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

This article is just pushing a point. What is that?

• You are making alarmist articles and stretching or changing the meaning of the refs you source about exotic insects which get sensational coverage in the press. --Gotanda (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

• Scientists and government officials are alarmed and are spending sensational amounts of money and talking about it in WP:RELIABLE sources. On the subject of exotic insects – you're wrong as I've only created this article – unless you've been looking on other wikis in which case you're entirely correct but I had scientific sources for those as well. – Invasive Spices (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• deletions of OR Use of images is never WP:OR. I've suggested on Talk: that you could ask the uploader.

• What would be the point of that? It would still be OR. We would just confirm whose. --Gotanda (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Invasive Spices (talk) 19:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• It's difficult to reply this way. Anyhow if you don't want to ask Asabengurtza then WP:OR and WP:IMAGE stand. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• We are nearing closure and I hope the decision is obvious. See:

• Compare Vespa velutina eradication to Asian hornet
• Compare Special:History/Vespa velutina eradication to Special:History/Asian hornet
• Compare Talk:Vespa velutina eradication to Talk:Asian hornet
• Compare byte size.
• Consider whether we should delete because another article was created to justify deletion. We certainly needed Asian hornet to exist but it would not have.

I hope the decision is obvious. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Wikipedia bots with unknown status

Category:Wikipedia bots with unknown status (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not currently used Kk.urban (talk) 23:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: The pages tag needs fixing as it isn't recognising the discussion.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Active Wikipedia bots

Category:Active Wikipedia bots (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Category:Active Wikipedia bots with no specified BRFA (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not currently used. Kk.urban (talk) 22:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Indian rituals after death

Indian rituals after death (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Content does not match article title. Gotanda (talk) 10:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yakety Yak (Yakety Yak, Take it Back)

Yakety Yak (Yakety Yak, Take it Back) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: According to enwiki, this is about a character from a "1991 celebrity charity music video film aimed at encouraging recycling using a combination of live action rock stars, rappers, and animated Warner Bros. characters". I don't think a character from this 50 minute video is notable, unless this is a well-known character like Smokey the Bear, which it doesn't seem to be. Kk.urban (talk) 00:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of poets from the United States

List of poets from the United States (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-encyclopedic, unmanageable list with no clear criteria for inclusion or exxclusion. Gotanda (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The number of notable (according to Wikipedia standards) poets from the US is reasonable to be included in a list. I don't think this is "non-encyclopedic". Kk.urban (talk) 00:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Delete The writer of this list is not being sensible or doesn't know what they are talking about. For example, they commented out Edgar Allen Poe and said he wrote no famous or important poetry. Therefore, I no longer trust the content of the list.Kk.urban (talk) 23:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

    " 23:25, 30 November ...‎ No important or famous poetry, from short-story writer Edgar Allan Poe (d. 1849), referenced".--To some or many, he is more famous as a short-story writer; The "List of poets" article, does not have a reference about his notability as a poet.--User:Kk.urban is the only one that has said "and said he wrote no famous or important poetry".--And yeah, I sort of get how anyone could have made the same misinterpretation that you did.--

    That mistake of yours, will not make me distrust your edits. 2001:2020:329:C36C:7C6A:2DD6:8E46:6CFA (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

• Keep - that is what I am leaning toward.--I added the word "famous" as a criteria.--"Famous or noted" - anyone can make that change, if that is a better criteria. 2001:2020:349:CAC3:F5DA:23E1:89F4:DFC0 (talk) 03:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  By definition, any poet with an article in Wikipedia must be notable, so noted is not a useful criteria. They may be noted for something else. Famous is highly subjective. --Gotanda (talk) 02:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

• Comment articles such as Pulitzer Prize for Poetry have clear criteria. This article includes Val Kilmer, Billy Corgan, and Alecia Keys? Categories are a better way of organizing things like this for people with mixed national identities. --Gotanda (talk) 06:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  I agree with User:Gotanda . This is what categories are for. Rathfelder (talk) 16:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

