Wikipedia:Requests for deletion
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]
Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
- A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
- The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
- The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
- Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- B. Carry out these checks
- Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
- If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
- Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
- Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
- Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
- Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
- C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
- If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
- If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
- If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
{{notability}}
,{{hoax}}
,{{original research}}
, or{{advert}}
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it. - If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
- If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
- If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.
Discussed deletion[change source]
- Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
- In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
- Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
- You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
- Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
- Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
- Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
- At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
- {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
- Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion[change source]
If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.
Notifying the user[change source]
Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions[change source]
- The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
- Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
- Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
- Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
*
and sign after your comment by adding~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one*
). - New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
- Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
- Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put
<s>
before your old idea and</s>
after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Deletekeep". - If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
- Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
- Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:
- A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
- Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
- All times are in UTC.
Current deletion request discussions[change source]
Corso di Porta Romana[change source]
- Corso di Porta Romana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nomminate this article for deletion as it does not prove it's notable in any way. The only cited source is not accessible, even if we disregard its incomplete citation. This page was created by Alec Smithson, a long term crosswiki abuser. Article does not contain spam at the moment, however per some features in the text I strongly believe it has been created by help of machine translation tool (see phrases like the center Milan of the HNWI (High Net Worth Individual) upper class). If community opposes the hard deletion, I suggest soft deleting it and rewriting it per principles of TNT. A09 (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 09:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Tyler Antonius (2nd nomination)[change source]
- Tyler Antonius (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I am starting this RFD per the recent QD rejection. My question is very simple: What are the improvements since Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler Antonıus, Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler_Antonius, and Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2023/Tyler_Antonius? MathXplore (talk) 02:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - it is not an encyclopedia article. It is not even close to that.--Please put wikipedia-readers out of their misery, and make the "article" disappear. 2001:2020:313:ACDE:18D6:F80A:FA63:50EA (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Le puta[change source]
2803:7780:3C:A28:2CA8:FB3D:7CFE:9D34 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: seems like a hoax. 2803:7780:3C:A28:2CA8:FB3D:7CFE:9D34 (talk) 20:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Quick Delete A1 or A4 Dream Indigo 23:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Palace Malchiodi[change source]
- Palace Malchiodi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article should be deleted because of weak sourcing. First reference (Casabella) is entirely made up, next two are apparently real. Even more fake sources can be found in the bibliography section, where, besides the first two entries, which aren't reliable sources, only three are real, other are fabricated. This article was created by Alec Smithson, which is known for inserting made up/hoax content as well as crosswiki spam and machine translation. I do not recall of any spam on this particular page, however can find numerous proofs of using machine translation tools when creating this page. This may be observed in some weird word sequences, wrong prepositions as well as other grammatical slips through the article. A09 (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 21:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Palace Maffezzoli (Milan)[change source]
