User talk:Quakewoody

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to the encyclopedia. However, please do not attack other editors. If you disagree with changes, please talk about the changes and not the editors who made them. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about changing Wikipedia. Thank you. per this diff You should not be attacking any editor, whether the account is locked, blocked, or not, all users must be treated with respect. Thanks Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recent QD request of article...

Hello, you recently added a QD request to Peyman Keshavarzi, despite an RfD currently happening.
Remember to specify which criteria an article meets for QD, if you are nominating it. Can you please share the "special circumstances that surround the situation" on RfD if you are nominating it for QD? Many thanks, Belwine • 💬 • 📜 20:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you have the amount of times the subject was deleted. Not just here, but on so many other projects. Not just with this spelling, but because of the language issues, you have many variations. And then you have the editor, who is a very well known globally blocked vandal.

The 'process' shouldn't apply. Quakewoody (talk) 20:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2: Please don't remove a redirect then mark it for deletion for simply not redirecting... Belwine • 💬 • 📜 20:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, I didn't remove the redirect. I put a tag on it, which had an unintended consequence. Quakewoody (talk) 20:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The point he was making is that when you tag an article for QD, you should be able to identify one of the criteria. This is not a process but simply a requirement for any speedy deletion to happen. --IWI (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QueerSportSplit

Quakewoody can you please refrain from marking the same article as Cross-Wiki-Spam on HR Wikipedia. It is outsid eof your language and context reach. Article was already proven non-spam on SH Wikipedia and even initial proposer IWI changed his original claim here that only notability is an issue. Your action od still doing this week later renders you hasty and trigger-happy which goes against core principles of contributions and should be regarded as offense under UCoC. As your hasty action is cross-wiki I am posting it also across. Peace and chill! Zblace (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zblace As Vermont said in RFD, this isn't a UCOC issue but I will advice Quakewoody that RFD isn't a vote, so purely voting a delete without rationale is almost useless. Please give some reasons in the vote will be useful. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Camouflaged Mirage I di dnot say that it started as UCoC, but that his actions are...please read closly what he did and how in Croatian Wikipedia where article stands good (without knowing language or context!). Check his blocked account on EN also! Zblace (talk) 11:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not ping me here. My nominating rationale talks only about notability issues. --IWI (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no ping use. What are you talking about? Zblace (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it anyone's business on Simple what I do on HR! If you have a problem with HR, take it to HR. Simple is Simple. And what happens on EN happens on EN. Quakewoody (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Because you lied about what is the status of the page on HR! Zblace (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HR has nothing to do with SIMPLE. Quakewoody (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stating obvious and avoiding to admit a lie Quakewoody. You will be reported. Zblace (talk) 23:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Report me. I don't care. And admin on SIMPLE won't care either. They will tell you to take it to HR the same as I did. Because nothing on HR matters on SIMPLE. Quakewoody (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you do not care over your actions is obvious, but the fact that You lied here on Simple about the status of page there is something Admins should care. I think that is worth attention and the fact that you are permanently blocked on EN Wikipedia since 2019 (as well as on Wikidata), so this is the reason why you moved in to Simple, not care for non-native speakers learning English. Zblace (talk) 09:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you see, this is different. Originally you said I did something on HR and were complaining here on SIMPLE. But now you say I lied on SIMPLE. That's different because this is SIMPLE and what happens on SIMPLE matters to SIMPLE. So, then, tell me... what lie did I tell? Quakewoody (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]