Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

ST Investment

ST Investment (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article doesn't provide any reasoning for notability, and the sources I've found are all trivial coverage and simple data. Depextual (talk) 16:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Faizal Khan

Faizal Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam article. It's possible that the person is notable, but the references don't really support the claims. They just mention the subject, often briefly. Depextual (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Forestbook

Forestbook (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated Content, This article written by Artificial intelligence, complex languages. References are spam, Created article using ChatGPT. Raayaan9911 04:31, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete spam article - not a notable website. even though there are many references, they are not reliable. Ternera (talk) 16:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Puss Gets the Boot

Puss Gets the Boot (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Complex, unsourced, and probably AI-generated. Depextual (talk) 03:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Barbara Milne

Barbara Milne (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No third-party sources, and may not be notable. Depextual (talk) 03:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pile breaker

Pile breaker (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated. Unverified, may be biased or contain errors, also contains spam references. Not simple either. Depextual (talk) 02:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mobile Cocktail Bar

Mobile Cocktail Bar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated article. Unverified, may be biased or contain errors, and full of spam references. Not simple either. Depextual (talk) 02:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Let’s Meet

Let’s Meet (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is written like a spam article and doesn't seem to be notable. Depextual (talk) 02:48, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete AI-Generated Content Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ops

Ops (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated article. Not verified, may have errors, may be biased. Not simple. Depextual (talk) 02:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Multiverse (Marvel Comics)

Multiverse (Marvel Comics) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated article. Unverified and may be incorrect or biased; not simple. Depextual (talk) 02:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

ʑ

ʑ (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Highly complex AI generated content, no simplification and frankly unable to be stubified or saved. fr33kman 22:58, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominator. BZPN (talk) 22:58, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
• Give me some time to make a proper article about /ʑ/ and its voiceless counterpart /ɕ/. If I can't do it before this RfD ends, then delete. If I can, redirect. This is not a good, printable title. It however does serve as a useful redirect.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:39, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

  We can still create a redirect after if you can create a suitable article. This would also benefit us by removing these clear AI revisions. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

  Eh, fair point. I'm fine with just deleting it for now. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Unencyclopedic, Complex, AI generated.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Globally blocked

Template:Globally blocked (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible test page. Depextual (talk) 22:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete G5. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 23:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Party Party of Rhode Island

Party Party of Rhode Island (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable minor political party. I only found one reliable source with significant coverage. Depextual (talk) 21:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Three Great Nobles of the Restoration

Three Great Nobles of the Restoration (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated and complex article Depextual (talk) 21:39, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:39, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Pest Informer

The Pest Informer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notable only for one event. Offering to pay people to put cockroaches in their homes and the coverage came only in two spurts: June 2022 and November 2023. Depextual (talk) 21:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

T Mayu Bogollagama

T Mayu Bogollagama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not much coverage of this poet. The coverage online is nearly all from bookselling websites except for a few websites with a paragraph each (possibly written as a review, possibly user-generated, I am unsure. Depextual (talk) 21:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

TV Pinsk Music Top 10 (2017 TV Series)

TV Pinsk Music Top 10 (2017 TV Series) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks reliable sources. Depextual (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Symphony Innova 30

Symphony Innova 30 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I found few sources and the ones that exist are written to promote the subject, so are not independent. Depextual (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Spym india

Spym india (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not enough coverage in reliable sources for notability. This organization does not meet WP:NORG. Depextual (talk) 20:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete clearly a A4 situation, doesn't say why it should have an article fr33kman 20:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as perfect A4 candidate, tagged as A4 and G11 as content also reads like an ad. --–Davey2010^Talk 20:58, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:47, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wavelet transform in DSP

Wavelet transform in DSP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated article. It is unverified and could have errors, and is not simple. Depextual (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:34, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Water politics in the Near East

Water politics in the Near East (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only one sentence of content, which does not match the title. Depextual (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ahir Kingdom

Ahir Kingdom (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: POV:PUSH and WP:SYNTH, barely any of the sources calls it an "Ahir kingdom", lack of notability and SIGCOV Mr.Hanes Talk 19:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:47, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Moonbear

Moonbear (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet notability guidelines, only claim is company being award winning. BRP ^ever 19:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Voluntary

Voluntary (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICDEF and I don't see any use for a page called Voluntary in an encyclopedia. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 18:12, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Changed to DAB page, can be kept.--BRP ^ever 19:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep per BRPever. Depextual (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Krishnavanshi

Krishnavanshi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shakib ul hassan has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article "Krishnavanshi" lacks any reliable sources to verify its claims. The title appears to be an invented or unsourced term, with no evidence of its independent historical or cultural significance. The content is better covered under existing articles related to Krishna, Yaduvanshi lineage, or broader discussions on Hindu dynasties and lineages. In its current state, the article does not meet Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability or notability and should be considered for deletion. Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Imran Mahmudul

Imran Mahmudul (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable, advertising and self-promotion. BZPN (talk) 09:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