- Palace Maffezzoli (Milan) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nominate this article for deletion since it presents a form of covered vandalism made by Alec Smithson, a known crosswiki long term abuser. This article might seem a tad better than some other, however after checking entries in 'Bibliography' section I came to a conclusion only real book that ever existed is Bertelli G., Brambilla M., Invernizzi M., Bergamo. Cent'anni d'architettura 1890-1990, Bergamo 1994, pp. 76-77. I could not find bibliographical data for other entries on the list. Thus we can establish an argument cited sources are hoaxes, which makes the article fail verifiability. Another giveaway of this user is usage of machine translation, some indices are present in this article as well: 'Execution' and other proper names that should be translated but weren't due to sloppy editing. As only one real source is present at the moment, I believe this article should be deleted and not TNT-ed. A09 (talk) 20:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 20:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Quadronno District[change source]
- Quadronno District (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article should be deleted per TNT rule. It has many flaws, the most eye soring is the article being unsourced, as well as its bad grammar. It was created by Alec Smithson, a crosswiki long term abuser, who is known for inserting spam as well as machine translated text. Spam is contained in "Other websites" paragraph, where these links were spammed in mass before. To suppport my theory about the article being a machine translation are weird occurences of 'Quartiere Quadronno', which the automated tool did not recognise as an Italian proper name and literally repeated it. I think we don't need such substandard article. A09 (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 20:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Corso Italia[change source]
- Corso Italia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I believe this page should be deleted per TNT. Page is wholly unsourced, so we can expect factual mistakes. Furthermore, this page was created by a certain crosswiki long term abuser, which creates autotranslated stubs en-masse without proper care for wikification/sourcing etc. Per some of the sentences (part of the prestigious and exclusive Quadronno district of the of the HNWI (High Net Worth Individual) upper class) I believe this page is autotranslated as well as contains spam (Real estate market, which was spammed on multiple settlement articles on crosswiki bassis). Another dead giveaway this page was created by aforementioned LTA is the Related pages section, which contains links to his other work here on simplewiki. A09 (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 20:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mughal–Safavid wars[change source]
- Mughal–Safavid wars (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A random list of conflicts and really isn't needed. Operator873 connect 20:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Searching with that title, I essentially get two conflicts, one in 1622/23 (see en:Mughal–Safavid war (1622–1623)) and the other roughly 30 years later (en:Mughal–Safavid war (1649–1653)). Given that both are rougly a generation apart, I think we need to have stubs for both. We can then turn this into a disambiguation page, but likely thats overkil..--Eptalon (talk) 21:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Out of India theory[change source]
- Out of India theory (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly AI generated non-encyclopedic, non-wikified, essay. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Comment: another case of macdonald-ross G2'ing pages listed at RfD.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Capture of Kabul[change source]
- Capture of Kabul (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cyber.Eyes.2005 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject likely fails notability and WP:GNG. The title 'Siege of Kabul/Capture of Kabul' is problematic because this event has not occurred a single time; Kabul has been captured by the Mughals (more than a single time), Taliban, Russians, and others. EnWiki has a list of these events. No date or year of the battle has been mentioned in the article, and important parts of the article depend on single sources. The sections 'Battle,' 'Aftermath,' and the lead are supported by single references, some of which only mention the battle without providing any details. I don't think this subject needs a standalone article. Additionally, the terms 'Hindustan' and 'Hindustani' have been used frequently, which may constitute WP:POV since 'Hindustan' refers only to the modern state of India today. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 12:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- The article matches notability. It mentions this event as "Capture /occupation of Kabul" in several instances.
"Akbar immediately sent an army under Raja Man Singh to occupy Kabul and then brought the city and its surrounding districts under direct imperial administration. This task completed"[1]
Moreover, Here too "Occupation of Kabul" is mentioned specifically (word to word)[2]
So if we name the article "Occupation of Kabul" instead of deleting it then the article indeed will be notable and it will pass WP:GNG.
- "Kabul has been captured by the Mughals, Taliban, Russians, and others."
- And this is a Mughal campaign? I agree Mughals have captured kabul several times, But this occupation of Kabul took place in 1585-1586. And as for the term "Hindustani". It was essentially used for the Mughal troops and Mughal empire. As the empire expanded, So did "Hindustan"[3]
As for your other questions regarding date, The date is between 1585-1586 as per the source.[4][5] Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: User:Malik-Al-Hind has provided two references regarding the dates. The first source states:
"In 1585, Akbar transferred his capital to Lahore in the Punjab at the death of his half-brother, Mirza Muhammad Hakim, at Kabul,"
and"In 1586, Akbar and the Uzbek Khan negotiated a pact in which Akbar agreed to remain neutral during the Uzbek invasion of Safavid-held Khurasan."
The second source mentions a number of events regarding the date 1586:"Large forces under Zain Khan Koka and other officers swept the plains and drove the Yusufzai clansmen into their rocky fastnesses (January 1586)."
None of these sources mention the siege or occupation of Kabul between 1585-1586. It seems like an assumption that the occupation happened after 1585, which makes it WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 14:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)- This is nowhere "Original research"
- Look closely what my first source says:
In 1585 Akbar transferred his capital to Lahore in the Punjab at the death of his half-brother, Mirza Muhammad Hakim, at Kabul. The Uzbek ruler, Abdullah Khan, who had annexed Badakhshan in 1584, was a possible threat to Kabul. The Uzbeks were subsidizing the Afghan tribes in their continuing defiance of the Mughal regime at Kabul. Akbar immediately sent an army under Raja Man Singh to occupy Kabul
- u can clearly see Akbar shifted his capital in "1585" to lahore and sent man singh to "Occupy kabul" here. It's obvious to any reader that the event was of 1585.
Moreover You have greatly cherrypicked my 2nd source haven't you?
It specifically says:
Large forces under Zain Khan Koka and other officers swept the plains and drove the Yusufzai clansmen into their rocky fastnesses (January, 1586). But soon afterwards a terrible blow fell on the Mughal army which had penetrated into the hills. There were quarrels be- tween its leaders, Zain Khan, Birbal and Abul Fath. On 16th February, (1586), during a disorderly march, the Afghans attacked it in a Swat defile. Panic seized the disunited Imperial army and 8000 men lost their lives, including Rajah Birbal and many other high officers, while all their camp and equipage were plundered. The fugitives straggling in the hills were cut off. The news of the disaster reached Akbar in two days and prompt steps were taken to retrieve it. An army under Rajah Todar Mal crossed the Indus and the Kabul rivers the next day to suppress the Yusufzais.
You can clearly see that Afghans had killed Birbal in 1586 because of Which, "2 days later" Akbar sends Raja todarmal to punish the Yusufzais. Again here too it is very obvious that the siege took place in 1586.
- Moreover, to end this discussion once and for all,here is what my Second source
- Says:
"The situation changed after Tahmasp's death 1576 with the Akbar's Occupation of Kabul in 1585"
- Again "Occupation of Kabul in 1585".
-Page 332 Here it specifically mentions "Occupation of Kabul 1585".
- So it passes WP:Notability and WP:GNG.¥
So yes I agree kabul was sieged many times from the reign of babur to humayun to Akbar to even Jahangir and Shah jahan. But my article specifically talks about the The siege which took place between 1585-1586 which is very notable.
Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: If I look at en:Mughal Empire, I find no date in the 1680s, associated with a "Fall of Kabul"; there seems to have been a siege in 1605 or 1607, and all the remaining "fall of Kabul" are associated with most ecent history of Afghanistan (that is: 2002, 2022, perhaps somewhere earlier in the 1980s). I am not against keeping a properly-sourced article, though..--Eptalon (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The conflict is not from 1680s rather 1580s, During the reign of akbar. There is no seperate article made for campaign yet. But this battle is surely the aftermath of en:Battle of the Malandari Pass (1586), Where Akbar sends Raja todarmal and Raja Man Singh to re-capture kabul and "punish" the Yusufzai pashtuns. This is why I made it here. But yes, the article is well sourced and notable. "Occupation of Kabul 1585" is specifically mentioned in several sources which I gave.
It passes WP:Notability and WP:GNG, Which Cyber eyes thought it didn't and hence he requested it for deletion.
