Talk:Death
Question[change source]
Is it just coincidence that this page has "people die if they are killed" in it? Possible Fate/stay night reference?
- No. I'm assuming it's a spin on trying to write simple English, the results of which can sometimes turn out oddly funny. Cassandra (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
List of causes of death[change source]
Any objections to removing this list? It obviously wouldn't be able to be complete. Kansan (talk) 18:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Suggested Merger[change source]
I just suggested Human death be merged into this article. Of course, before a merge, Human death would need a lot of cleanup, but what do you think? Is it a good idea? cymru lass (talk to me)⁄(see my edits) 04:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Extremely clever of you to think that. :) BTW, I'm sorry about the welcome. I didn't know I was supposed to leave all messages on your enwiki talk page. Well anyway, I agree it should be merged; pretty much the same thing to me. However, I don't think it would be great bad if the article just stayed there either. Belle tête-à-tête 05:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- The two articles have different enough scopes that I think that we should leave them as is, but I think it would be a good idea to have a notice at the top of the "Death" page saying something like "For human death, see here." Kansan (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea Kansan (sign your posts! :P). Should I be bold and do so myself? Belle tête-à-tête 05:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- I dunno, Bella, since the human death article is in pretty bad shape. {{Sonia|talk|en}} 05:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, yeah, can somebody clean it up? I will try to do it in the meantime, but I'm bad at those kind of things. Regards, Belle tête-à-tête 05:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Bella, It's okay about the talk page thing:) I put it up after you left the message because I realized it would simplify things :) And about the article, you should go ahead and be bold! I'd redo the article myself, but I don't think I have time. But I'm willing to look over your edits for you if you're not confident:) [Oh and you can leave messages on my simplewiki page, it makes leaving internal links simpler] cymru lass (talk to me)⁄(see my edits) 22:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- I support the idea on merging the two articles. Because Human death is somehow related to Death. Then we might need to add in Animal death too. Hydriz (talk) 14:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Bella, It's okay about the talk page thing:) I put it up after you left the message because I realized it would simplify things :) And about the article, you should go ahead and be bold! I'd redo the article myself, but I don't think I have time. But I'm willing to look over your edits for you if you're not confident:) [Oh and you can leave messages on my simplewiki page, it makes leaving internal links simpler] cymru lass (talk to me)⁄(see my edits) 22:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, yeah, can somebody clean it up? I will try to do it in the meantime, but I'm bad at those kind of things. Regards, Belle tête-à-tête 05:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- I dunno, Bella, since the human death article is in pretty bad shape. {{Sonia|talk|en}} 05:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Good idea Kansan (sign your posts! :P). Should I be bold and do so myself? Belle tête-à-tête 05:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- The two articles have different enough scopes that I think that we should leave them as is, but I think it would be a good idea to have a notice at the top of the "Death" page saying something like "For human death, see here." Kansan (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Merge There is no difference between the death of humans and that of other animals. 66.108.223.179 (talk) 00:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The merge tag was up there for long enough and there seems to be a rough consensus to merge. So I've done it. Osiris (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC)