Talk:Suicide risk assessment

Once sided approach

The article fails to consider patients' (or potential patients) rights and civil liberties. This is another aspect of the subject that needs to be addressed in a balanced manner. The article leans more towards suicide prevention than risk assessment. Comparison of the issue in other countries needs addressing as well. Rus793 (talk) 13:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

I can write it detailing the communication and cooperation part mainly followed by counselling to avoid suicide. I know your point which is avoided to shorted out and that is mutual commitment of success. Even a suicide thinker does only 1 % then 99% is responsibility of the person in front of him. I said a person for a reason as I have seen a position that we think is responsible just over look this life risking issue and they can justify their breech of trust shamelessly as they are overestimated and overrated than actual estimate they deserve and this can not be equal of higher in amount than that of a suffeer, a Suicidal mind or a human being. In short I can say a secret murder by not co operating a needy in time. My writings are quicker deleted by expert editors or power holders that is why I thought to take your thought in exchange of mine before I write. Thanks you wrote what was needed to express. Sandeep Manikpuri (talk) 06:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)