Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Policy shortcut:
WP:RFD
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Halloween coustumes[change source]

Halloween coustumes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Some Gadget Geek has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I see what this IP user is trying to do but would like to send this page to RfD for three reasons. first, the title is spelled wrong. Second, the article is not wikified and categorized and is for the most part poorly written. Third, the article does not really need its own page but would be better as a sub-section of the main article about Halloween. << S O M E G A D G E T G E E K >> (talk) 20:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete It has been copied and pasted from w:Halloween costume without any simplification or wikification. So it could also be nominated for QD:A3. Rus793 (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. Seems not just a copy/paste, but changes are actually more complex than the En version, and very badly written. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 20:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Hooliganz[change source]

Hooliganz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Questionable notability. A search on google yields a number of pages about sports fans keen on starting a fight... Eptalon (talk) 15:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete. Does not show notability, has no reliable sources and appears to be self-promotional. Rus793 (talk) 15:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. A legend on their own talkpage. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 15:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Brahmanas[change source]

Brahmanas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Declined QD (little or no meaning?); there is an article en:Brahmana. Big question to ask the community is whether the article we have (up for deltion here) summarizes the EnWp article well enough to be keepable? Eptalon (talk) 15:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Well, it doesn't seem to me to be an accurate rendering of the information in the En wiki article. Since an encyclopedia must be accurate, I'm leaning towards a delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 15:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Meghna River Park[change source]

Meghna River Park (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rus793 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, OR, not in Simple English, not encyclopedic Rus793 (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete. (I'd encourage administrators to see if there are QD grounds here.) StevenJ81 (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I would leave this to an Rfd. Being a geographic location it doesn't really meet any QD and it is reasonable for someone to think a park would be notable thus it makes claim anyway. -DJSasso (talk) 18:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
    FWIW, I was thinking of a QD more on language grounds than on notability grounds. But I don't necessarily disagree with you, either. I just wanted a sysop to eyeball it. StevenJ81 (talk) 19:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete Not sure I see any notability from any of my searches. -DJSasso (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. Incoherent and unreadable, and seems not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
  • At the moment, it is difficult to read, but the information is interesting, and given it is a geographical feature it is certaily notable. I do however think that this information could easily be added to Meghna River. Once this is done, the page could be replaced with a redirect there. --Eptalon (talk) 09:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 15:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.



Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

Related pages[change source]