Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/EhJJ

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship, request for bureaucratship, request for checkusership, or request for oversightship. Please do not modify it.

Two crat endorsments. Closed and user promoted. --Barras (talk) 20:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

EhJJ

EhJJ (talk • changes • e-mail • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • right changes)

End date: Dec 14, 2009 02:00

I've been an admin for many months and I think I've provided a lot of good opinions and made good choices as an admin. I continue to be interested in keeping the wiki running, and that includes taking part in more mopping (closing RfA's and approving bots, for example). I meet our new policy for cratship and figure it can't hurt to have one more. Although I'm not "always online", I check my watchlist at least daily and continue to be active in discussions.

Candidate's acceptance: Self-nom per new requirements. EhJJ^TALK 02:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Support

1. Hooray! I get to cast the first vote! —§ Snake311 _{(I'm Not Okay!)} 02:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
2. Should be fine. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
3. Support per Juliancolton. Razorflame 08:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
4. Support Yes please.--  † CR₉₀  11:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
5. Yes (per Djsasso :P) Kennedy (talk • changes). 19:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Not as far as today, the self-nominee has pretended to delete a reliable and notable old entry per a so-called oneliner.

Comments

• People might want to check out the talk page prior to commenting/voting here. As I think most of the people here have misinterpreted the new policy of creating crats. All that has to happen is that EJJ posts I think I need the tools for x reason. Then the crats look at the user if they think the user should have them they say yes. And when two of them say yes and none have brought up any concerns then a crats ups them. Community voting no longer happens. -DJSasso (talk) 14:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.