Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why hasn't this been moved out of your userspace and put into the mainspace yet? Razorflame 00:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded fr33kman t - c 00:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm? I don't know what you mean. ;) PeterSymonds (talk) 01:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Someone had it in userpace? MfD the damn thing. We clearly need to stop this brand of shenanigans, before it starts. Thats what I say anyway. Synergy 01:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was in synergy's userspace wasn't it? (or am on crack?) :) fr33kman t - c 01:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your not crazy :) Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 01:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank God for that. I was gonna go to the hospital and turn myself in, lol :) fr33kman t - c 01:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want to reitterate that our Wikipedia:Requests for deletion includes the ability to delete all the things that are listed on this page. The point of callingit Requests for deletion and not Articles for deletion is so that everything can be put up for deletion there. Since we are such a small wiki we were trying to keep all deletion discussions on one page. -Djsasso (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Times are changing and we might want to start thinking bigger. As long as I've been here, I can't recall one RfD we've had that wasn't an article. But soon, I believe we will be using MfD much more. Synergy 20:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have nothing against it as I mentioned. I just think that we get so few things up for deletion as it is that expecting people to go to multiple pages might make for less people being involved. To be honest I don't see a need to split the two until we are seeing 50+ things up for deletion at a time. Right now a busy time is like 3. But what you have created is really good, that I don't dispute. Well organized etc. -Djsasso (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I found the same thing when I first noticed Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion (our version of DRV, obviously). It doesn't get used much at all, but its still there for when we need it. This is the reason it was created, and I was in fact going to wait before moving it from userspace, but there was a call to be bold and move it so I won't stand in the communities way (even if it gets turned around and we see it put back into userspace). We will, at some point, however, need to make RfD more distinct. As in, "articles only". Synergy 01:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]