PRXDUM

PRXDUM (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable, looks like self-promotion. BZPN (talk) 07:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete After removing the junk sources, what's left is they have self-published a book (not enough for NAUTHOR) and had minor role in one film, not enough for NACTOR. No indepth coverage on any source. Article creator needs to do some serious review of what they consider a reliable source, as this article was full of clearly junk sources. Ravensfire (talk) 14:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

  Also see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Pradum Shukla from March 2024, which is PRXDUM's legal name. Missed it initially since this was created on a different name. Strong smell of UPE trying to promote this person. Ravensfire (talk) 16:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Patarapon To–oun Ron

Patarapon To–oun Ron (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unable to find any Notability for the subject Ksy 06:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kerry Shale

Kerry Shale (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sergiogriffiths has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable and empty Sergiogriffiths (talk) 22:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep - Replaced article - cited and expanded, Also has an article on Enwiki. I feel it would be big headed and or pompous of me to close this so I'll leave it for others to comment / close –Davey2010^Talk 23:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep - subject seems suitably notable.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

MTS Foundation

MTS Foundation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. I can't find reliable sources with significant coverage; fails WP:GNG. Depextual (talk) 22:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:20, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

League of Whale Fall

League of Whale Fall (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is not notable because it fails en:WP:NCORP. I can't find any sources that are significant, independent of the subject, and seem reliable. Depextual (talk) 22:17, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:17, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

IJEX Exchange

IJEX Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is not notable because it fails en:WP:NCORP. The only sources I can find with significant coverage are paid sources. Depextual (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lika O

Lika O (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Moondust534 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It was deleted on Wikipedia, bots moved to simple Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lika_O

Text it the same. It does not meet WP:BIO, WP:ANYBIO , WP:ATH ,WP:PROF, WP:ENT. All the sources are blatantly promotional. None of the sources meet the criteria and policies for notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS). A simple Google search confirms it Moondust534 (talk) 21:10, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

HV investment Group

HV investment Group (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This company appears to not be notable. I found significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Also I find it very unlikely that an investment company was involved in the development of TensorFlow 1.5. Depextual (talk) 20:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids (Andrew the PBS Kid's fanmade version)

List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids (Andrew the PBS Kid's fanmade version) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Probably a hoax or invention, but I haven't reviewed everything since it says "fanmade version". Depextual (talk) 20:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• delete - List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids already exists. Not a suitable search term. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:16, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Merge the sourced entries into List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids and  Delete the rest. No need for duplicate articles that serve the same purpose.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:27, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete false info, no reason to keep that. BZPN (talk) 09:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
• I'm not sure what to do because now they've made another one, List of programs broadcast by Qubo (Andrew the PBS Kid's fanmade version). If it takes a week to delete these and they keep creating them, we'll never be rid of them. Depextual (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Glendale Park

Glendale Park (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I found no references showing notability in a Google Search. The source here doesn't mention him as a member of the group. It is slightly difficult to find information because there are some search results about parks named "Glendale Park". Depextual (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jean Louis Hardy

Jean Louis Hardy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated Content, Article with complex languages Likely they created article using ChatGPT. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lithuanian traditions and customs

Lithuanian traditions and customs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated Content and Unreferenced, Likely written by ChatGPT, How users created their articles like this using ChatGPT, It would be easily to Blow it up and start over Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• If you believe the article is not well-written, go ahead and delete it. --Jon Gua (talk) 19:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. BZPN (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Editor note: Moved Comment Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Xích Quỷ

Xích Quỷ (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated article. These are hard to verify and may be written with a point of view, or misleading conclusions. Depextual (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chris M Walker

Chris M Walker (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable at all. Looks like an advertising. Complex language, generated by AI. BZPN (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete It's an advertisement that's non-notable and sourced by paid sources. Depextual (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Littlelinksga

Littlelinksga (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sergiogriffiths has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable Sergiogriffiths (talk) 04:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not notable, article is written like an advertisement, and besides it is written by AI. Depextual (talk) 05:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

  i wrote it myself wdym its for myself and my channel not a ad Uedhqweuhf (talk) 14:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete AI-Generated Content, Advertisement. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Most likely a self-promotion; not notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per above. BZPN (talk) 16:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Virgnia Arnejo

Virgnia Arnejo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 23:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Nothing in this article shows that this person meets WP:NBIO let alone WP:GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hiri Motu Wikipedia

Hiri Motu Wikipedia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This Wikipedia has been closed, and is not notable. Depextual (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 23:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable wikipedia edition.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Michael Graziano

Michael Graziano (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Vermont has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. All sources are primary or paid, except (probably) for the New York Times piece, which is a one-off about his wedding and doesn't provide much in the way of individual coverage or indication of notability. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 22:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Noting that I'd have G11'd this if not for the New York Times piece. Blatantly promotional and most likely UPE. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 22:15, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sayyid Abbas Mujtahid Gerashi

Sayyid Abbas Mujtahid Gerashi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated article. These are hard to verify and may be written with a point of view, or misleading conclusions, and this is also not simple. Depextual (talk) 17:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

If you don't like article, just delete it, it is OK. --Jon Gua (talk) 17:52, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:30, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lament for Nippur

Lament for Nippur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated article. These are hard to verify and may be written with a point of view, or misleading conclusions, and this is also not simple. Depextual (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

If you don't like article, just delete it, it is OK. --Jon Gua (talk) 17:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kazis GmbH

Kazis GmbH (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The Subject has no Notability and Page is written absolute like advertisement of subject. Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Qara-Hamid

Battle of Qara-Hamid (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot find any proof this battle occurred. It may have been part of the Campaign of Trabzon but I cannot find any sources that directly reference this battle. Griff (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sunil Sandhu

Sunil Sandhu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject has No Notability and Page is Written like CV for the subject. Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Advertisement/ CV, fails WP:Notability (people). Depextual (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Akuma Saningong

Akuma Saningong (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

38.183.10.216 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: cant find any strong reference of notability 38.183.10.216 (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sukhpal Singh Gill

Sukhpal Singh Gill (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

38.183.10.216 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I didn't find any notability in reference section there is only blog site and promotional fiuff 38.183.10.216 (talk) 16:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ahir rebellion in Raghogarh State

Ahir rebellion in Raghogarh State (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems POV pushing with invented name also this article isn't cited properly use of outdated sources and improper Citations.Not fit for a "Wikipedia Article". Mr.Hanes Talk 13:07, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ekam Bawa

Ekam Bawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem notable. This person looks like an average internet character, like many others. The article looks more like an advertisement. BZPN (talk) 12:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Climate restoration

Climate restoration (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content in this article, article would easy to Blow it up and start over How they created their article like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominator. BZPN (talk) 16:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mickey Ray Sinatra

Mickey Ray Sinatra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article does not establish notability through its content or the sources provided. Griff (talk) 01:27, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non-notable article. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 02:54, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Agree and delete per nom.--Ksy 19:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Cyber Crime Break Org

Cyber Crime Break Org (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Creator keeps removing the QD and my patience is wearing thin with them, Perfect A4 candidate, No evidence of any notability, Fails NCORP and GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I did some cleaning of the obvious junk in the article - wikis, blogs, press releases. Not going to do more at this point in part to show the clear promotional tone that still remains. Of the sources remaining, TheBlazeTimes is NOT a reliable source - a handful of followers on twitter and facebook, content seems mainly AI based, this is a paid news site. DrisktiIas is a cram site, articles are self-published and stuff like this is paid/sponsored articles, not a good source. Cyber Safe Girl book published well before this organization was founded and it's self-published - not a reliable source here. The TOI article is another case of w:WP:NEWSORGINDIA with the over-the-top tone trying to sell this person. Not a good source. TimesOfMalwa.in doesn't resolve. And a link to the org's about-us page. So no good sources to show notability. There's a history behind this organization across multiple Wikipedia sites trying to push getting them created. Look at the history on Wikidata - [1]. Lots of additions and removals from multiple other Wikipedia sites. The pagelogs on enwiki [2] show an AFD there from July 2024 w:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cyber_Crime_Break and multiple recreate attempts by a sockfarm w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Btw_Santhosh that I hope we're not seeing here. So for multiple reasons, but especially failing to show NCORP or GNG is met due to an utter lack of reliable sources with significant coverage, delete this article. Ravensfire (talk) 18:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Ravensfire Thank you for providing such an in-depth analysis, I'm truly amazed at how much research you've carried out and found, I had only searched Cyber Crime Break Org which is why I didn't get very far!, Thanks again –Davey2010^Talk 18:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  Also, see Cyber Crime Break where this has been created multiple times before. Ravensfire (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete. Created by LTA, lock evasion.–TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 10:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable organisation. Also getting a slight promotional feeling.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

January 2024 al-Asad Airbase attack

January 2024 al-Asad Airbase attack (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This attack is not particularly notable, with limited significant coverage after the fact. Reviewing the sources, they are either reposts of the US government's X statement or cover this as part of the larger conflict. I am advocating for merging this information in either the Israel-Hamas War article or as part of an article that covers International response to that war. (Note: I am asking for a merge but recognise there may be reasons to delete this completely) Griff (talk) 22:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep – Several news articles covered the event in-depth including CNN, BBC, and The Washington Post. WeatherWriter (talk) 03:17, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:02, 8 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Afghani guitar

Afghani guitar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think that it is worth having a separate article about strung, plucked instruments from Afghanistan, especially since all three of the instruments mentioned in the article are not exclusive to Afghanistan. The name of the article, to me, is also misleading. We don't call the pipa, liuqin, ruan "Chinese guitars", nor do we call the lute, baroque guitar, and the mandolin "European guitars". The prose also looks like an LLM was used to generate it, or at least parts of it. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Baby De Scarface

Baby De Scarface (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, I can't find any coverage online. The article has peacock phrases such as "He is still dropping songs relentlessly till date and his fanbase is extraordinarily strong". FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  15:48, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Agree Zero Notability --Ksy 19:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete not notable. Ternera (talk) 16:15, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Selsoviet

Selsoviet (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content, Too complex in this article, How users created their article using ChatGPT like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:25, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Content typically complex for AI. Most likely false information, no value for the reader. BZPN (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

