# Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:

### Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as `{{notability}}`, `{{hoax}}`, `{{original research}}`, or `{{advert}}`; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

### Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.
1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
• It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
• You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
• It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
• A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
• As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

### Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

### Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding `{{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~` to the bottom of their talkpage.

## Discussions

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with `*` and sign after your comment by adding `~~~~` to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one `*`).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put `<s>` before your old idea and `</s>` after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
• All times are in UTC.

## Current deletion request discussions

### Michael Serwa

· close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No independent or reliable coverage that would establish notability. The ones I can access are either interviews (which means they are not independent), don't cover the subject in-depth enough, or are promotional in nature. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 11:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:53, 25 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Sergey Smirnov (entrepreneur)

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Claims notability as company founder but no further description of company business. There are too many people with the same name and hard to find reliable sources for this BLP. In addition, using full name as query does not work. No relation found with others on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Smirnov MathXplore (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:07, 25 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### 1002 (number)

· close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:NUMBER. --Ferien (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### September Premieres

· close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looking carefully, the A4 criteria does not cover events such as TV marathons. No sources, no significant coverage, not a notable event. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 00:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• Speedy Delete I think QDA4 could have applied as TV programming is a product. --Gotanda (talk) 04:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Discovery Civilization (Latin American TV channel)

· close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Is this notable enough? Derpdart56 (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Comment: - I want to withdraw this, it seems the en.wiki article suffers from this too. --Derpdart56 (talk) 19:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
I think there is no need to withdraw. The current version and enwiki is a stub and does not give any references but only few web links. ptwiki has more context but no inline citations. eswiki has references but I'm not able to evaluate their reliability. Without reliable sources shown clearly, notability is not proved and the RFD must continue. MathXplore (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Star's Taco

· close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Shiva SS

· close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Awards are claims to notability so couldn't delete as A4. --Ferien (talk) 15:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Jacron

· close request

SlimyGecko7 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It does not seem to claim that Jacron is notable. The first revision was copied entirely from https://www.panaprium.com/blogs/i/jacron, which seems to be a blog and completely unsourced. The first revision listed jeans twice in what it is used for and the site also lists jeans twice. Even if it wasn’t copied from another site, enwiki appears to have never had an article about Jacron. SlimyGecko7 (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Category:Cardiovascular disease deaths in Australia

· close request
Extended content

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See w:Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#Deaths from cardiovascular disease and w:Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 15#Cardiovascular disease deaths - cardiovascular disease deaths are too common to be a defining characteristic. I've collapsed the list above as there are 46 extra pages in this RfD. --Ferien (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Category:Hispanic and Latino American people

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: According to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Categories showing mixes of national ancestry, it was decided that our project would not have descent categories. I think this category is equivalent to the previous discussion target. MathXplore (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Himanshu Rai

· close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Derpdart56 (talk) 18:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete. The motive of publicising the subject is all too obvious. He's not notable, and this is a misuse of the wiki. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete. This is ridiculous to keep this article. Almost half of the citations are directly from google search. No use of it.--DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 16:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Shiv Khanna

· close request

MER-C has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Undisclosed paid-for spam supported by only fake news black hat SEO sources and the usual advertorials. Non-notable, no equivalent en.wp article. MER-C (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### DIAO (DJ)

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP claims notability but the awards section is unsourced, discography is poorly sourced. Using stage name or real name as query does not lead to reliable sources. Sentences look like machine translations. MathXplore (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Josu Arzoz

· close request

TTP1233 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Independent coverage is missing and deleted on ENWIKI per g5 DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 12:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Atheist violence

· close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Disorganized OR. Gotanda (talk) 11:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete per nominator --DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 11:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
• None of the so-called examples stands up by the stated evidence (such as it is). Supposing a murder is done by an atheist. Is it claimed that was the motive for the murder? No, the motive could be anything. Not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Akshay Kumar (writer)

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP strongly depends on non-reliable/independent sources (wikidata, wikialpha, Medium, Google search results etc), and the award section is unsourced. Since there are several writers with similar name, finding coverage about this author (born in 1995) is difficult. No relations found with the writers at en:Akshay Kumar (disambiguation). MathXplore (talk) 07:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• The article has enough sources and can be distinguished. The reference attached are enough for a simple Wikipedia article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:401d:d078:2ccd:77b3:2d68:a97c (talkcontribs) 09:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete - I don't see any significant coverage. Sources are not significant enough to establish notability. Some of them are straight up unreliable (google, wikidata). — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 08:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete: Not notable, just promotional article.  DIVINE  18:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:43, 22 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Shubham Bairagii

