User talk:Eptalon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Simple! I hope you are happy editing here and being a Wikipedian. Some helpful pages to start you off are Wikipedia:Useful, Help:Contents and Wikipedia:Policy.

If you want to meet and talk with other members, you can visit our version of the "village pump" at Wikipedia:Simple talk. Just remember that you should sign your messages on Talk pages by typing "~~~~" (four tildes) at the end of your words.

We have a special page that describes how to write Simple English articles. If you want some ideas of which pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles. -- Netoholic @ 02:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Corm[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Corm, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Corm and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Interstellarity (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

attack pages[change source]

this is an attack page and falls under the speedy deletion criteria. Why bother wasting editors time with a ridiculous afd? Praxidicae (talk) 20:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion, with comments; I'd therefore like to wait a little more about what other people say. We can still close the RfD early, in 2-3 days...--Eptalon (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
In any other circumstance I would understand but this is a blatant attack page about living persons who are not even notable and should be deleted immediately. Praxidicae (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
looking in google, I see SEWP first, which is a pretty clear indication on Notability, then the Reddit page. Also, look at the RfD - I haven't seen a 'keep' yet. If things stay as they are now, this can be closed early, in 2-3 days. --Eptalon (talk) 20:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
2-3 days? It should have been deleted already. Computer Fizz (talk) 20:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
I do not see where the 'attack page' logic is. --Eptalon (talk) 20:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Did you bother to read any of the edit summaries? I'm not going to repeat them. Look at the history of the one you reverted and this. It's absolutely absurd. And I don't care what anyone sees on google, the fact that it's simple only should tell you it's not notable but I'm not here to argue that. This is against policy and requires speedy deletion as it's an outright attack page and violates every single policy. Praxidicae (talk) 20:37, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
That could be handled via Revision Delete, which leaves the question as to whether this is a valid redirect. Which in my opinion is not, but since another Admin is already reviewing this I will let them make that call. -- Enfcer (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
The fact that absolutely no one here is capable of spotting very blatant and obvious vandalism is beyond concerning and feeds the trolls. It would be like me redirecting Encfer in mainspace because you pissed me off on a Facebook comment thread. I guess the policy on attack pages doesn't apply here. Praxidicae (talk) 20:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
all done...--Eptalon (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Shark! Shark!‎[change source]

Hello, this page and the rest I QD today as A3. I know the page creator is in good faith and tried some simplification. It was not till after the QD more of the texts are simplified. If you have the time, could you give more advices to the page creator on how to create simple pages, I think it's a valuable user but I just can't communicate well with them. Many thanks.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

You've got mail![change source]

Hello, Eptalon. Check your email – you've got mail!
Message added 23:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by getting rid of the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Sent you an e-mail with information related to a possible error in oversighting. Computer Fizz (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and thanks for noticuing, I think we got it right now...--Eptalon (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Yep I checked and it's good now. Thanks. Computer Fizz (talk) 23:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Nevermind I found another thing that needs to be suppressed, sending new e-mail. Computer Fizz (talk) 08:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
A third incident, i've found another thing that needs to be suppressed. Is there a more efficient way I can contact you than e-mail? Computer Fizz (talk) 21:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Revdel action on Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Filmfx studio[change source]

The three revisions on the above page were indeed disruptive to the RfD process, but I do not think they meet the standard of disruption as suggested by RD3, which listed "grossly inappropriate threats or attacks" as an example, and also specifically indicated that "normal spam links" do not qualify for RD3. In addition, removing these diffs from public view may make it more difficult for future editors to cite evidence from the RfD when it comes to self-promotion of Filmfx studio.

Please reconsider the revdel action. Chenzw  Talk  02:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

I deleted the two revisions from the log because they contain an email address;note: I did not oversight, so as an admin, you are still able to view the revision. Also: closing an RfD (deciding whether the article should be kept or dleeted) is the task of an administrator, and not that of a named editor, who is likely a signle-purpose account. --Eptalon (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Mr. Wikipedian[change source]


I have been inspired by your years of work here. For someone to be this dedicated to a small community like ours, you really are a rare gem of this community. This journey started with Algorithm in 2005 and you are still here with the same level of dedication, I find this really inspiring. In regard to all this, I feel honored to be able to give you this star. Thank you so much for all the work you have done here.

--BRP ever 15:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

creating page Yukesh Chaudhary again[change source]

Can i create page if it is deleted and now have quality news and source in this topic?

No one keeps you from creating the page again; note tohugh: If it is not noticeably different form the one that was just deleted, it may get deleted without discussion. --Eptalon (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Guangdong Independence Movement[change source]


no , we havent this article in . i am translate from chinese.

The original article is in Chinese language and is still being completed. Please help me correct it when finished. What exactly meaning of Wikify? pls explain me. Unfortunately, all references are Chinese. Please wait until I translate the article completely, then try to find English sources. thank you so much.Alexisssa (talk) 10:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Look at a page such as Khalistan movement, and how the article is formatted. The main keyword (Khalistan movement) is in bold typeface. The references in the source use <ref>{{cite web ...}}</ref> tags. But first finish translating, and then we look at it again. --Eptalon (talk) 11:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello i finished translating the article. I tried to be without problems but it needs to be refined and simplified. The article contains interesting and very important material from Chinese history that contains very valuable material and I have translated from Chinese into English. The article is just a little long and time consuming. Please correct and improve the article in a manner that is consistent with the procedures. Thank you very much for your kindnessAlexisssa (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your user page[change source]

Hey Eptalon, I don't mean to be a pedant but I noticed that the user lists on your page seem to be out of date. The current lists are

  • CheckUsers: [[User:Bsadowski1|Bsadowski]], [[User:Djsasso|Djsasso]], [[User:Lofty abyss|Lofty abyss]], and [[User:Peterdownunder|Peterdownunder]]
  • Bureaucrats: [[User:Chenzw|Chenzw]], [[User:Djsasso|Djsasso]], and [[User:Enfcer|Enfcer]]
  • Oversighters: [[User:Djsasso|Djsasso]] and [[User:Peterdownunder|Peterdownunder]]

if you want to update them. Brantmeierz (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Redirect of Constance baker motley[change source]

Hi, I was wondering what the point is of having a redirect with lowercase letters, is this usually the practice here? I was debating whether to leave it or to request QD, since I didn't know what is usually done around here. Reception123 (talk) 06:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Reception123: Redirects are cheap aside, which is per en, the redirect may be useful when someone typed the letters wrongly (in the wrong case) and we expect some of these here as not all users are proficient in English here. I think let's leave it per now. Anyway it had been declined once as a QD, you have to RFD it if you think is needed. Regards,--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 06:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage: Thank you for the answer, I was not requesting another QD I was just wondering what the policy is on redirects in order to follow it in the future. Reception123 (talk) 06:39, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
In this case, the redirect is probably justified; a redirect from cOnstance bAker mOtley , probably isn't (unlikely search term). Just use common sense...--Eptalon (talk) 18:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello[change source]

Hello, just a heads up, I had contested your close of a RFD at DRV. Thanks for your attention. Regards,--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of article Ahlem Fekih[change source]

Hello , the article Ahlem Fekih was reliable but you deleted it. I would like to restore and improve the article and add notable sources. Thanks for your help Chdondon1990 (talk) 06:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Suheil al-Hassan[change source]

Hi, I was just wondering why you decided to keep the article, since it seems to me to just be a copy/paste from enwiki. I'd like to know so I can keep the rule in mind for future QDs. Reception123 (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

The article exists in several other Wikipedias, so there's at least a claim to notability. Yes, I agree that it could be simplified, and probably needs sources. Given we at least have 'a claim' to notability rules out quick deletion. Yes I agree: It lacks sources, and could probably be simplified. If you think it should be deleted, go through the regular RfD process.--Eptalon (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you, so in the future if there is a similar article created (i.e. same as on en-wiki), I should add attribution rather than request quick deletion? Reception123 (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
If there's a claim to notability, and you think its too weak, go through regular RfD. Add a link to the EnWP article, if it exists. Otherwise: as I did, add the respective templates: {{complex}}, {{no sources}} or similar. And ofc add the link to Wikidata, if it isn't there yet.--Eptalon (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Will keep that in mind, thank you for your help! Reception123 (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

lc66[change source]

