Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Adriano Gajoni

Adriano Gajoni (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriano Gajoni. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Act Against Bullying

Act Against Bullying (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Act Against Bullying. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jinsong Road

Jinsong Road (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG as a street and so fails w:WP:GEOROAD. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yingchun Road

Yingchun Road (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG as a street and so fails w:WP:GEOROAD. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:48, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NGC 711

NGC 711 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable galaxy, fails w:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

NGC 4588

NGC 4588 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable galaxy, fails w:en:WP:NASTRO. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Danila Bagrov

Danila Bagrov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be a notable character. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• @Ferien he is very significant character in Russian culture. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk | changes) 22:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:58, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Masashi Miyamura

Masashi Miyamura (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:53, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jake Dollery

Jake Dollery (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through reliable sources. The single award mention seems non-significant. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

You may feel that the nomination is not significant, but the fact it was awarded is truthful, and seems a an insignificant reason to delete the entry. The ISSA annual awards is a legitimate event open to nominations from all over the world

Now, this is my first attempt at creating a Wiki entry so I'll happily accept that if there are ways to improve the entry I will certainly take that feedback on board and rectify any issue.

Other references to Jake Dollery's prescenec can be found on youtube or simply by entering a Google search for 'Jake Dollery' Jason Dollery (talk) 18:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Do you have any sources that show significant coverage of him? Google News just shows things from the radio station and him in a photo with a band. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:37, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ashish Dixit

Ashish Dixit (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Single award nomination cannot be verified. Sources otherwise are typical Indian weak entertainment fodder. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:20, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pankaj Kashyap

Pankaj Kashyap (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notabiltiy not shown through reliable sources. Seems to have minor roles. The sources are typical Indian news sites with "editor's desk" authors and interviews that don't establish notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The nomination argues that the sources are “typical Indian news sites” however this is not a valid reason for deletion. Wikipedia's notability guideline WP:GNG requires significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and many of the cited publications (The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, News18, Lokmat, etc.) are established national media outlets in India for an actor primarily working in the Indian entertainment industry, coverage in Indian national media is expected and appropriate. Wikipedia does not require sources to be international it requires them to be reliable and independent. The subject has received interviews and coverage related to his work in the web series Maharani and other productions, which demonstrates media attention beyond trivial mentions if needed, additional reliable sources can be added to further strengthen the article, but the existing coverage from recognised Indian news organisations suggests that the topic meets the general notability guideline deletion would therefore be premature Dixtanti (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

•  Delete Source 1 has a significant portion of it being quotes from the subject, which makes it skew towards being less independent from the subject. Using Google Translate, I see that source 2 is even more of an interview, which disqualifies it from being an independent source. Source 3 is also an interview. Source 4 is not in-depth enough to establish any notability. I do not see anything in source 5 that would make it different enough from source 1, in fact, some of the paragraphs are identical. Source 6 is routine coverage. Source 7 another interview. Source 8 another interview according to GT. Source 9 more routine coverage. Source 10 clearly an interview. Source 11 is a single passing mention with nothing else about the subject. Source 12 same issues as source 11. Source 13 is routine press release and far from in-depth. Why is source 1 repeated as source 14? Why is source 11 repeated as source 15? I feel like the contents of source 16 has been repeated many times in previous sources, such as source 6. Why is source 12 repeated as source 17?. None of these sources are great.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:33, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ramkinkar Jha

Ramkinkar Jha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Overall seems non-notable. Awards seem to be local and the sources are either primary or passing mentions. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:19, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Antisemitism in Europe

Antisemitism in Europe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I would like to suggest we delete this article. If I don't count the country sections, which are like empty, except for linking to a few pages regarding antisemirism, or mass killings of jews in the respective country, all that is left are two historic sections (20th century/21st century, consisting of 3-4 sentences. A blurb or intro of 2-3 sentences, a few images and a related pages where the relation is unclear. I also want to point out there is no Anitisemitism in Asia/Africa/America/Oceania. So, sorry, in my book, the Antisemiism in $county, plus the page on Antisemitism are the place to cover this. This page adds little to no info, and should therefore be deleted. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 17:47, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Stella Drake (character)

Stella Drake (character) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this character. Sources are all from the broadcaster's website. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sandra Benede

Sandra Benede (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Erakilos has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. – Erakilos 𐤀 08:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:21, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Peller

Peller (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Erakilos has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Erakilos 𐤀 08:19, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:19, 12 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

GeoSpy

GeoSpy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:WEB, imo. Barras talk 22:54, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep The request for deletion is just a vague nod to 'not significant.' The software has the potential of significantly affecting society. It has been discussed or reviewed at https://studyflix.de/deutsch/tun-tuen-oder-tuhen-8276, MSPoweruser https://mspoweruser.com › geospy-ai-review, https://opentools.ai › tools › geospy, and elsewhere. Kdammers (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Big Back (Slang)

Big Back (Slang) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm inclined to speedy the page. No source. Would in doubt better fit for Wiktionary. Don't see how this is needed in an encyclopedia. Barras talk 22:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:42, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Celina Baljeet Basra