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This BLP claims notability but no inline citations to the filmography, missing recent works and possibly fails WP:GNG. Web search results just show IMDB pages, wiki mirrors and social media accounts etc. Since others with similar name show up in search results, I think the spelling of this person's name should also be checked. MathXplore (talk) 07:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Rohit Baghel

· close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested Quick dleetion, after this went to a Request for undeletion, let's do a regular RFd. Originally deleted as A1. I have to say what we have isn't very much, and searching for the name on google basically turns up social media on page one, and a few hits that I cant clearly attribute to the one we are talking about on page two. So, dear community, keep or delete? Eptalon (talk) 21:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete Only two possible claims of notability, and no references to support them.
• First is being a "social media star," which I don't think really means anything without further explanation and/or references.
• Second is having millions of viewers ("viewer's are in millions"): YouTuber statistics are usually stated in terms of subscribers or views, not viewers. The number of subscribers doesn't mean much: subscribing is free, people could subscribe and never interact with the YouTuber again, and there can be mass subscribing just for the purpose of making the YouTuber look good. A viewer would be someone who viewed a video at least once, so this can be translated as views being at least in the millions, but I don't know of any policy or guideline saying that a certain number of views (or subscribers, for that matter) constitutes notability.
If kept, though, copy editing is needed. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete Shouldn't have been restored, absolutely nothing notable said about the subject except that "millions" of people watch him.[source?] Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 22:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
@Hockeycatcat: The option used for deleting was A1 ("very short and provides little or no meaning"). That didn't fit because there was sufficient meaning. Because of that, the article was restored (see the deletion review discussion for more info).
WP:QD#A4 didn't apply because there is at least one claim of notability, however tenuous. The definition of the A4 option explains in more detail; sometimes we forget that the short descriptions of the QD options don't include the whole guideline, but we have to go by the whole guideline when processing QD requests. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment: I found a YouTube channel with the name Rohit Baghel vlogs, and YouTube says that he only has a total of 245,066 views. This is still a large number, but nowhere near the "millions" that the article claims. Also, these numbers don't mean anything, as Auntof6 said, someone could just click on the YouTuber's video, watch for 10 seconds, then click off again. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 22:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete - View count alone doesn't establish notability. That aside, no significant coverage from reliable sources.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 00:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nom and above.  DIVINE  18:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Dragoljub Galić

· close request

Ayuta Tonomura has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Grace Jones (supercentenarian), Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Tokio Watanabe, Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Orma Slack, and Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Edelgard Huber von Gersdorff, fails WP:GNG (even less notability than Grace Jones) , WP:CITE and WP:RS. Only routine coverage of age and also English Wikipedia's Edelgard Huber von Gersdorff's page was never created. According to the source she was the oldest living person in small country (Bosnia and Herzegovina) for few months, but I think other similar record-holder has no page and there's no reason to create only his page. Can't find any sources that prove notability and there's not much more about his in the article other than his age. In addition, he was only 108 years old, not even reach aged 110 (=Supercentenarian). --Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 19:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Edelgard Huber von Gersdorff

· close request

Ayuta Tonomura has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Grace Jones (supercentenarian), Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Tokio Watanabe, and Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Orma Slack, fails WP:GNG (even less notability than Grace Jones). Only routine coverage of age and also English Wikipedia's Edelgard Huber von Gersdorff's page was already deleted (redirected) years ago. According to the source she was the oldest living person in Germany (2nd-oldest if counted disputed claim Gustav Gerneth) for few months, but I think other similar record-holder has no page and there's no reason to create only her page. Can't find any sources that prove notability and there's not much more about her in the article other than her age. --Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 19:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Tokio Watanabe

· close request

Ayuta Tonomura has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Grace Jones (supercentenarian), this article fails WP:GNG (even less notability than Grace Jones of United Kingdom) , WP:CITE and WP:RS. Only routine coverage of age, and also completely unsourced. Plus, maybe not a reason for delete, but this article was created by the troll user who was banned eternally from English Wikipedia. Anyway, Really, can't find any sources that prove notability and there's not much more about his in the article other than his age. --Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Orma Slack

