User talk:Mastashat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

proud editor[change source]

I need corrections. I don't know why I have to point this out number of times.

Welcome[change source]

Hello, Mastashat, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will show your username and the date.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! Eptalon (talk) 21:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regards over Charles Ndukauba[change source]

Thanks for this wonderful opportunity. I saw a Created Page under Charles Chinedu and I see that wasn't the title or it may be misspelled or because the user is not auto confirmed to create the page.

In as much as the editor made good edits but there was spam and controversial edits which made the page placed with tag for adverrisement.

The page was deleted a while ago by the deleting administrator because of spam and Advertisement.

Please can the page, Charles Ndukauba be restored so I take it to a good article feature. Best, Mastashat (talk) 10:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can request an article for undeletion on WP:RFU. Articles that were uncontroversially deleted under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or Complexity (A3)) can be requested to be restored there. Also, you can request that deleted content be restored as a draft/sandbox so you can work on and improve it.
If the article you are requesting to be undeleted had little content or was in a promotional or advertising tone, I suggest recreating it from scratch, keeping in mind Wikipedia guidelines (See: Wikipedia:How to write Simple English pages). Articles that fail WP:Notability may not be suitable for Wikipedia.
Best, Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 15:59, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[change source]

Hello, Mastashat! Here at Simple English Wikipedia, we use the section heading "Other websites" instead of English Wikipedia's "External links", which you used in "Charles Ndukauba". This makes it simpler and easier to read. Please remember to use "Other websites" in pages that you create in the future. Thank you for your help! MathXplore (talk) 02:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much @MathXplore. I will really write to the best. Best, Mastashat (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to tell you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Unauthorized deletion review cleanup without archiving by non-admin user". Thank you. MathXplore (talk) 03:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MathXplore, Sorry for the pinging. If to assume good faith. Let it be reverted. Best, Mastashat (talk) 03:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Charles Ndukauba[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Charles Ndukauba, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Charles Ndukauba and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 11:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyber.Eyes.2005. That should be an archive of the former deletion review. If you are nominating the article should let you humbly state your reason and not that of Rigget. Thanks. Best, Mastashat (talk) 11:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article was previously deleted multiple times under QD A4. This time it is being discussed on RFD, and the reason is stated there. If you think the article shouldn't be deleted, you can discuss it on Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Charles Ndukauba. Best, -- Cyber.Eyes.2005 (talk) 11:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cyber.Eyes.2005 My Friend stop this nonsense. I will report your actions because it's unjustified. Don't push me to!!! It's not a threat. Best, Mastashat (talk) 14:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I reported to WP:AN. MathXplore (talk) 14:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[change source]

Request reason(s):
I woke up this evening to edit and all I can see is that I was blocked from editing because of abusing multiple accounts. Just like the rule of Wikipedia. I admit of using different account especially Editing Wizard which I forgot the password and other accounts that I don't have any access to. I have only been working with my current account and by all evidence, I have never done any disruptive edit. Any edit I made was always reported to WP: AN for clarification. I believe I haven't abuse multiple account as the deleting administrator has stated. I humbly request the block should be reviewed. Best

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
I have considered your request to be unblocked and decided in your favour. However, you are now under the WP:ONESTRIKE rule, are on probation for 6 months, must not use any account other than this one, must contribute good changes to the encyclopedia and not break any policies. fr33kman 17:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

, Melvin klein (talk · contribs · count) and Chacha igbokwe (talk · contribs · count). As you admit to owning the Editing Wizard account, and have declared a conflict of interest with Charles Ndukauba, why do you think it is appropriate to come back to this Wiki with multiple accounts and recreate the article about the same subject multiple times. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 21:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I admit I was the owner of this accounts as you listed but I have lost access to all these accounts. I created back the article Charles Ndukauba in the verge of it's Notability to simple Wikipedia. I have done this mistake and I believe I deserve any punishment.
I have done much research on the page for basic discussion and not speedy deletion. Coming on Simple wikipedia was to show make my unblock on English Wiki as my talk page has already stated.
I please please for mercy that I will never do such disruptive edits again. Best, Mastashat (talk) 22:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fehufanga it's very sad I know the law and yet disobey them. I promise to make good edits on a second chance. Please my understanding admin. Best, Mastashat (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mastashit (talk · contribs · count), Melvin klein (talk · contribs · count) and Chacha igbokwe (talk · contribs · count) are all an account I created but have lost access to it. I used them in creating Charles Ndukauba. I have no word to say as I am guilty of all case filed on me. I owe all apology to Simple Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Foundation and I am pleading for mercy and forgiveness.
Disclosures
These were list of accounts I used before;
Mastashat (talk) 11:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have used Simple Wikipedia in months. I understand that what I did was wrong. I plead you to give me a second chance. I blame nobody else but myself. I appreciate you reading, and I hope we can figure something out for Wikipedia. Mastashat (talk) 12:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We get a lot of people blocked on enwiki coming here to show the admins on enwiki that they can be trusted. We don't like when people do that. It is offensive and rude. People should come here to edit because they want to edit here not show the enwiki admins they can be trusted with a second chance. I have spoken to the blocking admin and will let you know soon whether or not you will get a second chance. fr33kman 14:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much @Fr33kman. Thanks for your support. Much grateful. Mastashat (talk) 19:34, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Be sure to read the unblock template above as I has attached conditions to your unblock. fr33kman 21:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman I really appreciate. I am very happy for that. I fully read every condition and will do my best in all my editing. Thanks once more. Happy New Year in advance!!! Best, Mastashat (talk) 21:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please substitute welcome templates[change source]

Thank you for your changes to Wikipedia, Mastashat. However, I would like to remind you that when you use certain templates, such as "{{welcome}},you should substitute them by adding "subst:" before the template's name. An example is, use "{{subst:uw-subst}}" instead of "{{uw-subst}}". This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. MathXplore (talk) 02:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed section heading, fixed my message and removed off-topic content. MathXplore (talk) 02:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I really appreciate that @MathXplore. Best, Mastashat (talk) 02:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Anambra State Children's Parliament[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Anambra State Children's Parliament, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Anambra State Children's Parliament and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 13:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Please give me a hand! We really appreciate your effort![change source]

Please join RFD Thanks for supporting us! もう一度あなたにありがとうと言わせてください! 私はこれまでのあなたの支援と助力に感謝します!! 一番大切にしてあげたい (talk) 15:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! We hope you can support deleting it! 一番大切にしてあげたい (talk) 15:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I can't hear or understand your language. It is barely a day you entered this Wiki and you are seeking votes for RFD. If you were paid, please disclose it. You can be banned if you don't. Best, Mastashat (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[change source]

Hello, Mastashat. You have new messages at 一番大切にしてあげたい's talk page.
Message added 00:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MathXplore (talk) 00:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

4 Warnings[change source]

Hello Mastashat! I noticed you reported some IP's for vandalism on VIP. I appreciate your efforts in maintaining the quality of Simple English Wikipedia. Just a reminder, we typically follow the 4-warning rule for normal vandalism. If the issue persists after warnings, report them to Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress. Keep up the good work! If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Happy editing! – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 09:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References (plural form at section headings)[change source]

Since you are using multiple references in one article, the section heading must be plural form. I fixed it at your creations (special:diff/9277365). In addition, "Other websites" should be plural form (Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#List_of_links_at_the_end_of_an_article). Please be careful in the future. MathXplore (talk) 01:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was unprecedented errors usually ignored. Thanks!!! Mastashat (talk) 01:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of section headings[change source]

"Other websites" is OK, but "Selected Filmography" is not. It has to be "Selected filmography". Please take your time to read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Wording and please be careful in the future. MathXplore (talk) 02:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helping other editors[change source]

Hi Mastashat, thank you for helping another editor at User talk:Kriji Sehamati#Twinkle Tool. Once you've helped another editor who is using the {{helpme}} template, remember to change it back to {{helped}} so it no longer appears in Category:Wikipedians looking for help. Thanks! --Ferien (talk) 19:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @Ferien. Noted. Mastashat (talk) 22:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouting at talk page section headings[change source]

I understand your frustration but shouting/yelling is rarely accepted, please see w:WP:SHOUT for related documentations (per WP:FOLLOW, this will be a helpful reference for us). MathXplore (talk) 03:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning editors[change source]

Hi Mastashat, thanks for reverting a vandal on X-ray. Once you've reverted vandalism, you should warn under the heading of month and year, for example this month the section would be called January 2024, with warnings going from level 1 ({{uw-vandalism1}}) to level 4 ({{uw-vandalism4}}). Once a level 4 warning has been given (as ChenzwBot had given for that user) the editor should be reported to WP:VIP for vandalism after level 4 warning given. Then an administrator will soon come and block the problematic editor. Thanks! --Ferien (talk) 17:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Mastashat (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January[change source]

it's like 1 or 2 hours

you've added a tag? Still many informations are required to be added there. I've been working on it .. SaneFlint (talk) 19:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Due to how silly you were with reverting...[change source]

To join the secret cabal follow me!


Whack!

Do not take this seriously. Someone wants to let you know you did something silly!

199.119.30.205 (talk) 12:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Sandra Okunzuwa[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Sandra Okunzuwa, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Sandra Okunzuwa and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 21:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Something Like Gold[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Something Like Gold, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Something Like Gold and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 05:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You probably have not been updated about Troms becoming a county again[change source]

Consider researching if Troms, again became a county in 2024.--That might put your Delete-suggestion, in another perspective: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Troms . 80.67.37.2 (talk) 12:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Uche Nwaefuna[change source]

An editor has requested deletion of Uche Nwaefuna, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Uche Nwaefuna and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. SaneFlint (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki 4.0 free-use policy[change source]

What is the policy for content copied/translated between Wikipedia articles? You recently tagged Arleigh Burke-class destroyer as a copyright violation. However, it was free-to-use text under a 4.0 license. I would ask you remove that template, since a message on the talk page instantly solved that issue. WeatherWriter (talk) 02:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is good when you copy from other wiki. But when you translate or copy from other wiki, don't copy verbatim. simplify/wikify it in guidelines of Simple English Wikipedia. The page is currently tagged complex article from another wiki. Best, Mastashat (talk) 03:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[change source]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mastashat (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I humbly request unblock for the following reasons; I have read the one strike rule and what it entails and all I can say is that I don't know what I have done to be blocked. In as much as I have agreed with the blocking admin. I sincerely request an unblock and the reason for the blocking to know what exactly the block is all about. Best

Decline reason:

reason You were warned not to violate any of the rules here. I endorse this block. fr33kman 10:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't violate any rules. Please can the blocking admin reveal my violation. Mastashat (talk) 11:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest you email BRPever. fr33kman 11:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked on En wiki for sockpuppet. I was still a novice then creating only one page Charles Ndukauba which I think I expanded to other wikis' including simple English Wiki. More or less, I created a new page to start editing in good faith but kept blocked by Check users. I guess I have always assumed good faith and decided to request unblock after six months following the SO rule. As it stands, I was unblocked here earlier for that same problem which @Fr33kman said it's disrespectful to come to this wiki only to show En wiki admins my capabilities of changing pages. I reversed to remain editing here. Best, Mastashat (talk) 11:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I am not convinced by what you mentioned above. Your page on enwiki was deleted and yet you continued to create it here. I will be happy to give you a third chance if you were to convince enwiki admins to unblock you with SO on Enwiki. BRP ever 12:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess this was one of he reasons I believe Simple English Wikipedia is not English Wikipedia. I mean why should my block be dependent on En wiki. After my unblock here on simple wiki. I have always edited in good faith.
@BRPever, your reasons simply isn't clear to me. If possible should be directed to AN. @Fr33kman, you too is confusing me. I don't even know what caused my block and you can.to tell me I was warned. Warned for what?
I have rechecked my edits and none is controversial and non is promotional too. I don't think I have edited badly. The blocking admin accordingly was still on the basis of my block on En wiki which has been resolved on my first block here. Please I am more than frustrated and still waiting for a proper response. Best, Mastashat (talk) 12:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked as sick puppet on Enwiki which happened to repeat here but was granted in good faith. I have then been editing Nigerian related pages and others. I was blocked on En wiki to prove my capability on Simple wiki. please @BRPever, you need to check the pages I have created and not judging on what exist on Em Wiki. I create pages like a normal editor. Please this should be directed to AN because I am not sure you are blocking me rightfully.
Note: while I respect every editor, I also believe I have created pages according to WP: GNG and like normal community, some may be deleted. So because I was blocked on Enwiki, I should abandoned other notable topics that was deleted because I was blocked on En wiki. I also believe pages should be created on merit of inclusion. Mastashat (talk) 12:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BRPeversaying repetition of deleted pages of mine on En wiki. Do you mean to say that Joe Biden was deleted because it was created by a sock but was later created here on simple wiki by that editor who was a sock on en wiki but came to simple wiki to edit in good faith. So do you argue that Joe Biden should be deleted because it was deleted on En wiki because of my sock-puppetry. That was just an example. In as much as I am confused, how do you expect me to convince the admins of En wiki while I am a full editor here creating Nigeria pages that met notability and not because I created them on En wiki. Best, Mastashat (talk) 12:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman, you should know more about my unblock after warning me how disrespectful it was coming to simple wiki because I was to convince En wiki admins. Please, I still don't understand the reason why I should be blocked when I haven't done anything wrong. Can you get the thread of the discussion when @Fehufanga blocked me firstly and I was unblocked for second chance. That first reason was what @BRPever blocked me for. What if I conclude I don't want to go back to En wiki since I have taken to heart editing my best here in simple wiki. Best, Mastashat (talk) 12:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lastly, I also believed in all my edits as I have always tried my best after the first unblock to maintain and keep this wiki in a good faith which I have always did. Every body no matter what deserves the right to be heard and one doesn't act because another said. I want @BRPever to show me clearly what his block is all about and show me also how no have contributed disruptive edits to Wikipedia. I humbly request @Fr33kman, @Fehufanga to check into my block for final conclusion. I have nothing to do with En wiki because I have accepted being a full editor here. So, why is my block still dependent on my block at En wiki. Best, Mastashat (talk) 12:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it is quite unfortunate that my unblock comments are not being responded to. Please @Ferien, @BRPever, @Fr33kman, @Fehufanga. Sorry for pinging admins but I exactly want to know why I am blocked. Nobody is responding to me. I want to know why my blocked En wiki is affecting me here since it has been cleared. Why was I blocked when I have only created pages that are notable in Nigeria. I am still patient waiting for a willing admin to review my request. I strongly believe I have done wrong to this wiki after my request. How do I do the blocking admin's request when I have nothing to do on En wiki. Just as @BRPever said, delete any page that doesn't meet notability with I created. None of my pages are promotional and for me like other normal editors on this wiki create pages in good faith. More than any one could imagine, I am more than loosing it. Best, Mastashat (talk) 16:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When I said you were warned I meant that in the unblock template I warned you as to what your behaviour should be. BRPever believes that you have broken the rules here so has blocked you. I would not have blocked you but if an admin believes you have broken the rules after the date of my unblock then I support that admin's right to block you. If you can get BRPever to unblock you I would support that also. I was surprised to see you blocked so soon after I unblocked you but BRPever has their reasons. fr33kman 17:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No body is responding to me. BRPever thought I still vandalise this wiki by creating pages of what caused my block on English Wikipedia. But that's not true, I have only created articles to meet WP: GNG. I was blocked in Enwiki for creating Charles Ndukauba which I did here but that was all of being a novice. I came here and after begging for unblock was unblocked. Now his block was still dependent on En wiki I have no business again on En wiki again since I have given my editing to this wiki.
Specially for you @Fr33kman, is it bad to create pages that meet WP: GNG but was deleted on En wiki. Can the violation of this wiki I did be revealed to me. How then do I get to contact BRPever since I have no reason for being block. I am confused. Mastashat (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This message from BRPever says They were blocked for UPE related incident along with socking on Enwiki. They seem to be doing the same here after being blocked on enwiki. Recreating the same content that got them blocked there. Thanks.
Since this is his reason for blocking me, I believe this is totally wrong and false accusations. I was even terrified by @Fr33kman's reply. I never knew that is what happens here. So are you telling me an admin cannot block one wrongly because obviously, @BRPever blocked me wrongly and still has nothing to say to all my question. All these are getting to my nerves. While I know admins are always busy, it is also bad when admins see other bad actions by other admins and remain silent. The posing question now is; I want a clear reason for my block and then, I will leave Wikimedia. I just want to be justified that I haven't done anything bad. Mastashat (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So @Fr33kman, in a situation where an admin blocks others wrongly, nothing can be done except from that blocking admin. Wow!, But if that is the case, it should have been documented that an admin is a god here. Well, it's ok, while I wait for a thorough review. I will as well be here to check when an admin reviews my request. Mastashat (talk) Mastashat (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do the Fame Police always lie that Joseph Carrillo isn't "notable"?[change source]

Why do the Fame Police always lie that Joseph Carrillo isn't "notable"? 67.180.157.137 (talk) 20:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He simply isn't notable. It's moreover advertising than anything. RiggedMint 00:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you get unblocked can you review this draft?[change source]

I was a bit upset you weren't reviewing this until I saw the block. But can you review this draft in the event you get unblocked? User:Immanuelle/Kamayama Shrine Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 18:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will do that or since I will be patiently waiting for the blocking admin to review the block. I can possible give review in my talk page once more, I really appreciate that @Immanuelle. Best, Mastashat (talk) 18:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mastashat I'd appreciate that. Good luck with getting unblocked Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 19:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]