Celina Baljeet Basra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Single review in NYT but otherwise a lot of interviews that can't establish notaiblity. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:41, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oriol Cardona

Oriol Cardona (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

The Sophocrat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Too short to be useful. Sophocrat (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marcus Mann

Marcus Mann (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

The Sophocrat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article is too short to be useful. Sophocrat (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:22, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Interstellar object

Interstellar object (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

PieWriter has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is inaccurate and misleading. Planets and comets bound to a star, including those in our solar system are in space, but not interstellar objects. Interstellar objects are not stellar objects (e.g. stars, black holes). (Creating for User:Grandfatherclok) PieWriter (talk) 04:54, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• We are talking about 10min effort to fix this. I would opt for fix & keep.--Eptalon (talk) 13:12, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Pol-e Shekasteh

Battle of Pol-e Shekasteh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Yousiphh has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is not an encyclopedic article and is an open violation of copyright (). Yousiphh (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:28, 10 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Urmia (1603)

Battle of Urmia (1603) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Yousiphh has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A problematic article, not verified by sources and a mixture of two other articles: Battle of Urmia (1604) and Battle of Sufiyan. Yousiphh (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:26, 10 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Government Engineering College, Rajkot

Government Engineering College, Rajkot (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through reliable sources. All the sources are database or internal in nature. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:54, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:54, 10 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Artemy Smolentsev

Artemy Smolentsev (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. The two awards don't seem to be overly notable, and aren't sourced. The references are primary it seems. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:52, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:52, 10 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Aujla (caste)

Aujla (caste) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notabiltiy of this caste isn't shown. This is a bizarre article; I can't figure out the see also, references, and hidden content. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:50, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete for obvious reasons. @CountryANDWestern: this might be connected to the same anonymous guy who created a ton of very low quality caste articles some months ago (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Jasrotia (caste)). You can compare the locations from the creator of this article, ~2026-13698-57, and a participant from that older discussion, 2402:8100:2B6B:7308:EDCD:B8AD:CBA4:BE26. Sophocrat (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:50, 10 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Ganja (1918)

Battle of Ganja (1918) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Yousiphh has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There were no such a battle in the history of Azerbaijan. Yousiphh (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Administrator note: transcluded 22:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC). Regards, -Barras talk 22:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC) 22:55, 9 March 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Biricodar

Biricodar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Fishsicles has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is a page on a drug that, as far as I can see, never got through clinical trials. I do not see how this is notable. I have also nominated it on English Wikipedia. Fishsicles (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Because of the expansion of the English article, I am now convinced this is a notable compound and would rescind this nomination. Fishsicles (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Administrator note: transcluded 22:56, 2 March 2026 (UTC). Regards, Barras talk 22:56, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC) 22:55, 9 March 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Trevor Kell

Trevor Kell (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Drafted in NHL but never played there and no coverage shown to establish notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:12, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pollyanna (US band)

Pollyanna (US band) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to claim/establish notability. Sources are weak fansites or mentions of them opening for more notable bands. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:05, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Euro-Vincentians

Euro-Vincentians (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be an established term/ethnic group. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per nom. Sophocrat (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Let It Come Down

Let It Come Down (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A bit too soon I think. I cannot find much in terms of sources that would make this notable. I honestly thought it was a hoax for a moment. It may one day be notable, however. Garsh (talk) 02:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Salena Rocky Malone

Salena Rocky Malone (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not clearly shown. The sources provided are obituaries and don't really establish the notability overall. Other sources found on En. and through Google seem to mention the subject in passing and not sigificant coverage. Also, is it Salena or Selena? En. has it as Selena but the infobox there is also Salena. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:56, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yurenjam

Yurenjam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this surname isn't shown CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Right Person Will Stay World Tour

The Right Person Will Stay World Tour (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notabilty for this tour isn't shown. The article is written in future tense so will need to be significantly updated if kept. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:38, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Thembelihle Mkize

Thembelihle Mkize (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown. Sources include her name in rosters or in a photo. One source is a local news story about someone donating money so she can participate in a championship. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:32, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:32, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The novel of a seamstress

The novel of a seamstress (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established for this painting. Sources all point to the one he was inspired by. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:30, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The dockers (Bardi)

The dockers (Bardi) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown. Source only proves its existence, not its notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Cyclone Ashoba

Cyclone Ashoba (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this cyclone. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:24, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Cécile Busteau

Cécile Busteau (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Only appears in lineup/roster for matches. No sginificant coverage offered. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:22, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Scarlet Latter

The Scarlet Latter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find anything to verify this movie's existence or notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:21, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sushmita Konidela

Sushmita Konidela (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. No WP:SIGCOV. Barras talk 13:13, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

hay no need to deletion of this article. i plan to improve of this article. She is very famous movie actor Chiranjeevi daughter . i have best media source in google news and i plan to improve this article. SoniaAmerica (talk) 08:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:13, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Send in the Troops

Send in the Troops (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtable notability. Probably merge with Tom Cotton? Barras talk 13:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep - The article was mentioned in many other articles. - Theparties (talk) 00:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Nikki Co