· close request

Ayuta Tonomura has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Grace Jones (supercentenarian), fails WP:GNG (even less notability than Grace Jones). Only routine coverage of age and also English Wikipedia's Orma Slack's page was already deleted years ago. Nearly 6 years passed since {{Notability}} template added, but no any contains' improvement. According to the source she was the oldest living person for 3 months since the death of Colombe Benoit-Leclerc, but I think other record-holder has no page and there's no reason to create only her page. Can't find any sources that prove notability and there's not much more about her in the article other than her age. --Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 12:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### SMK Negeri 1 Mandiraja

· close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable school, nothing significant or reliable comes up in my searches. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 10:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### GFashion

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be a New York-based company, but most of the web search results are non-American companies with similar name. Does this meet WP:GNG ? MathXplore (talk) 08:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### The Mighty King Man

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be related with Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Nutri Ventures but I'm not sure about the connection and QD G4 may not apply. Although I'm sure that the reference section is empty and cannot find reliable sources about this series. MathXplore (talk) 08:04, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Polsheer House

· close request

Tymewalk has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article is written like a press release or advertisement. Searching for more details online only brings up this article. I tried the name of the Persian Wikipedia article too, which brings up that article as the first result, but I don't speak Persian and can't tell if there are reliable sources available in Persian. Only notability seems to be the UNESCO award mentioned in the article. Tymewalk (talk) 04:42, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### National female dresscode for Bangladesh

· close request

Every country has their own traditional clothing, but is that equal to a national dresscode ? A national dresscode sounds like a legislation. Should we keep these misleading/unsourced redirects ? MathXplore (talk) 07:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Chenzw  Talk  10:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### National saint of India

· close request

Nationalistic POV redirects equivalent to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Hindustani Mother of the Nation. MathXplore (talk) 07:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Chenzw  Talk  10:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. Useless articles. --DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 11:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### National juice of Pakistan

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible NPOV violation redirect. The source of this redirects comes from a popularity poll held by the Pakistan Government Twitter account (https://propakistani.pk/lens/guess-what-the-national-juice-of-pakistan-is/). After the vote, Daily Times reported that "Sugarcane juice declared as national drink of Pakistan", but this declaration is from the voters rather than the government (https://dailytimes.com.pk/347884/sugarcane-juice-declared-as-national-drink-of-pakistan/). According to these sources, there were about 7600 votes. About 82% of the participants voted for sugarcane juice, while the others voted for something else. The majority would be respected, but are we supposed to ignore the minority ? I'm not sure about the legal effect of this poll. In addition, I don't think the 7600 votes represent the 200+ million people of Pakistan. MathXplore (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• Delete Unlikely search term, and this can't be concluded properly just from a poll. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my User talk) 17:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete I am not sure that something can be considered a national symbol simply because the government's social media account declares it so. Chenzw  Talk  10:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Himanshu Jaykar (artist)

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Since QD G4 has been declined, I would like to have the differences to be explained. Search results about the subject are filled up with IMDB, primary sources, wiki mirrors and social media etc. MathXplore (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• Why do you want to remove this page? While it is full of sources to live up to the rules of Wikipedia. I request to the administrator not to remove this page from Wikipedia. (Philips ur (talk) 07:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Philips ur
• With regards to why this article was declined for G4, this particular version of the article talks about the subject in the context of his acting career. The previous article at Himanshu Jaykar (Musical artist) discusses the subject as a songwriter and producer. Chenzw  Talk  07:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. If this article is going to remain, then it should be renamed like Himanshu Jaykar (actor). MathXplore (talk) 07:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment: A profile that can easily be made by anyone on the website has been added to the article as an unreliable source, This is the link. Because of this, I vote... Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 16:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
If you think that it is so easy to create a profile on a website like Amar Ujala, then make it and show it, and your poetry should also be on that site. As Compared this link. --Philips ur (talk) 07:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete No noteworthy coverage, only on IMDb, the rest of the Google results are all self-made or fan-made websites. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 16:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Summer national fruit of Pakistan

· close request

No reliable sources to see that national fruits are different by season. Even if they exist, the redirect should be like National summer/winter fruit of Pakistan just like other national symbol redirects. I think this redirect was made like this to avoid detection, not intended for users convenience. MathXplore (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Chenzw  Talk  05:20, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment: The mango is listed as the national fruit of Pakistan at both National symbols of Pakistan and List of national fruits. The source for that is the government of Pakistan's website. However, both pages also list the guava as the winter fruit without a source. Could this be related vandalism? Tymewalk (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### STO

· close request

Praxidicae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: non notable vanity spam by an xwiki lta, no meaningful in depth coverage, everything is paid PR or passing mentions Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete - Non-notable, LTA-made article. NytharT.C 20:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Provincial flower of East Bengal

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can this be equivalent as the national flower of Bangladesh ? Cannot find official sources from the East Bengal-era. MathXplore (talk) 14:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete per nom. It is rather equivalent to National flower of Bangladesh in present effect. --DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 11:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:32, 19 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### State tree of Kashmir

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: According to en:List of Indian state trees, there is a state tree for the state of Jammu and Kashmir, but this redirect does not specify which side on Kashmir (India or Pakistan). In addition, Kashmir is not a state but a region. Should we keep this inaccurate redirect ? If it is common to mention Jammu and Kashmir as the "State of Kashmir", please let me know. MathXplore (talk) 14:17, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete The way I see it, due to the territorial dispute involving the region of Kashmir, the mere presence of this redirect (or any title resembling this) is a violation of NPOV. Chenzw  Talk  05:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### User:DreamlarT/Umesh Perera

· close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. *ignore the repeat rfd* Derpdart56 (talk) 13:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:46, 19 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Provincial birds of Pakistan

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cannot find good sources to show the reliability of this page. The page says they are "unofficial" in the beginning (although the title says provincial), and the only one reference in the page is a dead link. Possibly misleading page. Is there any reliable/useful content that we can take out from here ? MathXplore (talk) 07:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Category:Provincial symbols of Eastern Pakistan

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot find any reliable sources for the provincial symbols of former Eastern Pakistan. Web search results lead to sources about other Pakistani provinces. Allow this RFD to include these:

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete Again- nonsensical, unverifiable redirects claiming that the subject is what a country is known for. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 07:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### World Party Day

· close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: doesn't appear to exist, also see Wikipedia:Simple talk#Another worth deleting... --Ferien (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete - Not notable, doesn't have an article on enWP. NytharT.C 00:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete complete hoax. --DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 11:51, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:32, 18 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Karina Komil

· close request

TTP1233 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, not notable DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 17:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• Against the removal of this article. Karina's life has been covered for several years by the leading Tajik media. Her images have been featured in major fashion magazines. --Mihal Romazov (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Cross-A

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I tried to find sources about this Japanese company by search with EN/JA does not lead to any reliable sources, no references given in the page. Using "Cross-A" or クロス・エー as query just leads to companies or products with similar name. When the query is "Cross-A avex ", the search just leads to this page or other Avex contents. MathXplore (talk) 06:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• Ok now I understand, at first I was so confused until I realized there’s other companies with the same name, I’ll see the outcome or have a change for the name of the article, if the article’s name would be changed, I’d like it to be called “Cross-A (Avex)”, if not, that’s understandable. Thanks AW336 Lab (talk) 17:08, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Just for a reminder, this is a discussion for deletion. Renaming can be discussed after this one. MathXplore (talk) 07:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Ok, understandable AW336 Lab (talk) 21:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### National mountain of Republic of India

· close request

No reliable sources found for these India-related redirects. MathXplore (talk) 15:36, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:36, 17 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### National reptile of Pakistan

· close request

Cannot find reliable sources to support these Pakistan-related redirects. MathXplore (talk) 15:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete These serve no purpose and are unverified claims, that settles it. N1TH Music (talk) 09:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### National mosque of Republic of India

· close request

India is not an Islamic republic. MathXplore (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• See also List of national mosques. I have to check the sources to see if they're real. Lights and freedom (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete - No reliable sources to support. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 00:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
• I'll give you sopmething ot consider: The Roman Catholic Church is headed by the pope; Eastern Orthodox chuexhes have "main priests/bishops" per conuntry (usually called Metropolitans, I think). To my knowledge, Islam has a similar ocncept; so, in Egypt or Saudia arabia, there's a National mosque. In India, Islam is very prominent, so I could well imagine that someone decided that a particular mosque was the "main mosque of r the country". But who would be in a position to decide that, and how easy would it be to change ofr a different one?- In any case, we'd ned a reference that a particular omsque is the main one in India...--Eptalon (talk) 22:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### PBS TJ100

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article is same as enwiki but QD A3 may not apply because the simple version was made first. Although, I cannot find any independent reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, and the given references are only primary sources. MathXplore (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### NAKIVO

· close request

TTP1233 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Ah, sources are not sufficient enough to produce an article. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 13:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• I updated the list of sources.
There are reliable sources like: forbes.com, theregister.com, venturebeat.com, bloomberg.com, cnet.com. Alextray (talk) 12:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### Gerald Scheiblehner