English in the Commonwealth of Nations

English in the Commonwealth of Nations (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content plus unsourced. How they created their article like this using ChatGPT. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete complex language, obviously AI generated content and of little aid to the project. fr33kman 13:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete generated by AI. Unverified (most likely false), unsourced information. The content is typical for AI, probably a real user could not have written it in such a non-specific and complex way, only LLM could do it :). BZPN (talk) 13:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - unverified, AI-generated content. It would be easier to blow it up and start over. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  15:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Not helpful, if my memory serves me correct Commonwealth English is a thing, but not in the way that the articles proposes it as. AI generated.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

TEFL Institute of Ireland

TEFL Institute of Ireland (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 12:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete unable to find any notability--Ksy 19:59, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Biggest claim of notability is being a finalist in an ofqual competition. If they won, then sure, but as far as I can tell, they didn't win, which (in my opinion) holds barely any notability. I tried to access the competition results but couldn't find any mentions of it by ofqual.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sujit Kumar Mishra

Sujit Kumar Mishra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2409:4055:4E16:A470:0:0:504B:F610 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think he is notable person as I can see there is such no results of any proof of notability 2409:4055:4E16:A470:0:0:504B:F610 (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non-notable actor/author. Self-serving sources fr33kman 19:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

  I have to deleted the links with actor/author and -Golden Book Awards (India) reference link as per your request. Sujitbus (talk) 17:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete is what i am leaning toward.--Golden Book Awards (India), is not notable whatsoever.--If the website
  goldenbookawards.com
  is the main source, then that is not a good sign. 2001:2020:309:C12D:108:BE6:70E1:3957 (talk) 03:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  Done linked removed of this website. Sujitbus (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete not notable at all. BZPN (talk) 17:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  What Remove? Sujitbus (talk) 17:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

• Administrator note: Extending the date because this RFD was not listed on the main page. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  HI Raayaan9911,

  If this Bio Articles will be deleted withing 7 December 2024 (UTC). We have 3 Question about you?

  1) When Can I Re-Apply for same and Which types articles needs for notability?

  2) As author my one technical non fiction books "Fundamental of Android Apps development " it was sale more then 20K plus globally and I'm still not notable person as per Wikipedia. I have to worked major TV shows but it's same. Some idiot Youtubers are notable without doing any public interest of work. So which types of Website in India they are providing info for notability and How to achieved them?

  3) What is the meaning of the line "Extending the date because this RFD was not listed on the main page"?

  I have to done changes as per my knowledge.

  Thanks for supports,

  Sujit Kumar Mishra

  Mumbai,India Sujitbus (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Sujitbus, Your Article is Non-Notable, Administrators extended a date of closing because RFD Request was not listed in main pages, Your article will be delete in 9 Days but i still voted delete, Please see WP:GNG for any more information, Thank you! Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 16:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Non-notable person. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:37, 5 December 2024 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

OkGranCanaria

OkGranCanaria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a single notable source And Page is written Like a Advertisement of the Travel Agency Ksy 10:08, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No sources in the article show any significance of the subject. I found no meaningful coverage on a Google search either. And the page is written like an advertisement. Depextual (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

MARIANO BUSSO

MARIANO BUSSO (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable at all, fake references, advertising and spam. BZPN (talk) 08:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Spam. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

 Delete - Does not show any claim to notability. Griff (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Video game companies established in the year

Template:Video game companies established in the year (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: created by Ігнат Лостюк. Simple English Wikipedia does not (at least at the moment) have dedicated category-tree to companies by year of establishment, or a template. We are Simple English Wikipedia, and we are different from English Wikipedia afterall. What's the point of saying to Keep this template? QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:YYYY in video gaming category header

Template:YYYY in video gaming category header (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: created by Ігнат Лостюк (Ihnat Lostyuk). Simple English Wikipedia currently does not have a fully-complete category tree for "(YEAR) in video games" (i.g. Category:2012, 2009, 1999 in video games); whereas the parent would be "Video gaming by year" and the children of that category would videogames companies started in 2001, 2004, and so on. This template is currently is currently not necessary and corresponding categories that use this template may be deleted. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 21:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

San Miguel Petapa

San Miguel Petapa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Agree with nominator, instead of few words better to be deleted--Ksy 21:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep - In general, I agree with A1 deletions, particularly where there is no useful information to begin with and the article is better off not existing. In this case, this article was an easy article to resolve the A1 issue and should have just been fixed instead of requiring the time of several other editors at the RFD process. The article is now sourced and has a photo. Griff (talk) 17:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Milton, West Dunbartonshire

