Talk:Konstantinos Zappas

Pre-required reading[change source]

Talk:Evangelos Zappas#Aromanian_origin; Mark Miller's verdict: "Sources simply do not demonstrate strong, multiple reliable referencing for exceptional claims and quotes from a living person. While there is more, that is the nutshell." Kojak Savalas (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That thing is from 2015 and it doesn't matter. English Wikipedia still includes his Aromanian ancestry claim because it is supported by a large amount of sources. Stop removing sourced content Kojak Savalas. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 22:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ageism is unacceptable. The discussion's verdict is a pre-requisite. Kojak Savalas (talk) 22:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to remove sourced content from Wikipedia. You have no rational way of justifying it. That's why you resort to a random discussion that is not even enforced on the edition of Wikipedia it took place. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 23:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"no rational way", you say? The discussion which you either cannot read or refuse to read is very rational. It addresses and refutes the substandard sources you treat as Gospel Truth along with the either-or misframing of two historical figures. Calling the discussion "random" is therefore no excuse for not reviewing it and comprehending its relevance here. And until you take the discussion seriously, the answer is, as you would say, "nope". Kojak Savalas (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]