Wikipedia:Deletion review

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

If you think a review of a deletion discussion is needed, please list it here and say why. Users can then comment to reach an agreement on whether the community thinks the discussion was closed correctly, or the decision should be overturned. Each user can say if they want to endorse the closure, or overturn the closure, with a brief comment, and sign with ~~~~.

A page should stay listed here for at least 5 to 7 days. After that time, an administrator will decide if there is a consensus (agreement) about what to do, and take appropriate steps. If the consensus was that the discussion was closed correctly, the discussion should be closed with a note saying this.


Current requests[change source]

LaFlia Contenidos[change source]

I request the restoration of the article LaFlia Contenidos, the article meets all the notability guidelines to remain on Wikipedia, the company appears in more than 10 journalistic articles with independent sources, in the most important media in ArgentinaInfobaeLa Nación among others.

(I have taken care to add it in the references), This production company has significant coverage in the media. Julian AR (talk) 18:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Julian AR Please provide your sources. Media companies can usually be included if they have significant coverage outside of social media and websites that users can update (like fandom, wikipedia, et cetera). Thanks, Da LambTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 21:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Done Long standing and robust article in the native language along with significant coverage in local press. Restore the article from QD and take to RfD if required. Operator873 connect 06:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Bobik Platz, Sphere Matchers and SM Billiards[change source]

All three articles has been deleted; one for being RfD'd, another one deleted with A6 (Hoax), and lastly with A4 (Not notable/requires reliable sources). I certainly believe that Bobik Platz and games they develop is real or not a hoax. Unfortunately, these links, which are all from IGN are dead links and I can't find anything besides the FANDOM wiki about this first two.

Related discussion: Deletion review/Log/2022 August 4 on English Wikipedia

I hope your doing well. 36.74.42.66 (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

X mark.svg Not done Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and only contains things that have already happened and/or have significant and independent coverage by reliable sources. Additionally appropriate in this circumstance: Wikipedia is not for advertising. Operator873 connect 06:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Operator873 Now, I'm done with Bobik Platz and related things on Wikipedia because these pages are fanons misrepresented as real things thus it certainly doesn't belong to the encyclopedia. As goes with @Trade's baseless accusations of me being an LTA, according to Bbb23 on the same DRV on English Wikipedia, the IPs involved in editing by User:LiliaMiller2002/User:Angelmunoz50 were in Spain according to the SPI archive of the aforementioned vandal on English Wikipedia whereas IP involved in creation of Sphere Matchers and Bobik Platz pages on both Wikipedias are in Indonesia, from what I understand, I'm certainly not an Angelmunoz50/LiliaMiller2002's sock. More information is available on the relevant AN discussion here and the relevant ANI discussion on enwiki. 36.74.42.211 (talk) 10:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Susovan Sonu Roy[change source]

I am requesting restoration of the article Susovan Sonu Roy, the article now meet all notability guidelines and also have reliable sources. I want to edit this page. Thanks. 2409:4060:38F:52B7:0:0:29E4:70B0 (talk) 19:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

X mark.svg Not done No significant coverage found for subject during independent Google search. Previous iterations of deleted pages contained largely the same material. This has been and continues to be misc, boring spam. Operator873 connect 06:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Operator873 This article is about an Actor. Can I create this page again with neutral point of view writing and with reliable sources ? 2409:4060:381:13CE:0:0:41:F8B0 (talk) 07:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There are no reliable sources.... so no. Operator873 connect 08:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Operator873 Please give me permission I will create an account and start this article on Sandbox and when it have reliable sources then I'll move to mainspace and I promise. 2409:4060:392:C47F:0:0:27E8:D0B0 (talk) 09:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Weather, conditions the coming of the end wasn't a test[change source]

Weather, conditions the coming of the end wasn't a test, it was the equivalent of; the text was copied from there but changed to Basic English using Simplish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.52.88.245 (talkcontribs) 05:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Additional relevant discussion found here Operator873 connect 06:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]