Milton, West Dunbartonshire (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Agree--Ksy 21:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep This article does not belong anywhere near RfD. @Kuskrey and BZPN: please review WP:BEFORE: Deletion is not cleanup. In the time you both could have commented on and made this nomination respectively, you could have improved the article to a level that no cleanup templates would be required. --Ferien (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ferien: Well, I disagree. This article only has one sentence. No sources, nothing more, just one sentence. This is not even a basis for expanding/improving the article. There is no big difference between writing a new article and expanding it with seven (!) words. I understand cases where stubs are a bit more extensive, perhaps without references, but contain some data. But one sentence is not serious. The reader will not learn anything from this article, and inserting templates into it will result in an indefinite period of waiting for corrections. Besides, I am rather reluctant to expand articles on topics I have no idea about (geography is not my best side) :). BZPN (talk) 08:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  @BZPN: Having a small amount of content is not a reason to delete if it has useful information. This isn't my opinion – this is the deletion policy, literally word-for-word. A sentence, particularly the ones in the West Dunbartonshire settlements you have nominated for deletion, is a basis for expanding and improving the article. There is actually nothing wrong with the article other than the fact that it's short. It's unsourced because there is nothing to source. The fact that Milton is a village in West Dunbartonshire is not controversial and what are you even going to source to prove that? Just because you are not intending to expand or source it does not mean no other editor will look at it. Special:ShortPages is watched by many editors, including myself, and often acted upon. I for one enjoy expanding geographical articles such as this, and have actually passed through this specific village during my trips to Scotland. But on the whole, we as a wiki will be realistically not be significantly better off having used a week of community discussion to delete an article, that while short, offers useful information, when we could have made minor improvements to the article that would have avoided this discussion entirely. --Ferien (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Ferien: Yes, but this information is not useful. The only information here is that there is such a village and its approximate location. This article has no value to the reader. BZPN (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  @BZPN Yes, but this information is not useful. How is basic geographical information not useful? WP:SOFIXIT then. Like I have said before, not everything needs a citation. If it's uncontroversial enough then a citation is not mandatory. Sure, it's nice to have, but do you need to cite that the sky is blue? Time spent in this discussion could have been spent discussing more contentious articles currently at RfD or RfDs without any !votes. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep - The nominator's reasons for proposing the deletion no longer apply to this article. Griff (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep While the original rev could've been A1'd, the current revision isn't deletion worthy. Is it an okay page? No. Is it bad enough to warrant deletion? Also no.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alexandria, West Dunbartonshire

Alexandria, West Dunbartonshire (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  Keep. Places are generally notable, even if there isnt much content Rathfelder (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bonhill

Bonhill (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a village/town exists. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Milice

Milice (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Volkspolizei

Volkspolizei (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  Additionally I am happy to directly help in expanding this to a much larger level by the end of the year. --Ferien (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep - The article has a source now. Is it a stub? Absolutely. Does it meet A1 or RFD criteria? No. I understand that short articles provide little value to the reader, but so does a non-existent article. Griff (talk) 21:06, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
• Definitely a keep. On a side note we probably want the article at 'Deutsche Volkspolizei', which was the official name of the orgsnization--Eptalon (talk) 06:13, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Korean People's Army

Korean People's Army (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I agree with nominator--Ksy 21:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep per ferien, and another point: Wouldn't a significant army during the Korean war, one of the more famous and notable wars of both the cold war and the 20th century be notable? it would be best to add to it instead of deleting it. RiggedMint 15:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  The question should be is the topic notable, not is this a good article. Rathfelder (talk) 17:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  In which, the article is very much notable. RiggedMint 23:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rafael Viguera González

Rafael Viguera González (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unable to find any reliable sources Other please check If I am not wrong Ksy 20:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ahir-Rajput Connection

Ahir-Rajput Connection (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shakib ul hassan has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article contains a mix of unsourced or poorly sourced claims, historical inaccuracies, and original research (WP:OR). It relies heavily on religious texts and unverifiable assertions, which do not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable, verifiable, and neutral content. Additionally, it presents conflicting interpretations of the relationship between Ahirs and Rajputs without providing scholarly consensus, making the content misleading. The topic is better covered in existing, well-sourced articles on Yaduvanshi Kshatriyas or related subjects. Shakib ul hassan 💬 talk 20:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per nomination Mr.Hanes (talk)

• Delete seems like purely WP:OR to me NXcrypto Chatting 06:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, Content is OR, Better off partially merged into the related topics, –Davey2010^Talk 15:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Polyphase decomposition

Polyphase decomposition (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Incomprehensible Rathfelder (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Likely AI-generated --Ferien (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete for our readership this article is jibberish. There is no fixing it either fr33kman 22:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Article with AI-Generated Content. Using AI is not allowed in Wikipedia. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 08:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Raayaan9911: That's not the case. Please see WP :AI. fr33kman 12:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete, that's an obvious AI nonsense. BZPN (talk) 08:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete entirely based on A.I without use of Manual language, seems violation of Wikipedia policy. Mr.Hanes Talk 12:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Mr.Hanes: As of now there is no policy regarding the use of AI. Perhaps you could review the proposed guideline. fr33kman 12:43, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mir Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz

Mir Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly copied - badly Rathfelder (talk) 17:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: The exact revision this is copied from is en:Special:Permalink/1252433793— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete A copy from English Wikipedia per Fehufanga. This could really be quickly deleted. Depextual (talk) 05:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of awards and nominations received by Tyler, the Creator

List of awards and nominations received by Tyler, the Creator (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a separate article Rathfelder (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of NHL retired numbers

List of NHL retired numbers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I dont know what this is about. Rathfelder (talk) 17:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Emma Tremblay

Emma Tremblay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 17:14, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick Delete should be deleted in QD mode. BZPN (talk) 17:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC) _{Keep Because it has been greatly improved and expanded by Davey. BZPN (talk) 21:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)}
•  Keep as I've rewritten, expanded and cited the article. Article still needs work but it's better than what it was. --–Davey2010^Talk 17:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Done a Quick research on the subject found notable --Ksy 20:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  Much improved, thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  You're welcome @Rathfelder, Happy editing:), Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Abhira Brahmins

Abhira Brahmins (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

NXcrypto has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There is no such community called Abhira Brahmins exist. References are failing its verification. Seems like a hoax or WP:OR to me. NXcrypto Chatting 16:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. BZPN (talk) 16:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination Shakib ul hassan (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Owen Garitty

Owen Garitty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

38.183.10.216 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not found any strong reference for notability 38.183.10.216 (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not notable at all, looks like an advertising or spam. BZPN (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nominatior, non-notable article. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 08:07, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deji

Deji (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not very notable Rathfelder (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:52, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom and Asteralee, no evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. --–Davey2010^Talk 17:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Not Notable --Ksy 20:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Per Nominator Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 08:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:51, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Noman A. Said

Noman A. Said (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesnt seem very notable Rathfelder (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. --–Davey2010^Talk 17:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Imtiaz Ahmed (actor)

Imtiaz Ahmed (actor) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Could not find even a singly notable source for the subject other Please Check if I am not wrong. Ksy 08:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. Cannot find any evidence of any notability, fails NACTOR and GNG. --–Davey2010^Talk 17:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete As nominator noted, there's nothing in the article to show that NACTOR or GNG is met. A brief web search didn't turn up anything that I would term as useful. There are Imtiaz Ahmed articles on enwiki but none for actors (w:Imtiaz Ahmed. Article would need substantial pruning if kept as it's pretty much a hagiography at this point, without sources. Ravensfire (talk) 23:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fetside

Fetside (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot find any reliable sources using an internet search browser at all and is therefore not notable. The article is written like an advertisement and uses peacock terms such as "offering tools that support seamless interaction," "focusing instead on fostering a genuine and supportive community," and "It aims to go beyond traditional social networking by building a genuine community that values openness and respect." All of the references that are used in the article are random and completely unrelated. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  17:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete no coverage on Google. fr33kman 17:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete i can't find any sources in Google, I searched, can't find any websites. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 18:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
• delete nothing in my before. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:33, 5 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Siverek (1925)

Capture of Siverek (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

JJPMaster has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See all of the other RfDs for "Capture of..." articles by Canoooo.4 from today. JJP_Master (she/they) 23:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Canoooo.4 is clearly working on the history of Kurdistan. I think they should be helped to do that. Rathfelder (talk) 17:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Ergani (1925)

Capture of Ergani (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Maden (1925)

Capture of Maden (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Lice (1925)

Capture of Lice (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete As per nom --Ksy 20:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as per nom Mr.Hanes Talk 05:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Cleanup is Not Deletion Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 19:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Badirkhan beg campaign against Ottoman

Badirkhan beg campaign against Ottoman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Palu (1925)

Capture of Palu (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Random Sources that redirected back to article, How users created new article like this. Both are non-notable and unreliable references Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Bingöl (1925)

Capture of Bingöl (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Bitlis (1835)

Battle of Bitlis (1835) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Rawandiz

Battle of Rawandiz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Please see WP:BEFORE Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 15:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alqosh Massacre (1832)

Alqosh Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Khatare Massacre (1832)

Khatare Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. BZPN (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Batapur

Battle of Batapur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: "The article is relied upon 2 sources, which breaks Wikipedia's policy that an article should be having 'atleast' 3 sources. Moreover, out of those 2 sources, you cant access 1, which breaks Wikipedia:Verifiability, This leaves us to the last remaining source, that source nowhere calls this event as "Battle of batapur" nor the source specifically talks about an "X victory" or "Y victory" taking place here, this breaks the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability, Making this article WP:OR, If we go further, we can clearly see WP:SYNTH here since it is cherrypicking few relative words from the source, mixing them together and drawing a conclusion of its own" Mr.Hanes (talk) 18:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pathankot airstrike

Pathankot airstrike (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mr.Hanes has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article relies heavily on sources that do not meet Wikipedia's reliable sources policy WP:RS. These sources lack editorial oversight, established reputability, or neutrality, which undermines the verifiability of the content. Without reliable, independent sources, the subject fails to meet Wikipedia's standard for inclusion. Mr.Hanes (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ardalan Emirate

Ardalan Emirate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no sources or wikitext formatting. There is no major value for the reader, just a few minor mentions of dates. It looks more like an edit test and substub. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The subject is notable. Lack of sources and formatting can be fixed. However, it could be deleted as a direct copy from enwiki. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  Also, I'm not sure the term "emirate" applies. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  I really don't understand the purpose of leaving articles like this. If we leave it like this and do not delete it, it will remain in this for an indefinite period of time until someone decides to correct it (but we don't know when). An article like this really has no real value to the reader. The topic is notable and encyclopedic, but it is not enough to leave this article in such a state. It is actually an out-of-context fragment of unformatted and unverified information. BZPN (talk) 07:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mauryan Conquest of South

