Talk:Christ myth theory

Balanace[change source]

Would anybody object to adding a little more balance to the links? There are four links in favor of the theory and none against. Kansan (talk) 22:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tis a good idea. Lauryn^☆ 22:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No objection from me. Griffinofwales (talk) 23:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given as has been demonstrated by Remsburg the Christ myth theory is that Christ was myth there is no balancing links needed.--BruceGrubb (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]