Talk:Sexual reproduction
Redundant article[change source]
This is a pretty bad article by any standards, and in any event overlaps several quite good articles, namely:
The article also contains v. poor notes on the development of an embryo, which is also done better elsewhere. My suggested remedy: deletion, and title redirected to Sex. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'd agree. Covered much better in the other articles. {{Sonia|talk|en}} 06:17, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Why does it need to be deleted? Why not simply redirect it? Lauryn Dirty little secrets 06:18, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, could be blanked and redirected. I didn't want to do this without some consensus. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- I see you've just put it in for RFD. I approve of your carefulness, even though sometimes we all have to be bold. Belle tête-à-tête 06:33, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, could be blanked and redirected. I didn't want to do this without some consensus. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
No longer relevant[change source]
The above issues do no longer need attention. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)