  @Rathfelder, just to make it clear, do you also agree to delete? --Gotanda (talk) 00:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

This article, and the following, should maybe have criteria changed to "has written important poetry" (and then one can remove Val Kilmer from the list, since he is not notable because of his poetry). Thoughts?--

• Comment: List of poets from Oceania,

List of poets from Africa,
From Asia,
From South America.--In regard to the article in discussion, perhaps redirect to List of poets from North America (if that gets started, before this Delete-discussion, ends). Thoughts?--I am fine with not having a list of everyone in Category:American poets. So, which (other, poet-names or) names seem undesirable on this list? 2001:2020:321:C171:74DA:2371:8ED6:5B42 (talk) 22:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

• Redirect to List of poets from North America - that is one possibility. 2001:2020:305:ABFC:FD5A:7070:9385:FAB0 (talk) 20:37, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Altaf Dadasaheb Sheikh

Altaf Dadasaheb Sheikh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Minimal sources that focus on the person, and the coverage of their films isn't much. This article was recently deleted on enwiki [2] for those problems. I've removed a couple of press releases hiding as new stories, some paid / vanity awards and unsourced awards. Just WP:TOOSOON for an article. Ravensfire (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

User:PivoBanka/2

User:PivoBanka/2 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cyber.Eyes.2005 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I believe there are several issues with this user page in question that warrant attention. Firstly, it contains extensive biographical information about "Sergey Kovalev", which seems beyond the scope of a user page and more aligned with an article. Additionally, the page appears to have elements of promotional content, showcasing Kovalev's business ventures and achievements. The inclusion of external links to personal websites, a Telegram channel, and TikTok might violate Wikipedia's guidelines on external links, especially if they serve a promotional purpose WP:UP#PROMO. Furthermore, the user page is structured like an article, with an infobox, references, and sections, deviating from the typical user page format, clearly violates WP:FAKEARTICLE. There's also a potential concern regarding copyright, as the content resembles biographical information that could be copied from other sources. Lastly, the level of notability suggested by the user page's detailed account of Kovalev's business activities may be more appropriate for a Wikipedia article than a user page, If it passes WP:Notability, I suggest making it an Wikipedia article. See: What may I not have in my user pages? Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 14:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep It's a sandbox. A lot of users start new articles in their userspace. This is allowed, especially because simplewiki doesn't have drafts. Kk.urban (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep per WP:USERSUBPAGE. I even have my own sandboxes, even one that is supposed to be inspired by another guys userpage. (which was also nominated here.) RiggedMint 16:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep Userspace is where drafts go here in simple due to the lack of something like Articles for Creation on EN.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:51, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lover Fest

Lover Fest (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Isaias204 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has been redirected on Wikipedia main (, and many of the same reasons apply here. While not a horrible article in terms of quality, most of the information could be used to expand Lover (Taylor Swift album), Folklore (Taylor Swift album), and The Eras Tour. As such, it should be deleted with the other articles being expanded. Isaias204 (talk) 23:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• merge into relevant articles fr33kman 19:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Clear consensus is to delete Peterdownunder (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

List of Disney characters

List of Disney characters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Going to quote part of the deletion rational when this page was deleted on en.wiki because its equally applicable here. "As far as I can tell, this appears to be an attempt to create a list of every character, no matter how minor, that ever appeared in a piece of animation created by Disney. Not only is this a blatant example of WP:NOTDIRECTORY (falling under the "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as....persons (real or fictional)" example)" -Djsasso (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete fr33kman 21:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete per Djsasso. Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 12:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. RiggedMint 14:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Per above. Chapter49493 (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete 今好きになる (talk) 12:59, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Notability not established Peterdownunder (talk) 11:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Balajii Mancha

Balajii Mancha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

94rain has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, for existing sources in Special:PermanentLink/9219342:

