Talk:Pichilemu

This article contains a translation of Pichilemu from en.wikipedia.

Untitled[change source]

Some was also based on my work made at my sandbox. Check the history for more info. --Diego (talk) 01:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[change source]

Well, the pictures seem now decent. Thank you Drini. --MW talk contribs 17:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this be better suited to user talk:Drini? Lauryn Ashby (d) 17:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. --MW talk contribs 17:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, seeing as how it's a message for a particular user, it only seems appropriate that it should be on said user's talk page and not on the talk page of an article. Lauryn Ashby (d) 17:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number of pictures[change source]

Why do we need a gallery of 15 pictures? They take up about 3 times as much space as the rest of the article put together!

Until this article is a more substantial one (like the Catalan, English, German or Spanish versions), I don't see that so many pictures are justifiable. Simple English Wikipedia isn't a holiday brochure!

(Incidently, I notice that the Afrikaans, Albanian, Chinese, Japanese, Latin and Swedish ones are the same as this one, as it was created by the same editor)

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I want to expand this article. Hold on. --MisterWiki (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pichilemu: my fault[change source]

I'm sorry for not translating the article in Thai Wikipedia. You know, I willing to help, but I didn't not log in Thai Wikipedia since you post the message. Sorry about that! --Horus (talk) 12:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --MisterWiki (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simplifying[change source]

This article has good length, lots of information, pictures, is nicely written...but it has too many red links, and is not simple enough. Here are a few that I saw when I quickly scanned it:

~~autochthonous~~, ~~actuality~~, ~~autochthonous~~, indigenous, inter alia, petroglyphs, embarkation, currently, constructed, renovated, inaugurated, exhibits, allegedly, recreational, variety, commissioned, corvette, hydrographic conditions, residences

Please strike through them like ~~this~~ when you've removed or simplified them. Thank you. Meanwhile, I'll see what I can do to help simplifying. Classical Esther^♣ 02:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More formal PGA review[change source]

Hello, rthis is a more formal review, for PGA:

Intro: Extend, should be at least as long as "Ortzúcar family", or even longer, compared to the length of the article. The intro should give a basic idea what the reader can expect to find in the rest of the article; look at Mimicry and its intro for an example.

History[change source]

First explorations: Pinto is linked; Vidal Gormaz isn't. Why?
To perform a recognition of the coast: What do you mean? - Can you say it simpler, perhaps in more than one sentence?
In his research (...) he said that -> In his opinion, ...; His findings were that....
Link all those words I suppose are place names?
Link all the people's names the first time they appear.

Geography and climate[change source]

Extend the climate section, or get rid of the section title for the table...

Demographics / Govt & Politics / Culture[change source]

As they are now, these sections look unorganized. Statistics are great,but what is your intent of telling us? - Perhaps re-organise and get a lead in there. Again, link all those people if they are important. (Rest review once these issues have been addressed) --Eptalon (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]