User talk:PotsdamLamb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Unlock Request December 4, 2023[change source]

@Ferien Per your last comment, I am requesting the unlocking of my account so I can request my unblock as it has been over 6 months since I’ve last edited, as requested. Since my account is globally locked I cannot log in and request anything.

Thanks. PDL

174.236.98.95 (talk) 08:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock Request August 14, 2023[change source]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PotsdamLamb (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

While I know now (and knew then) my behavior on the way out was unacceptable, I acknowledge that what I did was rude and uncalled for. I would like to ask for another chance since it has been over a year since I have been blocked. I do recognize I was not following the 5 pillars of the project and promise to do so going forward. I plan on working on expanding articles, working on getting templates onto articles, connecting to a wikidata item (or create it if needed) as these are all the areas I have knowledge of. I spent an incredible amount of time updating and fixing articles and would like to resume doing so, as well as fighting vandalism. Since my account is locked, if my block is removed I would need the lock removed from this account so I can log in. This is PotsdamLamb. A few people have my email address and can email me directly to verify I posted this. Thank you in advance for whatever your decision happens to be.2606:54C0:76E0:C90:0:0:26B:2E (talk) 12:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Let me note that there is no issue with this unblock request, and with the way you've written this, I would support an unblock soon. However, according to Special:CA/ThatFungi, you've evaded your block as recently as May, and so I would not feel comfortable until you had not edited at all for 6 months (in December). I will note here, for the record, that I do not believe globally locking your account was appropriate in the first place and would support an unlock prior to another unblock request in the future. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 16:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ferien Thank you. I am not sure how to request an unlock as it would require me to be not be blocked on two or more wikis per the rules. You as a crat may be able to better help me to go about doing this and when I should start the request. If you would like, you can email me. Thanks 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:1D51:8BEC:EB5:B9D8 (talk) 06:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ferien Thank you for starting the request https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global#Global_unlock_for_PotsdamLamb. I appreciate it. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:386E:38F5:3FBB:CFD3 (talk) 02:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't want to make this a thing. It's been a thing long enough. For me, the answer is hard no. The lock remains in place, the blocks should remain in place, the user should move on. The user should not evade blocks by using IPs. Emailing the admins isn't going to change that stance for me. They should be blocked on sight for evasion. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 04:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I understand that you have marked yourself as retired, though the comments you made while leaving, (1, 2) combined with other instances of recent incivility (3, 4, and others) have necessitated that this be enforced with a block. I understand it can be difficult to handle disagreements, but resorting to incivility is never an acceptable option. Regards, Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-14[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-15[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Movement Charter Drafting Committee's monthly newsletter[change source]

Committee's meeting in New York, in early March.

Coming up:

  • Revised chapters: The Committee is preparing to publish the revised draft chapters of The Preamble, Values & Principles, and Roles & Responsibilities intentions statement, based on the community feedback received in November and December 2022.
  • Inviting advisors and experts: The Committee is preparing to welcome a number of advisors from outside the Committee. All interested Wikimedians were invited to apply earlier (you can still apply here!). Additionally, the Committee is planning and scheduling meetings with individuals with specific sets of expertise in various topics, including stewards, movement committees, Wikimedia Foundation and affiliate staff, and others.

Subscribe to this newsletter on Meta wiki


--19:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC).

Tech News: 2023-16[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-17[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-18[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-19[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:36, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Movement Charter Drafting Committee's monthly newsletter[change source]

Updates:

  • Charter Ratification Methodology proposal conversations: The Movement Charter Drafting Committee recently held the first conversations regarding the ratification methodology for the Movement Charter. The MCDC has received valuable feedback from different communities and the Committees during the community input period. The report of the community input will be shared in May, while the updated version of the ratification methodology will be presented between September and November 2023.
  • Communication evaluation: The Communications sub-committee of the MCDC together with the support staff conducted an evaluation of the communications. The Communications sub-committee appreciates the time and input of the community members who shared their opinions during the interviews. Several recommendations are going to be implemented in the upcoming period based on the valuable input.
  • Learn about the MCDC’s work in April: The MCDC continues to draft additional chapters: The Global Council, Hubs, Decision-making and Roles & Responsibilities. Alongside the drafting work, the MCDC is planning their in-person meeting scheduled for 2-4 June in Utrecht, Netherlands with the aim of advancing the charter's content.

What’s coming up?

Subscribe to this newsletter on Meta wiki


Tech News: 2023-20[change source]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tech News: 2023-21[change source]

16:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 56[change source]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

  • New partner:
    • Perlego
  • Library access tips and tricks
  • Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RfD nomination of Template:Non-admin closure[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Template:Non-admin closure, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Template:Non-admin closure and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Ferien (talk) 14:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock Request - December 6, 2023[change source]

@Ferien per your request to wait until December, I am requesting an unblock.

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PotsdamLamb (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

While I know now (and knew then) my behavior on the way out was unacceptable, I acknowledge that what I did was rude and uncalled for. I would like to ask for another chance since it has been over a year since I have been blocked and six months since I socked. I do recognize I was not following the 5 pillars of the project and promise to do so going forward. I plan on working on expanding articles, working on getting templates onto articles, connecting to a wikidata item (or create it if needed) as these are all the areas I have knowledge of. I spent an incredible amount of time updating and fixing articles and would like to resume doing so, as well as fighting vandalism. Thank you in advance for whatever your decision happens to be. - PDL 2600:8801:CA09:CC00:6CB9:B177:C816:7458 (talk)

Decline reason:

While I'd be inclined to unblock you, you are also currently globally locked, so an unblock would have no effect. Please pursue getting the global lock removed before asking for an unblock. By the way, the standard procedure for requesting an unblock when you can't edit from your primary account is to send an email to the admins' mailing list. By making the request under an IP, not only can we not be certain who's asking, but you are technically violating your block. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Auntof6 I cannot request an unlock as my account is locked and the page requires auto-confirm status. I do not feel requesting my unblock is evading my block, as I am not editing any part of Wikipedia other than my talk page. If I email the stewards page they will not respond unless I’m unblocked as that is what happened before, even when I should not have been globally locked. Therefore, I would need to have to request the unblock and be granted it then an admin could request my unlocking to expedite it rather than me waiting months for a response from the stewards then requesting to be unblocked here (and based on what you stated, even if under my account posting an unblock request would be considered evading my block). I can be verified by IP by a crat and Ferien has my info and I’ve emailed him so he is aware I did indeed post this request. I’m not sure of any other way to do this. I also like it on the page so I can answer any questions someone has, which I know you have said to me previously :). Thanks - PDL 2600:8801:CA09:CC00:5078:1E07:15D0:2D47 (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Auntof6 To let you know I emailed the stewards list a few moments ago. Thank you. If granted the unlock, I’ll re-request the unblock. 2600:8801:CA09:CC00:5078:1E07:15D0:2D47 (talk) 08:07, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Auntof6 @Gordonrox24 @Ferien
This is the reply I got from the stewards:
”Dear (redacted)(they used my real name),
They may sponsor an unlock appeal for you by posting to: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global
Yours sincerely,
Shaemous Flocks
(below signature was standard disclaimer)
So this takes me back to I need someone to do this for me please. Whomever does, please post the link here so I can follow.
This was my email:
Username: PotsdamLamb
Reason: I have two admins on Simple Wikipedia who are “inclined” to unblock me but have requested that I get my account unlocked first. My account was locked as X-wiki since I was/am blocked on simple and en Wikipedias.
If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know. I look forward to your answer so I may move to the next phase of my unblock request.
Thanks,
PDL 2600:8801:CA09:CC00:5078:1E07:15D0:2D47 (talk) 10:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2600:8801:CA09:CC00:6CB9:B177:C816:7458 (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • We can probably discuss this a bit. My initial thought is, once again, no. I have no reason to believe the user won't just fall back into the same old pattern. Do we have the energy to keep dealing with that? With one strike, I don't think we have any obligation to give the user a 2nd or 3rd or 4th chance.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 03:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Gordonrox24 I see where you are going. I have reviewed a lot of where I erred before and when I look at it I ask myself why was I even commenting or starting anything to begin with. None of those violated anything that Wikipedia says is not allowed, albeit, something’s hit a gray area. I should have let those go and let someone else handle those and in that position to do so. Going forward, I am not going to let those things or what people say to me get to me nor comment uncivilized. It has been over a year and a lot of things change, including people. No one is perfect, including myself or admins, and I have on occasion seen admins be uncivil but I know where my place is now and that is to edit in good faith and fight obvious vandalism and help others out as needed. I am happy to answer any other questions you or others may have. Thank you. PDL 2600:8801:CA09:CC00:5078:1E07:15D0:2D47 (talk) 04:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]