Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Yash Gawli[change source]

Yash Gawli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Elcobbola has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person created as self-promotion by sock of LTA Yash gawli (more than 20 globally locked socks, see here, for example). Article already deleted (multiple times) and indefinitely salted on en.wiki--would suggest same here. Elcobbola (talk) 21:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 21:09, 31 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Jodhpur Literature Festival[change source]

Jodhpur Literature Festival (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be a minor organization, does not seem to be notable. Zaxxon0 (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete. No significant information found to prove this event's importance. It might be very newly launched Lit fest. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 02:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Keep. This festival is organising since 4 years not a newly launched event and it is notable as many star writers participates in this event and the largest newspaper of Rajasthan also have it's coverage. 2405:204:4001:B708:6490:A9FF:FE00:66C9 (talk)
  •  Delete. It's not notable. 4 years is too short. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigos (talkcontribs)
  •  Delete. Does not seem notable neither has enough sources that I can find when doing a search. Reception123 (talk) 09:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete more sock spam. Praxidicae (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Per Praxidicae, it does indeed appear to be LTA sock spam. Hiàn (talk)/editing on mobile account. 15:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete LTA sock spam.  — FR 18:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Amirhossein Mashaherifard[change source]

Amirhossein Mashaherifard (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Computer Fizz has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: i have googled and i cannot find anything about this person. possible self article? Computer Fizz (talk) 22:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

You find his name on google news — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16b8:42ea:2800:c095:c31d:df77:5862 (talkcontribs)
Search Amirhossein Mashaherifard on google. what means you didn't find anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamirkoeck (talkcontribs)

  •  Delete. Non-notable promotional spam. I cannot find any evidence of the subject's notability. Hiàn (talk) 11:53, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Obvious advertisement of a not notable person. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete Per above, advertising of a non-notable person, created by a user whose sole edit is this page. Reception123 (talk) 18:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete I agree with all of the above statements. The sole edit doesn't look good and with the notability concern, it makes it a pretty obvious self-edit. --Examknowtalk 01:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete Extensive spam. Wikipedia is not a place to put spam. --Znotch190711 (Talk || Edits) 02:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


GRUH Finance[change source]

GRUH Finance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Medium-sized (600-odd employees) Indian state-owned company active in the housing market. Wikipedia is not a company directory, where's the encyclopedic notability? Eptalon (talk) 16:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete. Notability not proven, and the page is essentially an advert for the company. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Keep. Indian state owned and listed entity with notable presence in authoritative media. As checked with Google News on Aug 19, 2019. Though the article need to comply with wikipedia standards. MilesML05 (talk) 06:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete The article's wording is like an advertisement, and the notability isn't proven. Nigos (talk · contribs) 12:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Keep. It's one of the well-researched microfinance companies in India started in the pre-liberalization era. From notability point of view, it has a considerable amount of presence in academic search and news. Instead of deleting it, one should improve it as suggested by MilesML05. Thanks a lot to everyone for the kind support. AnuraagPatel (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Keep I don't really see much reason for concern as for notability. On the editing side of things there is definitely work to be done but I hardly think a delete is necessary. If somebody finds hard evidence that the article is 100% fake please let me know. --Examknowtalk 01:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
To clarify, you are saying this article meets WP:GNG? Vermont (talk) 21:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete Upon close inspection of the sources provided, nothing can fulfill en:Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Primary_criteria. Significant coverage is not stocks information nor things such as lists. Merger news aren't significant. Lastly, the Forbes India article is on the creator of the company and even if it is for the company, the enwp page details the very issue Forbes have, "Most of such posts are company-sponsored or based on company's marketing materials", which in plain terms non independent. Responding to the Google News source above, we need real sources. Responding to the point per 100% fake, it's definitely real. All in all, there is a lack of independent, reliable, secondary sources to prove it is notable based on enwp notability criterion on companies, and of course GNG is not met. I believe this is some sort of advert too per Mac, and it's sort of native advertising. Delete. --Cohaf (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete per Cohaf. Notability not proven. Hiàn (talk)/editing on mobile account. 00:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Keep Indeed, Notability is not much concern per Examknow. Sources checked and found that JSTOR links, Google News links, Google Books links clears the air. As far as the news on the merger is a concern, it seems to be quite significant as more than 100+ google news link found dating from January 2019 to till date. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 01:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
    • NOTE 1: A reliable news source taken from The Times of India has been added by me in the merger section. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
    • NOTE 2: Tried to scale down the language of the article to encyclopedic level. Help is always welcomed. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 02:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Just so this is not missed and it's clear I would just like to point out that there is some conflict here, with three of the "keep" votes being very likely the same user who has created accounts with the sole purpose of "improving" the article that is nominated for RfD and for voting on this RfD to "keep" the article. Reception123 (talk) 09:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Comment: A This request is due to close on 16:15, 24 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mohammad Azharuddin[change source]

Mohammad Azharuddin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Too little info, to say whether this person is/was notable. Propose deletion... Eptalon (talk) 16:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • According to the source, he was a test-level cricketer who was banned for fixing matches. The article says nothing, and in effect has no content. It's best to delete such cases as the page is "little or no content". Of course a proper biography would be welcome. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:14, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Macdonald-ross; if no one wants to improve there's no point in keeping the article that basically says nothing about the person. Reception123 (talk) 12:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. An important figure in the history of [[India national cricket team] as he was once upon a captain. Better to improve the article. AnuraagPatel (talk) 01:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep I really don't get how this guy is non-notable. Former captain of the Indian National Cricket team who got embroiled in a match fixing scandal and was banned for life. There sure are a multitude of sources that have reported this.  — FR 02:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep Per en:Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Cricket, clear notability met. I can't agree this is little to no content, the infobox + the text gives enough content. AFD is not cleanup and the article needs expansion but not deletion. --Cohaf (talk) 17:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep per Cohaf and others. The article needs an improvement withe respect to content. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 01:38, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
  • We're not arguing about whether the person is notable. I'm saying the page it simply rubbish, and fails because it has has little or no content. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Nabanita Das[change source]

Nabanita Das (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtful notability. Google search finds little to no reliable third-party sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Hiàn (talk) 12:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete. Clearly fails to prove notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Seems to be a non-notable actress, with no reliable sources or anything. Reception123 (talk) 12:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Notability not proven. Hence, delete. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 01:47, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bumblebee Man[change source]

Bumblebee Man (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

PrimordialTaco has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Minor character from the show, and is arguably already covered by List of The Simpsons characters. All this page seems to actually cover on him is his appearances, which aren't really important. PrimordialTaco :D (say hii) 11:22, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete: Already on the general list and only content of the page is appearances, nothing else. Also doesn't have a page on enwiki, for what I assume is the same reason. Reception123 (talk) 11:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Minor character, no individual page on En, notability not shown, obvious delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Redirect to List of The Simpsons characters: there's an incoming link. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Redirect per rationale of Auntof6 -- Deborahjay (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Redirect per rationale of Auntof6 and Deborahjay. -- Ronojoy675 (talk) 02:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. We've had 2 RfD's for this LTA/subject in the last year, the previous one ended yesterday. Vermont (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC).

Joél Célestin Filsaime[change source]

Joél Célestin Filsaime (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

PrimordialTaco has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Same person as already discussed at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Joél Filsaime. Probably still not notable, but decided RFD anyway just in case. (useful to note that the creator has only made this page) PrimordialTaco :D (say hii) 11:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Quick Delete under G4. Zaxxon0 (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Can you point to the Rfd where it was deleted before? -DJSasso (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
I have an incomplete list containing 31 deleted Wikipedia/Wikidata pages, most of which have been recreated and deleted numerous times. Posting all of them seems excessive, so pick a number, I will gladly post it for you. Quakewoody (talk) 12:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. QD'd as A6. -DJSasso (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2019 (UTC).

Liam Atkinson's second perfect game[change source]

Liam Atkinson's second perfect game (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Nunabas has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not really notable for its own article. Nunabas (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete QD under A6 (Hoax), much of the info on that page is bogus. Zaxxon0 (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete Per above, I'd propose a QD under A6. Even the main subject of the page, Liam Atkinson doesn't have a page on Simple or any Enwiki, and does not seem at all notable, so this is likely a hoax. Reception123 (talk) 13:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. QD'd for A6. -DJSasso (talk) 12:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC).

Liam Atkinson's perfect game[change source]

Liam Atkinson's perfect game (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Nunabas has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not really notable for its own article. Nunabas (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete QD under A6 (Hoax), much of the info on that page is bogus. Zaxxon0 (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete See my comment for the other similar page, requesting QD. Reception123 (talk) 13:17, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Extra Credit[change source]

Extra Credit (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A short high school skit created by group of students, does not seem notable. Zaxxon0 (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Comment: It was accepted into the Pontchartrain Film Festival. Do we know if that festival is significant? --Auntof6 (talk) 06:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Here's their website. I don't believe it's conferring of notability; considering it's designated for "emerging filmmakers", few results on Google, and that it's website is terribly made, I doubt it's even notable itself. Vermont (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
as far as i know ip's can't vote...can an admin confirm? Computer Fizz (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Deletion discussions aren't votes; it's about consensus. An IP who simply writes "keep" and nothing else will very likely not be taken into account by the reviewing administrator. Vermont (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Yeah i know but most people use the word "vote" since it's shorter than "leaving a consensus note for the closing admin". I have seen anons get striked during RFA's and figured it might be the same for RFD's. Computer Fizz (talk) 19:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
RfAs are different. You have to have an account before the RfA started to !vote to prevent canvassing from other wikis. Because RfDs are content discussions anyone can take part. -DJSasso (talk) 11:55, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete as non-notable. I fail to see how the Pontchartrain Film Festival bit establishes notability. Hiàn (talk) 11:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Notability not proven. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 06:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pages[change source]