Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Mavic Chijioke Okeugo

Mavic Chijioke Okeugo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Displaying at these particular galleries doesn’t show notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Gradonymy

Gradonymy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not yet established for this new theory that was first proposed this year. CountryANDWestern (talk) 01:42, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Empty Beats for Lonely Rappers

Empty Beats for Lonely Rappers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There are no sources in this article, and I couldn't find any others that would make this subject notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Garsh (talk) 00:49, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pasobionic

Pasobionic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I've been unable to find sources to show this person passes WP:GNG, and none are provided on the article. Doesn't pass WP:BAND either. Garsh (talk) 00:42, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

V5000 Sagittarii

V5000 Sagittarii (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:43, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:43, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mir Muhammad Campaign Against Assyrians

Mir Muhammad Campaign Against Assyrians (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article seems to amount to a collection of non-notable events (as with similar articles that have been deleted, they’re mentioned in a sentence or two on a book) being conflated into a bigger article. The article suffers from a multiple of concerns including synthesis, POV pushing, and potential AI generation. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

William Dunst

William Dunst (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

lp0 on fire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Repeatedly recreated by sockpuppets on enwiki (en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jomajor8). The only cited source that looks reliable is based on an interview. lp0 on fire () 18:10, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per nom. Could be qdeleted as LTA-spam --NDG (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:10, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Claude Brosset

Claude Brosset (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. The only significant reliable source I can find is one about his death. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:35, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Carol Castro

Carol Castro (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:26, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Carlos Knight

Carlos Knight (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Knight. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:10, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:10, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

CD -24° 13806

CD -24° 13806 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:04, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:04, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Firman of Mir Muhammad

Firman of Mir Muhammad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability/verifiability of this article is not well established. The phrase "Firman of Mir Muhammad" appears nowhere but Wikipedia results related to this article. The phrase "The Firmān of Mīr-i-Kura" only appears in the title of a journal article that is cited elsewhere. Overall, this appears to be another Wikipedia entry that takes events that are covered in a sentence or two and conflates them or utilizes synthesis to create a grander event. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Heydarabad and Sahin Ghal Massacre (1918)

Heydarabad and Sahin Ghal Massacre (1918) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established for this massacre. As a comparison, Wikipedia includes it in a sentence on the larger article on the genocide. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:16, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Massacre of Rabban Hormizd

Massacre of Rabban Hormizd (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established for this massacre. The actions at Rabban Hormizd are summarized in one sentence each in the two sources provided. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:50, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shaswat Kumar

Shaswat Kumar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seemingly based primarily on paid coverage. Not otherwise notable, per WP:GNG. This has also been deleted on enwiki for similar reasons. Garsh (talk) 01:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:30, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Stephen Berry

Stephen Berry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:NPROF. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:47, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tadao Oka

Tadao Oka (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable on his own. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:44, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:44, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sylvester Petro

Sylvester Petro (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:42, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Come on - he is a noteworthy published author, and was instrumental in helping people understand nuanced issues on labor relations and labor law existent in the late sixties. ~2026-16101-06 (talk) 02:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:42, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sylvain Garant

Sylvain Garant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:39, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Syed Adil Hussain Shah

Syed Adil Hussain Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A case of BLP1E. Not notable - despite the many sources on this event in particular. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Adil Hussain Shah. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:37, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:37, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Swedish Transport Agency's law-breaking of security for computer system

Swedish Transport Agency's law-breaking of security for computer system (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There's a lot wrong with this article. A headache-inducing lead to start off Swedish Transport Agency's law-breaking of security for computer system was law-breaking - exposed by media in 2017 - regarding the security of information in a database of the governmental agency, Swedish Transport Agency. There seems to be only one part of the article that makes sense and that's the part in quotations! Ignoring the way this article is very poorly written, and the actual name itself, this seems to be a violation of NOTNEWS. It doesn't seem like there's enduring notability or a long-lasting effect here. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:27, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Swann VR

Swann VR (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. It seems like a lot of the references are press releases, such as these . --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:22, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:22, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Taeko Kawasumi

Taeko Kawasumi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. A very different case - in reviewing these Japanese footballer articles, I generally click away and move on when I see "played for the Japan national team" but these were two appearances at 15 years old and I am unable to find any other games. There is no jawiki article to review to find more references, the other languages are basically the content of our page or worse. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:18, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Taihei Hayashiya

Taihei Hayashiya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, appears on a TV series but this doesn't appear to make him notable. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:15, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Taiki Maekawa

Taiki Maekawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, one professional appearance as far as I can see. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taiki Maekawa. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:14, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Takaki Shigemitsu

Takaki Shigemitsu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:12, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:12, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Takashi Sambonsuge

Takashi Sambonsuge (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, eighteen professional appearances. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takashi Sambonsuge. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:12, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:12, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Takashi Umezawa

Takashi Umezawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, three professional appearances. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:11, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Thoriq Husler

Thoriq Husler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thoriq Husler. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:05, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:05, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Thousand Dollar Bee

Thousand Dollar Bee (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Just completely fails WP:GNG and has managed to stick around for over 5 years now. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:02, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:02, 19 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Voov

Voov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nine years on from Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Voov many of the deletion arguments are still ringing true. Some outrageous statements remain (Zuckerberg really wanted to buy this video streaming application but the "key people" wouldn't let him!?) and there is one source. This was pretty much kept on the basis it would be sourced later because it made some good claims to notability, but so many of these claims have proven to be nothing but nonsense so I feel that is especially now such a poor basis to have kept this article for so long. Searching Voov online (as "voov south africa" specifically, as there are many other Voov things out there) brings up nothing but social media, so it fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete For all of the contestable statements that are in the article, it only has one citation, and it's barely in-depth. No good sources elsewhere, not notable.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 21:38, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:54, 18 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Roy Lyster (2nd nomination)

Roy Lyster (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Second nomination: little has changed from my previous nomination which resulted in a SOFTDELETE closure. The only "new" information is his h-index and i10-index scores and number of citations. en:WP:NPROF specificially states "Citation measures such as the h-index, g-index, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. "

As before: Notability not shown through reliable sources. The bulk of sources are primary or from his institutions/programs. The awards cited are from his own industry/organizations and don't confer overall notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Interstellar comets

Interstellar comets (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Grandfatherclok has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The title is a phrase not a term used in astronomy, and therefore inapproprate. This article is redundant, inaccurate, and misleading. Interstellar objects are not from outer solar system. Interstellar objects do not have elliptical orbits about our sun or other stellar objects.

This article has been merged with interstellar object. Grandfatherclok (talk) 09:41, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I closed the RfD on interstellar objects a short time ago (as keep). As I understand, a comet can be an interstellar object , or it can have a (usually large) orbit. In its current form,the article up for deletion is not keepable. I would therefore suggest extending the article on interstellar object, and adding useful/keepable info there. I haven't looked at the article we have on comets, maybe some info can also go there. Redirect only needed, if this is a likely search term. Otherwise, clear delete--Eptalon (talk) 10:08, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

In astronomy, the term object refers to otherwise unspecified natural bodies under discussion. Comets are a specific category of objects so far observed, as of 2025, only in our solar system. Typical comets are primarily made of ice, but not all ice bodies are comets (e.g. Saturn's ring material).

interstellar objects seen in our star system in 2019 and 2025 had similar spectroscopic properties to comets, but comet similarity of the first in 2017, is speculation only based on course analysis after the object passed.

The Unikitty Movie

The Unikitty Movie (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources that would show notability are included in this article, and I was unable to find any others. Fails WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 02:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deaths in 2029

Deaths in 2029 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A bit too early isn't it? Having it as a redirect to Deaths in 2026 doesn't make much sense. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:05, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Gross Abdul Malikian

Gross Abdul Malikian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

TDKR Chicago 101 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources and article fail to establish notability. A Google search also doesn't really turn up any results from independent sources that establish notability. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Azadeh Ale'ayoub

Azadeh Ale'ayoub (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

TDKR Chicago 101 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources and article fail to establish notability. A Google search also doesn't really turn up any results from independent sources that establish notability. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Design.com

Design.com (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This particular website/tool failes WP:GNG, and the article in its current state borders on an advertisement. Perhaps notability can be shown for the company "DesignCrowd", since a lot of the article's sources seem to cover it extensively, but I don't think that's the case for this article's subject (the specific tool developed by that company). Garsh (talk) 20:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:45, 17 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Octophobia

Octophobia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

HurricaneZeta has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No indication of notability for this phobia because it has no sources. I also couldn't find many sources for it and don't think it's worthy of an entry here. Maybe it would fit better in Wiktionary. HurricaneZeta (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep - I will admit I thought this was a Hoax at first, but it does seem to be real and covered by reliable sources, such as 1 and 2. There are also others out there, but I wasn't as sure about their reliability. The article needs a lot of cleanup, but I think there is notability for the topic. Garsh (talk) 20:29, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Caprice Cayetano

Caprice Cayetano (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable actress. Only "claim to fame" is winning a reality TV show. Otherwise, her roles and appearances aren't significant. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:45, 16 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Murder of Jayson Zoleta

Murder of Jayson Zoleta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability for this event is shown. Potentially a hoax; can't verify things aside from Facebook pages and social media. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Vani 30 (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)The Murder of Jayson Zoleta is not a hoax! See at the referencesVani 30 (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete - Even if it's not a hoax, I don't see any evidence of notability from the article or a search for other sources. The sources from the article don't meet the requirements for WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok then search again it Thank you.Vani 30 (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:21, 16 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Big black cock

Big black cock (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Diademchild has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article arguably fails WP:Neutral point of view, WP:No original research or WP:GNG. ⇌ Diademchild^☥ _{🗣Sọ̀rọ̀ níbí} 19:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep This definitely does pass GNG but I think it is a matter of where we have this article and how we describe it. are a couple that talk about it slightly - it's difficult to easily find sources about these sorts of topic. ( is paywalled though is cited on enwiki's article- I may very well be able to access it but currently don't have the time, if someone is able to review it, that'd be great!) It is a slang and a type of porn, and the (incorrect) stereotype is exactly what it's referring to. No original research isn't really a concern here because the content does have a citation. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 19:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
• likely a well-established stereotype, well used in the porn industry. These may go back to colonial times; there are third-party relable sources (also in the form of books). The article we have now has a lot of room for expansuion, but that's not what we are discussing here. Likely a keep; if kept, article likely needs to be expanded to 2-3 paragraphs. --Eptalon (talk) 20:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  I have extended the article a little, and added what looked like meaningful references. Eptalon (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

• Rename to something like "sexual stereotyping of Black people". It has good references but the title is an obvious troll. Not sure what the pictures add either, we all know what penises look like. ~2026-14882-38 (talk) 21:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

  Big black cock (or BBC) is what the article is at at EnWP. As to image use: Wikipedia is not censored, we are talking about sexual stereotypes. We can always discuss the use of images, but I currently don't think they are problematic.. Eptalon (talk) 21:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep I agree with the comments mentioned by the users above, I have also done some copyediting. One thing I want to suggest is rename it to BBC (sexual slang), mainly because “Big Black Cock” is explicit and may be considered offensive or unnecessarily vulgar and “Big Black Cock” could be mistaken for a literal description. “BBC (sexual slang)” also tells the reade that the article is about a slang term, not just the literal phrase. The abbreviation is also a common usage in pornography. PieWriter (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

  EnWP has the article listed as BBC (sexual slang) with a redirect from the term big black cock. I think a similar change would be appropriate here, as you propose. Voyager640 (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

  I have added a sentence to say what the abbreviation stands for; note also: We likley wouldn't have an article on a large black rooster... Eptalon (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

  Rephrased it a bit PieWriter (talk) 10:22, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep Not trying to pile on, but notability has been shown for this subject. Yes, it is stereotyping, but it is a notable stereotype. Garsh (talk) 02:37, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
•  Keep There is room for improvement on this article, for sure, but it seems like a good start to an article after Eptalon's expansions. I have no issues with the images in the article; it seems essential to have them to illustrate the article's points. Especially with there being a similar article on the EnWP, it seems important to cover on the SEnWP as well.Voyager640 (talk) 04:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Senkoukai

Senkoukai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability of this style of karate is not shown CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG standards. Ravensfire (talk) 22:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Adriano Gajoni

Adriano Gajoni (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriano Gajoni. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Act Against Bullying

Act Against Bullying (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Act Against Bullying. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jinsong Road

Jinsong Road (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG as a street and so fails w:WP:GEOROAD. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yingchun Road

Yingchun Road (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG as a street and so fails w:WP:GEOROAD. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:48, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NGC 711

NGC 711 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable galaxy, fails w:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NGC 4588

NGC 4588 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable galaxy, fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Danila Bagrov

Danila Bagrov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be a notable character. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• @Ferien he is very significant character in Russian culture. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk | changes) 22:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:58, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Masashi Miyamura

Masashi Miyamura (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jake Dollery

Jake Dollery (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through reliable sources. The single award mention seems non-significant. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

You may feel that the nomination is not significant, but the fact it was awarded is truthful, and seems a an insignificant reason to delete the entry. The ISSA annual awards is a legitimate event open to nominations from all over the world

Now, this is my first attempt at creating a Wiki entry so I'll happily accept that if there are ways to improve the entry I will certainly take that feedback on board and rectify any issue.

Other references to Jake Dollery's prescenec can be found on youtube or simply by entering a Google search for 'Jake Dollery' Jason Dollery (talk) 18:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Do you have any sources that show significant coverage of him? Google News just shows things from the radio station and him in a photo with a band. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

I can't provide too much significance for this entry but I believe he does deserve recognition for his contribution to grassroots music through his radio show and the decades he's spent being a creative musical artist. Without an entry like this how will anyone know about the hard work he does?

There are a number of You Tube interviews with Jake. on podcasts and was recognised here:

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/perth-indie-rock-group-head-29038049

Otherwise, if this entry is deleted, then it will be a crying shame. Jason Dollery (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:37, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ashish Dixit

Ashish Dixit (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Single award nomination cannot be verified. Sources otherwise are typical Indian weak entertainment fodder. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:20, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pankaj Kashyap

Pankaj Kashyap (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notabiltiy not shown through reliable sources. Seems to have minor roles. The sources are typical Indian news sites with "editor's desk" authors and interviews that don't establish notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The nomination argues that the sources are “typical Indian news sites” however this is not a valid reason for deletion. Wikipedia's notability guideline WP:GNG requires significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and many of the cited publications (The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, News18, Lokmat, etc.) are established national media outlets in India for an actor primarily working in the Indian entertainment industry, coverage in Indian national media is expected and appropriate. Wikipedia does not require sources to be international it requires them to be reliable and independent. The subject has received interviews and coverage related to his work in the web series Maharani and other productions, which demonstrates media attention beyond trivial mentions if needed, additional reliable sources can be added to further strengthen the article, but the existing coverage from recognised Indian news organisations suggests that the topic meets the general notability guideline deletion would therefore be premature Dixtanti (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

•  Delete Source 1 has a significant portion of it being quotes from the subject, which makes it skew towards being less independent from the subject. Using Google Translate, I see that source 2 is even more of an interview, which disqualifies it from being an independent source. Source 3 is also an interview. Source 4 is not in-depth enough to establish any notability. I do not see anything in source 5 that would make it different enough from source 1, in fact, some of the paragraphs are identical. Source 6 is routine coverage. Source 7 another interview. Source 8 another interview according to GT. Source 9 more routine coverage. Source 10 clearly an interview. Source 11 is a single passing mention with nothing else about the subject. Source 12 same issues as source 11. Source 13 is routine press release and far from in-depth. Why is source 1 repeated as source 14? Why is source 11 repeated as source 15? I feel like the contents of source 16 has been repeated many times in previous sources, such as source 6. Why is source 12 repeated as source 17?. None of these sources are great.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:33, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Ramkinkar Jha

Ramkinkar Jha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Overall seems non-notable. Awards seem to be local and the sources are either primary or passing mentions. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:19, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:54, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Antisemitism in Europe

Antisemitism in Europe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I would like to suggest we delete this article. If I don't count the country sections, which are like empty, except for linking to a few pages regarding antisemirism, or mass killings of jews in the respective country, all that is left are two historic sections (20th century/21st century, consisting of 3-4 sentences. A blurb or intro of 2-3 sentences, a few images and a related pages where the relation is unclear. I also want to point out there is no Anitisemitism in Asia/Africa/America/Oceania. So, sorry, in my book, the Antisemiism in $county, plus the page on Antisemitism are the place to cover this. This page adds little to no info, and should therefore be deleted. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 17:47, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Due to a lack of conversation, I am closing this discussion as no consensus.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

GeoSpy

GeoSpy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:WEB, imo. Barras talk 22:54, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep The request for deletion is just a vague nod to 'not significant.' The software has the potential of significantly affecting society. It has been discussed or reviewed at https://studyflix.de/deutsch/tun-tuen-oder-tuhen-8276, MSPoweruser https://mspoweruser.com › geospy-ai-review, https://opentools.ai › tools › geospy, and elsewhere. Kdammers (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
• It is 12 March. What was the decision?Kdammers (talk) 19:17, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

  Kdammers, not all RfDs are closed the second they are due to. Please be patient. Sometimes if there is not a clear consensus, admins will hold off closing it in case there are any more comments, even though most tend to be over only a few hours after closure. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:48, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:10, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Big Back (Slang)

Big Back (Slang) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm inclined to speedy the page. No source. Would in doubt better fit for Wiktionary. Don't see how this is needed in an encyclopedia. Barras talk 22:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:42, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Peller

Peller (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Erakilos has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Erakilos 𐤀 08:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:19, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Sandra Benede

Sandra Benede (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Erakilos has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. – Erakilos 𐤀 08:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:21, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Stella Drake (character)

Stella Drake (character) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this character. Sources are all from the broadcaster's website. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 19:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Oriol Cardona

Oriol Cardona (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

The Sophocrat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Too short to be useful. Sophocrat (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Celina Baljeet Basra

Celina Baljeet Basra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Single review in NYT but otherwise a lot of interviews that can't establish notaiblity. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:41, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. I decided to delete this one. As outlined there are few non-primary sources. I did however add a section to the article on Tom Cotton, containing roughly the same information. So this is more like a 'merge' without redirect...--Eptalon (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Send in the Troops

Send in the Troops (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtable notability. Probably merge with Tom Cotton? Barras talk 13:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep - The article was mentioned in many other articles. - Theparties (talk) 00:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Also deleted as A1. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Marcus Mann

Marcus Mann (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

The Sophocrat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article is too short to be useful. Sophocrat (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:22, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.