Mauryan Conquest of South (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

NXcrypto has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Most of the references are failing to verify. NXcrypto Chatting 10:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per nom Shakib ul hassan (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Comment : I would suggest that it maybe better to draftify this article rather than delete, I want to improve it Mr.Hanes Talk 19:45, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Mr.Hanes if you wanted to improve it in draft, then I have no issue. Better to draftify then. NXcrypto Chatting 19:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Military forces by type

Category:Military forces by type (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Category:Types of military forces (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Overcategorization, should be merged with Category:Military forces to make things easier to navigate through. Also created by a blocked or banned user. Depextual (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom, neither category really justifies it's existence, especially when Category:Military forces serves the same purpose as these cats and predates these.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:AI-notice

Template:AI-notice (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-generated content can simply be addressed at RfD or other deletion methods if we decide to implement them as a community. If AI-content has been added in, it can be reverted as disruptive. I do not see a scenario in which this template would be useful. --Ferien (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: I have explained the purpose of this template here: Wikipedia:Simple talk#Baby shower. Baby shower is an example of an article where the template should be included on its talk page, if the article would not be deleted through RfD. Thank you. BZPN (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
• Delete we should be deprecating the use of AI in our articles. It goes against the pillars of Wikipedia in my eyes. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep If they're not going to be deleted (Ferien: you yourself removed the QD criterion for this), then it's useful to be able to tag them as such so they are collected together in a category and other users can look at them later. I have seen a number of these AI-generated articles and didn't really no what to do with them. AI is able to quickly generate a lot of text, which cannot be verified so quickly, may be biased, and on this project usually doesn't fit the criteria of being simple. So it's not so easy to change them into properly written articles that follow the manual of style. On the other hand, if a QD criterion is made for these, then this template won't be needed. But it seems you're putting the cart before the horse here. Depextual (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

  Depextual, I'm not wanting these articles to be kept - I'm wanting them to be deleted. But there are two reasons why I removed the QD criterion. Firstly, there was no discussion in the community about the QD criterion, at all. It is not normal for QD criteria to be added without discussion, nor is it fair on the community. Secondly, it was not an objective QD criterion. While there are telltale signs a page is created by AI, there is no certainty a page was created by AI, unlike A3 where you can see a page was copied from enwiki or G12 where you can see an article was a copyright violation. We don't have to use QD criteria to delete articles, that's why we have RfD for cases that might need more oversight. We already have abuse/misuse of A4, even though that is an objective criteria - QD criteria should be cut and dry cases, and that would not be the case with an AI G13. --Ferien (talk) 22:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

  In that case I strongly support keeping this template. It's similar to other types of tags that can be used on poorly written articles, such as {{Hoax}}, {{NPOV}}, {{COI}}, {{Notability}}. We could delete all those tags and just say the pages should go to RfD instead, but I'd rather not do that. Depextual (talk) 22:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

  That is because those issues are typically able to be fixed whereas AI articles present fundamental issues to article creation. --Ferien (talk) 22:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Wait. Depending on how the proposed WP:AI guideline goes, this will either serve the purpose of demarcating (preferably with a tracking cat) or be useless and get deleted. Right now, I can't comment on how well the proposed guideline is going, and so can't decide whether to delete this template.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as AI articles should be deleted not fixed/rewritten, I guess you could create a tracking category for them incase editors aren't sure, anyway delete. --–Davey2010^Talk 19:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  That's why the template exists fr33kman 13:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  I thought this was created so that articles in this category can be improved not deleted but if the purpose of this is to check articles to see if they're AI or human before deleting then sure id be happy to keep

  If it exists purely to improve them then then no I still say it should be deleted

  Does that make sense?

  From my reading of the simple talk baby shower section the OP wants these improved not deleted? –Davey2010^Talk 14:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep, in accordance with my comment above and statements on ST, I maintain my opinion. BZPN (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep We now have multiple articles generated by AI and it's not going to end. It is useful to be able to tag these creations so that the community can work on them and so our readers understand that they are AI generated content fr33kman 13:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
• Wait until the discussion at WP:AI concludes. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  19:56, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  I think it's quite difficult to say there is a place this is being centrally discussed. It's all good and well waiting for discussions to finish but the last comment on Wikipedia:Simple talk#AI generated content. was mine 4 days ago. If you are looking at the majority opinion and consensus on Wikipedia talk:AI generated content, it is currently to ban AI-generated content in its entirety, but it's quite difficult to determine the current consensus easily because it's all split into different sections, and it's not centralised on simple talk. --Ferien (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  I agree we need to centralise the discussion somewhere. I don't think the consensus is to ban it but it's hard to say without a poll. I think everyone is leaning towards it being a problem but we're yet to decide what to do. fr33kman 20:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Referring to the AI generated article Baby shower, and further to section/heading "Cultural Variations", it only shows results about India, Mexico, China and Africa. However, it doesnot discuss about the countries where it's a common tradition i.e Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. This is just an example of AI generated article which might go against the essence of Wikipedia platform being a reliable platform. --Ksy 22:04, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Kuskrey I don't see how the article "Baby shower" is relevant in the deletion of this template.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:06, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete - In general, agreeing with Ferien. If a guideline/policy is created that ends up using this template, then great. While I agree with the concerns with AI (LLMs) being used in writing articles, it is ultimately the responsibility of the writer of the article to meet all policies and guidelines related to articles on this Wikipedia. If the article writer is able to meet those policies and guidelines, while using AI, I don't see a way we can police that. If the writer of the article is not able to meet our policies and guidelines, we have ways to work with that, either through direct editing of the article or this process. We also have another method of working around mass creation of poorly written articles. On a separate note, I recommend that the proposed AI guideline be finalised, then proposed formally via ST. Griff (talk) 16:54, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment: we already have 16 articles tagged with this template, containing partially (or entirely) AI-generated content (typical, very complex and non-specific sentences) but not eligible for deletion. BZPN (talk) 23:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

  That's not exactly true - the vast majority of the articles that were tagged have been taken to AfD, and quite a few I don't think are actually AI adjacent. Our scope should be to both RfD articles and warn users that unambiguously use AI. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:38, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Toyota Century

Toyota Century (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article provides no useful value to the reader. Actually, there is no specific information, only a vague context around this model. Also as the IP editor in my discussion said (whom I thank for pointing this out), the article contains a lot of NPOV and false information, e.g. "so many people liked the old one" or "had a very good look in black" '. There are no sources whatsoever. In this form, the article has no meaning for readers and it is better to delete it than to keep it for an indefinite period of time. The article has already been waiting for improvement for about a year, and it is not worth keeping it any longer. BZPN (talk) 16:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: Hello everyone,

I understand the concerns raised in this discussion regarding the lack of sources and neutrality in the "Toyota Century" article. I appreciate the feedback from editor BZPN and other participants. However, I would like to present the following points in favor of retaining the article:

1. Sources and Verifiability: I acknowledge that the article currently lacks reliable sources to back up some claims. I am committed to researching and adding credible, verifiable sources. While the Toyota Century may not be widely covered globally, it remains a notable vehicle in Japan, and I believe we can find reliable sources to support the content.

2. Neutrality and Objectivity: I agree that certain subjective statements, such as "many people liked the old model" or "it had a very good look in black," need to be revised for neutrality. I am happy to make revisions to ensure the article adheres to Wikipedia’s neutrality guidelines and remove non-objective language.

3. Value of the Article: Although the Toyota Century may not be as globally known, it holds significant value in the context of Japanese automotive history. The article can offer valuable insights into this unique luxury vehicle and contribute meaningfully to the encyclopedia.

4. Commitment to Improvement: Instead of deleting the article, I propose that it be retained with a commitment to improvement. I will work on enhancing the content, adding proper sources, and ensuring that it meets Wikipedia's standards.

For these reasons, I respectfully request that the article be retained. I am committed to working on it and improving it in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Thank you for your consideration. 179.109.141.185 (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Farsad (rapper)

Farsad (rapper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have checked in detail could not find any Notability for the subject other Please check If I am wrong Ksy 08:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Farsad is one of the notable Persian rapper, as in Iran news don't cover the rappers because hipHop is illegal and Iranian sources are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

But some super notable sources coverd Farsad which I added for him *Timsar* (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

No offence, Lets other Editors decide, as I have already mentioned Please Check If I am Wrong. Wikipedia follow rules and regulation.

And according to wiki rules you can improve the article but your Vote don't Count. Ksy 09:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

We don't have any rules that article maker can't vote in Wiki! I did it a lot on farsi wiki and English wiki, Thanks for the corporation *Timsar* (talk) 09:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrator note: @Kuskrey: If you're going to tell another user that they can't !vote, you need to cite the rule that says so. I believe that the article creator is allowed to !vote. Did you have some other reason in mind? -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

ok, if you say so, it is added in my knowledge. Ksy 10:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

• Administrator note: Comments moved into the discussion section. MathXplore (talk) 09:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete The English language sources clearly are not good enough for notability. I translated the the Persian language sources using Google Translate and they seem promotional, and not really in depth coverage. Also, this musician does not seem to be particularly popular according to online metrics like the number of "fans" on the pages linked. Depextual (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Depextual in Iranian sources anyone can't promote news or something else, As I told the News source are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard and hipHop music is illegal so that's so clear *Timsar* (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  I think Berouz and vaghte sobh are significant mentions but they seem to repeat the same content. I don't know whether they're independent of the the subject, but it's not really enough unfortunately. As for the number of fans, you're right and I probably shouldn't have said that, but what I was trying to say is that there's not really any indication outside this page that he would meet the notability standards. Depextual (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  Because, Vaghte Sobh news is one of the most notable Iranian sources and other sources are getting rewrite of them sometimes and I would insure u that in Iran Farsad is notable *Timsar* (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment people can be notable with significant mentions in multiple, independent/third-party, secondary sources and Farsad is qualified enough. please check here. In addition, number of fans or pages link Are not criterion of Notability!

*Timsar* (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

• keep I have also checked this page. I didn't see any voidation. I didn't come here to make a fool of myself. As an editor, I will definitely do this. This page is following a Simple English Wikipedia policy. I will say that it should be kept Mmukhas (talk) 08:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

African–American Indigenous solidarity

African–American Indigenous solidarity (edit · talk · history · links ·