Talk:0

Way too complicated... ordinal, cardinal... I'm quite confused i expected to find SIMPLE Articles ?!?

That is a very good observation. When I started working on simple wikipedia I realized that it was wrong in many important aspects (in some ways, too simple and wrong) and almost every article was way too complicated. I agree totally. Just slap an {{unsimple}} tag on any page you have trouble with.

--Filll 22:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed some spelling mistakes and the {{unsimple}} tag in this talk page. 75.153.221.227 06:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the unsimple template from this Talk page. Sue W 19:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Verbal has two hats. John is jealous." Not really necessesary--78.53.155.32 (talk) 22:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a number or not?

In the arithmetic section it states: "Zero is not considered a number". Yet everywhere else in the article it is referred to as a "number". Perhaps this sentence should be modified? 121.72.242.206 (talk) 05:50, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is a neutral number?

From the article "The number zero is not a neutral number." I can find no mention of natural number in the reference. The only other statement based on the reference might be "zero is a not a non-zero number" which is redundant.

Another possibility is "zero may or may not be a Natural Number ref [1], but "may or may not" is just confusing.

I would suggest to remove this statement. Thought I should first post here. Alien878 (talk) 10:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. Alien878 (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]