Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Policy shortcut:
WP:RFD
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Manoj[change source]

Manoj (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zhangj1079 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't see how this person is notable at all. The IMDB ref says that he has one minor movie, and nothing else. Also, don't see how farmer means notablility. Only active for one year. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 19:56, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 19:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Beef (slang)[change source]

Beef (slang) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Only has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Dictionary definition that doesn't have a likelihood of expanding beyond a definition Only (talk) 18:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 18:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Delete as creator. I only did this article to split the article for Beef because the dictionary definition had been included with the meat article, making it confusing. Two separate things, two separate articles! If this one isn't suitable, bin it, it's not a problem! DaneGeld (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


Vijayadashami[change source]

Vijayadashami (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Same case as with the aborigines below: Festival exists, there is an article at EnWP(en:Vijayadashami), but what we have here is too little to justify keeping as a stub. Eptalon (talk) 19:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Reject deletion - please userify this into my space, and I'll expand it into an article. No need to delete it, every wall starts with one brick! DaneGeld (talk) 20:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
You are free to edit the article; if by the end of the week it is longer/keepable, it will be kept. --Eptalon (talk) 20:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ngarrindjeri[change source]

Ngarrindjeri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject seems to be notable, see en:Ngarrindjeri; What I see as problematic is that the article is (to my liking) too short to be a stub. If I look at the EnWP article, scientits seem to disagree on what they really are/were. DeWP mentions that Ngarrinderj women were forced to work (also as sex slaves) together wis Tasmanian aboriginal women on Kangaroo Island. In short: For this article to be keepable, it needs a little more fleshing out, ideally with sources.. Eptalon (talk) 19:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 19:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Cara Mund[change source]

Cara Mund (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Miss North Dakota, Miss america 2018; two sentence stub. Questionable notabiliity. Eptalon (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete. Way too short, though it could be expanded into article. Article has enwiki equivalent. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 02:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - IMHO CSD-worthy, Article is very very short to the point where there's no actual valuable nor helpful information included. –Davey2010Talk 20:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Pornographic actors[change source]

Category:Pornographic actors (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Wwikix has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Although I made an article belonging to this category a few days ago (Daphne Rosen), I think on second thoughts that this kind of articles shouldn't exist. They have no encyclopedian relevance but are only an advertisement for indecent behavior. — This unsigned comment was added by Wwikix (talk • changes).

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • I see a gerneral problem: If you take the (replacable) actor/actress of the "usual" porn movie of today, you will find very few actors/actresses that are notable; the 'average' porn movie of today has very little (usually trivial) dialogue, and the 'action' consists of what you expect it to be. Now take people like Bettie Page, who was very important; she was probably the most photographed model of the 1950s, and the first known model to participate in bondage and fetish movies; she paved the way for what is called en:Sexual revolution (in the late 1960s), and is important for a movement called en:Neo-Burlesque. I could probably write a similar story, for Marilyn Monroe or Dita Von Teese. This gives us three entries for a category (Searching a little, we likely find a fourth and fifth one). Which means that we might need to rename the category, or create a sligtly broader one, but I don't think we should delete it, esp. not on the grounds that it is morally inacceptable. --Eptalon (talk) 09:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Take for example en:Traci Lords, pregnant at age 15, had an abortion, ran away from home; from age 16 active as an pornographic actress; some talk because she was not 18, when she started as a porn star. Even though no one says so, probably quite a typical carreer. --Eptalon (talk) 18:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep This is a valid category and it is filled with articles/subcats. Wikipedia does not censor. -DJSasso (talk) 18:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep per DJSasso - Cat is filled with articles etc so no valid reason to delete. –Davey2010Talk 20:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier due to WP:SNOW.


Robertas Preiksa[change source]

Robertas Preiksa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tbennert has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to meet notability. Article looks like direct translation of lt.wiki References not reliable sources and first isn't even about him. Tbennert (talk) 05:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete. Non-notable shareholder. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 22:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Not Delete Robertas Preiksa its very notable shareholder for Wikipedia article about him. He its notable person with explained facts about his active and important facts about developing Democracy in EU and Internationally for Lithuania and Central Europe countries integration into EU and NATO Democratic Countries family and fight of his homeland Freedom from Soviet Union occupation. His personal business developments and achievements are notorious and important to support him and also International Democratic society. Deletion this article sounds like from Comunistic countries wish tomato silence about persons who fight for Freedom and Democracy of homeland countries. User Zhangj1079 writing not real facts in his request for article deletion ! All Reference sources are about and related about Robertas Preiksa. And user Zhangj1079 note that english article its just translation from lt.wiki - sounds strange. Of course lt.wiki and article in English wiki are similar - because they are similar about same person Robertas Preiksa - bouth articles must be like a translation from each other. Vitalis777 (78.58.155.236 (talk) 15:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC))
I wasn't the one to state those facts. Tbennert was. If you have any discussion, bring it to him/her. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 02:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
As well, your argument doesn't make much sense. Could you clarify? As well, do you have a conflict of interest, judging by your argument?
I've taken a look at the sources. One is a ten-second long YouTube video, which isn't verifiable. The link in the description of the video links to a certain www.wbgv.com, which has absolutely NOTHING about the invention, or Preiksa. This source is as well a duplicate of the last source. The other YouTube video has the same situation as above. The 1stdibs site has NOTHING about Preiksa. The second site (machine-translated) doesn't say much about him anyways, it only states that he was the chairman for the Klaipeda Airport, which is a private aerodrome and isn't a major airport at all, and first site isn't about him, considering the age difference, person mentioned in site is 27 in 2011, and Preiksa would have been around 45 at the time. As for the translation, take a look at this translation, which is the lead and first section of the ltwiki article, and it's obviously a machine-translated article. Your arguments about communism won't help. The section about communism in this article has no sources, and cannot be proven. Thank you, and happy changing. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 02:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete per Tbennert. Also, does not entirely make sense, and it appears complex. Also looks a little like a CV with a few modifications. Bin. DaneGeld (talk) 21:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:05, 25 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Lists of Nobel Prize scientists[change source]

Category:Lists of Nobel Prize scientists (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't see the need to separate certain lists of Nobel Prize winners, just to be able to include them in scientist categories. If someone is looking at the lists of Nobel Prize winners, they have to go through an extra step to get to the science-related ones. Category:Lists of Nobel Prize winners certainly didn't have so many entries that it needed to be diffused. Auntof6 (talk) 06:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete: There are nobel prizes for physics, chemistry, physiology/medicine, literature, and peace efforts; there is one prize which is close to the nobel prize, awarded for economics. This means that 4 of the 6 prizes are in (hard) science related disciplines. If I look at the winers of the peace prize, I see many lawyers, and politicians/diplomats, a few economists, and a few non-governemental organizations. Many of the persons receiving the prize were scientists, by our definition. Making a category for scientists who received the prize probably does not make much sense. Taker René Cassin, who was awarded the prize in 1968 -he was a layer and diplomat. Andrei Sakharov was awarded the prize in 1975 - he was a physicist. Mikhail Gorbachev (1990) is a layer. Examples for the few that weren't: Aristide Briand (1929), George Marshall (1953) -member of the armed forces. I could go on, bur I really do not think this classification is meaningful. John Forbes Nash was a mathematician, and was awarded the prize in economics, in 1994. How many more mathematicians were awarded a Nobel Prize? - do we need a category for them? MohamedElBaradei is a physicists, and was awarded the peace prize (in 2005). Anyway: The nobel prize is one of the most prestigious awards, I do not think it matters if those awarded are scientists... Willy Brandt was given the peace prize in 1971. He had worked as a journalist, but had no formal education at university level... --Eptalon (talk) 12:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per Eptalon. The category name is pretty misleading. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 23:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Mostly, we just don't need this level of categorization here. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:SimonKSK/Sandbox/Bryan Danielson[change source]

User:SimonKSK/Sandbox/Bryan Danielson (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Old userspace page with no substantive edits in 7 years. We do have a page on this subject. The owning user hasn't edited here in 7 years. Auntof6 (talk) 03:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • User hasn't edited on this wiki for 7 years; I think this can safely be deleted. --Eptalon (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete for reasons above. I wouldn't even consider voting for merge, the draft is probably much too complex for readers. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 17:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. No reason to keep. This copy is identical to a version in the history of the current page, except that the categorization (at that point in time) was commented out. If this user ever reappears, he can get the old version (or the current version) from the page history. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per above - Hasn't been edited in over 7 years and Simon's not been on in 7 years either, better off deleted. –Davey2010Talk 20:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:09, 23 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Lists of scientists[change source]

Lists of scientists (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We have a category (Category:Lists of scientists) that covers this topic quite well, so I don't think we need this list article. It currently has entries for lists we don't even have, and it would just keep needing update as lists were created, deleted, reorganized, etc. Auntof6 (talk) 03:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Interwiki links don't always mean inclusion. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 00:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Redirect - as long as interwiki (from other wikis) gets kept. Sju hav (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - per Eptalon. Just want to make a note here that the wiki has historically accepted that lists and categories are not mutually exclusive (1, 2). We can also consider redirecting this article to Category:Lists of scientists by nationality. Chenzw  Talk  17:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect - to Category:Lists of scientists by nationality as Chenzw suggested. Even though this title is unlikely to be searched for, if someone does they will likely not know about categories. It also keeps the list current, assuming new Lists will become stand-alone with more blue entries.--Tbennert (talk) 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect. Delete. I hate cross-namespace redirects, but as Tbennert said, readers don't necessarily know about categories. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 00:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment. Redirects are often a good way to avoid deleting articles, but they are useful only if the page name is something someone would actually search for. I doubt that's the case here. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Good point. Changing my vote to delete, I suppose. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 00:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect. The main reason to redirect instead of delete is because of those interwikis mentioned above. And readers don't necessarily always know about categories. Redirects are cheap, even cross-namespace ones. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - One problem with redirection to "Category:List of scientists from ...":
Sometimes a user of wikipedia is looking for Lists by job (which includes, or perhaps should include, List of Ecologists and List of physicists etc.
Or looking for a list of Scientists by time period; I have no plan for creating that one.
Not everything a user is interested in, is something she "types in and clicks the search-button".
The current page, is a better choice than redirecting, in my view. Sju hav (talk) 19:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
    • I don't see how this is a problem with redirection. Chenzw  Talk  23:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - List of ecologists I have now added.
If one redirects as suggested, will the "Ecologists" list, be readily available?
(If ecology and environmentalism are fads/fashions that will pass, then perhaps the list of the experts of each field, is not important.) Sju hav (talk) 12:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2D Entertainment[change source]

Template:2D Entertainment (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused navbox with only one blue link. Template was created in May 2017. Auntof6 (talk) 22:51, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete - per nom. Plus the main company doesn't even have an article. --Tbennert (talk) 16:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per Tbennert. Probably promotional as well. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 21:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Kashif Khan[change source]

Kashif Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Chenzw has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apparently the only claims to notability have to do with the sale/auction of massive diamonds. Also, it is technically the firm, and not him as an individual, that is involved in the sale/auction process. Chenzw  Talk  16:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • weak Keep - he is the owner of the auction house, and at least one publicly traded company. Besides the articles on his auctions, there are several where the journalist has contacted him for information about other diamond or auction related stories. --Tbennert (talk) 17:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - The company is operated by him. He conducted most of the auctions on behalf of the company as you can see in the news sources. Sources are in-depth and independent. --Kevin Cameron (talk) 03:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 09:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Ashley J. Hassard[change source]

Ashley J. Hassard (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Only has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject does not seem to be notable. Her acting roles are not in notable works. Her coverage in sources is not significant. Only (talk) 02:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete - Fails en:WP:ENT; also, the sources cited in the article are either not independent, or provide only trivial coverage of the subject. Chenzw  Talk  15:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - She might meet notability for an athlete because she represented Canada at a world championship, but I'm not seeing any independent sources supporting that. --Tbennert (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 19:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - I'm the contributor author of this page. I have put a lot of effort on this page, followed other good Wikipedia pages. I thought references were enough. Yes, she competed from 2004-2008 at the World Championships and represented Canada. 1. I know i need more credible source to verify it. Other participants could vouch for her if possible. I'm requesting the admin to keep the page. I was able to find three reliable sources so far Toronto Star, . North Bay Nugget, Metronews.ca. I'm also forgot to mention, she is a Leadership Facilitator and Motivational Speaker here. Featured in Canadian fitness magazine JustTryIt Daviestessa (talk) 15:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment. You're getting close. But none of these sources confirms that she participated in World Gymnastics Championships, and I can't find any such evidence. And that's really the only thing that will get her over the top here, I think. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages[change source]