· close request

TTP1233 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable football player, fails WP:GNG DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 06:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

• Keep:He is really not a notable player. But he is headcoach of a professional team in Austria.--Werner100359 (talk) 06:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:16, 16 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

### List of Deputy Chief Minister of Madhesh Province

· close request

TTP1233 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is one of the least popular topics in simple wikipedia. No need to be keep in Wikipedia. Asking for consent. DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 16:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Comment: Moving tables into list of chief ministers of Madhesh Province could be a possible option. If this list is going to remain as an independent page, it should be renamed as "List of deputy chief ministers of Madhesh Province" per others. MathXplore (talk) 01:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
You are right @MathXplore, it better to merge it in list of chief ministers of Madhesh Province instead of keeping it as independent page. --DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 02:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
• "least popular topic" isn't a valid reason for deletion. We deal with notability here. Most politicians aren't exactly popular, just by the nature of their job, but Wikipedia isn't a popularity contest. Why should we delete this?--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete. Deputies are just brides-in-waiting: they don't get power unless the senior rank dies or resigns. Until then, they are not notable, or at least it has to be shown why they are notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:13, 9 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

## Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Deletion is not cleanup and a problem with sources is usually easy and quick to fix. I've just added a source and if I have some more time over the next few days, I might try to expand the article further. If you see a problem with sources in an article and don't have enough time to solve it, you can use Twinkle's "Tag" function. --Ferien (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

### Feeding frenzy (Game)

· close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced, only the PopCap Studios homepage Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 07:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

### Turkic Bactrian-lily

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot find any reliable sources about the usage of this naming. No hits on Google Scholar by searching with "Turkic Bactrian-lily", no related information on Google Scholar by searching with "Turkic Bactrian lily". MathXplore (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete - No supporting sources for this name. Simplewiki comes up as the first search result - not a good sign. Feohfang (talk) 23:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:17, 14 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No clear consensus and this has been due closing for well over a week now... Probably best to try and discuss a solution on Category talk:All Wikipedia articles in need of updating? --Ferien (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

### Category:All Wikipedia articles in need of updating

· close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be an unhelpful copy of Category:Articles_to_be_updated. The former is generated by Template:Update inline while the latter is generated by Template:Update. It was suggested in 2014 that this category is unnecessary. I think we should delete it and modify Template:Update inline to point towards the other category. Lights and freedom (talk) 04:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete - Per nom, duplicate of an already existing category, and the template should be deprecated.*Fehufangą✉ Talk page 11:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Changed my mind on deprecating the template.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 08:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment: Keep - So what this is is that the articles are using code with a date which is as of and date. That is why it gets put in this category. We can always run AWB and strip the code out of these articles, so it is just the dates. So instead of "As of" with code, it would still say "As of," but without code. The other cat is not nearly the same. It uses a code that is {{tl:update}} or {{update after}} which means it is an article that has possibly outdated information, say a population count from 2000, and an editor put the code into let others know hey this number needs to be updated after a certain time. So I need to say keep as they are not the same and do not use the same cats as they have different meanings. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 20:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Right now it doesn't make a difference because the articles are not sorted into subcategories by date. If they were, it would be a different story. Lights and freedom (talk) 15:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
@Lights and freedom It does make a difference and they can be separated by date, but then that generates a lot of categories that we do not need (or even subcats). I think the way they are is just fine as is because they need attention and they use different codes to put them in the cats. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
@PotsdamLamb I don't think template that adds to this category includes the words "as of". Where did you see that? By the way {{as of}} uses a different category: Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements. Lights and freedom (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment: May be their meaning (the topic's name I mean) is same but still there are some difference in here (in terms of time). So this could be a serious matter in which most of the active users must give consent about this.
Tagging @Lights and freedom and @PotsdamLamb for reply. Jyoti Roy (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment: @Lights and freedom Category:Articles to be updated uses {{update}} in the header. So for example 12 Rounds (movie) needs to be updated because it has dated statements in it. ex. 12 Rounds is a 2009 movie set to be directed by Renny Harlin and produced by WWE Films. Casting is currently taking place, but professional wrestler John Cena is set to star with Steve Harris, Aidan Gillen, and Brian J. White. Filming has been scheduled to take place in New Orleans between February 25 and May 12, 2008. Category:All Wikipedia articles in need of updating uses {{outdated inline}}. So there are differences, as if one cat having 5 article's in it vs. another having 521 articles in it does not show a difference in and of itself. Both have other templates they use to put them in and you are also talking about a discussion from 2014. Category:All Wikipedia articles in need of updating was created at 11:52, April 3, 2014. The Category:Articles to be updated was created at 11:52, April 3, 2014. So despite the discussion you listed, they were never removed and have been on here since 2014. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Yeh so why there is need of deleting this category huh...@PotsdamLamb by the way, thnx for clarification. Jyoti Roy (talk) 15:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
@TTP1233 No worries. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
You are right that
In my opinion, both templates mean the same thing (that something in the article needs to be updated), so I don't think two separate categories are needed. Lights and freedom (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
@Lights and freedom If so, then the discussion must be made before here. Then why at this time? If the suggession made at Paladox's talk page in 2014, then a consent or discussion must be carried out before. The discussion being made or not, I can't say, but if yes then this could be deleted earlier. Jyoti Roy (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
@Lights and freedom If we do that then we have to remove one of the templates and have the template added to the other so it goes into that cat, but the problem is, they are not the same. {{update}} can be removed easily because it is at the top of the articles, where the inline can be anywhere and appear more than once in an article. Thanks - Da LambTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 15:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect - I've confused myself so apologies if this doesn't make sense - I would suggest the template that generates Category:All Wikipedia articles in need of updating should be deleted and redirected to Category:Articles to be updated as although one apparently is for update and the other is for outdated inline - Both pages say the same thing and both templates are seemingly doing the same thing - At least to me it would make more sense to have one update page than like 20-30 categories/pages that never get seen or updated.
We could delete one template and one category but chances are they're just going to be recreated by a newbie unaware of this very discussion so to save all that it would make more sense to just delete and redirect the least populated one to the most populated one. Hope that all makes sense as like I say I've confused myself trying to figure it out!, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:08, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The category should also be deleted and redirected - no objections to just redirecting (without the deletion). –Davey2010Talk 23:10, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Keep Voting keep for now. I think the issues are more complex than just dealing with this category, because there are multiple templates involved. I'd prefer to deal with the underlying templates first. Redirecting this category would have no effect because the category is not hardcoded -- at least it's not supposed to be. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:35, 6 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. It was nominated as such by the author - reason was that it was deemed a test page --WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 09:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC).

### List of Stanley and Martin episodes

WannurSyafiqah74 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Episodes of fictitious Comedy Central show, the show's main article was deleted, but this page wasn't.

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk) 09:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

### National animal of East Turkestan

· close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot find any reliable sources to justify this redirect. I will also include these redirects:

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

#### Discussion

•  Delete - No reliable sources to support any of these. Delete. Feohfang (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
I have provided a source now Thank you? Mathxplore2A00:23C5:8D98:E201:ED4C:47F2:2C96:9233 (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
I see none that support the claim that these are national symbols of Turkestan. Feohfang (talk) 11:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Here's one that that is supporting this claim if in doubt? User:Feohfang Thanks2A00:23C5:8D98:E201:ED4C:47F2:2C96:9233 (talk) 11:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
[[<iframe frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="border:0px" src="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jfrWCQAAQBAJ&newbks=0&lpg=PP1&pg=PR11&output=embed" width=500 height=500></iframe>]] 2A00:23C5:8D98:E201:ED4C:47F2:2C96:9233 (talk) 11:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Please tell us which page should we check. MathXplore (talk) 12:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Page 44, as numbered in the book. It is listed as "unofficial", does that mean the government-in-exile doesn't accept it, or is it only unofficial because it's not allowed by China? Either way, there's little use for this redirect. Feohfang (talk) 12:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. National animal redirects should be limited to official entries, keeping this redirect is possibly misleading. MathXplore (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
If it's unofficial, in general it shouldn't be kept, there some exceptions where unofficially recognised things or places are notable but certainly not with national animals as that very title hints at officiality. T think we can all agree on that right? N1TH Music (talk) 09:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete We've all seen this before, with the redirects for "National [...] of Pakistan". No sources, Delete all. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 15:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete No sources to verify it. Recommend for deletion. --DRC (User:TTP1233) (talk . e-mail . contrib) 15:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete Yes, we've seen it all before. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nom, no use or evidence to support this. N1TH Music (talk) 19:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete East Turkestan a historical region – the present-day region now is mostly comprised of the Autonomous Region of Xinjang in China (and although there are many independence movements, it's still a part of China) so this page doesn't make sense. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.