Wikipedia:Editor review/Kansan 2

Kansan

Kansan (talk · contribs) I know I was reviewed somewhat recently, but I've become a lot more active since then, and now that I've been here for a couple of months, I think that I'd like to try to run for administrator later this year, and I'd like to know what I'm doing well at and what I need to keep working at to get to that point. Kansan (talk) 01:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Reviews

• I was very surprised at your efficiency and fine knowledge of Wikipedia when you first came here, and was continually more and more impressed by your vandal fighting, editing, interaction in Wikipedia, and, above all, your cool, mature, calm, yet amiable politeness. I've also been surprized at the great amount of work you've done in such a short time, and the quality of the work is very good. More than sixty percent of your work has gone to article-building, and I know how hard that can be! :) Continue this way, Kansan, and I'll certainly support you as an admin sometime later. Hmm...I need to criticize something, I protest, but what? :p Maybe you should interact more at good articles and Very Good Articles - in other parts of Wikipedia you seem to be very active, and this part is quite important if you want to be an admin. I can scarcely think of anything else to say. Therefore, God bless you, and please keep up the great work! Classical Esther^♣ 12:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• View this user's edit count using WikiMedia User Edit Counter

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   A lot of the "dirty" work I've done like defaultsorting, but really, those articles that I've written and simplified that I'm most proud of are the ones that I listed on my user page.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   To this point, no. There have been a couple situations where I haven't agreed with an editor's course of action or thought it too bite-y, but I've made an effort not to get into arguments that I don't think ultimately have much to do with making the project better in the end.