The second allegation of his was the article provides no date. Well the dates of the battle varies. From "1585" to "1586". But it definetly took place between 1585-1586. This is a scholarly agreed date. And this is for sure that by 1586, Man singh and Raja todarmal had occupied kabul. [6] Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: G2'd by macdonald-ross.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 12:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Adolescent’s Orquesta[change source]
- Adolescent’s Orquesta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Spagooder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Already discussed on main English WP, where the article was deleted - issues included lack of notability, lack of reliable sourcing, and promotional content/conflict of interest editing. Spagooder (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Keep - Has won various notable awards[1] (en:New York Latin ACE Awards? and en:Golden Globes?), –Davey2010Talk 20:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)- The group still fails notability guidelines. Those New York Latin ACE awards are not a major music award (and I'd argue they're not notable either) and those are the wrong Golden Globes. The Golden Globes are film and television awards, they don't have a salsa music category, and I was unable to find info on what their "golden globe" award is. Info on the group should not be taken at face value considering the COI/promotional editing that has been done on their part. Spagooder (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Yeah I can't find anything that confirms these were awarded - makes you wonder if these were made up in order to keep the article around, Anyway agree there's no notability here. –Davey2010Talk 17:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The group still fails notability guidelines. Those New York Latin ACE awards are not a major music award (and I'd argue they're not notable either) and those are the wrong Golden Globes. The Golden Globes are film and television awards, they don't have a salsa music category, and I was unable to find info on what their "golden globe" award is. Info on the group should not be taken at face value considering the COI/promotional editing that has been done on their part. Spagooder (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: macdonald-ross A4'd the page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Aiden Fucci[change source]
- Aiden Fucci (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 14-year old, born 2004, in Florida, who killed a 13-year old girl, in 2021. Personally, I think than no matter what the verdict of this is, the interest of this should be the murder case, which enwp has at en:Murder of Tristyn Bailey. Other than that, here in Europe there are special laws that protect junvenile delinquents (amongst others: giving them a new name, when they served their sentence). In this respect, I think, this page should be deleted; if we have a page on Wiki, it should be about the murder, and not the murderer. Eptalon (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete per nom - The murder is notable however the oxygen thief himself isn't. –Davey2010Talk 18:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)- Redirect as per below, makes sense, –Davey2010Talk 10:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have brought over Murder of Tristyn Bailey, which is the article about the murder case. It is very basic at the moment, but can be extended if neeed. Of ocurse, if the murder isn't deemed notable, it can be deleted as well; that's up to the closing admin to decide.--Eptalon (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- weak Redirect to Murder of Tristyn Bailey. If the only real thing notable about the person is one murder, the page would be better as a redirect.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: (for some reason) macdonals-ross A4'd the page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Austin Powers discography[change source]
- Austin Powers discography (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
William Graham has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Implausible redirect. William Graham (talk) 17:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Tagged as G5 "created by sock" - some of their redirects may be legit but given the false articles the've created I don't hold much confidence in these being legit. Can always be created by editors in good standing. –Davey2010Talk 17:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Already quickly deleted as WP:G5@William Graham Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
James Bond (group)[change source]
- James Bond (group) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
William Graham has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Implausible redirect. William Graham (talk) 17:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Tagged as G5 "created by sock" - some of their redirects may be legit but given the false articles the've created I don't hold much confidence in these being legit. Can always be created by editors in good standing. –Davey2010Talk 17:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Already quickly deleted as WP:G5 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
We da Best Forever[change source]
- We da Best Forever (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
William Graham has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Implausible redirection. Article name is DJ Khalid song and redirect is to different musician. William Graham (talk) 17:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Already quickly deleted as WP:G5 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 17:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mackenzie Shirilla[change source]
- Mackenzie Shirilla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Being a criminal isn't notable Operator873 connect 17:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Unfortunately, murders do happen, and this one got quitte a bit of media attention. I do however have to say what I said with the other article I nominated: the article should be about the murder case, and not about the murderer. So, either we get the material together, and write about the murder case (verdict: life in prison) or we don't. In any case, we should delete this article, perhaps after merging some of the content elsewhere --Eptalon (talk) 18:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Comparison of Islamic and Jewish dietary laws[change source]
- Comparison of Islamic and Jewish dietary laws (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated nonsense Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- There is an article en:Comparison of Islamic and Jewish dietary laws, there are also corresponding articles in Arabic, Persian and other languages. If wanted, we could 'translate' the EnWP article properly, pointing out similarirties and diferences. The article we currently have is clearly not up to any satandard; and if it hasn't been imporved by the time this closes, it is easily deleted. Given that there are similar versions in English, and other languages, I think we should try to fix it so it becomes keepable, though.--Eptalon (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Likely what we have is a 'translation' of one section of the Engglish page. --Eptalon (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
[change source]
- Template:Los Angeles Rams roster navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 98% redlinks, not too much use Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Comment: macdonald-ross G2'd the page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
K.O.Y.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: per below Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 21:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
D.F.Y.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Too ambigious, could mean a whole lot of things Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 21:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Military logistics[change source]
- Military logistics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 03:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Windows 11 editions[change source]
- Windows 11 editions (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Redirect - I've merged the content into Windows 11, ENs version at en:Windows 11 editions also redirects back to Windows 11. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reverted- @Davey2010: When an article is under discussion, it's best to wait for the outcome before taking action to resolve anything,. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merged reverted. Merge because it's content that is missing from the article and is content that is in the EN article en:Windows_11#Versions anyway. –Davey2010Talk 15:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just merge it with the Simple English wiki page of Windows 11, just merge it, i dont care anymore. USER9646 (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @USER9646, Please read WP:Notability - In short if your article was similar to en:Windows 10 editions then it'd be a different ball game but as your article contains no sources and doesn't explain why this list warrants a seperate article it obviously makes sense to have it all in one article ? ....,
- You're more than welcome to source it and show it's notable for an article, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then delete it, i am lazy. USER9646 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @USER9646 So you come here in a huff because it's up for deletion but then you state you're too lazy to source it anyway .... the mind boggles. –Davey2010Talk 21:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just delete it, i dont care abut this wiki site anymore. USER9646 (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get upset. RFD doesn't mean we don't treasure your contribution, just mean that this page is not appropriate. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just delete it, i dont care abut this wiki site anymore. USER9646 (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @USER9646 So you come here in a huff because it's up for deletion but then you state you're too lazy to source it anyway .... the mind boggles. –Davey2010Talk 21:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then delete it, i am lazy. USER9646 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just merge it with the Simple English wiki page of Windows 11, just merge it, i dont care anymore. USER9646 (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merged reverted. Merge because it's content that is missing from the article and is content that is in the EN article en:Windows_11#Versions anyway. –Davey2010Talk 15:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: When an article is under discussion, it's best to wait for the outcome before taking action to resolve anything,. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Easiest Merge of my life. I will note that the redirect that en has also includes the redirects with possibilities tag and a de-facto abandoned draft exists at en for en:Draft:Windows 11 editions.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The four calligraphy masters from the Song Dynasty[change source]
- The four calligraphy masters from the Song Dynasty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
The article is pretty weak, but it sounds like a notable topic. Rathfelder (talk) 22:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Šeina Grama[change source]
- Šeina Grama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Needs references, but is notaable. Rathfelder (talk) 22:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
One Thing Remains[change source]
- One Thing Remains (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Keep The article itself is too short and should be expanded, but the album is notable. Dream Indigo 00:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Exists at en:One Thing Remains. en:WP:SOFIXIT. –Davey2010Talk 14:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - It doesn't fail WP:GNG, and while this is very short, that's not a reason to delete, that's a reason to improve the article! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
T.T.G.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This could mean so many things that having it as a redirect is meaningless and will do more harm than good. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- We should not have redirects from acronyms except in the most exceptional cases. Rathfelder (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, but change to dab page. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is going to be a lot of things to disambigute from@Auntof6 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Me Da Wikipedian: That shouldn't be a problem, although the enwiki page has only 8 entries. -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is going to be a lot of things to disambigute from@Auntof6 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 00:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
T.T.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This could mean so many things that having it as a redirect is meaningless and will do more harm than good. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete to generic.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, but change to dab page. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 00:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Perfect Sisters[change source]
- Perfect Sisters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cmarsch has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It doesn't appear to be a notable topic as the article hasn't been edited since 2018, and it is pretty confusing and bare bones. I think that there is not enough interest or notability for someone to fix this article (and if there is, feel free to do so instead of deleting!) Cmarsch (talk) 21:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- I have edited and extended the article. Likely, it is keepable now. --Eptalon (talk) 07:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't have the wish or time to look over the entire article right now, but not being edited since 2018 is not a reason to delete. It is a reason to improve the article though. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Dele Kelvin Oye[change source]
- Dele Kelvin Oye (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable lawyer - Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. Also created by a globally-banned sock, RFD'ing in case others may find things I haven't, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Isnt the President of the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines, and Agriculture notable?Rathfelder (talk) 21:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- The EN article was draftified, I'll be honest I don't know but looking at the sources it does appear to be a notable role, As it was created by a globally banned sock I'll keep it open for the time being in case others believe it should be deleted (i'm not fussed and if it goes to keep i'll happily withdraw this), Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 21:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Kurt Wiehle[change source]
- Kurt Wiehle (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Potential hoax, no reliable coverage, unsourced. I cannot find any information about this person. He is mentioned on enwiki, but nothing beyond that. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 15:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Keep. I can see quite a lot of sources which mention him. Rathfelder (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Only found this and this, I've not found anything else - No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Template:Homicide[change source]
- Template:Homicide (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template, I don't really know if these sort of templates would be considered complex?, The words are certainly complex but they can be fixed but not sure on the templates themselves, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 15:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Comment. Maybe it would be better to move this template to Template:Murder if it is kept.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Whether AI generated or not, the page was unclear. Also, the verdict of almost all people below was to delete the page...--Eptalon (talk) 21:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Legal engineering[change source]
- Legal engineering (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
DovahFRD has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This page is fully AI-generated. The reference section starts with "Here are some reference links to the topics you requested:", showing that it was the result of a query. I don't think this falls under any QD (I haven't seen any precedent on AI content), but when tested, QuillBot showed 100% AI-generated content. 🤘🤘 DovahFRD (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete Per nominator, I'm not convinced this is a purely notable topic as a stand-alone, there's no equivalent on EN. The sources are mainly links to commercial tool websites (and only a couple) which also pushes this into promotional / advertising territory. Ravensfire (talk) 16:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Formatting reeks of Chat GPT.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't seem to be notable and clearly AI generated. Perhaps we should have a QD for something this obvious.Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Very obviously generated by AI, which in my personal opinion is harmful to this project. Maybe we should propose a guideline soon regarding AI content seeing as this type of content is coming to RfD more and more often? FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 21:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete AI. Dream Indigo 00:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. A.I.-generated. --ginaan(T/C) 01:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: If the article is good, does it matter if it's AI-generated? The posting user is responsible for the content either way. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't consider if it was or wasn't AI created, and still view this as something that should be deleted. It's mainly sourced to commercial websites pushing their services and I think it's promotional article that doesn't belong here. Ravensfire (talk) 17:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't, at least to me. However, that's a big if. The essay style, weird citation issue, non-simplicity, lack of wikification, failing notability, and being an advertisement. In addition, should someone an expert look at it in depth, I am nearly certain there would be factual errors. But, using AI is fine if you fix the issue. I don't care if an AI creates good content, or a human creates good content, as long as it is, in fact, good content@Auntof6 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Meets PORNBIO...--Eptalon (talk) 21:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Kendra Lust[change source]
- Kendra Lust (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable porn actress, Deleted at EN due to notability, Fails en:WP:PORNBIO and GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Has articles in several other wikipedias, won awards... Just becuse she does/did porn movies does not mean she isn't notable. So, this likely is a keep--Eptalon (talk) 09:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Eptalon I was unaware but PORNBIO has now been deprecated meaning awards are now irrelevant - All porn actors now need to meet en:WP:NACTOR which states and I quote:
- The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or
- The person has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
- None of Kendras films or roles have been notable and imho they've not made a "nique, prolific or innovative contribution" but you could argue they have given their awards. I mean the EN AFD only had 2 !votes so I can't exactly use the line "It's been deleted on EN so cannot be notable", Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- ever heard of Sylvia Kristel. Yes, she died a few years back, but her case is similar.. Eptalon (talk) 10:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- In what way is someone who's been in notable films similar to someone who hasn't?.
