Hey Hydriz, just a note that there's no need to revert changes that are made to the sandbox - even if the header is removed - as it is automatically cleaned by a bot for a reason. The sandbox is often the first place potential new contributors can help, and so it's not a great idea to revert their comments within seconds of them being posted. And, if they do remove the header, please don't communicate via edit summaries as it is highly unlikely new users will be looking at Recent changes, Watchlists or Histories to see them - instead leave them a note on their talk page, using {{uw-sandbox}} if required. Thanks, Goblin12:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Nifky![reply]
Sure, though I believe that user was a vandal given the talk page is populated with warning templates. Thanks anyway, didn't know of this template before. HydrizTalk12:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removing valid references because they are named refs whose content was not copied over from the enwiki article is not exactly beneficial; wouldn't it have been better to find and add the content of the refs? sonia♫07:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not telling you off at all, just pointing out a better alternative-- remember to take a bit more time when looking over something to decide what is best for the project. :) sonia♫07:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done Sorry. HydrizTalk 07:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
