Talk:Iso-Polyphony

Welcome, Feminism and Folklore participant and thank you for contributing this entry! I will begin by running it through my readability gizmo:[1] The gizmo is giving nothing below high school. This usually means the entry is too complex for SEWP.

I will now read it with my mighty human brain. My brain doesn't think it's quite that bad, but it still needs to be simplified more. Instead of linking complex words like polyphonic, trying simplifying them with a link to the complex concept: [[polyphonic|explanation of polyphonicity tailored to the article's needs]]. There are a few other places where this article should be simpler too. What doe it mean that the taker's role "became more defined"? Remember, simple English sometimes requires more words to say the same idea than regular English does. English, like Latin, is concise. Is it necessary to say something "evolved last" rather than something else?

Given that many of your entries are complex articles, maybe you should move some of the ones you feel most invested in to draft space so that no one will delete them? Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

This was one of my first entries for Feminism and Folklore, and I agree it's more complex than my other submissions. I've simplified it and tried to explain the difficult words as you suggested. Could you review it again? – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 04:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)