Can anyone give me a brief history of Marxism?
Ok, the part about materialism is a disaster. Something has to be done.
No, the whole article is a disaster. It's confusing. It uses big words. And large portions (like the section on the labor theory of value) are completely wrong. "10 nails exchange for 10 shoe laces so the exchange value of nails is 10" Uh, no. That means 1 nail exchanges for 1 shoe lace. I'm going to try to fix this up when I have time. Hedge (talk) 21:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)