- I can assure you "en:Kendra Lust Takes Control and Fucks Her Son's Friend when She's Got Him Alone!!" and en:Loving Wife Kendra Lust Defends Her Husband's Small Cock, but Can't Resist a Thundercock! do not exist on the English Wikipedia or any Wikipedia for that matter. –Davey2010Talk 11:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know why but I didn't realise WP:PORNBIO existed here - There's plenty of WP pages that have yet to be created and so I thought this was another. At the end of the day Different project > Different rules - So I guess strictly speaking irrespective of ENs PORNBIO deprecation it's still used here (rightly or wrongly) so strictly speaking she meets PORNBIO #1 and so strictly speaking there would be no valid reason for deletion. Whether PORNBIO should exist or not is for another venue but yeah different project > different rules. I believe my reason is valid and I stand by it but given PORNBIO exists there's not really a valid reason to delete. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 19:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- ever heard of Sylvia Kristel. Yes, she died a few years back, but her case is similar.. Eptalon (talk) 10:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Subject has won multiple awards, and is quite well-known in other sources. Almost 9 million followers on Instagram, although that doesn't really matter. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 09:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Awards show notability only if the awards themselves are significant. Are these? --Auntof6 (talk) 03:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, That's a fair point they do - Personally I've considered AVN and XBIZ to be significant however going by Google News AVN has far more results than XBIZ so I would assume generally speaking AVN is her only notable award, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 09:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 22:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Idea is to merge the two pages, I will therefore close this long overdue item, and place the respective template--Eptalon (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Blood Brothers (musical)[change source]
- Blood Brothers (musical) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Essay, not an article, no claim to notability Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- I disagree with the no claim to notability part. However, the page is clearly written as a personal analysis (according to the change summary, as a GCSE project), and not an encyclopaedia article. Best case scenario, we rewrite the article and keep. In its current state, delete. Yottie =talk= 21:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Yottie. Rathfelder (talk) 10:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have rewritten it, and replacd it with a short intro, and plot section. Still needs references, but should be borderline keepable now...--Eptalon (talk) 21:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Actually redirect/merge to Blood Brothers... Eptalon (talk) 21:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Or the other way around. The term "blood brothers" has other meanings, and enwiki has this article at en:Blood Brothers (musical). --Auntof6 (talk) 01:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- yes, of course, so: merge the two in a fitting location.. Eptalon (talk) 06:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Or the other way around. The term "blood brothers" has other meanings, and enwiki has this article at en:Blood Brothers (musical). --Auntof6 (talk) 01:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 11:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Nyusha Sarmi[change source]
- Nyusha Sarmi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 09:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 09:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 11:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Piplup[change source]
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 09:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Related pages[change source]
- All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
- Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
- Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy
- Wikipedia:Quick deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
- Category:Deletion requests
- Category:Quick deletion requests
- ↑ Richards, John (2000). The Mughal empire. ISBN 9781932705546. Retrieved 2000.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ↑ K. Palat, Madhavan (2000). History of Civilizations of Central Asia, UNESCO. ISBN 9781932705546. Retrieved 2000.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); Unknown parameter|Page=
ignored (|page=
suggested) (help) - ↑ Vanina, Eugenia (2012). Medieval Indian Mindscapes: Space, Time, Society, Man. Primus Books. p. 47. ISBN 978-93-80607-19-1 – via Google Books.
- ↑ Richards, John (2000). The Mughal empire. ISBN 9781932705546. Retrieved 2000.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ↑ Sarkaar, Jadunath (2019-08-06). History of Jaipur. Invincible Publishers. ISBN 978-81-936662-0-3.
- ↑ Sarkaar, Jadunath (2019-08-06). History of Jaipur. Invincible Publishers. ISBN 978-81-936662-0-3.