Nikki Co (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown -- both sources provided are from the network he is signed to. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per nom. Sophocrat (talk) 05:30, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

3030

3030 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

PieWriter has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think its a bit too early for this, isn’t it? PieWriter (talk) 12:07, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:R protected/excon

Template:R protected/excon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

PieWriter has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template, extended protection doesn’t exist PieWriter (talk) 11:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kingsammelot

Kingsammelot (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There are no sources that would satisfy WP:GNG on the article or on the internet. I would A4 this, but I think there is technically a claim. Garsh (talk) 19:15, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Subject does not seem notable. Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 03:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Sophocrat (talk) 01:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nomination and also it seems like an ai generated article PieWriter (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:15, 7 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pooja Somani

Pooja Somani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown. The main website used for sources (IWMBuzz) is generally considered unreliable for establishing notability and none of the articles used here has much significance. Two are about "we've heard she's going to be playing this role in this show" and another is "This actor on this show posted photos from the set of that show and she's in one of the photos." The other source is also just "we heard she's going to play this role on this show" PR puff. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep : She did major roles in Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak and Shiv Shakti – Tap Tyaag Tandav, both the cast and roles are mentioned in English Wikipedia pages of TV show. 10Bugs (talk) 03:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

  Having your name appear on a wiki isn’t a reliable establishment of notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:25, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pearl Kapur

Pearl Kapur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl Kapur. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete . Promotional-filled page, not notable at all. Dubious claims about wealth fill up most of the page. Aesurias (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: The Main En Wikipedia page seems to be a user who does not seem to be familiar with the policies and guidelines and has a very limited number of edits... their nomination is so flawed and the argument is so illogical that it should have been dismissed and this afd should not be based on that discussion. The nominator cited two articles (, ) and claimed that they both were self-published articles or PR article on contrary, both articles are investigative and critical pieces that critically analyze the billionaire and its buisiness why would one pay for publishing bad about them. The articles instead constitute independent coverage, including critical analysis, which is relevant when assessing notability under Wikipedia’s WP:GNG. Kalpanastruc (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
• Delete- As was mentioned in the enwiki discussion, much of the coverage around him was published incredibly close together. It raises some red flags to me, and I don't think sustained coverage is likely. Garsh (talk) 01:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:18, 5 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Alam Educational and Welfare Trust

Alam Educational and Welfare Trust (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable organization. The sources on this article are press releases or otherwise self published. A search revealed no significant secondary coverage. Garsh (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Quick deleted as A3 as this was copied from a portion of En:Sayfo without simplification or attribution. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Walto(1915)

Battle of Walto(1915) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability of this battle isn't established. The phrase "Battle of Walto" does not appear in Google search results or Google Book results. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:40, 13 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeeps: Hide and Seek

Yeeps: Hide and Seek (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this game isn't shown through coverage in reliable sources. Google News results show mention in app store release updates kind of things, but nothing establishing notability. Links provided are Fandom in nature. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:48, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:48, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Tuberculate

Tuberculate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Passengerpigeon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:54, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Sources cited (including those mentioned on this RFD page itself) were not found to provide significant coverage of the subject. Chenzw  Talk  14:00, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

RemoFirst

RemoFirst (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. The bulk of sources and content of this article are about their funding rounds which is transactional in nature and not something that establishes notability. The inclusions on the various lists also don't establish notability, especially when there are 200 or 500+ companies on the list. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:13, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: Found multiple secondary sources , , , demonstrating significant coverage of the company beyond fundraising. ~2026-13496-96 (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:13, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. While there were numerically more keep votes than delete votes, the keep votes did not surface valid policy-based reasons for keeping the article, and crucially did not adequately address the issue of sourcing, which I have found did not adequately provide significant coverage that is independent of the subject. Chenzw  Talk  13:55, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Board Intelligence

Board Intelligence (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 08:42, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: Following the nomination for deletion of the article, I added new information and notable sources to meet the WP:GNG criteria. Since this is the first article I’m creating in the Simple English version, I believe the article can be kept in stub format. Thank you, and for any discussions or help, please feel free to ping me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baleozid (talk • contribs)
• Delete -- The bulk of the sources are routine coverage of transfers or equity raised. The two Times sources mostly focus on the founders of the company and not the company itself. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Both articles from The Times describe the company and include a series of important details. Even though they also contain information about the founders (who are clearly not notable enough for a separate article), overall the articles focus on the company and describe a number of events already included in the article. The articles from Tech.eu, although they mention funding information, also contain details about the company and its history. After conducting an analysis, I have also determined that it is an important company in the United Kingdom (once I have more free time, I will expand the article with additional local sources). For now, I will vote to keep the article.--Aistoco (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:42, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Pranay Sahu

Pranay Sahu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. The sources are mostly "news desk" type authors. It says he was a member of Congress, but really he seems to be a party member, not an elected official. The sources provided indicate that he ran for office but lost. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:53, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:53, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

What Does the Bee Do?

