Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Katrina Papalia[change source]

Katrina Papalia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Vermont has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources I can find to establish notability. Vermont (talk) 01:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete and QD under A4. Non notable character in a non notable game. Also seems to have been invented by the author. Zaxxon0 (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
@Zaxxon0: I don't think A4 applies to fictional characters. It would apply to the game, because a game is a product, but I don't think a character is an independent product. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
I guess you're right, it only applies to real individuals. This subject is made up, though. Zaxxon0 (talk) 04:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. I tried searching for sources, but could not find any. Desertborn (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul[change source]

Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: An editor mentioned on the talk page it should be checked for notability, looking into it, it should probably be deleted. en.wiki has a discussion on it that closed as delete as well. DJSasso (talk) 12:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Alleged Sources

https://static.cambridge.org/resource/

https://static.cambridge.org/resource/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20180515111551054-0795:S002191181700136X:S002191181700136Xsup001.pdf Country Of 70 millions people Thailand has on 251 female ever elected .Notable Alumni for Two United States University

Appendix. A list of Thai female MPs elected since 1975 and their kinship ties (arranged in the alphabetical order of their firs 15 พ.ค. 2561 · 222 Thitima Chaisaeng. Chachoengsao. /. /. /. 1. 2. 223 Thitiya Rangsitpol/Thita Manitkul party -list. +. /. 1. 224 Thongmark Rammasut. Nong Khai. /. /. 1 1 1. 1. 3. 1. 225 Thongsuk Paripunyo. Mukdahan.

Notable Alumni for Two United States University

Plenary Highlights (Member of the National Assembly, Lao PDR), Congresswoman Cynthia A. Villar. (Member of the House of Representatives, Philippines' Lone District of Las Piñas. City), Lt. Col. Thitiya Rangsitpol (Member of ..

na-vn-aipo-ww... Read A List of participants Hon. Ong-Ard KLAMPAIBOON 11. Hon. Lt. Col. Thitiya RANGSITPOL 12. Hon. Wittaya MASAYNA 13. Hon. Malinee SUKAVEJWORAKIT (Mrs.) 14. Hon. Patsak OSATHANUGRAH 15. Hon. Somkuan

Further information: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes § Politicians Shortcuts WP:POLITICIAN WP:NPOL WP:JUDGE The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or sub-national (e.g., province- or state-wide) office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels.[12] This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them. Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.[8] Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline. Wikipedia:Notability (people)

Women in Thailand - IPFS ... Chaiyakan became the first Thai woman to be elected to hold a post in the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Kingdom of Thailand. First Women Army Officer Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul (2001-2005) ...

Thailand Women were actually amongst the initial women in Asia | ViralTide [ 4 ] It was actually merely on June 5, 1949 that Orapin Chaiyakan ended up being the very first lady to become ... was actually Lieutenant Colonel Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul, (birthed Thitiya Rangsitpol, 8 November ...

https://classesinformation.blogspot.com/?fbclid=IwAR2UWUDfLJCcTWq8aEoZMkK5womzNqD7CwYXQbTJNe1MYUpAweWWX7WTADA https://classesinformation.blogspot.com › ... University of Dallas - classes info 17 ส.ค. 2561 · ... Katherine, Crown Princess of Yugoslavia - Wife of Alexander, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia; Thita Manitkul - Member of Parliament (House of Representatives) of Thailand; Rosemary Odinga - Kenyan

List of University of Colorado Boulder alumni - WikiVividly ... of the 1960 US Olympic ski team; Steve Ells, founder, Chairman, and CEO of Chipotle Mexican Grill; Thita Manitkul born Thitiya Rangsitpol, Thai politician, former Congresswomen House of Representatives

univchoices.blogspot.com › 2017/01 University Of Dallas Online Mba - University Choices ... Suren Dutia - Business executive and entrepreneurship expert at Kauffman Foundation; Thitiya Rangsitpol a Politician , Former Thai Congresswoman House of Representatives of Thailand,Former Deputy Secretary

