User talk:Michael VanDyke2

January 2022

It looks like you are in an edit war judging from the reverts you have made on Snoop Dogg. Take care, because the three-revert rule does not let users make more than three reverts on a single page in a single day. Any user may still be blocked for edit warring and disruption, even if they haven't broken the three-revert rule. When you disagree with another user, you should first try to talk about changes in order to work together to improve Wikipedia and reach consensus. If you continue to disrupt the page, you may be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Mwiqdoh (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Please try to assume good faith when talking with other editors, which you did not do on Snoop Dogg. Thank you. Mwiqdoh (talk) 04:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC) Mwiqdoh

• Tupac Shakur
• Daz Dillinger
• Bow Wow
• Kam
• C-Murder
• RBX
• Sylk-E. Fyne

All Qualify

Have you read and understood the criteria? Mwiqdoh (talk) 05:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

? Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I apologize but I thought they all were AA. Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I believe so.

• 7 acts please Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:05, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

- The 7 can stay? Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding. Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

You thanked my edit on my talk page? Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The criteria?

This criteria. Mwiqdoh (talk) 05:06, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I don’t want to start anything.

7 acts!! Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Listen, it's not about how many acts your adding, it's about whether ANY of the acts follow the criteria. You can't just add any act, if it doesn't follow this, it won't be added. That's just how it is. Mwiqdoh (talk) 05:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

• Understood. Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

  I get it. Alright? The 7 acts are close. 2Pac and Daz. Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I mean, I don't know much about this anyway, but it's been discussed many times on the en.wiki article and as you can see, they don't have those acts there. Mwiqdoh (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding. Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

So. I apologize. Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

I apologize for this inconvenience. And wasting your time. Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Oh don't worry about it, you didn't waste my time. I appreciate that you discussed this matter with me, and I have removed the vandalism warnings, as you were doing this in good faith. --Mwiqdoh (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Understandable Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Why did you thank my edit? Michael VanDyke2 (talk) 05:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

FYI he is not acting in good faith. He is a long-term abuser on Wikipedia who should be banned and reverted on sight. Mwiqdoh Wizzito (talk) 07:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)