What Does the Bee Do? (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not really within our scope. Wikipedia isn't an explaining guide like this. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 08:41, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - Yup, not really an encyclopedic article/topic. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Already have an article available (Honey) on this subject. Therefore, this one must be deleted.--Aistoco (talk) 14:22, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:41, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Ternera (talk) 16:37, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Category:Former dictators

Category:Former dictators (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Coddlebean has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The category lacks a clear definition & could lead to vandalism. Coddlebean (talk) 11:54, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: Enwiki has a confusing problem with trying to define what a dictator is, but we have had no such problem (nor have the 32 other language wikis with dictator categories). We have categories for dictators and dictatorships, and I don't see why distinguishing former dictators is a stretch. Its use in vandalism is not a good argument for deletion. Vandals will always find something to vandalize. Garsh (talk) 04:54, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: it in accordance with the argument presented by Garsh.--Aistoco (talk) 14:01, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:54, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 16:36, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

D Rajkumar Wadiyar

D Rajkumar Wadiyar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources provided appear generally unreliable. A lot of YOuTube sources or "news correspondent"/"editorial desk" type references. Some don't mention him at all. There are additional concerns about crosswiki spamming as this is a blocked sock at En., though doesn't seem to have blocked accounts here on Simple. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:25, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete It is possible that the editor has a conflict of interest (COI). In the English version, they were blocked for using multiple accounts, and the article was deleted. I do not believe it can be kept in the Simple English version.--Aistoco (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:25, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:36, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Dalton Gang

Dalton Gang (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this "gang" isn't shown in significant coverage inreliable sources. Only the BBC mention seems reliable, but the others don't seem overly reliable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:28, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:35, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Rus'–Samanid conflicts (910–911)

Rus'–Samanid conflicts (910–911) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm uncertain if this is an AI generated article, so I am bringing it here for additional eyes and input. There seem to be sources that are AI delusions such as the Kaspij one and the Kovalevskij one. The "vibe" of the format with the infobox and how the sources are presented also feel AI generated. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:37, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Roy Lyster

Roy Lyster (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through reliable sources. The bulk of sources are primary or from his institutions/programs. The awards cited are from his own industry/organizations and don't confer overall notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:49, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 16:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Ancient egyptian hierarchy

Ancient egyptian hierarchy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be within scope. No sources provided and doesn't seem like it necessitates its own article. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Looks like pretty much any hierarchy of the ancient world. I guess that in the middle ages there was little difference. Plus the article is really short. Unless we get more flesh on the bone this is a clear delete--Eptalon (talk) 22:48, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:56, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Nattaree Hamon

Nattaree Hamon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable reality TV contestant; sources provided are mostly her own production. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:58, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Interview Coder

Interview Coder (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable sources. The CNBC is more about the founder than the company. Ycombinator is a forum. Business Insider is also more about the founder. The Columbia source is the campus newspaper so not a great source. The NDTV and India Today are unreliable, specifically as the INdia Today is written by the "Education Desk." CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:28, 4 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Actions of temp. account at En. Wiki have proven this is a Nyanzi Martin Luther sock creation and, therefore, treated as a G5 deletion CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Bossip Africa

Bossip Africa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this magazine isn't shown. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:59, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The page is notable for a Wikipedia entry ~2026-13778-47 (talk) 19:46, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

  There are no reliable sources provided that show it is notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

  Okay, I will add them tomorrow since the discussion is still for a few days ~2026-13778-47 (talk) 20:53, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

  Sources have been added ~2026-13778-47 (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  And none seem to be reliable. Watchdog is a submit your news site (); "PeopleAI" is just an AI generated site; "East News Uganda" looks to be just one guy's website for news; The Inspector and WatchDog articles are written by nameless authors suggesting paid placement. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:17, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Cilovluq

Cilovluq (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Last year, en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cilovluq genocide determined that this subject was not covered by "mainstream" history sources and was limited to "references [that] are either partisan, locally produced, or non-scholarly." Looking at the sourcing provided here, it appears to be the same case. I see several research papers as sources. The couple of books it cites don't seem to mention Cilovluq when you search inside the book. Overall, this doesn't appear to meet notability standards. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete - per nom Dasani053 (talk) 19:36, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The name Cilovluq does not need to be "mentioned" for the atrocities themselves to be recognized in a book. For instance, the research papers never refer to “Cilovluq” by its exact name, yet they still speak of the specific atrocity and record the death toll. Now there is a difference between Simple English Wikipedia and English Wikipedia, they are two separate projects and I don’t quite understand why you try to use the situation from the latter in order to justify the page-deletion on the former, there are different requirements on the separate projects. Worthy to mention; you recently nominated the Rawandiz massacre page here on Simple English Wikipedia for deletion (I have no issue with the deletion), despite it having a large amount of academic and scholarly sources. But you seem to have no issue whatsoever with allowing pages like Heydarabad and Sahin Ghal Massacre (1918) to stay (no idea what this page is about). Not one time have I seen you nominate that page for deletion, despite it being way more unfit for Simple English Wikipedia than the Cilovluq page. Etcnoel1 (talk) 22:15, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

  If you think that other page should be deleted, feel free to nominate it for deletion. Yes, we are different from English Wikipedia, but we still have essentially the same needs for notability and sourcing. I cited their AFD here not because we have to delete it because they did, but to show that an analysis of this subject and its sourcing has already occurred at another project and came to the same conclusion that I’m seeing here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

  Well I was around when the Cilovluq page on English Wikipedia was first "published", and the sources used were literally just random Persian or Arabic books with no links to them whatsoever, hence why it was deleted. Not to mention; that whole page was literally just an English translation of the entire Cilovluq page on Azerbaijani Wikipedia (no reconstruction whatsoever). And my point isn’t that I’m capable of nominating the Heydarabad and Sahin Ghal Massacre (1918) page for deletion, my point is how you pick and choose what to nominate and what not to nominate. If you nominated based on how academically reliable a page is, then you would’ve surely nominated Heydarabad and Sahin Ghal Massacre (1918) for deletion by now. Etcnoel1 (talk) 00:05, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Delete - per nom + can't find mainstream notability, Google Books gives 1 result for me. Wlaak (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:34, 2 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 14:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Sonal Agrawal

Sonal Agrawal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot find any evidence of notability. The sources in the article are routine (trivial rating and listing sites for medical professionals) and a searching for other sources has yielded nothing. Garsh (talk) 23:26, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - Sources are routine and don't show notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:08, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:26, 2 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 14:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Office of Akash Nanda

Office of Akash Nanda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I would A4 this, but it's a place. In any case, this article makes no claim of notability and sources don't support it either. I should note also that it has been deleted at RFD on enwiki. Garsh (talk) 05:12, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick delete A1: One sentence describing it as "a place" does not sufficient context make. Passengerpigeon (talk) 07:05, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
• Delete -- This is slightly different from Akash Nanda which I recently protected after multiple recreations after RFD at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Akash Nanda. The original article is about the lawyer and this is about his office, so it's technically different so not G4. Either way, notability isn't established. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:21, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:12, 3 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Withdrawn PieWriter (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Chauhan Rajputs

Chauhan Rajputs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

PieWriter has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems like an attempt to POV push PieWriter (talk) 07:03, 20 February 2026 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep. The page has good sources so there’s no point to delete it. There are several pages related to castes why you never raised the nomination for deleting them? ~2026-11304-06 (talk) 08:55, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  The deletion nomination is not due to lack of sources, but because the title and framing may be misleading. Official title is Chauhan dynasty 赛义菲 (talk) 09:03, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  I think the title of this page should be changed to either ‘Chauhan dynasty’ or ‘Chauhan clan’ and then we should Keep this article. I myself had changed a sentence in this article by adding term ‘claim’ for a mythological descent as wikipedia’s language must be kept in mind while creation of pages. MrBeardalien (talk) 09:12, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  Well...On English Wikipedia such cases are sometimes handled under G4 if that has not been established here yet. My support for deletion was primarily based on concerns about possible sock activity influencing the discussion, rather than solely on the sourcing issue. The topic itself may be notable however the article should be created and developed by a knowledgeable or independent editor to ensure neutrality and proper sourcing. 赛义菲 (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  Yes you’re right @赛义菲, this article needs some minor revision and change of title to ‘Chauhan dynasty’ as it is on en.wikipedia to maintain neutrality and avoid any povpush. Thanks MrBeardalien (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  Agreed. Renaming it to ''Chauhan dynasty'' would better reflect the historical subject and help maintain neutrality. Necessary revisions can then be made to ensure balanced sourcing and avoid POV issues. 赛义菲 (talk) 09:47, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Keep it, just a normal article related to an Indian caste same as there are plenty such pages related to many castes so targeting a single such article is not a wise thing. Check the references too. ~2026-11334-10 (talk) 09:04, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Why you logout and vote again? 赛义菲 (talk) 09:06, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy delete – The issue is not lack of sources, but that the title and framing are misleading. The historically recognised subject is Chauhan dynasty, not “Chauhan Rajputs,” which changes the scope and may introduce POV. There are also concerns about possible sock activity influencing the discussion.赛义菲 (talk) 09:09, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  Which of our quick deletion criteria does this meet? CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  you Didn’t get my support.. read again 赛义菲 (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  Again, what criteria does that meet if you're saying it should be quick deleted? "Misleading" isn't a category. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Note – 赛义菲 has been CU blocked on enwiki as a sock of Alakmarsaify/Edition of India. Emk9 (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep I understand the concerns about Rajput POV pushing. It has been a problem here recently. The sources here seem adequate, however. The enwiki equivalent seems to be located at en:Chauhan dynasty, so it might worth considering a move to that title. For now, this seems like a notable subject to me.Garsh (talk) 04:31, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

  Oh, I didn’t notice that. Thanks for the note. PieWriter (talk) 08:27, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

•  Comment: The article title was moved to Chauhan here. Jolly1253 (talk) 14:06, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

 Request withdrawn PieWriter (talk) 08:28, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:03, 27 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Discussion on what the best title/scope is for this article should continue at its talk page. CountryANDWestern (talk) 02:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Trans shooter

Trans shooter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: After some though, I would like to propose this article for deletion. Yes there are articles in English and Spanish Wikipedia, and yes there are third-party sources. The article is about (allegedly right-wing) people using (falsified?) statistics to discredit transgender people and to majke laws to the detriment of the LGBT community. I am also not talking about having the article at its current title, or moving it elsewhere. My very basic concern is: right now, we do not know how widespread the phenomenon is, i it only touches the United States, if it has been observed in other countries. I am sorry to say so, but Simple Wikipedia should be a platform where we can find half-way reliable information, that has some relevance. There was a school shooting in Canada, and the perpetrator allegedly was transgender, and as a 'hasty generalization', I construct such a concept of 'transgender shooter' - the media spread a lot of disinformation if it helps them gain reach, and it is clear that a political party/movement will use it, if it can help them gain supporters/voters. My very basic question is different, though: Does this have enough relevance to merit an article - what do other people think? Eptalon (talk) 16:48, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep. Sufficiently sourced and an important topic. Better rename to a more neutral name rather than just delete. Theparties (talk) 07:23, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. I don't see anything wrong with the article's existence as a separate topic. The misinformation campaign has sources that would make it notable on its own. It should almost certainly be retitled, and I'm rather surprised that discussion has gone nowhere. To be more specific, I support a move to Misinformation about violence by transgender people. Garsh (talk) 04:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

• Keep I think the topic is notable based on source coverage on this which can be seen on enwiki Misinformation about violence by transgender people, whether it should merged with the alleged “movement” 2020s anti-LGBTQ movement in the United States is an issue on that platform, but that main thing is we dont have that article here. requests for deletion should not be used for cleanup like the advice you gave me Wikipedia:Simple talk#c-Eptalon-20260215085200-Yeatglazer-20260215031800

Yeatglazer (talk) 23:51, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

I am not trying to clean up using an RfD, I posed the valid question if the event/movement is notable enough for an article; this is independent of what we call the article. Eptalon (talk) 15:01, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:48, 28 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Notability not established, self promotional, and using socks to support the article. Peterdownunder (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Fausto Ferrara

Fausto Ferrara (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown through significant coverage in reliable sources. The sources provided are often passing mentions. Many are his own works or are databases. The awards don't seem notable overall; the World Architectural one, in particular, seems to be a submit yourself and pay and we'll give you an award type site. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:32, 26 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hello, I am Fausto Ferrara, the subject of this biography.

I have removed the unrelated person (homonym) and I am trying to keep the article factual and well-sourced.

Some sources were replaced with institutional and reliable references (for example Senate WebTV for the “Ricostruiamo i borghi” press conference).

I did not commission or pay anyone to write or edit this page. If possible, I ask that an uninvolved editor evaluates the notability based on independent sources and considers alternatives (such as improvement/cleanup) instead of deletion.

Thank you. ~2026-11178-76 (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Support

I ask to keep the page. I will add more independent reliable sources in the next days.

FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

I am the subject of this biography (COI).

Since the nomination, the article has been rewritten to rely on independent sources with non-trivial coverage:

• The Architect’s Newspaper (2008), “Future Follies” (mentions Ferrara in the context of Architecture Omi).
• Ville & Casali (Oct 2010), Aldo Mazzolani, “Luce, acqua e terra in forma geometrica” (article about Ferrara).

The 2012 Venice Architecture Biennale collateral event at Palazzo Bembo (“Traces of Centuries & Future Steps”) is supported by the European Cultural Centre invited-architects list.

A Routledge book (Elena Liotta, 2013) contains image credits (“© Fausto Ferrara”; “© Fausto Ferrara, Pino Barillà”), but I am treating that as attribution evidence only, not biographical coverage.

FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 12:05, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Note: this was a Biennale collateral event at Palazzo Bembo (European Cultural Centre), not an official national pavilion. FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 12:07, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Il Messaggero (1 June 1991) and Il Corrispondente (18 May 1991) report Ferrara receiving second prize in the “Immaginario Aprilia” competition (three public squares).

FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• The 2012 Palazzo Bembo (“Traces of Centuries & Future Steps”) participation is supported by the European Cultural Centre invited-architects list, and the related catalogue is documented with ISBN 9789490784119 in OPAC SBN.

FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 12:12, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Update (COI): the article has now been shortened and rewritten to rely mainly on independent, non-trivial coverage. In particular, the 2012 catalogue Traces of Centuries & Future Steps: Palazzo Bembo, Biennale Architettura 2012 contains signed critical texts on Ferrara’s work by Franco Purini (p. 76) and Elisabetta Cristallini (p. 82), in addition to the 2010 Ville & Casali article. FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 14:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

I am the subject of this biography and therefore have a COI. I will not argue about style or promote myself, but I would like to point out the main independent sources with non-trivial coverage that are now used in the article.

• Traces of Centuries & Future Steps: Palazzo Bembo, Biennale Architettura 2012 (Global Art Affairs Foundation, 2012, ISBN 9789490784119) contains two signed texts dedicated to my work: one by Franco Purini (“Fausto Ferrara”, p. 76) and one by Elisabetta Cristallini (“Fausto Ferrara”, p. 82). These are not listings, but full texts discussing the work.
• Ville & Casali (n.10, Oct 2010) includes an article by Aldo Mazzolani (“Luce, acqua e terra in forma geometrica”, pp. 24–25) discussing my work.
• ARTKEY Magazine (issue 2, 2007) includes a piece by Maria Leonardi (“Art Museum Omi”, p. 15) on a project credited to me (and Daniela Antonucci / Studio Arckeo). The IRIS Sapienza record is used as bibliographic support for this citation.

Other links (event listings such as ECC / Artribune / professionearchitetto) are only used to verify dates and participation, not as the main basis for notability. The article has also been rewritten to avoid “passing mention” wording and to focus on these published sources.

Given this, I ask that the closing editor consider alternatives to deletion (such as further cleanup) based on the significant coverage already present in independent publications. FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Note (COI): The article no longer relies on the WA Awards mention; that section has been removed. The notability argument is based on independent, non-trivial coverage in published sources (not event listings or awards).

FaustoFerrara1965 (talk) 13:42, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• Disclosure: I am connected to the subject (e.g., professional collaboration). I’m not asking to “vote”, only listing independent sources that appear to provide significant coverage beyond databases/awards:
  • “Traces of Centuries & Future Steps: Palazzo Bembo, Biennale Architettura 2012” (Global Art Affairs Foundation, 2012, ISBN 9789490784119): dedicated texts on Fausto Ferrara signed by Franco Purini and Elisabetta Cristallini.
  • Ville & Casali, n.10 (Oct 2010): Aldo Mazzolani, “Luce, acqua e terra in forma geometrica”, pp. 24–25.
  • Show Room, “Speciale Architetti” (Oct 2011): Margherita Toffolon, “Sulla linea dell’orizzonte”, pp. 66–68.
  • PLATFORM, Issue 55 (2025): “Architecture the Slope / CASA 1”, pp. 64–69.

Based on these, I believe the article meets notability and could be kept (or moved to draft for cleanup). Valeriagliolo (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Notability not established and appears to be sel-promotional Peterdownunder (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Catman Chung

Catman Chung (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Johannnes89 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to meet the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (people), both the "awards" and the political / business career appear to be of minor relevance. Johannnes89 (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Subject: Request for direct help posting a BLP triage request on zh-yuewiki (I am blocked, user talk also restricted)

Dear Johannnes89,

I am asking for your direct help, not just advice.

I am the subject of a biography on Cantonese Wikipedia (zh-yuewiki):

https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%8D%BE%E8%A9%A0%E6%B7%B5

My zh-yuewiki account (User:Catmanchung) is currently blocked AND my user talk page is also restricted, so I have no way to post a request, submit diffs, or ask for admin review locally. I will not create any alternate account.

Could you please post a short, policy-based request on zh-yuewiki (e.g., the admin noticeboard / appropriate venue) asking for BLP triage and, if needed, page protection?

Key concerns:

- The article contains contentious allegations and non-neutral headings (e.g. 「網上集資被指欺騙網友」「香港區議會選舉涉嫌賄選」「催眠服務涉嫌性騷擾等爭議」) and political labeling.

- The contentious content has been repeatedly restored.

Evidence diffs:

- 2024-11-24: https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%8D%BE%E8%A9%A0%E6%B7%B5&diff=prev&oldid=2210128

- 2024-11-13: https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%8D%BE%E8%A9%A0%E6%B7%B5&diff=next&oldid=2198825

- 2024-08-05: https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E9%8D%BE%E8%A9%A0%E6%B7%B5&diff=next&oldid=2163351

Suggested disclosure line you can include (important):

“Disclosure: I am posting this request at the subject’s request because the subject’s account is blocked and their user talk page is also restricted. I am not editing the article; I am asking admins to review BLP compliance and advise/act as appropriate.”

If you are willing, please reply and I will send you a ready-to-post text for the noticeboard in Cantonese/Chinese.

Thank you,

Catman Chung (鍾詠淵) Catmanchung (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments.

I understand that each Wikimedia project is independent, but I am concerned about inconsistent application of the same core principles across projects.

If this Simple English Wikipedia article is considered non-notable under notability/verification standards, then I ask that the Cantonese Wikipedia biography about me be assessed with the same rigor (reliable independent sources, neutral wording, and BLP standards), rather than allowing a more contentious version to persist there.

To be clear: I am not trying to game outcomes. I am asking for consistency and policy-based handling of both pages, especially because the Cantonese Wikipedia article contains contentious allegations/headings and has been repeatedly restored.

Regarding the sockpuppet allegation: I am the real-life subject and I am posting here in good faith from my own account. Any concerns about sockpuppetry should be handled through the appropriate investigation process.

Thank you.

--~~~~ Catmanchung (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This is probably the work of a sock puppet farm. Socks related to en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Macdonald5122/Archive have been found changing the Cantonese version of this article. They added awards same as the ones here. The user who created this article also shares the same user name and page changing pattern as some of the socks found. H78c67c (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

對不起, 請原諒, 多謝你, 我愛你 Catmanchung (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments.

I understand that each Wikimedia project is independent, but I am concerned about inconsistent application of the same core principles across projects.

If this Simple English Wikipedia article is considered non-notable under notability/verification standards, then I ask that the Cantonese Wikipedia biography about me be assessed with the same rigor (reliable independent sources, neutral wording, and BLP standards), rather than allowing a more contentious version to persist there.

To be clear: I am not trying to game outcomes. I am asking for consistency and policy-based handling of both pages, especially because the Cantonese Wikipedia article contains contentious allegations/headings and has been repeatedly restored.

Regarding the sockpuppet allegation: I am the real-life subject and I am posting here in good faith from my own account. Any concerns about sockpuppetry should be handled through the appropriate investigation process.

Thank you.

--~~~~ Catmanchung (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:10, 26 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Agha Mirza

Agha Mirza (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown -- single source doesn't establish notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - one single source that's self-published, non-WP:RS, not notable.

This request is due to close on 11:19, 2 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Os Carrinhos em Aventuras em Rodopolis

Os Carrinhos em Aventuras em Rodopolis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability for this TV show is established CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:48, 2 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

The Adventures of Petey and Friends

The Adventures of Petey and Friends (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability for this TV show is established. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:49, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

O Pe Grande (Os Carrinhos)

O Pe Grande (Os Carrinhos) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability for this TV episode is established. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:49, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

The Finest Example Is You

The Finest Example Is You (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this album isn't shown/established. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:55, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 20:05, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Khwarazmian-Ayyubid Conflict

Khwarazmian-Ayyubid Conflict (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Dasani053 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, no WP:SIGCOV. Dasani053 (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Note - This was created but never transcluded. I have now added it to the list of RFDs and extended the time for discussion. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:48, 22 February 2026 (UTC) 11:46, 28 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Imgflip

Imgflip (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page has existed since 2023, but I do have a concern about notability of this website. Note also, thereis a large number of dewleted edits. Since this page has existed for roughly 2.5 years, I filed an RfD, to enable discussion. Searching on the internet, I don't find many third-party sources. Opinions? Eptalon (talk) 08:17, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. This is one week overdue, and has not been closed. So there's no consensus to delete. I am therefore closing this as 'keep'--Eptalon (talk) 10:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Limoges Avenir Basket Club in Limousin

Limoges Avenir Basket Club in Limousin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have not seen evidence of notability for this group per the WP:GNG. I cannot find significant coverage in a single secondary source, much less multiple. Garsh (talk) 05:54, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Hello, I have read the French article. So: we are looking at a club for women's basketball in France, located in Limoges. We are looking at an amateur club, who has eon the amateur liga for French basketball several times. Note: we are looking at amateur players, not professionals. This likely explains that finding sources is difficult. Looking at the FRWP article, there are references, such as reporet where they won against Chartres, in 2020. Giben that the club has existed since 1983, and that they have won their respective qualifications several times, this might be keepable. If you find references, they'll likely be in French, finding english ones is unlikely. The link above is from FranceInfo, which is a state-run broadcaster of radio and tv stations in France.--Eptalon (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

  It looks like 1996-2001, and 2009/2010 they played as professionals, in the French Championship for Women Basketball. Eptalon (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

  I'm struggling to decipher the French (I don't speak it) but as best I can tell, the sources from the French article are routine or primary. I would welcome anyone else, especially those that speak French, to check around for sources. I have been unsuccessful at finding anything significant. Garsh (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

  The one I gave above is secondary (official french state owned tv reporting on a match) Eptalon (talk) 11:16, 20 February 2026 (UTC)\

  I'm not sure that reporting on a single match qualifies as coverage of the entire club, but either way we need more than one secondary source. Garsh (talk) 05:44, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

  Other references in the FRWP article are from the french federation of Basketball clubs, and articles in Le Populaire du Centre fr:Le Populaire du Centre, a local newspaper with a circulation of 20-25k copies. Eptalon (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:54, 21 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 15:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Jose Manuel Ciria

Jose Manuel Ciria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources provided -- can't prove its notability. Google News search shows mostly unreliable sources. The awards dont' seem overall notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• @CountryANDWestern: was absolutely right to point out that references needed to be provided, and that's much appreciated. I think it is now a more than satisfied requirement. By the way, a simple Gemini search throws up: "José Manuel Ciria (born in 1960) is widely considered one of the most prominent Spanish painters of his generation and a central figure in the contemporary art scene over the last three decades."DominguezNavas (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  What an AI generates in search results is not a reliable proof of anything. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:08, 27 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Natalia Bryant

Natalia Bryant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem notable overall. Articles in People and Vogue are mostly gossip fodder and are basically only of interest because of who her father is. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:49, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Melanie Schweizer

Melanie Schweizer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:13, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:13, 25 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

VJP

VJP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable politician. The sources provided don't appear to be reliable -- look like puff pieces with generic bylines. If kept, needs to move back to Prashant Saini. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:10, 26 February 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.