List Of University Of Colorado Boulder Alumni - Cu Aerospace | Natnat Selma. Politics. Gordon L. Allott, former U.S. Senator from Colorado (1955â€"1973); Bob Beauprez, former U.S. Representative; Thitiya Rangsitpol(Lt.Col.Thita Manitkul(Economic),a Politician Former Thai.Yosakrai (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

  • That is irrelevant here, articles can be asked to be deleted a second time. It can't just be quick deleted which is what he was rejecting. -DJSasso (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
  • That link and the above wall of text is unnecessary, especially considering only one of the links you posted is a reliable source, this one, which lists Manitkul as a party list MP from 2001-2005. As far as I can tell, this claim is one of very few that are actually able to be verified. However, considering their position as a former party-list MP, this does make them notable, although the present article is terribly written, promotional, and definitely includes false information. If this ends in a consensus to keep, I'll scrap the entire article and make it a short stub with only what reliable sources can verify. Thank you, Vermont (talk) 17:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Yep. Personally, I wish it was deleted as that would prevent the xwiki sockpuppets that enwiki had problems with, however with their former position in Thailand's parliament they are inherently notable so the page should remain. Due to BLP policy issues with the many additions by various IP's of unverifiable content, if this article is kept I think it may be beneficial to protect it from non-autoconfirmed editors, or to watch over its content closely. Thanks, Vermont (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Yeah wouldn't be the first article that we have done that to. There is one that we ended up having to restrict the article right down to admins because it kept getting very POV stuff added to it. -DJSasso (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Other arguments
  • It is relevant because the person who asked this simple wiki to be deleted is the one who deleted my page within 6 hours

https://th.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%B8%90%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%B2_%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A5

Please look at the history of the page

and was asking the English article to be quick deleted that why it’s was deleted

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RJFF/Thita_Manitkul

I didn’t join Wikipedia then but he was using the reason that English Wikipedia was deleted not to approve my article Could any of your guys help me by written that article. So it would not be the reason to delete my page within hours. Yosakrai (talk) 05:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

  • She was spokeperson for the ministry of defense and the following was the achievement that was done to promote the vision of the ministry of defense while she was in that position.

The others achievements while she was spokesperson were

1) Appointment of Female General for Equality . The First Female General was appointed on 23 April 1997.[1]

2) Early Retirement Programs for the Ministry of Defense officials to reduce the size of government officials and increase efficiency .According to the cabinet resolution 19 August 1997.[2] Yosakrai (talk) 04:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

ผลการค้นเว็บ Ministry of Defence - Thailand, กระทรวงกลาโหม, Bangkok (2019) - GovServ Lt.Col.Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul a Thai Politician and Congresswoman who represented Thailand from 2001- 2005. As the first spokesperson of Thai Ministry of Defense ,Manitkul led the successful effort to enact the ...

  • I believe @Auntof6 can comfirm you that all of the link that empty now was usable on her last edit.

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/6575285 On June 15,2019 on the last edit before technically did something to the source that was strongly protect as much as UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE sources the other sources seem to be dead link

She was a first of the spokesperson for the Ministry of Defense (Thailand).[2] Manitkul led the successful effort to enact the Conscription Payment Act of 1995 (military salaries must equal the Thai minimum wage) which resulted in more men willingly enlisting and fewer men avoiding the draft.[3] [4]

Both link that supported the information seem to be empty now

I notify them and let see if they could fix the link.

even her website www.Rangsitpol.or.th in the Poster is DOWN.

Lieutenant Colonel Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul,WRTA.jpg

The subject English Article was deleted asked to delete with a Notable reason and it was used against my Thai Project yesterday that is why I am here.

https://th.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%B8%90%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%B2_%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A5

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RJFF/Thita_Manitkul

I believe @Kudpung

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/740803312

If he could read the poster might be able to confirm you something

He is a foreigner,he probably would not have political bias Yosakrai (talk) 04:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

  • The Government Document
Royal decorations

Manitkul received the following decorations in the Honours System of Thailand

Order of the White Elephant - 1st Class (Thailand) ribbon.svg Order of the White Elephant - 1st Class (Thailand) ribbon.pngKnight Grand Cross (First Class) Order of the White Elephant (2004).


Order of the Crown of Thailand - 1st Class (Thailand) ribbon.svg Order of the Crown of Thailand - 1st Class (Thailand) ribbon.pngKnight Grand Cross (First Class)Order of the Crown of Thailand(2003) [5] Yosakrai (talk) 04:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

References

  1. "Ministry of Defence - Thailand, กระทรวงกลาโหม, Bangkok (2019)". www.govserv.org.
  2. "Ministry of Defence - Thailand, Bangkok 2018". www.govserv.org.
  3. "การปฏิรูปวิธีการเกณฑ์ทหาร กระทรวงกลาโหม ประเทศไทย ๒๕๔๐". GotoKnow.
  4. "Ministry of Defence - Thailand". www.facebook.com.
  5. http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2546/B/019V001/1.PDF ประกาศสำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี เรื่อง พระราชทานเครื่องราชอิสริยาภรณ์อันเป็นที่เชิดชูยิ่งช้างเผือกและเครื่องราชอิสริยาภรณ์อันมีเกียรติยศยิ่งมงกุฎไทย (ชั้นสายสะพาย ในโอกาสพระราชพิธีเฉลิมพระชนมพรรษา ๕ ธันวาคม ๒๕๔๖)] เล่ม 120 ตอนที่ 19ข วันที่ 1 ธันวาคม 2546
  •  Comment I would like to note first that this is my first edit in SimpleWP, and it was a long time that I have not edited any encyclopedic content in any project with my username. In your discretion, this can be a canvassing vote, but I would like to note that this article suffered from various issues.
    1. First, it tried to present the notability of the article by listing sources with passing mention of the name, but otherwise failed to establish why the passing mention of this person matters. At its present state, I would agree that the list of PMs (which is a supplementary for the academic journal, shown here) may be used as a source (though I believe there should also be Thai sources that mention her position, which I cannot find at this time) but other sources contain mention of attendance, and the position at the time. This "passing mention" to me appears not to warrant the notability enough.
    2. Second, the articles attempt to list the achievement of the project initiated by the subject of the article (i.e. describe the details of the project in the biography). This barely makes sense, since the project should have been written in a separate page and the biography should keep the thing brief (this assumes that the source provided by the user is verifiable, which, after a quick check, doesn't appear to list the name of the subject as the founder).
    3. Third, I concur to the comment of the original nominator in English Wikipedia (Paul_012) that it may have been edited by the sockpuppet. Although CheckUser stated that Yosakrai is not likely to be related to the sockpuppet (at least based on technical evidence), the article appears to be edited by only the person with interests on the subject. Yosakrai also admitted to an administrator that he was working on the article and want the page in enWP undeleted so that he "'could finish my homework in Thai Wiki'". The sandbox in English Wikipedia and Thai Wikipedia see no improvement of the coverage.
    I am in favor of voting "Delete" for this article since it suffered problem that cannot be easily rectified with the compromise provided by DJSasso (which is actually a fair compromise, but the source it provided is not really sufficient enough for me to prove). If the Notability issue is out of the question, then I believe DJSasso's revision is a best solution to deal with the issue, though with better sources. --G(x) (talk) 12:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Discussion in Thai

[[:th:http://archive.li/uMrWf

ความหวังใหม่ ยุบมารวมกับ พรรคไทยรักไทย ตาม ม.73 เมื่อ 22 มีนาคม 2545

(ส.ส.ทั้งแบบเขต และบัญชีรายชื่อ ย้ายมาสังกัดพรรคไทยรักไทย มีเพียง ชิงชัย มงคลธรรม ส.ส.ระบบบัญชีรายชื่อ ขออยู่ฟื้นฟู พรรคความหวังใหม่/ และ ร.ต.อ.เฉลิม อยู่บำรุง ส.ส.บัญชีรายชื่อ ขอไปฟื้นฟู พรรคมวลชน/ พ.ท.ฐิติยา รังสิตพล ส.ส.บัญชีรายชื่อ ย้ายไปอยู่พรรคประชาธิปัตย์)

ในขณะที่ นักการเมืองไทยต้องการเป็นฝ่ายรัฐบาล เพื่อผลประโยชน์หรืออะไรผมไม่ทราบ
ประเทศไทยมีนักการเมืองฝ่ายรัฐบาลมีอุดมการณ์ ยอมเสียสละ ย้ายไปพรรคฝ่ายค้าน สมควรจดจำ ความเสียสละนี้ไหมครับ ถ้าคุณเป็นคนไทย ที่รักและอยากให้ชาวโลก ทราบว่าเมืองไทย มีนักการเมืองที่ดีและเสียสละ เหมือนกันครับ
นักการเมืองที่ไม่ได้สมัครรับเลือกตั้งมาตั้งนาน ทำไมผู้ดูแลที่เลือกข้างถึงอ้างสารพัดเหตุผลมาลบประวัติที่มีผู้คนมาเขียนครับ ]]Yosakrai (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 Comment I would like to submit that Yosakrai gave the following explanation in Thai, which I will translate here

[...] whether Thai politician wants to participate in the government-establishing party for any benefits is another issue. Thailand has so many government-aligned politicians who uphold the ideal and is willing to move to the opposing party, an act that should be remembered [...] there are more politicians who did not run for election, why the biased administrator has to rely on many reasons to delete the biography written by other people?

This quotation is however unrelated to what we are discussing here. She may be notable according to the established guideline (though I still need a better source. RYT9 and Cambridge Academic Journal appears not sufficient for me since RYT9 is more like a syndicated news agency, and Cambridge Academic Journal does not state where it takes the information from), but the article must be rewritten from scratch, removing any dramatic scene and the project initiated by her that does not clearly state that it came from the brainchild of the subject. --G(x) (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
The New Aspiration Party was merged with the Thai Rak Thai Party. There are three members of National Assembly of Thailand in the New Aspiration Party who choose not to join the Thai Rak Thai Party

1)Chalerm Yubamrung who return to be the Leader of the Mass Party

2) Chingchai Mongkoltham decided to continue the New Aspiration Party and

3)Lieutenant Colonel Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul[3], WRTA Member of the Parliament and Deputy Secretary of the party. Offset to the Democrats. (Opposition Party) remains the only MPs moving from the government team to the opposition teem .[1]

I thought you could read Thai that why l wrote the even in Thai

[[:th:http://archive.li/uMrWf
ความหวังใหม่ ยุบมารวมกับ พรรคไทยรักไทย ตาม ม.73 เมื่อ 22 มีนาคม 2545

(ส.ส.ทั้งแบบเขต และบัญชีรายชื่อ ย้ายมาสังกัดพรรคไทยรักไทย มีเพียง ชิงชัย มงคลธรรม ส.ส.ระบบบัญชีรายชื่อ ขออยู่ฟื้นฟู พรรคความหวังใหม่/ และ ร.ต.อ.เฉลิม อยู่บำรุง ส.ส.บัญชีรายชื่อ ขอไปฟื้นฟู พรรคมวลชน/ พ.ท.ฐิติยา รังสิตพล ส.ส.บัญชีรายชื่อ ย้ายไปอยู่พรรคประชาธิปัตย์)

ในขณะที่ นักการเมืองไทยต้องการเป็นฝ่ายรัฐบาล เพื่อผลประโยชน์ หรือ อะไรผมไม่ทราบ
ประเทศไทยมีนักการเมืองฝ่ายรัฐบาลมีอุดมการณ์ ยอมเสียสละ ย้ายไปพรรคฝ่ายค้าน สมควรจดจำ ความเสียสละนี้ไหมครับ ถ้าคุณเป็นคนไทย ที่รักและอยากให้ชาวโลก ทราบว่าเมืองไทย มีนักการเมืองที่ดีและเสียสละ เหมือนกันครับ
นักการเมืองที่ไม่ได้สมัครรับเลือกตั้งมาตั้งนาน ทำไมผู้ดูแลที่เลือกข้างถึงอ้างสารพัดเหตุผลมาลบประวัติที่มีผู้คนมาเขียนครับ ]]
It was when the lead of New Aspirations Party sold his part to the Former Priminister.

Lieutenant Colonel Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul,WRTA refused to join the The Thai Thai Party and join the opposition party Democrat Party (Thailand)

The series of achievements during her duty as the first Spokesperson of Ministry of Defense create a Scandal on the front page of every Newspaper in Thailand at that time.

Anyway after more than 20 years,I could found only one working Link.

There were chaotic because Thailand Drafting System was derived from Thai Slavery System During King Rama 5 .

Ministry of Defense were enjoyed free labor of 200000 each year Thai for many decades.

Even though it was minimum wages but there were 200000 Soldiers .

It caused the ministry of Defense increasing 4000 millions bath budgets for new drafting political annually.

There were very much criticism especially when the first women generally was promoted.

http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2540/B/008/2.PDF

Ministry of Defense Early Retirement Program 2540/1997

The Minister seemed to approved all her projects.

The Project that no Thai soldiers had never dream getting Salaries.

The first Woman General and Early Retirement Program was approved with in the months apart.

They were the new projects and in order to implement it would be large some of budget.

She would have got criticism from the secretary of The New Aspiration Party in the following link

http://www.tamanoon.biz/tamanoon/example/maprang.htm Yosakrai (talk) 04:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Somdip Dey[change source]

Somdip Dey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability may be weak. Article was deleted many times on enwiki and as for other wikis, they are created by a globally locked user which looks to me as X-wiki spam. Zaxxon0 (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete Yep, it is xwiki spam. Not notable.Vermont (talk) 00:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I notice that the articles in the Spanish, Italian, and German have been worked on by the same IP as here. Which makes an argument for xwiki spam as noted. However, in the German one a number of other editors (who seem to be quite active) have since worked on it as well. Interestingly there are a large number of search results with many websites mentioning the subject, even news sources such as the Times of India article. Granted that is an interview, of course, but still the paper did feel he was known enough to be worth an interview. To me, this subject may perhaps be notable. While Zaxxon0 mentioned that is was deleted on enwiki, I may point out that the first two deletions were in 2011 and 2012. That is quite a few years ago, and it is possible for people to become notable even if they were not years before. I see that all of the references and any search results I find are much more recent than those years. So we shouldn't hold those deletions into account for this decision. The third (and last) deletion on enwiki was not for lack of notability, but was due to block evasion by the creator. Maybe Vermont can see if it was the same IP as here that created it. As for right now, I am on the fence with this one. On the surface, I would lean towards Keep. But given the potential issues with the IP that created it, that gives me pause. I will withhold my vote for now. Desertborn (talk) 20:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ponce an egg[change source]

Ponce an egg (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not encyclopedic, and not a dictionary. Zaxxon0 (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete. I didn't see anything remotely resembling what was in this article at wikt:en:ponce, so I don't even see this as "move to Wiktionary". StevenJ81 (talk) 14:19, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. I strongly suspect this is a WP:HOAX. After some searching, I see no evidence of this even existing at all as a cooking method. Or for the supposed "inventor" to exist. (Plenty of search results for that name, just none that have been in television shows. The one chef I found by that name is not from Australia so rules out being the "inventor" listed in the article). And given that "Ponce" is an offensive term in some places (per Merriam-Webster Unabridged), I doubt it would be used as the name of a cooking method. Even if this is not a hoax, it is certainly very unknown and not notable at all. Desertborn (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Upon further thought, I suspect this could be deleted under A6. But since it is already here at RfD, I won't tag it for QD. Desertborn (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


მასტერი[change source]