Is there any reason for the decline of the qd here? I tagged it because the page was created by LC600 who is globally locked. Computer Fizz (talk) 23:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

QD restored: providing reasons for admin actions is not optional. Still interested in hearing from you though :) Computer Fizz (talk) 02:35, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @Computer Fizz: I have re-declined the QD. It is not always necessary to delete pages created by globally locked users, especially user and user talk pages. When you're tagging pages created by such users, it would be better to leave the user and user talk pages alone unless there's some other reason to delete them. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
@Auntof6: Thanks for the info. But let me explain my rationales:
1) It feels offbeat for me to leave it up the state created by an LTA. Of course this acceptable in cases like GRP capitalizing the word March, but I don't see any reason here. Which is why I suggest replacing it with a sock/blocked user template.
2) Even if the QD is declined, that still doesn't justify to rollback the QD, and then make matters even worse by not replying to my statement on his talk page.
Is this a reasonable solution? Computer Fizz (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
We don't have a QD option to delete pages created by a locked/blocked editor so your QD wasn't appropriate. Whether it should have been rolled back or not it definitely should have been declined and removed as it was a completely invalid request. As for not engaging with you everyone is a volunteer and may not respond in a timely manor. Secondly, readding the QD template after it has been declined by an admin is disruptive editing and could lead to a block. So really think about what you are arguing here. -DJSasso (talk) 11:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-10[change source]

notability[change source]

Hi there. If an admin of Wikipedia deletes article because it doesn't claim notability.. What it mean? And how to claim notability? Syedfalak (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

It basically means: Other (independent) sources talk about the person, company, event... - There's a writeup at Wikipedia:Notability that gives the details. --Eptalon (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt response. As I've gotten articles on many publications websites and i want biography page on Wikipedia. I've tried to create Wikipedia page but unfortunately it got rejected. Can you please help me to create a biography page about me? Syedfalak (talk) 23:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

restoration request[change source]

Hi. Recently someone delete a page which i published yesterday.. And i don't know the exact reason but it's my request to restore it temporarily (if you cannot restore it permanently) because i want social media verification and i sent that link to social media verification form the verification request is still pending if the page is delete and they review the link they'll reject my verification request and it'll be very painful for me.. if you please restore that page for a week I'll be very thankful to you.. Here is the link: Syedfalak (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Syedfalak: That page was deleted because it did not meet Wikipedia's requirements for showing notability. Also please note:
  • Wikipedia is not social media. It is an online encyclopedia.
  • Wikipedia is not to be used for temporary articles needed for outside verification.
  • Since you are closely associated with the company that the article was about, you should probably not create the article yourself. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for more information on this.
If you want to pursue this, I recommend making the request at WP:AN. However, I don't think the article would be restored. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

@Auntof6: As you said I'm closely associated with the company and i cannot create the article. So is there any other way to create article about my company? Syedfalak (talk) 20:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Syedfalak: Wait for someone else to create the article. If a company is really notable, people will create in due course. Or else write a draft and allow someone else to move it to article space (preferably an admin). Regards,--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage: Thanks for your prompt response.. How to write a draft? And how to allow someone else to move it to article space? Kindly briefly explain this.. Thank & Regards. Syedfalak (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Syedfalak: Create it in User:Syedfalak/draft. Thanks. When done, post to WP:ST for review, disclosing your paid status. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

The sort of OS on WP:AN[change source]

To be honest, that isn't quite needed as their meta talkpage they also put that. However, no qualms of OSing that. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am responible for SEWP; I have little influence on other wikis...--Eptalon (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Sure, understand it. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Dhiraj Mishra[change source]

Thanks Eptalon, for not doing a speedy deletion and providing the opportunity for cleanup, This was my first article so please find below justification.
1. I've changed the occupation from Hacker to Information Security which fits more better, the article is not borderline notable.
Would request if you can move this article to main space. Aside the article has a proper references with citation. Please let me know if any further clarification is required.

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-14[change source]

Hello![change source]

Hello Eptalon! Are you an admin here on Simple English Wikipedia? --Technoquat (Simple English) (talk) 20:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I am; I am also bureaucrat, CheckUser, and Oversighter. I would however suggest you use the "Email user" function, to not reveal deatails that not everyone should be able to read. --Eptalon (talk) 20:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Okay, great. My name is Technoquat. I am new to Simple English Wikipedia. I was active on the normal Wikipedia, but I was subject to a 'community ban' after a persistant trolling campaign in the early 2010s. My community ban disclosure is here. I have turned over a new leaf and now I am not a troll or a vandal. I hope to build an encyclopedia here.
Will Simple English Wikipedia accept an ex-offender? --Technoquat (Simple English) (talk) 20:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello there, and that you for being so open about your past (which is long past, if that was the only offence). Like most other wikis, we judge people on what they do, so: Try making constructive edits, and don't spend time in endless discussions. If as you say, you want to start anew: be welcome. Note however: This community is much smaller than EnWP. So unless you start using multiple accounts in bad ways ("socking"), or doing other things that usually get you blocked/banned, you get a new chance here. Also note, that if anyone finds you doing the things that got you blocked on EnWP 8 years ago, we will be swift to react. In short: have fun editing here, and avoid doing stuff that gets you blocked. --Eptalon (talk) 20:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll start editing stuff now! Goodbye old troll, hello new me! Be sure to look out for my awesome edits. --Technoquat (Simple English) (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-16[change source]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-17[change source]

Care to close[change source]

This? As you are the only crat who didn't !vote. Thanks.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you[change source]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Hello, nice to meet you, This is for your valuable efforts for contributing to Wikipedia.--Eyatu Ben (talk) 08:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

qd[change source]

  • Why isn't twinkle logging every page I tag for qd, even when it's turned on to log my qd log? --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
I have no idea...--Eptalon (talk) 22:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Is there a "village pump" here I can ask? --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 22:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Look at Wikipedia:Simple talk, thats our village pump--Eptalon (talk) 22:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 22:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

for MooseBox Episode List do you have the revision history for this page? I want to make sure 100% that I tagged this page and twinkle did not log it --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 22:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

25 April, 14:45, some IP creating the page; 25 Apr, 22:55, you requesting quick deletion (with twinkle); 22.58, me deleting the page.--Eptalon (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 22:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-18[change source]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-19[change source]

You've got mail![change source]

Hello, Eptalon. Check your email – you've got mail!
Message added 19:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by getting rid of the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Auntof6 (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Missal[change source]

In the article you wrote "Pope Pius V published the first missal for the Roman Catholic Church 1570" did you mean "..for the Roman Catholic Church in the year 1570"? I was going to add that, but wanted to make sure it was the year 1570 and not the name of a church.--Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 15:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Need to know how to submit request against Deletion of any page, It is Urgent[change source]

Dear Sir, I Have tried searching to know the process to reach the person user who requests the Deletion of any page. I would be thankful to you Pls, help. regards

Respected sir here are the list of References collected and mentioned as an appeal to pls go through. Regards

Discussion[change source]

  • No Not Deletecan not an editor make the necessary changes and do the needful. I mam submitting all references in separate category and lets analyse which does not suite in the category of credibility and I shall personally delete anything found irrelevant and against the policy, I believe this page have credible citations as they are not generated at the same time and also they are from all deferent sources and few of them are the topmost and very rigid in their selection policy of any articles. Here are the separations of links, references-

Seperate References as a coach/Freelance commandos mentor/trainer, As an actor, women empowerment, controversy and latest notable articles analysis[change source]

As a mentor and Bollywood celebrities coach/Commando trainer and Action designer - 1.













































IMDB page for all of his movie projects not only as an Actor but as a stuntmen and Action Designer and Master Trainer for Action.

Controversy and investigation outcome[change source]

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6. 7. 8.








These are deferent Wikipedia Type pages verifies all similar claims, details and controversy you can consider or delete your choice[change source]








==Supporting links to check government documentations All closure reports from Ministry of Defence and Police Crime Branches==(reference to just have a look at the Attachment files, which Ara available here).

Link - Ministry of defence's clean chit with all despised of of all kind of complaints (just to check attachments of closure reports).

All trade marks registration certificate - (link is just to check attached files )

Thank you Regards

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-20[change source]

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-21[change source]

WP:RFCU[change source]

Hey Eptalon! Any objection to me closing the RFCU request we were talking about as a likely match? Best, Vermont (talk) 23:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

IP Urgent[change source]

You seem to be active so could you please block the IP keeping us all busy right now? Thanks, IWI (chat) 00:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

It has been globally blocked. IWI (chat) 00:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Quick Deletion[change source]

Hello Eptalon, can you please share your reasons as to why you quick deleted the page? The page meets all the criteria. The reason I recreated the deleted page was the issues in the write up and citations of the previous one, and a lot of irrelevant details and references were used. This page uses all the relevant information only and doesn't fail any wiki criteria. Why would you still ask to delete it? Thank you for your input. Falixx (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Half a week ago, I took the decision to delete the page; see the RfD discussion. Less than a week later, you re-create the page, with very similar content. So I quick deleted it under A4("recreation with the same or similar content"). Given the deletion discussion happened less than two weeks ago, there's no reason for discussion,little will have changed. If you think the page should not have been deleted (referring to the RfD), please add a request to the deletion review page.--Eptalon (talk) 20:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back. If similar content is the issue, we can change that, can't we? Can I add a request deletion review with unique content? Falixx (talk) 20:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia, we are always happy if people contribute. Deletion review: I think this is the first step. Any other admin will act similarly, if they see a page being re-created with very similar content, shortly after the RfD closed.--Eptalon (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello Eptalon, I have rewritten this page and removed the similarity. I am uploading it again. Please let me know. Best Falixx (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Noting that Falixx is a sockpuppet account. Vermont (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-22[change source]

Ahlem Fekih[change source]

You deleted this article on 12 February 2020 per Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Ahlem Fekih. I just wanted to point out it has been recreated with similar content. Moumou82 (talk) 20:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks fdor noticing, I re-deleted the page. I don't thinkj Mrs. Fekih is any more notable than she was in February...--Eptalon (talk) 20:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Delete article[change source]

Hello Eptalon I hope you're okay. I'm a fan of the Tunisian actress Ahlem Fekih. I ask for a rereading of the article that you deleted. the article is notable and linked by several reliable sources. thank you so much --Doctor tn (talk) 23:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2020-23[change source]

IVA Advice[change source]

Sir, you deleted my article. I planned to work on it. I have wrote in neutral tone and it has been cited in several reliable sources which I can add to it. Please could you restore it so that I can work on it? Regards, --Merinalsi (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I restored it, without the qd template, and moved it to your userspace: User:Merinalsi/IVA Advice--Eptalon (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much! I appreciate it. --Merinalsi (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Article Revelation 13:18[change source]

Hello Eptalon this is concerning your deletion request for the article Revelation 13:18 I submitted a revised draft of the article thinking it met wiki reliable source guidelines from the researched feedback given on the article from the community. When you did a speedy delete you noted it was promotional so the article was edited to met wiki guidelines and rewriting at am encyclopedic form and resubmitted. The article is not spam I tried to fix the errors in the article and resubmitted. Please don't penalize my submission for being a novice on Wikipedia. Can you quick delete the article instead of having it go through this process Thanks-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs)

Hello, his is exactly the reason I didnt quick dleete the article again, but that I sought community input. You'll see that the same day I also nominated a signer/songwrter from Uganda, and an Italian fashiondesigner. I will likely not be the one who closes these nominations (its good tone not to); anyway, you got a week to convince the community that the rapper is indeed notable, and that he deserves an article here. RfD is more of a discussion, than a death sentence for the article in question.--Eptalon (talk) 20:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)