User talk:WriterArtistDC

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not a Wikipedia article or the talk page for a Wikipedia article. If you find this page on any website other than Wikipedia, you are looking at a mirror site. This page may not be up to date, and the user who made this page may have no relationship with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page can be found at https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:WriterArtistDC.

This is WriterArtistDC's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to WriterArtistDC.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline

Nudity proposed for good article..[change source]

Hello, as you likely know, Nudity is a good article at EnWp. I have also proposed that it be made a good article. The nomination is here. The criteria, which are likely similar to those at Enwp are here. Honestly, other than some copyediting for grammar, I don't see much that needs doing. What do you think? Eptalon (talk) 09:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I began editing the Nudity article here in March 2022 while I was also doing the enWP article, where I have also added about 80% of the text and nominated it for GA there. My intention here was to think about the topic in its basic form, and leaving out the full complexity helped me to clarify what to include in both versions, and decide what needed to be split off into sub-articles. If this main article is a bit long, perhaps that could be done here also. As far as grammar, I am aware of being a bit loose in my use of punctuation, so I have a third-party grammar checker installed, which allows me to fix problems as I go. However, any writer knows that fresh eyes are always needed, so any copy-editing would be appreciated.WriterArtistDC (talk) 12:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought that this being one of the oldest artiles, and after all the work you put in it, it would be a good candidaate for GA. It is also fairly stable now, and has been sine you replaced the older versiion with what we have now. GA requiremens are similar, and as I wrote in the nomination, all that's likely needed is someone proofreading it for grammar,perhaps reading flow. I saw that the EnWp article is quite similar to the one that we have (except, that it has 1.5 times the size). Eptalon (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]