Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfD)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcuts
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]

Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Shehab TV[change source]

Shehab TV (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Claims notability as TV channel/network but maybe nothing else. Web search shows only primary sources or websites of companies with similar name. In addition, no sources founded for their programs. MathXplore (talk) 02:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 02:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Oyinkansola Alabi[change source]

Oyinkansola Alabi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability claimed as leading a company but no further explanation of the company's business. The award section does not tell about criteria and missing further details. Since most references are not updated, I don't think the article has been improved since the last AFD at EN in 2019. MathXplore (talk) 08:29, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This person is a member of Forbes Councils which is for high level executives. Give the editor that created it time to update it. I vote keep Kc Tien (talk) 01:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This vote was the first edit from this editor. MathXplore (talk) 01:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Wikipedians who use RedWarn[change source]

Category:Wikipedians who use RedWarn (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: RedWarn isn't officially supported here and there is no official script over here. People just copy the script from enwiki. Unlike every other script on Category:Wikipedians by software, this script is not designed to work on simplewiki. --Ferien (talk) 06:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Comment: A userbox template was putting pages into this category, but it wasn't doing it properly. Therefore, I removed categorization from the userbox template and manually added the category to the user pages it had been on. If this category is deleted, no change to the userbox template will be required. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I removed both myself and Hocket from that category, so it is now empty and I believe QD for the cat would be ok. As far as RedWarn (software) it does work on simple. It has to be pulled from enWP until the UltraViolet team puts in somewhere else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PotsdamLamb (talk • contribs) 17:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: That's premature. Why remove the entries while this discussion is still open? This is a valid type of category, even for software that doesn't run here. Category:Wikipedians by software has categories for other software that has nothing to do with Wikipedia. On any case, empty categories can't be QD'd until they've been empty for 4 days. Might as well wait until this RFD ends. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 As I explained to Ferien RedWarn does work on this wiki. Thank you for explaining that to me. I am working on the correct way to put this on the template since manually is not the ideal way. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 17:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: I looked at other templates for software, and the ones I saw didn't add a category. (Some of them probably don't have a category at all.) So it seems that adding it manually is an appropriate way. -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 This is where I copied it from EN:User:UBX/RedWarn_yeehaw. It does show a cat on it of: | usercategory = <includeonly>Wikipedians who use RedWarn</includeonly>}} {{#ifeq:{{{nocat|}}}|1||<includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedians who use RedWarn]]</includeonly>}} <noinclude> PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 17:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferien Can you clear this up for me please? You are requesting deletion of the CAT based on the fact that RedWarn is not designed to work on simplewiki? Any script we use is almost always based on enWP and RedWarn is the same thing. It works pretty darn good and it is much faster to undue vandalism. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 17:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PotsdamLamb, many scripts we use are not designed to work on simplewiki but the main reason I'm requesting deletion of the category is because we don't have it for any other userscript in Wikipedians by software, and as it's not officially supported here yet, and is a little bit broken as well - for example protection requests going to AN and going under a heading "Page protection" - I don't see why we should have this category. --Ferien (talk) 06:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferien If you look below it was an error from the ub. Auntof6 fixed that and I’m gonna work on it so it goes into the right category of the software with everything the way it’s supposed to be. She manually added it to our user pages because it was attached to the ub that I copied over from enWP and forgot to triple check it. I’m ok with a QD of the cat without the full RfD going through if you want. As far as RedWarn, yeah there are a few issues but not ones that really effect us as I feel, because we (the regular editors) know what we have versus enWP so I don’t use them and I use twinkle for those. I know @Hockeycatcat uses it too so I wanted to bring him in for his thoughts on this. Thanks for the explanation. I have to get up early tomorrow first day back to work so hoping I can get through it. Not sure of who else uses it without going through the change log looking for it. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Let's not assume the "regular editors" all know how to use or not use this. The list of people we might consider regular editors changes over time, and also the ones right now may not know the issues here. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 For now I added us back to the cat. My personal opinion is some of these should auto-added to the cats to help eliminate any issues and it is a one and done, does't require us to go in and make any other changes. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 17:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PotsdamLamb: I can see your point. The reason I touched the template in the first place was that it was adding the category to WP:Userboxes, which it shouldn't do. If you can figure out how to prevent that kind of thing, then having the template add the category wouldn't be a problem. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 yeah no worries. I know a lot are no includes and also usually have a doc. I’ll have to look at some of the other ones that do it on enWP and see the differences. I would think it would be similar to the stubs so I may start there too. I’ll let you know what I find. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 23:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 06:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kemi Filani News[change source]

Kemi Filani News (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The only claim of notability is the award section, but award criteria/significance has not been explained. Web search results just show primary sources, and paid edit has been doubted at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kemi_Filani_Blog. MathXplore (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 05:52, 13 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Duck Amuck (2013 short)[change source]

Duck Amuck (2013 short) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I can find sources about Duck Amuck but not about this one. Hoax ? MathXplore (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 05:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Jurgens Drive[change source]

Jurgens Drive (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: One of several articles on minor roads created by the same user. It was deleted in 2020 at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Jurgens Drive.

I would also nominate:

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Can be QD. G4: Recreation of deleted material already deleted at RfD and I think all of these can be QD A4: People, groups, companies, products, services or websites that do not claim to be notable. A road is a product. It is just a public one rather than a private one. Taking all of these to RfD is just a waste. The user needs a time out. --Gotanda (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gotanda: Agree. I think it would be best if all of these road articles are quickly deleted, as they don’t show claim to notability and it’s just a waste of time to go through RfDs for all of them. Additionally, Milmont Drive and Jurgens Drive have been deleted many times before, so I think they should also be protected from creation. Nike5453 (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The Juice (season 1)[change source]

The Juice (season 1) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think this was an actual show on Cartoon Network and I don't think it is anything notable. The only webpage I can find that matches these titles is this Youtube channel.

I wanted this to be RfD instead of QD so it would encompass anything related to "The Juice" that gets created in the future. These now include:

(but also anything created after this discussion begins. Lights and freedom (talk) 03:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • But I also see that this video says "Aired Cartoon Network October 1, 2012". Does anyone know if this kind of description is set by Youtube, or by the creator? Lights and freedom (talk) 03:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's a description that is entered by the person who posted the video. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 03:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bibiquadium[change source]

Bibiquadium (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Being a chemical element is a claim of notability. But web search results about this one just show fandom, social media or sources about elements, therefore it is hard to find reliable sources to expand this article. Should we keep/delete or redirect to Extended Period Table like EN ? MathXplore (talk) 12:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete This would be element 224. Theory suggests that elements with atomic number of 173 or higher cannot exist.[1] So this is not really a scientific topic. Lights and freedom (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't claim to be scientific; it clearly says that it's hypothetical. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it is hypothetical, but anything written about this hypothetical element would be based on science, and for the reason I mentioned, there is nothing scientific to write about it (besides that it probably isn't possible, which can apply to any elements above this number). Lights and freedom (talk) 15:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Hypothetical element, no indication of notability (such as importance in a work of fiction). --Auntof6 (talk) 08:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Orange Alone[change source]

Orange Alone (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May not meet WP:MOVIE. No references are given in the page, and web search results just show Fandom or YouTube videos. MathXplore (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 11:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Larkwood Court[change source]

Larkwood Court (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable as a road, same road editor again. Hockeycatcat (talk) 03:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 03:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Lisbon Terrace[change source]

Lisbon Terrace (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable as a road, same road editor again Hockeycatcat (talk) 03:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 03:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Gingerwood Drive[change source]

Gingerwood Drive (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown. I declined the QD because the QD option for notability does not apply to roads. Auntof6 (talk) 02:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete As original nom of the QD for the same reason as RfD nom. Hockeycatcat (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Same - We are not an atlas nor do we store information about roads because of where they end, start, go, hills, trees, types of houses, etc. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 03:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, but we could add some information about the history of the road as well as information about who/what it is named after. Orange5454 (talk) 03:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That could help if those things show notability, but just having more information wouldn't necessarily do that. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Clearly not notable. Google search returns nothing. Nike5453 (talk) 03:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Timberview High School shooting[change source]

Timberview High School shooting (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I would thank the explanation of the incident, but we are not Wikinews. What makes the notability of this case ? I do not see any sources that may override the discussions at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Timberview_High_School_shooting. MathXplore (talk) 12:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 12:32, 11 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Music languages[change source]

Music languages (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: As explained at here, the reliability of this article has been disputed and considered as possible hoax. I will also add these articles due to the same reason:

Editors can add more candidates if I missed something else. MathXplore (talk) 11:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 11:58, 11 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Alireza Mehrabi[change source]

Alireza Mehrabi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Claims notability but no further explanation about how it was established. It seems there are many people with the same name so I can hardly find reliable sources about the subject. MathXplore (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 11:36, 11 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Japanese-Meitei culture[change source]

Category:Japanese-Meitei culture (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Culture category missing clear definition (even at EN). Cultural topics may be categorized with multiple nations, but do we need to make culture categories with double nationality ? I think category:Meitei culture is enough. MathXplore (talk) 11:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 11:33, 11 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Inoxcrom[change source]

Inoxcrom (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is pretty close to an A4 candidate, but I think we can do an RfD. I'm not seeing anything to really show that this company meets any notability requirements. Gordonrox24 | Talk 19:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Comment It does have a de and es.wikipedia article, but I'm not too sure whether it should be deleted here. It doesn't seem to be that notable though. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:58, 10 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chiddie Anyasodo[change source]

Chiddie Anyasodo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a BLP about a relationship coach, matchmaker, and company founder. Although there is no further explanation about the coaching or matchmaking, so the only claim of notability is the company, which coverage is limited to social media or company websites etc. MathXplore (talk) 07:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Thank you for your observations. You wrote that "Although there is no further explanation about the coaching or matchmaking..." which is very valid. I will update the article with information about the notable things she has done. The updates will be added within 48 hours. Thank you. Sandysoil719 (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The award section says Chiddie Anyasodo was listed as one of the five most inspiring Nigerian women based on her coaching. That's notable given that the population of Nigeria is more than 200 million. I vote keep Areara202 (talk) 07:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Note that this was the editor's first change at this project. MathXplore (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 07:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bollywood- India's other world[change source]

Bollywood- India's other world (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems promotional, and we already have Bollywood. Auntof6 (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 05:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Arif Azad[change source]

Arif Azad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not widely covered, only local sources Hockeycatcat (talk) 05:21, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 05:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


St. Lucie County Public Schools[change source]

St. Lucie County Public Schools (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a school district, and there are a number of news articles about it, but most of them are local news. The notability of this district depends on what we see as the purpose of WP:GNG. What do other editors think? Lights and freedom (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 16:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Wellston High School[change source]

Wellston High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: From what I can see, the coverage of this schoool is routine or only of local interest. See also Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Agoura High School. Lights and freedom (talk) 16:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 16:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


West Forsyth High School[change source]

West Forsyth High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's a relatively good school with high rankings, but is there anything actually significant about it? See also Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Agoura High School. Lights and freedom (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 16:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


John Beckham[change source]

John Beckham (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Previously declined QD about a filmmaker and musician. Web search by full name just leads to IMDB and sources about people with similar names, so its hard to check details of filmography/discography. Given references are about movies rather than himself. MathXplore (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete imbd alone is not a reliable source. --SHB2000 (talk) 14:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Meghwar Bhil[change source]

Meghwar Bhil (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No widespread coverage - not enough sources, the top Google result is this very page. Hockeycatcat (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 15:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sripati Tudu[change source]

Sripati Tudu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May not be notable enough. He seems to be working on translation of the constitution, but I cannot find any other works that may establish notability. Most of the web search results are social media or YouTube videos. MathXplore (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Comment: An editor tried to move this page to Birmal Hembram, but I do not see any relation with this person. MathXplore (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment: This may be of the people trying to recreate the articles. We may need to do a search on this name and possibly get it added to filter list. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Not significant enough. I can try and translate the Indonesian constitution into Esperanto, would that make me notable? There's no other indication of notability besides that he translated the Indian constitution into Santali. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:Character[change source]

Template:Character (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Template:Pocoyo Infobox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Proposing deletion of two templates:

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 02:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of school bombings[change source]

List of school bombings (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: List with too few links, narrow coverage, limited information. If you just want to list up school incidents in alphabetical order, Category:Attacks on schools is enough. In addition, I think some cases are not bombings (just like Columbine High School). MathXplore (talk) 05:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • The "list" is a complete nonsense, and should be quickly deleted. Correct would be a version of En "List of school shootings in the United States" or more generally En "List of school-related attacks" which is a list of lists. En "List of school massacres by death toll" shows that violence of this type occurs in countries other than the U.S.A. Anyway, I think the topic is very relevant to our readership. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirecting without merging because article doesn't contain anything worth merging that isn't already in the proposed merge target.

Android 1.1[change source]

Android 1.1 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Shall we keep pages for every Android minor update ? I think keeping as redirect to Android (operating system) or deletion is a reasonable option. MathXplore (talk) 05:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 05:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Legtex[change source]

Legtex (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Category:Abcence (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears non-notable, with no significant coverage. Strangely, none of the sources provided include the word "Legtex", or what is listed as the parent company "Enytially", or another company that is apparently connected "Abcence". Also, if the company is privately held, then why are all the references about stock prices? You can't invest in privately held companies. Lights and freedom (talk) 04:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete I would have actually QD for advertising. However, I do agree with the reasoning. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 05:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Per nom. Sources don't talk about the company itself, no significant coverage of the company from reliable sources. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:15, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Allen[change source]

Jack Allen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another local politicians that I'm not sure is crossing the bar to be notable. Not seeing any national or international recognition. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete - Municipal council isn't notable enough to automatically warrant an article. While Bayview Ghost itself appears to have some coverage, none of them are significant enough. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 01:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Tonks[change source]

Christopher Tonks (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Perhaps an interesting case, but I think I'm leaning delete here. Local politicians are not inherently notable. They can be notable given international or national attention, however I'm simply not seeing that here. His son may be notable as a member of parliament, but I'm not sure city alderman is crossing the bar Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 01:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brayan Rivas[change source]

Brayan Rivas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copy of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Brayan_Rivas. Claims notability but all references seem to be primary sources. Web search results just show social media or evidences of cross-wiki spamming. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brayan_Rivas, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brayan_Rivas etc. MathXplore (talk) 09:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Essentially no content about him online; nothing that would show notability. He has less than 1500 followers on the social media accounts listed, which does not stand out at all. Lights and freedom (talk) 05:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - No significant coverage at all. Too soon? — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Mifflin[change source]

Thomas Mifflin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Артём 13327 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Very short article Артём 13327 (talk) 14:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep Just because it is a short article, does not mean it should be deleted. This person is a huge part of American history and has numerous primary and secondary sources. The RfD should be closed early as it should not have been opened. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 18:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • We are looking at the first governor of Pennsylvania. Some people see him as one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Yes, he was expellled from the Quakers/Society of Friends, because he joined the military, and the Quakers are pacifists. I do however think, that there's at least a little notability. So: keep--Eptalon (talk) 11:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:09, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Pedro Sánchez[change source]

Criticism of Pedro Sánchez (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Category:Pedro Sánchez (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough criticisms to justify its own page. Merge to Pedro Sánchez and redirect. I am also including the category as I don't see this being a useful eponymous topic category anytime soon. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 03:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete both. The article barely explains why he is being criticized and the content would be better in the article Pedro Sánchez. On enwiki en:WP:POVFORKs are usually discouraged. The category will have no other contents, and it's not necessary. Lights and freedom (talk) 03:56, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sánchez is a politician, so likely there are people who do not agree with him. What I currently don't see is why this needs an article of its own, and can't be handled in a sectioon in the article about him. As to the category: Categories need three pages, so where do we get the other page from?- in short: merge to main article, then delete; no redirect needed. Category: delete--Eptalon (talk) 08:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Agree with both. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 03:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feroz Al Tamimi[change source]

Feroz Al Tamimi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Some parts of the article (especially the early life section) may not make sense in English. In addition, most of the works presented in the article has no references, the reason she got an award has no further explanation. I tried to add sources but web search results just show others with similar name. MathXplore (talk) 11:29, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 11:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.



Related pages[change source]

Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion&oldid=8321269"