Wikipedia talk:How to write Simple English pages

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rossford Ohio[change source]

I recently created a article on Rossford, OH, but I think I screwed up. Can anyone tell me how to fix it? 47.16.99.72 (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How should a simple encyclopedia work?[change source]

It seems to me that the project page focuses on writing pages in simple English, rather than writing pages for the simple English Wikipedia. If that is the page's sole purpose, I suggest it would be better called: How to write pages in Simple English. It could then link to guidelines for writing simpler pages. GrounderUK (talk) 16:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think we can all agree that our goal is to have an encyclopedia written in simpler English. I am not one of those people who think we should have only a simple encyclopedia. But what we have now is neither and, given that, my question is: how do we fix that? My preference is for making existing content simpler, but that's just me.
When editing, I pay most attention to the Lead Section and the first paragraph above all. It is from here that the reader can be prepared for what is to follow. It is a guideline that the subject should be established here as notable; I would go further and suggest that there should be some idea given of how notable it is. (There are proper nouns that would not appear at all in a selective encyclopedia, but some would appear in the least encyclopaedic of dictionaries; citations from such tertiary sources would be a guideline I think I would support.)
If the subject is not a proper noun, it is likely to fit into some broad category of knowledge. Some sorts of "expert" have published primary sources on the subject and (for the subject to be notable) these sources have been referenced somehow in secondary sources. So this broader subject should be identified early on: both generally (is it physics or linguistics) and more particularly (is it syntax or phonetics). I think of this as the container/contains model: what is the subject in and what is in the subject. Again, I think this should be clear in the first paragraph or two. A good choice of Categories supports this.
Less simple words can be explained when they are needed but I think we should think about inheritance here. The necessary words may also be needed for the broader subject and we would like the parent and the child to share their use of words, if that is what the experts do. Or there may be controversy, lack of mutual understanding, entrenched positions... so we should note that and perhaps agree about the extent to which we can agree here! Another approach would be to refer to a shared glossary, where all the less simple words could be organised, with links to Wiktionary where it can do the job. --GrounderUK (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bengali Literature[change source]

Now a days The Bengali Literature is not being cultured hugely, Bengalee People are being interested to the other Languages. We should think what is the acctual cause of it, The students are also being less interested to the books, We should find out how the Bengali literature may be popular again, the style of writing should be changed, the world is being updated, so, The style of writing should be updated, the style of Recitation should also be updated. RISHI ABHRATANU (talk) 06:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is there any Palace in Gujrat Of Pakistan[change source]

Nop but It's Comming soon & with name of Syedi_saltanat & Empiross Of lights of sky.& goin to prior.& Luxurious. Syedi saltanat (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Link for AECMA Simplified English[change source]

The article currently contains:

> For writing special to science or trade, do as asked by the process of AECMA Simplified English

The target of the link is Simplified English.

Would a better target link be the (standard) English-language Wikipedia page Simplified Technical English? That seems more useful, but I don't know your conventions for inter-wiki links.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Espertus (talkcontribs) 19:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]