Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2010/Bill Toone: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Discussion: d |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*'''Delete''' not notable in any way. I don't know what it means to "reach the lowest level of notability" and how this subject has done so. [[User:Either way|Either way]] ([[User talk:Either way|talk]]) 12:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' not notable in any way. I don't know what it means to "reach the lowest level of notability" and how this subject has done so. [[User:Either way|Either way]] ([[User talk:Either way|talk]]) 12:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' just one of hundreds, if not thousands, in the same field, doing the same thing.--[[User:The Three Headed Knight|The Three Headed Knight]] ([[User talk:The Three Headed Knight|talk]]) 23:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' just one of hundreds, if not thousands, in the same field, doing the same thing.--[[User:The Three Headed Knight|The Three Headed Knight]] ([[User talk:The Three Headed Knight|talk]]) 23:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:*Although I concur with deleting this article, your reasoning is bullshit!! By your reasoning, we ought to delete all the Olympians and head of states in the world solely because they are "just one of hundreds, if not thousands, in the same field, doing the same thing". Please provide a policy-based reason for deletion in the future! My policy based reason for '''deletion''' is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]! [[User:Protector of Wiki|Protector of Wiki]] ([[User talk:Protector of Wiki|talk]]) 21:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Kansan|Kansan]] ([[User talk:Kansan|talk]]) 21:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Kansan|Kansan]] ([[User talk:Kansan|talk]]) 21:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
<!--Please add any discussion above this comment.--> |
<!--Please add any discussion above this comment.--> |
||
Revision as of 21:50, 18 August 2010
|
If you have not already done so, please click here and add {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2010/Bill Toone}} at the top of the box. Thank you.Click here to return to the main RfD page. |
The outcome of this request for deletion has not been decided yet.
Bill Toone
Purplebackpack89 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:
- Questionable notability, possible promotional nature, and an unreffed BLP on top of that
Please discuss this deletion below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options that are not just "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion
- Delete per nom. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 18:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Keep seem to have reached the lowest level of notability. still notable subject.--Sinbad (talk) 21:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete not notable in any way. I don't know what it means to "reach the lowest level of notability" and how this subject has done so. Either way (talk) 12:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete just one of hundreds, if not thousands, in the same field, doing the same thing.--The Three Headed Knight (talk) 23:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Although I concur with deleting this article, your reasoning is bullshit!! By your reasoning, we ought to delete all the Olympians and head of states in the world solely because they are "just one of hundreds, if not thousands, in the same field, doing the same thing". Please provide a policy-based reason for deletion in the future! My policy based reason for deletion is Wikipedia:Verifiability! Protector of Wiki (talk) 21:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kansan (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
This request is due to close seven days after it was filed; that is on approx. Friday, 20 August 2010 at 6:22 pm, although it may be closed more quickly due to WP:SNOW.