• They are the Head Of Digital Marketing at Infinity Reach, source #1 is not independent
• #3-5 seems to be user-generated content
• #2, #6, no significant coverage
• #7-8 Youtube

unlikely to have other WP:RS 94rain ^Talk 08:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete over-the-top promotional article based on user-generated sources and a sprinkling of sources with just passing mention. This isn't enough to show notability for a Wikipedia article. Ravensfire (talk) 19:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Speedy delete as a hoax Peterdownunder (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Artificial intelligence (video games)

Artificial intelligence (video games) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Complex, AI-generated, and not related to video games. Kk.urban (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Nonsense. Rathfelder (talk) 22:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

 Comment: It seems the page is already deleted under A6, should we close? RiggedMint 13:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  Peterdownunder (talk) 20:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

I’m a LA…Get Me Out of Here!

I’m a LA…Get Me Out of Here! (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As far as I can tell, this show lacks any coverage in reliable sources. Kk.urban (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete A hoax based off of I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here!. I would have quickly deleted this, if I had seen it myself, and probably still could. --Ferien (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Same hoax made by the same guy, I'd consider them pretty much an LTA for simplewiki for now. RiggedMint 14:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

  Also, could we QD the other stuff that the IP(s) and users made? They're definitely not needed as far as I can tell. RiggedMint 14:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Unreferenced single sentence Peterdownunder (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Principle of intervention

Principle of intervention (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: One line unreferenced. Rathfelder (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Apart from lacking a source, this should be put as an addition to a page, not a page in its own right. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:14, 4 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Notability not shown in independent reliable sources. Peterdownunder (talk) 20:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Manikanta Belde

Manikanta Belde (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

0x0a has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article has neither any sources nor indicates the importance of the subject. 0x0a (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

External Links

• [Manikanta Belde's Official Website](https://manikantabelde.in/)
• [Manikanta Belde on IMDb](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm15284392/)
• [Manikanta Belde on Goodreads](https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/8100673.Manikanta_Belde)
• [Manikanta Belde on Wikialpha](http://wikialpha.org/wiki/Manikanta_Belde)
• [Manikanta Belde on Quora](https://www.quora.com/Who-is-Manikanta-Belde-and-what-are-his-notable-achievements-in-the-world-of-literature-and-personal-development)
• [Manikanta Belde on Mid-day](https://www.mid-day.com/brand-media/article/manikanta-belde-an-author-speaker-and-entrepreneur-23310958)
• [Asian Prime News Article](https://www.asianprimenews.com/news/manikanta-belde-indian-author-and-public-speaker-inspiring-lives-through-books/)
• [Manikanta Belde on Apple Podcasts](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/manikanta-belde/id1128684329)
• [Borok Times](https://boroktimes.com/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Scoop360](https://scoop360.in/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Tripura 360 News](https://tripura360news.in/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Indian Times Express](https://indiantimesexpress.com/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Hindustan Pioneer](https://hindustanpioneer.com/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Weekly Mail](https://weeklymail.in/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Entrepreneur Story](https://entreprenuerstory.com/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Daily Mail Express](https://dailymailexpress.in/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Express Hunt](https://expresshunt.in/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Timesticker](https://timesticker.com/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Prime24Seven](https://prime24seven.com/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [News Patrolling](https://newspatrolling.com/discover-the-power-of-self-liberation-with-stop-tolerance-by-manikanta-belde/)
• [Newswire Online](https://www.newswireonline.com/stop-tolerance-transformative-guide-manikanta-belde-hyderabad/)
• [Daily Global Reporter](https://dailyglobalreporter.com/embracing-personal-growth-manikanta-belde-hyderabad/)
• [Madhya Pradesh Times](https://www.madhyapradeshtimes.in/early-readers-testimonials-stop-tolerance-manikanta-belde-hyderabad/)
• [Global News Hub](https://globalnewshub.in/10-years-experience-personal-development/)
• [News Maker India](https://www.newsmakerindia.co.in/embrace-authentic-self-manikanta-belde-hyderabad/)
• [Business Journal](https://www.businessjournal.co.in/manikanta-belde-authentic-living)

Check all the links to ensure the notability and please update accordingly but do not delete the page without any perfect creadible reason.

Campaigningsource (talk) 12:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

I moved the comments into discussion section. MathXplore (talk) 12:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

I acknowledge the concerns raised regarding the Manikanta Belde Wikipedia page, specifically the need for additional sources and clarification of the subject's importance. In response, I have implemented the following measures to enhance the credibility and verifiability of the content:

Inclusion of Reputable Sources:

Incorporated information from well-established and reputable sources such as Asian Prime News, Borok Times, Daily Global Reporter, and others. Ensured that all added sources are from independent and reliable publications known for their accuracy. Highlighting Noteworthy Achievements:

Emphasized Manikanta Belde's significant contributions to the field of self-help and personal development literature. Provided detailed insights into his successful works, notably "Stop Tolerance," which has achieved widespread acclaim with over 50,000 copies sold. Included information about awards and recognitions, such as the Literary Excellence Award 2022 and Wordsmith Achievement Prize 2023. Rigorous Content Review:

Conducted a thorough review of the entire page to eliminate any content that lacked proper citation or verification. I am eager to collaborate further and welcome any constructive feedback to refine and improve the Manikanta Belde Wikipedia page. My objective is to ensure that the page adheres to the highest standards of verifiability, reliability, and notability.

Thank you for your consideration and assistance in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. 103.68.23.104 (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

The Sources all have the same title, seems suspicious? RiggedMint 13:36, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Please explore the extensive coverage of Manikanta Belde, a highly respected individual with a significant real-world following, as confirmed by Google research and article data. We'll specifically address the numerous articles, each featuring unique titles and diverse content, showcasing the depth and breadth of Belde, impact and influence. Additionally, I have already provided concrete proof of the credibility of these articles, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the positive reception and recognition has received. moreover there are thousands of articles and press releases published on his name. please go through them. Campaigningsource (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Since those are all paid/sponsored articles (press releases, really), those are anything but independent of the subject and aren't [[WP:RS|reliable sources at all. This is a pretty clear promotional article, I'm thinking there's a WP:COI here, and probably undeclared paid editing as well. Ravensfire (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete Way too many paid/sponsored articles, lots of other unreliable sources, this is a promotional article without enough to support WP:GNG being met. I've also got concerns about undeclared paid editing and WP:COI. Ravensfire (talk) 18:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

This is all promotional rubbish. No evidence that any independent reputable source sees him as notable.Rathfelder (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete Promotional non-notable rubbish fr33kman 19:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

how can we say that its an promotional content and what will be the evidence for reputable content, is mid day, times of india or IMDB is not an authorised content, tripura360 and indianexpress hindustan pioneer is also a reputable article. and we can take it as notable and the person manikanta hold 100s of news and notable articles published on this name over google also he is recognised with govt. awards that also to be taken in note. and as per Campaigningsource (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

I found out Campaigningsource (talk · contribs) is banned on enwiki for promotion. I feel like he is just promoting their business/article by crosswiki editing. RiggedMint 19:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

I attempted an unofficial edit without sufficient information and faced a ban as a result. but manikanta belde having several recognitions and notable articles over google. Campaigningsource (talk) 19:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Check changes over the page its a notable profile having several notable recognitions 117.55.242.132 (talk) 05:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

I did. It's still full of junk sources, self-published sources, paid articles that are press-releases and nowhere near anything resembling an actual good reliable source with significant coverage, so the !vote for delete stands for me. In addition, the tone is so over-the-top promotional a marketing team clearly wrote it. I'm not going to copy-edit something that's been written by an undeclared paid editor. Ravensfire (talk) 13:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

• Quick Delete QD A4/G11. The sources are clearly non-realiable (per Ravensfire) and are promoting a person. RiggedMint 13:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  Peterdownunder (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

AI effect

AI effect (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Was Quick Deleted as A1, but then restored at the creating editor's request. No improvements were made. What is here is a complex stub with little meaning. The reference does not support the content such as it is, so seems like just very brief OR with minimal and possibly incorrect information if anything. Gotanda (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The reference does support the text.

