Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

The Worlds (television film)

The Worlds (television film) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactus0rme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not much content/no sources/citations CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 03:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rodrigo fereira

Rodrigo fereira (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: non-encyclopedic thought rambling Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ryan Sinclair (Doctor Who)

Ryan Sinclair (Doctor Who) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactus0rme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: NO sources/references, Wikipedia:Reliable sources CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 03:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Administrator note: The RFD starter did not include the discussion in Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion#Current_deletion_request_discussions. Therefore, I have changed the closing date. MathXplore (talk) 07:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tosin Cole

Tosin Cole (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactus0rme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: lack in information/no references and reliable sources CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 03:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Administrator note: The RFD starter did not include the discussion in Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion#Current_deletion_request_discussions. Therefore, I have changed the closing date. MathXplore (talk) 07:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

William H. Kerdyk, Jr.

William H. Kerdyk, Jr. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Xegma has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability issue. Xegma(talk) 08:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep - Subject is notable due to significant news coverage such as: Community Newspapers 1, CN 2, Miami Herald 1, Miami Herald 2, South Florida Business & Wealth Magazine, Weekend Golfer, Lifestyle Mag, CN 3, CN 4 and CN 5.Zazzledazz (talk) 17:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
• Keep - Subject is notable enough to remain on Wikipedia.--CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 04:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ron Buhnik

Ron Buhnik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not sure if this musician meets the Notability threshold for inclusion. Most of the references are passing mentions or just not in-depth coverage or are questionable at best. Operator873 ^connect 05:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: The artist meets the notability by participating in the third season of the Eurovision show "The Next Star, the artist has a wide variety of albums very recognized in Israel, the article comes from reliable and reliable sources such as Jerusalem Post. It has also been designated as an honor guard by the IDF (Israeli Defense Force). I think the user who was not sure whether to nominate this article should have consulted first or. listen to one of their songs before giving a rating.190.219.72.75 (talk) 05:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Nikolai (nicholas iii)

Nikolai (nicholas iii) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated non-encyclopedic essay, article exists elsewhere, keeping as redirect doesn't make sense even Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not simple.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

811 (number)

811 (number) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Redirect to 800 (number) MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 14:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  Maybe, did anyone notify the author? CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 03:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

  Never mind just checked, but I think it should be deleted and added on to 800 (number) instead. CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 03:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

  Delete - a pointless article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

  Delete CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 03:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  @Rathfelder@Cactus0rme just a clarification, why not just redirect to 800 (number), with any relevant information put onto said article? MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 04:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  hmm, can you create the redirect, I need to go soon CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 04:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  or I will do late CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 04:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

• Do not redirect to the page of another number. The pages about numbers are each about their specific number and not any other. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

991 (number)

991 (number) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Redirect to 900 (number) MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 14:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  Delete - a pointless article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

  Delete CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 03:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

• Do not redirect to the page for a different number. The pages for numbers are each about their specific number and not any other. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Didier Guillon

Didier Guillon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another article that does not claim notability throughout the article. This one might be a little more dubious, since there are more sources, but there is no explanation as to why this individual is notable. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 19:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - that is what i am leaning toward. I was not able to spot any wiki-notability in the article.--There might be arguments to be found in discussions at En-wiki:
  12:24, 24 August 2023 Deb talk contribs deleted page Didier Guillon (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)
  17:04, 1 February 2018 Jimfbleak talk contribs deleted page Didier Guillon (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject). 2001:2020:353:998B:C58D:D7F8:18B5:97EB (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

These are literally two different articles, with different text and used sources. See also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. 37.252.90.203 (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

• Keep. The article contains 30 reliable sources that are sufficient to confirm the notability of the topic. Some points from the rules that the article follows:

1. WP:GNG (If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable.).

2. WP:PEOPLE (A person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject.).

3. WP:CREATIVE (The person's work.. (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

4. WP:CREATIVE (The person has a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work. This work has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.)

5. WP:CREATIVE (A person who fails to meet these additional standards may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability.). 37.252.90.203 (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

• Comment - French-wiki deleted to articles with that name.--Can cross-wiki spam be ruled out? See "9 juin 2015 à 16:20 O Kolymbitès ... a supprimé la page Didier Guillon (Ne répond pas aux critères d'admissibilité)". 2001:2020:327:B0B6:B1A0:D3A1:C2C4:50BB (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:353:998B:C58D:D7F8:18B5:97EB
• Further comment - i have googled the person: the hits do not indicate wiki-notability.--Perfume seller that claims to be an art expert? 2001:2020:327:B0B6:B1A0:D3A1:C2C4:50BB (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep, upon further consideration, but some work should be done to fix some of the heavy promotion MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 14:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep it needs some work, but it is an okay article. --CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 10:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)2001:2020:303:BEB3:1CB1:A7A0:97EE:8CAD (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  User:Cactus0rme, who 'voted' Keep: that person started editing yesterday on June 11, it seems. 2001:2020:303:BEB3:1CB1:A7A0:97EE:8CAD (talk) 10:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  you made three contributions. CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 10:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

  and I do not think there is a minimum requirement to participate in the discussion, unless I am mistaken. CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 10:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Palazzo Galmanini Portaluppi

Palazzo Galmanini Portaluppi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nominate this article because it fails both verifiablity and notability. Article is largely unsourced, however only the Enciclopedia Treccani is an existing source. Casa d'abitazione a Bergamo cited under ref. nr. 2 does not exist. I am also not sure on reliability of the Treccani Enciclopedia. This page was created by Alec Smithson, a banned crosswiki vandal and spammer, who uses spam, machine translations and other covert ways of vandalism on crosswiki level. This article does not contain any usual spam, however on several occassions it does seem like he used machine translation tools to create this article. Unless importance is proven, I believe this article should be outright deleted and not only TNT'ed. A09 (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete because of Alec. But please note that en:Treccani is The Italian Encyclopedia, not just a random book. It is the most important Italian Encyclopedia and maybe also one of the most important European ones. Just because you have never heard of it, it does not mean that it is not reliable. It is like saying that Encyclopaedia Britannica is not reliable. Anyway, Treccani talks about the notable architect, not the palace, so let's delete the article. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  Noted, thanks for explaining about the Treccani. I haven't heard about it before, hence I was sceptical. A09 (talk) 16:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  I want to apologize because I read my comment again and it was very rude for no reason. I am sorry, @A09, I do not know why I got so defensive, I should have not replied so rudely. My apologies, ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 20:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  It’s okay, I understand. No need to apologise, A09 (talk) 21:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Xabier Lezama

Xabier Lezama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: promotional, and not notable, the only sources of which seem to be not very reliable. Deleted on many other languages, including de, en, etc MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 16:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Corso di Porta Romana

Corso di Porta Romana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nomminate this article for deletion as it does not prove it's notable in any way. The only cited source is not accessible, even if we disregard its incomplete citation. This page was created by Alec Smithson, a long term crosswiki abuser. Article does not contain spam at the moment, however per some features in the text I strongly believe it has been created by help of machine translation tool (see phrases like the center Milan of the HNWI (High Net Worth Individual) upper class). If community opposes the hard deletion, I suggest soft deleting it and rewriting it per principles of TNT. A09 (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Hard Delete, is what i am leaning toward. Not okay English, seems Machine-translatish. 2001:2020:353:998B:7D7B:EB6:83A0:1529 (talk) 01:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete, but then start it again, if needed, as a redirect to Porta Romana (Milan) (the road is named after it). About notability, it is a very important and notable road here in Italy, but I do not know if it fits Simple English Wikipedia's notability criteria or not. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 01:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tyler Antonius (2nd nomination)

Tyler Antonius (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I am starting this RFD per the recent QD rejection. My question is very simple: What are the improvements since Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler Antonıus, Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler_Antonius, and Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2023/Tyler_Antonius? MathXplore (talk) 02:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: unsourced JoshuaAuble (talk) 01:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

I have moved the opinion to the discussion section. MathXplore (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

• Delete - it is not an encyclopedia article. It is not even close to that.--Please put wikipedia-readers out of their misery, and make the "article" disappear. 2001:2020:313:ACDE:18D6:F80A:FA63:50EA (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

• Delete, that is what i am leaning toward. Seems like not wiki-notable.--It does not look like En-wiki can help us with arguments: "12:57, 23 March 2022 Praxidicae talk contribs moved page Tyler Antonius to Draft:Tyler Antonius over a redirect without leaving a redirect (Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace (via script)).
  14:18, 11 March 2022 Praxidicae talk contribs moved page Tyler Antonius to Draft:Tyler Antonius over a redirect without leaving a redirect (Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace (via script))". 2001:2020:319:BC56:1556:D0C1:6BB9:1615 (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
  Besides, the article does not seem presentable in an encyclopedia. 2001:2020:319:BC56:1556:D0C1:6BB9:1615 (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete a G4 case. Truse45 (talk) 00:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

  As explained above, another admin has denied QD enforcement. Therefore, the case has been redirected here. MathXplore (talk) 00:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

  (Note) This is the user's first edit. MathXplore (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete The primary issue in the 3 listed RfDs is the notability of the person, and I believe that they still don't meet the notability criteria.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
• Delete There are no sources or improvement even after multiple chances previously.--CactusMunch ^{Yum o.o} 09:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete No more notable than in past RFDs Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 11:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Palace Malchiodi

Palace Malchiodi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article should be deleted because of weak sourcing. First reference (Casabella) is entirely made up, next two are apparently real. Even more fake sources can be found in the bibliography section, where, besides the first two entries, which aren't reliable sources, only three are real, other are fabricated. This article was created by Alec Smithson, which is known for inserting made up/hoax content as well as crosswiki spam and machine translation. I do not recall of any spam on this particular page, however can find numerous proofs of using machine translation tools when creating this page. This may be observed in some weird word sequences, wrong prepositions as well as other grammatical slips through the article. A09 (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nom. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 11:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Palace Maffezzoli (Milan)

Palace Maffezzoli (Milan) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nominate this article for deletion since it presents a form of covered vandalism made by Alec Smithson, a known crosswiki long term abuser. This article might seem a tad better than some other, however after checking entries in 'Bibliography' section I came to a conclusion only real book that ever existed is Bertelli G., Brambilla M., Invernizzi M., Bergamo. Cent'anni d'architettura 1890-1990, Bergamo 1994, pp. 76-77. I could not find bibliographical data for other entries on the list. Thus we can establish an argument cited sources are hoaxes, which makes the article fail verifiability. Another giveaway of this user is usage of machine translation, some indices are present in this article as well: 'Execution' and other proper names that should be translated but weren't due to sloppy editing. As only one real source is present at the moment, I believe this article should be deleted and not TNT-ed. A09 (talk) 20:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete (TNT), per nominator. 2001:2020:353:998B:194B:CE18:494:336B (talk) 01:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  So you believe there are enough sources to rewrite an article on their bassis? A09 (talk) 08:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: If it was created by an LTA then it really should be G5'd.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

   Comment: Fr33kman rejected my speedy nomination and pointed me to RfD. A09 (talk) 08:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

  huh. In that case  Delete.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Per nom. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 13:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 11:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Quadronno District

Quadronno District (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article should be deleted per TNT rule. It has many flaws, the most eye soring is the article being unsourced, as well as its bad grammar. It was created by Alec Smithson, a crosswiki long term abuser, who is known for inserting spam as well as machine translated text. Spam is contained in "Other websites" paragraph, where these links were spammed in mass before. To suppport my theory about the article being a machine translation are weird occurences of 'Quartiere Quadronno', which the automated tool did not recognise as an Italian proper name and literally repeated it. I think we don't need such substandard article. A09 (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Deleted three times on it-wiki because it fails notability and because it was created by that LTA (it:Quadronno). ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 11:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Corso Italia

Corso Italia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I believe this page should be deleted per TNT. Page is wholly unsourced, so we can expect factual mistakes. Furthermore, this page was created by a certain crosswiki long term abuser, which creates autotranslated stubs en-masse without proper care for wikification/sourcing etc. Per some of the sentences (part of the prestigious and exclusive Quadronno district of the of the HNWI (High Net Worth Individual) upper class) I believe this page is autotranslated as well as contains spam (Real estate market, which was spammed on multiple settlement articles on crosswiki bassis). Another dead giveaway this page was created by aforementioned LTA is the Related pages section, which contains links to his other work here on simplewiki. A09 (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - that is what i am leaning toward.--Not encyclopedic. No source.--Nuke the article is okay. 2001:2020:353:998B:7D7B:EB6:83A0:1529 (talk) 01:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Alec has been trying to create this article since 2017, see it:Corso Italia (Milano). ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 11:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Mughal–Safavid wars

Mughal–Safavid wars (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A random list of conflicts and really isn't needed. Operator873 ^connect 20:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Searching with that title, I essentially get two conflicts, one in 1622/23 (see en:Mughal–Safavid war (1622–1623)) and the other roughly 30 years later (en:Mughal–Safavid war (1649–1653)). Given that both are rougly a generation apart, I think we need to have stubs for both. We can then turn this into a disambiguation page, but likely thats overkil..--Eptalon (talk) 21:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Mackenzie Shirilla

Mackenzie Shirilla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Being a criminal isn't notable Operator873 ^connect 17:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Unfortunately, murders do happen, and this one got quitte a bit of media attention. I do however have to say what I said with the other article I nominated: the article should be about the murder case, and not about the murderer. So, either we get the material together, and write about the murder case (verdict: life in prison) or we don't. In any case, we should delete this article, perhaps after merging some of the content elsewhere --Eptalon (talk) 18:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirected to Windows 11. Anyone who would like the content merged can go into the page history to find it. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Windows 11 editions

Windows 11 editions (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Redirect - I've merged the content into Windows 11, ENs version at en:Windows 11 editions also redirects back to Windows 11. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reverted

  @Davey2010: When an article is under discussion, it's best to wait for the outcome before taking action to resolve anything,. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

  Merged reverted. Merge because it's content that is missing from the article and is content that is in the EN article en:Windows_11#Versions anyway. –Davey2010^Talk 15:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

  Just merge it with the Simple English wiki page of Windows 11, just merge it, i dont care anymore. USER9646 (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

  Hi @USER9646, Please read WP:Notability - In short if your article was similar to en:Windows 10 editions then it'd be a different ball game but as your article contains no sources and doesn't explain why this list warrants a seperate article it obviously makes sense to have it all in one article ? ....,

  You're more than welcome to source it and show it's notable for an article, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

  Then delete it, i am lazy. USER9646 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

  @USER9646 So you come here in a huff because it's up for deletion but then you state you're too lazy to source it anyway .... the mind boggles. –Davey2010^Talk 21:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

  Just delete it, i dont care abut this wiki site anymore. USER9646 (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

  Don't get upset. RFD doesn't mean we don't treasure your contribution, just mean that this page is not appropriate. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

• Easiest  Merge of my life. I will note that the redirect that en has also includes the redirects with possibilities tag and a de-facto abandoned draft exists at en for en:Draft:Windows 11 editions.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

The four calligraphy masters from the Song Dynasty

The four calligraphy masters from the Song Dynasty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The article is pretty weak, but it sounds like a notable topic. Rathfelder (talk) 22:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Dele Kelvin Oye

Dele Kelvin Oye (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable lawyer - Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. Also created by a globally-banned sock, RFD'ing in case others may find things I haven't, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Isnt the President of the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines, and Agriculture notable?Rathfelder (talk) 21:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

The EN article was draftified, I'll be honest I don't know but looking at the sources it does appear to be a notable role, As it was created by a globally banned sock I'll keep it open for the time being in case others believe it should be deleted (i'm not fussed and if it goes to keep i'll happily withdraw this), Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 21:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests