Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Policy shortcut:
WP:RFD
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Manan Shah[change source]

Manan Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Grayfell has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam.

This article makes strong claims, but sources do not actually support those claims. "Guinness Book of Records for Windows Black XP"? What is that record, and why isn't it sourced to the Guinness Book of Records? It doesn't exist, that's why.

Likewise, Microsoft's website doesn't list him as one of their MVPs on that project's site, nor has it ever issued any statement listing him as one of '100 ethical hackers'. This was very, very aggressively spammed on en.Wikipedia by Shah himself, and has been salted for several variations of the name. Grayfell (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete and salt. Administrators could look at the page deletion record at enwiki and decide if that constitutes sufficient grounds for QD on G11 or A6. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No Discussion - This article having been kept open past the standard time, and having no discussion, in my opinion, is the same as no consensus, and being closed, as such. -- Enfcer (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Citroën Jumper[change source]

Citroën Jumper (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article is better off merged and redirected to Fiat Ducato, It seems silly to have different articles for the exact same (but rebadged) vehicles, FWIW the Citroen Jumper is a redirect to Fiat Ducato at EN and IMHO we should follow that rule here, Could've boldly redirected however as it was created in 2011 I figured a discussion was better, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 19:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 19:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No Consensus -- Having ran longer then the proposed week, and the main votes are the writer of this article, and the proposer, and a comment with a leaning toward keep, there is no clear consensus, and therefore defaults to a keep -- Enfcer (talk) 20:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Notes from the psychoanalysis of Knut Hamsun[change source]

Notes from the psychoanalysis of Knut Hamsun (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Only has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The notes do not to be seem notable as a standalone article. Only (talk) 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Keep - The subject is arguably notable as a standalone article. The sources are multiple, notable sources.
    From the sources that I have read, I would say that the topic is notable. In my opinion the article should not be deleted, and not deleted-by-merging to other articles. The article is arguable adequately researched and adequately sourced. Sju hav (talk) 18:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
  • This is a difficult one: Knut Hamsun was awarded the Nobel Prize; In the 1930s, and 1940s, he was ideologically close to the NSDAP, like many other people. After the war (when he was like 89 years old), he inisited on a process, to clarify his position. He was given a fine (which ruined his family), and died aged over 90 years old, in the early 1950s. His last few books show that he still had a sharp mind, even though his health was deteriorating. As I take it, what is discussed here are some note of his (he probably made 1940/1945-1950ish) which were released ofr publication in the mid/end 1990s. I can see an academic, and perhaps hisotrical interest in keeping the information around. I cannot say though if the info should be in its own article, or if we should move it to the article Knut Hamsun--Eptalon (talk) 20:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The topic is notable, in part because it continues to have historical interest (and, as Eptalon says, academic interest). If the notability might in part be based on wrong reasons, is debatable. I think it would be difficult, perhaps even impossible, to merge the essential information (in regard to notability) into one section of the Knut Hamsun article, without overloading that article with the "psychoanalysis notes" information. Sju hav (talk) 11:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 18:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Gil de Roca Sales Renaissance Choir Music Festival[change source]

Gil de Roca Sales Renaissance Choir Music Festival (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Only has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability expressed for this event. Outside sources not provided to establish this as a notable event. Only (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 22:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages[change source]