It would be very unusual WP:OR which has sources.

Nominator should read WP:BEFORE.

The real problem is the complexity. This is philosophy. There is a great deal of irreducible complexity. It will always be difficult to write on en: and this is simple:. – Invasive Spices (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

The "Intelligence at any price? A criterion for defining AI" ref links to an abstract which does not mention the effect. It might be in the article but it is not properly cited (page number) and behind a costly paywall. If this truly is notable, then a proper reference should be easily available. Your editing is becoming disrputive.. --Gotanda (talk) 06:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Very disruptive fr33kman 13:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Likewise, the cited Wired article makes no mention of an AI effect. --Gotanda (talk) 06:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Finally, ref 1 does not appear in the text and it is unclear what it is referring to anyway. So please just stop. --Gotanda (talk) 06:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh the pain!!.. fr33kman 13:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Paywalled references should be deleted on sight as unreliable. They also bring NPOV and COI into play. They ruin the entire concept of a free encyclopaedia. fr33kman 13:20, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Nonsense. Wikipedia allows references to paywalled websites and books. Kk.urban (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  fr33kman 19:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Doom Dance

Doom Dance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable Gotanda (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• It's nonsense, delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

  Not encyclopaedic. Rathfelder (talk) 22:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  fr33kman 19:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Cities of Indonesia

Cities of Indonesia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This an unreferenced paragraph about cities in general. Its not about Indonesia and its not very comprehensible. Rathfelder (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per Rathfelder. It's useless. Kk.urban (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Keep per WP:BEFORE. It can definitely be rewritten. RiggedMint 16:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

  I'm not against an article on Cities of Indonesia, but this is not even a start on it. Its a personal essay. Rathfelder (talk) 19:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

  Then it's best to blank it and start over. Its still a notable subject. RiggedMint 14:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  Then why don't you do that? This is not List of cities in Indonesia. Kk.urban (talk) 15:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  fr33kman 19:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Mehak Gul

Mehak Gul (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think all FIDE Woman Candidate Masters qualify as being notable. Note: the required ELO score for "Woman Candidate Master" is lower than that for "Candidate Master", which I also think does not make someone notable. This player does not meet the requirements at en:WP:NCHESS. Kk.urban (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. delete by admin Macdonald-ross fr33kman 19:23, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Niraj Kumar

Niraj Kumar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Getting one award doesn't make a person notable, and that's all I can see here. Kk.urban (talk) 02:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  fr33kman 19:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Abdul Habib Attari

Abdul Habib Attari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Baazarr has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Baazarr (talk) 23:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Notable??? Baazarr (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Notable enough? Thanks.

Baazarr (talk) 23:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete This is a bizarre request, with the original article author filing this RFD. I was unable to find any reliable sources about this person that could meet GNG or NPROF, and the article's only claim about this person does not meet the bar for inclusion. Chenzw  Talk  23:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
• Administrator note: Extended again to 22:12, December 4 2023 (UTC). This discussion was not transcluded untl today.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

:Extended to 19th November -issues with transcludinf/listing it on the RfD page--Eptalon (talk) 09:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. The page has been rewritten as a disambiguation page, and the unsbstantiated abbreviations removed. Peterdownunder (talk) 10:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Sz

Sz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

つがる has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hello. This redirect seems like an non-common abbreviation of Schizophrenia, so I am sending it to RFD for discussion. On Google, the abbreviation 'Sz' is not found... Tsugaru let's talk! :) 01:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

@つがる: that is very easily provable: sz is shown in the second source of the article. For your ease I replicate the link here: ""schizophrenia sz" Google Scholar" Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 01:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

@Simpul skitsofreeneea: Thanks for the info. I just didn't see it as a common abbreviation, so I just sent it for discussion here for further thoughts. Not that I have anything against you. :) --Tsugaru let's talk! :) 01:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Also I wasn't able to open the link. So when I looked up "Sz" according to EN Wikipedia Sz is short for "Seizure". While this site refers SZ as the abbreviation for Schizophrenia. Tsugaru let's talk! :) 02:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

I think you meant existing not common, because if it is common is difficult to determine without a numerical survey: depending on the percentage returns for the whole number of doctors - the sample size describes the confidence level for a generalization: such that the survey provides a relative value which is then expressed in a word not number (numbers are obviously additionally accepted) Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

the s is curvy the z isn't and goes in the other direction: together they look okay and complement each other like two similar things....but different. I think the abreviation is nice. If you think not, that is fine with me. I can't change the reality though. Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 02:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Replying to your below question, enwiki means the English Wikipedia. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete This is not used on enwiki, and I have never heard it before. According to enwiki, there are many things that this could mean, and this is not one of them. QuicoleJR (talk) 02:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

  Update: I am not opposed to Kk.urban's disambiguation page, only the redirect. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete This looks like another generic redirect that will likely only cause confusion on the readers of the wiki.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

This is not used on enwiki, and I have never heard it before

It is an enwiki - perhaps I've misunderstood: we write in English - what other does enwiki mean? and I already indicated the existence of the reality of the abbreviation: the reality is shown in the 1st reply:

For your ease I replicate the link here: " "schizophrenia sz" Google Scholar"

— Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 01:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

obviously people who use the abbreviation or other people who know of the use of the abreviation would use the redirect well I thought it would e useful for people who have viewed the schizophrenia artilce which has the abrevistion on there who then want to relocate the article without needing to type in the complete word.

According to enwiki, there are many things that this could mean, and this is not one of them.

Is not a good argument for very obvious reasons (which I indicated in the 1st instance by the google scholar return: that "sz" exists as an abbreviation) the work on enwiki is not verifiable: so no-one could knows if it true. I provided verication: you don't want to accept my answers: I won't attempt to convince people who cannot see the answers that already exist. Let me think like this: given the difference between a tyrannical fascist answer and the correct answer: tyrannical fascist often wins because winning is everything so killing and murder is possible as a winning choice : contrary answers just disappear from peoples view: why not give me that type of way of thinking, as winning matters (is the subjet matter) not the reality of the debate. Let's look together boys and girls: "seizure sz" → https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=seizure+sz+&btnG= the proof that it exists: so you win! that's all that matters - but I provide the proof, you don't win, so no reality, is that it? Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 10:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

My point is that this could mean many different things. We should not redirect it to Seizure either. We should not redirect it at all. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Well within the scope of the article and also in the scope of existing literature it also means as is used in the existing articles currently. The abbreviation is Flesch Kincaid 100 the word is 0. I don't prefer or not the use, the F K is the reason I'm using it. That sz could mean seizure, does not mean that sz cannot mean some other thing: for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sz is not an introduction to a contest of which one is the winning abbreviation. Sz seizure does not exclude sz schizophrenia. Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 16:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

It does for redirects. This could redirect to seizure as much as it could to schizophrenia, and we can only pick one. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Besides, FK scores are not everything. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

@QuicoleJR: ""schizophrenia sz" Google Scholar" Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 16:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

so I changed it to: Revision as of 17:04, 27 November 2023 which is both Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 17:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Is easier I can get there faster as others also would: the estimated wiki-difference: (1) type sz perhaps 1/2 a second (2) routes (3) selection (4) double route. "Schizophrenia" is direct from typing - but economically the expenditure of the letters is much less than the effort of typing both physically and to think of the sequence for spelling of the word Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 17:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Copypaste the word is faster than the letters - but would need the word: having both the option of copypaste and letter route is useful, convenient, provisive, considerate: the abbreviation page is informative: c.f. caramazepine (anti-epileptic) drugs also used for schizophrenia Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 17:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

facilitative, an enhancement Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Antiepileptic drugs in schizophrenia: a review Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020 L. Hosák and J. Libiger Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 17:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

sz schizophrenia has a semantic value within seizure Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 17:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

• Disambiguate. I have created the disambiguation page. Evidence has been provided that both schizophrenia and seizures are sometimes abbreviated as "sz" so I think they should stay on the page. Kk.urban (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete As a doctor I can easily say this is not an abbreviation for schizophrenia. It's not a short form for any disorder. fr33kman 20:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  First time using employment knowledge in an onwiki "argument"' When doctors write in a patients' notes and charts we often use well known and understood short-cuts and abbreviations. This (Sz) is not one of one of them ; I've never seen it used ever. If it were used the doctor using it would constantly be getting [phone calls and bleeps asking what it means]. We use short-cuts to save time not to encourage people to waste our and their time by making calls and asking questions. I've clerked in India, USA, Canada and worked for 6 months MSF (Doctors Without Borders} and none of them use it. fr33kman 04:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep It is now a disambiguation page. – Angerxiety^! 12:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

  It won't be used. People won't perform searches on "sz" looking for schizophrenia. But, what the heck redirects are check fr33kman 04:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Unreferenced, no evidence of notability 10:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Lee Hamilton

Lee Hamilton (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: BLP unreferenced for 12 years. Rathfelder (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete This lacks a source. Flowbird77300 (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Keep per WP:BEFORE. Definitely a notable person and sources can definitely be added. RiggedMint 19:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
• Well, add the sources, don't just say "they exist". Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
• Keep as clearly notable. Per RiggedMint WP:BEFORE should be rememberd. -Djsasso (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

  Where is the evidence of notability? Rathfelder (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

  @Rathfelder: Enwiki page for him. And plus, lots of sources for him by just looking him up on google, I'm pretty sure the enwiki page is as good enough for him. RiggedMint 14:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  Also, should we Disambiguate the Politician from the Sportscaster? RiggedMint 14:56, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  Only two of those references work. Neither say anything much about him. Rathfelder (talk) 21:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  The existence of an enwiki page is not an indication of notability. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

• We've got here a very clear difference between those who say "Its notable" and those who say "show us". Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete No claim of notability. Would have been a candidate for QD. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 17:01, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Sunil Kalda

Sunil Kalda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:WP:GNG, also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Kalda --Ferien (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agree with nomination, not enough to meet notability, feels somewhat promotional in tone. Ravensfire (talk) 17:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Enzo Zelocchi

Enzo Zelocchi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG, also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enzo Zelocchi --Ferien (talk) 20:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete Easily an A4 decision fr33kman 19:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

  "received more than 290 awards from a variety of film festivals around the world" is a claim to notability --Ferien (talk) 21:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete better known as a scammer, than as an actor [3].

This request is due to close on 20:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

List of animated television series by episode count

List of animated television series by episode count (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced uncategorised article not touched for 4 years. Is a list like this worth keeping? When compared to [[4]] it clearly needs a lot of work. Rathfelder (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I don't think this article adds anything of importance to the project. It can be deleted without negatively harming the encyclopedia. fr33kman 19:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Garima Malik

Garima Malik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources are primary sources from YouTube, minimal mention in bio pages or search pages. No significant coverage in independent secondary sources. Ravensfire (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. using admin descrestion to close early s it is obviously AI written and of no help to the project fr33kman 20:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Glory (honor)

Glory (honor) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Very obviously written by an AI engine and is by no stretch of the imagination simple. Most of the page is commented out and it contains a conclusion section which usually indicates it was written by artificial intelligence. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  08:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete looks like something that ChatGPT wrote, even then since it states it's an essay it wouldn't be encyclopedic meaning that it would be deleted anyway.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete I do agree, I feel like AI-written content should be under QD criteria. RiggedMint 13:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete The article is not useful or simple. It was probably written by an AI and therefore no real effort was put into it, so it should be deleted. Kk.urban (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests