User talk:American Eagle/Wikiproject Good articles

The Talk page of Wikiproject Good articles! -- AmericanEagle

lol?[change source]

And no one is using it :) --Runningblader, Proud owner of OGame artical 02:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just started it. lol -- AmericanEagle 02:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some help needed[change source]

Hey guys, I need some help. Do you guys know a page where the templates and codes used in wikipedia simple English are listed? I'm now struggling finding the right codes every time.

Thanks in advance. Djb26 (talk) 12:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For templates see here. By the way you just need to get some experiance, after a while you know what to use when. The life of brian (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you'll so much just by messing around and picking up on other things users do. --AmericanEagle 16:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have another small question: http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x240/diamania/wiki.jpg

what do those green numbers mean? Djb26 (talk) 10:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

they show how many bytes were added to or removed from the article. The life of brian (talk) 13:59, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ring of Fire[change source]

I've made another short artical for Ring of Fire on St. Helens volcano. So now incase people don't know what ring of fire is they will know now.

Runningblader, Proud owner of OGame artical 00:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minerals[change source]

Guys check this artical out.

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 00:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this article has 2 improvement templates on it, which means that it cannot be a good article unless the problems illustrated in the templates are fixed. Cheers, Razor flame 00:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll check that out and fix the problem.

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 01:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Uhud[change source]

A possible good article. Razor flame 01:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible, But don't you think the red links means a problem? There several of them.

Runningblader, Proud Maker of OGame artical 02:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red links don't matter. Good articles allow a few red links, but not if they are important terms. A quick scan of this article shows that none of the redlinks on this page are of any import to the understanding of this article. Razor flame 02:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romania[change source]

Romania would also be a great article to try to edit and get it to become a GA. I will work on this page for now. If anyone else would like to help get this article up to GA status, feel free to help! Cheers, Razor flame 02:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both of them are okay, but the first (Battle of Uhud) is a little short and the second (Romania) has a lot of Red Links. But that is why I started this Wikiproject. But I'll say they're both candidates. I was off al weekend. Cheers -- AmericanEagle 04:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]