მასტერი (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to pass WP:GNG. Tried searching his real name, Giorgi Pavliashvili, but no reliable sources came up. Zaxxon0 (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Keep He is popular and this articles did all standards of wiki, In Georgian wiki there is article, and why not in simplewiki?--ჯეო (talk) 10:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I searched for his name in Georgian at yandex.ru and found a few more sources, such as this. I don't know Georgian and Google Translate isnt particularly reliable in this, but to me they seem to be notable in their home country and sorrounding areas and thus I don't see an issue with having an article on here about them. Thanks, Vermont (talk) 10:56, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Based on Vermont's search I am leaning keep. We have to be careful not to have systemic bias towards english speaking figures. -DJSasso (talk) 11:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment If kept, the title should be changed to his acutal name in English. Zaxxon0 (talk) 11:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Do we have reliable sources for the English name? If not I rather keep per the original. We don't prohibit foreign names, do we?--Cohaf (talk) 11:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
      • Generally we do transliterate to the English version. We need English readers to be able to read it. Native name goes in the lead sentence. -DJSasso (talk) 11:31, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
        • Make sense. --Cohaf (talk) 11:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Essential to have all titles in our alphabetic script. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Agnostic on keep/delete. Noting that policy explicitly requires article titles to be Romanized when the original alphabet is not Latin. See en:WP:UE, which is valid here in that WP:Article titles is a soft redirect here. (But it's probably better not to fix that until the RfD is concluded.) StevenJ81 (talk) 14:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
    @StevenJ81: What do you mean by Agnostic? The article doesn't tell me anything. Is it no opinions? Thanks for your input.--Cohaf (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
    It's no opinion. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
    Thank you StevenJ81. --Cohaf (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete searching all variations of his name gives nothing valuable to establish notability. The Georgian version of his name and nickname give generic results for the term "master" or social media and otherwise unreliable sources. Searching for his full name gives virtually nothing useful anywhere, aside from a handful of mentions about people who are not this person. I'd also like to note that not a single reliable source has been produced by the creator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete. As mentioned by Praxidicae, I was also unable to find much to establish notability. I believe notability should be shown in the article supported by reliable sources.--BRP ever 00:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Maurice Cheung C. H.[change source]

Maurice Cheung C. H. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Jim.henderson has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Anonymous blurb allegedly about a schoolboy Jim.henderson (talk) 19:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Delete as possible self-promotion or hoax (the work "Sex and the School" doesn't appear to exist). Also @Jim.henderson: you didn't put the discussion into the main RFD page which probably made it not noticeable. Zaxxon0 (talk) 01:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom and Zaxxon0. As I said below, it may qualify as QD under A6. If not, though, it should stay on this page for seven days before deletion, so I changed the closing time below to reflect that. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC) 01:02, 01 July 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

  • Closing time changed to 7 days after it was added to the main RFD page, without prejudice as to whether it should be QD sooner under A6 (hoax). StevenJ81 (talk) 14:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Consensus to delete.--BRP ever 00:47, 24 June 2019 (UTC).

Alex Angel[change source]

Alex Angel (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Alex Angel is just an urban mad with a mania of grandeur and a thirst for cheap glory, a freak of a certain degree of marginality. As a musician, as a singer, and especially as an advocate - he insignificant for Wikipedia. — Green Zero обг 12:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete as not notable. The nominator's reasoning, however, is very uncivil and not acceptable. Vermont (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
BTW. He has eight studio albums, a few singles and 70 music videos (some of them got millions of views). Also, he has recently got a "Silver play button" on YouTube [4]. Socialblade states that he reaches top 250 Youtube Channels in Ukraine [5]. Also, his songs have a review from Roy D. Hacksaw (Eurovision apocalypse blog). Everybody knows, he's a funny man who "craves glory", but we should take into account all the information. --Stellsman (talk) 12:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
None of that information establishes any notability. So what if he has X-amount of followers? Or has been mildly successful on a social media site? Please see en:WP:MUSICBIO, these are the guidelines we follow when discussing the notability (or supposed notability) of musicians and bands - the subject seems to fail each of the criteria outlined on the page. Hiàn (talk)/editing on mobile account. 13:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete Not seeing any evidence of meeting WP:GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 13:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete. But as @Vermont says above, the nominator's statement is not appropriate. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:21, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Rock on, guys! I have to inform you all that Green Zero (Ruslan Ivanchenko) is admin of ukrainian Wikipedia and financial scammer!! One week ago he demanded the money 10,600 UAH from Alex Angel to keep the article "Alex Angel" on ukrainian Wikipedia. Also he promised in letter that if we don't give money to him, he also will delete the articles about Alex Angel on UK Wikipedia, Spanish Wikipedia etc. We decided don't pay to Green Zero and then he deleted article Alex Angel WITOUT DISCUSSION (!!!) on Ukrainian Wikipedia. Also 4 years ago he deleted the article about Alex Angel on Ukrainian Wikipedia which already WAS VERIFIED by Ukrainian Wikipedia. So if he promised to delete article about Alex Angel on UK Wikipedia (without your opinion) in past, he thinks that your are all idiots! So decide for yourself: are you idiots or should send Green Zero to hell? I'm ready to send you screensots where Green Zero demand the money from Alex Angel. Feel free to text us: alcatrazz@list.ru Thanks! Alex Angel-team — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.192.209 (talkcontribs) 15:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

If they did in fact do this, it's a violation of the Wikimedia Terms of Use. Please send all relevant evidence to trustandsafety@wikimedia.org and the T&S team will handle it. Thank you, Vermont (talk) 15:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Vermont, just resent to trustandsafety@wikimedia.org the letter of Green Zero to us. That letter from our email alcatrazz@list.ru and calls "for Wikipedia and Vermont about admin of Ukrainian Wikipedia Green Zero". Please look at your inbox. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.192.209 (talkcontribs) 16:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

I will note that I am not a member of the T&S team, nor an employee of the WMF, although hopefully someone who is will review the email. Thank you, Vermont (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. If what the anonymous user says above is true, I'd rather still be an "idiot" rather than sending Green Zero to hell for precisely this reason: the subject isn't notable and as such doesn't meet our inclusion criteria. Hiàn (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The subject has 270 000 and 135 000 000 views on the Official artist channel on YouTube now. This is top-10 from all ukrainian musical artist. Also don't forget that subject was as hero on 10 top ukrainian tv-shows, so there are millions fans and haters (Green Zero is not only financial scammer, he is one of the haters too). Don't manipulate the history, my friend. The subject is a legend of ukrainian rock and metal stage. He is #1 in Ukrainian rock and metal. Objectively. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.192.209 (talkcontribs)

No one's manipulating history. Tell me (or even better, show me) where the sources are that suggest the subject remotely meets en:WP:MUSICBIO, then we can move on from here. Arbitrary numbers are no sign of notability, and I don't know how clear I have to make this. Hiàn (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

About the criteria please ask for who created this article here. But i see that the subject meets criteria en:WP:MUSICBIO: his music videos presented on national musical TV channels more than 5 years: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dthbxQGdbw His song We Let You Know became as soundtrack (from 0:13) for one of the famous ukrainian reality TV-Show PoLoveinki where subject was also as a hero: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6mG9HXX0J0 He also found a new musical genres: Sex rock and Sex pop which get hundreds millions views worldwide. So the subject is INTERNATIONAL (not local) rock star. Songs of subject about 10 years on ukrainian national radio rocks. etc etc etc... I think it's enough for understanding why subject is a real international star and why administrator of ukrainian wikipedia (fucking financial scammer and hater) must go to hell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.192.209 (talkcontribs) 17:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Quite frankly, I don't see why I should be asking the article creator considering you are the one defending the article's notability. I'm not seeing much in the claims you're presenting. The fact that one of his music videos made it onto a Ukrainian television channel does not establish notability - it has neither been placed in rotation nor has been featured in a substantial broadcast. The soundtrack claim seems fine to me but the fact that this is the only clear claim you've been able to put forward doesn't help the subject's case for notability, especially with such a weak claim. IMO this suggests to me a clear lack of notability.
I'd also like to warn you to please remain civil when making your case, instead of referring to others as "fucking financial scammers". Regardless of whether this claim is factual or not (that is above my paygrade), that statement wasn't appropriate in the slightest and I ask that you refrain from remotely discussing that (it is of little relevance to this discussion). Hiàn (talk) 02:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

"The fact that one of his music videos made it onto a Ukrainian television channel does not establish notability - it has neither been placed in rotation nor has been featured in a substantial broadcast." A lot of music videos of the subject were in rotation of 7 Ukrainian TV channels. The subject was also like a hero in many rated talent and reality TV shows. This is a multi-million dollar audience, not a local level. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.72.192.209 (talkcontribs) 17:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --BRP ever 00:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC).

Newstrend.news[change source]

Newstrend.news (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Indian website, may be popular in India; quick glance reveals no English-language content. First page reveals no wikis. Even though it may be top-ranked in India, an entry in SEWP is of little use to our readers. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 17:07, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • I don't see a point to keeping this. Interestingly, a search on enwiki showed only one appearance even as a reference. So I've just got to wonder how important this really is. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --BRP ever 00:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC).

Shyla Day[change source]

Shyla Day (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested Qiick deletion request. Possible reasons for deltion: Possibly promotional (G11), and unclear notability (A4). In addition, the page isn't wikifierd, or formatted like our other articles, but this is a minro thing. Page creation by a possibly single-purpose account. I propose we discuss this as a regular RFD. Eptalon (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete. Non notable and promotional.--Cohaf (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Promotional. Desertborn (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --BRP ever 01:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC).

Faraz Zaidi[change source]

Faraz Zaidi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to be notable, sources not independent of the subject. Zaxxon0 (talk) 05:19, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Promotional article, non-notable. — FR 05:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete Promotional. The single major source citation, from Time Magazine, doesn't demonstrate impact on the industry but rather as an example of one young person starting out in the field. -- Deborahjay (talk) 18:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete Clearly promotional and clearly not notable. Coverage is extremely poor, but has been made to look better than it is by the article's creator who is clearly not a brand new editor. Observe their very first edit [6]. A complete article with perfectly formatted references and an infobox is a dead giveaway of paid editing. The article's creator was very cagey with the references, three of them (Time, Entrepreneur, and MY CENTRAL JERSEY) are by the same author, Brian Roberts, who is a freelance promotional writer [7]. But he is only stated as the author of the Entrepreneur reference. He is not on the editorial staff of any of these publications and the Time "article" is clearly marked as an opinion piece. There is a similar promotional campaign going on at English Wikipedia. In fact, I am about to nominate the article on his company there (en:Profound Aesthetic) for deletion. Voceditenore (talk) 09:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete As noted, it seems to be quite promotional. Desertborn (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:19, 20 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No consensus to delete--BRP ever 00:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Barliner/my boxes[change source]

User:Barliner/my boxes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused user subpage not edited in over 8 years. User hasn't edited here in almost 8 years. Page consists of user boxes, most of which are redlinked (which is what brought the page to my attention). Most of the non-redlinked ones are on the user's main page; this page is not transcluded there. If decision is not to delete, can we at least comment the redlinked items to stop them from appearing as wanted pages? Auntof6 (talk) 04:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • I usually oppose deletion of old things for housekeeping purposes, but due to the red link issue I support deletion of this page provided they are notified on their talk page it was deleted and that they can request it back if they resume editing. Vermont (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
It turns out they're still active, but on enwiki. I still support deletion unless those pages are actually wanted. Vermont (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I am hesitant to delete an old userspace page unless its a sandbox type page. (ie draft article) However, I won't oppose. But I must strongly indicate that we should not be removing red links from anywhere just because they show up on the wanted pages list. In fact the goal of trying to clear any of the wanted pages lists is a bad one. Unless of course you are creating the wanted page. Those wanted lists are meant to exist so that slowly as pages become more wanted they rise up the list. Removing links just to remove them from the list breaks the purpose of those pages. -DJSasso (talk) 14:33, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • For red links, can't we just remove / hide the red linked items. I am very disinclined to delete this page as this is a page from a very experienced user and I think they deserve their page to be remained intact. Keep--Cohaf (talk) 08:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I think keep, but by all means comment out the red-linked items. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:42, 19 June 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pages[change source]

  • http://archive.li/ uMrWf